If you read the above - you can come to understand what a digital signature is.
The formation of electronic contracts subsists as a subset of all contractual formation. By their very nature and as it is expressed in a large number of contractual disputes which occur every year without dispute as to the content of the contract, contracts are uncertain. Thus it must logically follow that there will always remain a level of uncertainty in electronic contract formation. At best, if all uncertainty associated with the electronic nature of a contract was removed leaving no dispute between the natures of formation whether written, verbal or electronic; there remains room for uncertainty.
from Doc above.
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
The formation of electronic contracts subsists as a subset of all contractual formation. By their very nature and as it is expressed in a large number of contractual disputes which occur every year without dispute as to the content of the contract, contracts are uncertain. Thus it must logically follow that there will always remain a level of uncertainty in electronic contract formation. At best, if all uncertainty associated with the electronic nature of a contract was removed leaving no dispute between the natures of formation whether written, verbal or electronic; there remains room for uncertainty.
from Doc above.
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
Advanced Electronic Signatures are defined as an advanced form of electronic signature, which are defined to meet the ensuing requirements as defined in the act:
1- it is "uniquely linked to the signatory;
2- capable of identifying the signatory;
3- created using means that the signatory can maintain under his sole control; and
4- linked to the data to which it relates in such a manner that any subsequent change of that data is detectable. "
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
1- it is "uniquely linked to the signatory;
2- capable of identifying the signatory;
3- created using means that the signatory can maintain under his sole control; and
4- linked to the data to which it relates in such a manner that any subsequent change of that data is detectable. "
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
Payment Channels and finalisation:
Hyde v Wrench[1]demonstrates that a counter-offer amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In contracts formed by email, it is essential to ensure that the contract has been concluded and not that a counter offer remains. Stevenson v McLean[2]shows us that a counter-offer should be distinguished from a mere request for information as occurs commonly in email requests.
[1] Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334
[2] Stevenson v McLean (1880) 5 QBD 346
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
Hyde v Wrench[1]demonstrates that a counter-offer amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In contracts formed by email, it is essential to ensure that the contract has been concluded and not that a counter offer remains. Stevenson v McLean[2]shows us that a counter-offer should be distinguished from a mere request for information as occurs commonly in email requests.
[1] Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334
[2] Stevenson v McLean (1880) 5 QBD 346
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
The reason that I called my trust and some of the companies Tulip is directly related to the change in a commodity to a speculative derivative. The truth of the Tulip bubble was that the contracts being issued were a pure future contract on a commodity. The government officials who had speculated on these looked to lose a lot of money. Consequently, those officials changed the nature of the contract from a futures contract into an option. In doing this, they had the right not to pay.
If you think about an options contract is worth far far less than a futures contract. I won’t go into the pricing models, but a paper by Amin and Jarrow (1992) documents some of the issues.
Amin, K. I., & Jarrow, R. A. (1992). Pricing Options On Risky Assets In A Stochastic Interest Rate Economy 1. Mathematical Finance, 2(4), 217-237.
The introduced legislation altered the value of saving the government official from bankruptcy but equally collapsed the entire market.
Few people understand this, but as Thompson (2007) demonstrates, tulipmania was just a period when futures contracts had been converted into option exercise contracts worth a fraction of the original value.
Thompson, E.A. The tulipmania: Fact or artifact?. Public Choice 130, 99–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9074-4
From the myth about tulipmania, the lie and falsities that people promote, when you look at this, you start to see how important stable commodities really are. Changing commodities and the contracts around them can collapse economies.
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632413758013600?thread_ts=1632413758.013600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3042
If you think about an options contract is worth far far less than a futures contract. I won’t go into the pricing models, but a paper by Amin and Jarrow (1992) documents some of the issues.
Amin, K. I., & Jarrow, R. A. (1992). Pricing Options On Risky Assets In A Stochastic Interest Rate Economy 1. Mathematical Finance, 2(4), 217-237.
The introduced legislation altered the value of saving the government official from bankruptcy but equally collapsed the entire market.
Few people understand this, but as Thompson (2007) demonstrates, tulipmania was just a period when futures contracts had been converted into option exercise contracts worth a fraction of the original value.
Thompson, E.A. The tulipmania: Fact or artifact?. Public Choice 130, 99–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9074-4
From the myth about tulipmania, the lie and falsities that people promote, when you look at this, you start to see how important stable commodities really are. Changing commodities and the contracts around them can collapse economies.
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632413758013600?thread_ts=1632413758.013600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3042
SpringerLink
The tulipmania: Fact or artifact?
Public Choice - The famous tulipmania, which saw the reported prices of several breeds of tulip bulbs rise to above the value of a furnished luxury house in 17th century Amsterdam, was an artifact...
digital identity is firewalled from the Blockchain but evidence of the identity and changes to it may be protected
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
the outcome of the Florida trial will despite what you've been told, determine that I am in fact the creator of bitcoin
CSW
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
CSW
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
So people know.
I do interviews because other people want me to. I have no real interest in doing any interviews ever. I do it because other people talked me into it.
However, if you are a complete rude asshole and shithead who can’t respect other people’s time enough to turn up on time and not cancel, not postpone, your first of all a rather shit journalist and secondly, I won’t be dealing with people who do that.
The simple PR answer is that if you’re not willing to be here on time, go fuck yourself. Then, when I win the case in Florida and win the other ones if you expect to have an interview with me, the answer is very simple, go fuck yourself because forty years from now, I still won’t interview with you.
CSW
Sep 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632755662212600?thread_ts=1632755662.212600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3055
I do interviews because other people want me to. I have no real interest in doing any interviews ever. I do it because other people talked me into it.
However, if you are a complete rude asshole and shithead who can’t respect other people’s time enough to turn up on time and not cancel, not postpone, your first of all a rather shit journalist and secondly, I won’t be dealing with people who do that.
The simple PR answer is that if you’re not willing to be here on time, go fuck yourself. Then, when I win the case in Florida and win the other ones if you expect to have an interview with me, the answer is very simple, go fuck yourself because forty years from now, I still won’t interview with you.
CSW
Sep 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632755662212600?thread_ts=1632755662.212600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3055
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632755662212600?thread_ts=1632755662.212600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3055
Sep 27, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632755662212600?thread_ts=1632755662.212600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3055
S. Aaronson, MIT
“If P = NP, then the world would be a profoundly different place than we usually assume it to be. There would be no special value in ‘creative leaps,’ no fundamental gap between solving a problem and recognizing the solution once its found. Everyone who could appreciate a symphony would be Mozart; everyone who could follow a step-by-step argument would be Gauss.”
The aspect that people don’t understand is that many forms of mathematical problems are insoluble. Unfortunately, we cannot even tell which ones are insoluble, just that there must be some that are insoluble.
My personal comprehension of how P=NP? is represented is because of insolubility. Basically, as mathematics advances, we will find more, but there will always be NP complete problems. As a consequence, there will always be the question as to whether P and NP are the same, and unless we have a solution to each problem, we will not know. The difficulty will be that we don’t know all the questions, and we cannot know all the questions and hence will never answer that problem.
hash is a one-way function. So not really like a hash
alternatively, ECDSA is such a function
CSW
Sep 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632858308255600?thread_ts=1632858308.255600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3058
“If P = NP, then the world would be a profoundly different place than we usually assume it to be. There would be no special value in ‘creative leaps,’ no fundamental gap between solving a problem and recognizing the solution once its found. Everyone who could appreciate a symphony would be Mozart; everyone who could follow a step-by-step argument would be Gauss.”
The aspect that people don’t understand is that many forms of mathematical problems are insoluble. Unfortunately, we cannot even tell which ones are insoluble, just that there must be some that are insoluble.
My personal comprehension of how P=NP? is represented is because of insolubility. Basically, as mathematics advances, we will find more, but there will always be NP complete problems. As a consequence, there will always be the question as to whether P and NP are the same, and unless we have a solution to each problem, we will not know. The difficulty will be that we don’t know all the questions, and we cannot know all the questions and hence will never answer that problem.
hash is a one-way function. So not really like a hash
alternatively, ECDSA is such a function
CSW
Sep 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632858308255600?thread_ts=1632858308.255600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3058
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632858308255600?thread_ts=1632858308.255600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3058
Sep 28, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632858308255600?thread_ts=1632858308.255600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3058