4/4
The critical aspect people miss in all of the false mantra around your key is your bitcoin is a safe-deposit box can be accessed by people who don’t own the safe-deposit box and this can be done legally. For instance, a company that has a night deposit box can authorise staff to collect the money. If those staff members take the money it is theft. They may have a copy of the key but that doesn’t mean they own the contents or the box. I’m not sure why this is a difficult concept.
You cannot access an encrypted file without the key because it is not physically, logically or otherwise possible. You can access and change digitally signed system. My digitally signed I mean system that uses a digital signature algorithm with or without identity in a format that creates a value that can be checked using that digital signature algorithm and not the legal aspect of a signing process involving identity which is a superset of the other.
Bitcoin is mirrored on an accounting system. In traditional paper-based accounts, I know I am old; people would keep paper ledgers because this would demonstrate any changes. Changes can be made, but these are visible. To make a change you don’t go back and change the original entry you add an addendum. This is easy to do on any Blockchain and in fact is impossible to stop. There is no way to stop governments ordering the implementation of a change. There is no way to stop reallocating the tokens.
One way is to create new tokens and devalue the originals. A digital token with no associated use has no value. So, creating a token that is not registered on the Blockchain or holding that after a reallocation has occurred is meaningless. As I’ve said, you can easily devalue and recreate tokens, and this can be done as simply as getting a court order.
The requirement to get access to property through a court order requires evidence in court.
Again, this should noot be a difficult topic to understand
As soon as you stop thinking that bitcoin is encrypted, it is not, you start to realise that the only control that people like or have is illusionary. They create a fraudulent and misleading view of reality and, in a religious fervour, have people make the claim of something that is not based on evidence.
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632212979387800
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3028
The critical aspect people miss in all of the false mantra around your key is your bitcoin is a safe-deposit box can be accessed by people who don’t own the safe-deposit box and this can be done legally. For instance, a company that has a night deposit box can authorise staff to collect the money. If those staff members take the money it is theft. They may have a copy of the key but that doesn’t mean they own the contents or the box. I’m not sure why this is a difficult concept.
You cannot access an encrypted file without the key because it is not physically, logically or otherwise possible. You can access and change digitally signed system. My digitally signed I mean system that uses a digital signature algorithm with or without identity in a format that creates a value that can be checked using that digital signature algorithm and not the legal aspect of a signing process involving identity which is a superset of the other.
Bitcoin is mirrored on an accounting system. In traditional paper-based accounts, I know I am old; people would keep paper ledgers because this would demonstrate any changes. Changes can be made, but these are visible. To make a change you don’t go back and change the original entry you add an addendum. This is easy to do on any Blockchain and in fact is impossible to stop. There is no way to stop governments ordering the implementation of a change. There is no way to stop reallocating the tokens.
One way is to create new tokens and devalue the originals. A digital token with no associated use has no value. So, creating a token that is not registered on the Blockchain or holding that after a reallocation has occurred is meaningless. As I’ve said, you can easily devalue and recreate tokens, and this can be done as simply as getting a court order.
The requirement to get access to property through a court order requires evidence in court.
Again, this should noot be a difficult topic to understand
As soon as you stop thinking that bitcoin is encrypted, it is not, you start to realise that the only control that people like or have is illusionary. They create a fraudulent and misleading view of reality and, in a religious fervour, have people make the claim of something that is not based on evidence.
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632212979387800
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3028
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632212979387800
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3028
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632212979387800
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3028
If you read the above - you can come to understand what a digital signature is.
The formation of electronic contracts subsists as a subset of all contractual formation. By their very nature and as it is expressed in a large number of contractual disputes which occur every year without dispute as to the content of the contract, contracts are uncertain. Thus it must logically follow that there will always remain a level of uncertainty in electronic contract formation. At best, if all uncertainty associated with the electronic nature of a contract was removed leaving no dispute between the natures of formation whether written, verbal or electronic; there remains room for uncertainty.
from Doc above.
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
The formation of electronic contracts subsists as a subset of all contractual formation. By their very nature and as it is expressed in a large number of contractual disputes which occur every year without dispute as to the content of the contract, contracts are uncertain. Thus it must logically follow that there will always remain a level of uncertainty in electronic contract formation. At best, if all uncertainty associated with the electronic nature of a contract was removed leaving no dispute between the natures of formation whether written, verbal or electronic; there remains room for uncertainty.
from Doc above.
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222030399200?thread_ts=1632222030.399200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3036
Advanced Electronic Signatures are defined as an advanced form of electronic signature, which are defined to meet the ensuing requirements as defined in the act:
1- it is "uniquely linked to the signatory;
2- capable of identifying the signatory;
3- created using means that the signatory can maintain under his sole control; and
4- linked to the data to which it relates in such a manner that any subsequent change of that data is detectable. "
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
1- it is "uniquely linked to the signatory;
2- capable of identifying the signatory;
3- created using means that the signatory can maintain under his sole control; and
4- linked to the data to which it relates in such a manner that any subsequent change of that data is detectable. "
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632222034399400?thread_ts=1632222034.399400&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3038
Payment Channels and finalisation:
Hyde v Wrench[1]demonstrates that a counter-offer amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In contracts formed by email, it is essential to ensure that the contract has been concluded and not that a counter offer remains. Stevenson v McLean[2]shows us that a counter-offer should be distinguished from a mere request for information as occurs commonly in email requests.
[1] Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334
[2] Stevenson v McLean (1880) 5 QBD 346
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
Hyde v Wrench[1]demonstrates that a counter-offer amounts to a rejection of the original offer. In contracts formed by email, it is essential to ensure that the contract has been concluded and not that a counter offer remains. Stevenson v McLean[2]shows us that a counter-offer should be distinguished from a mere request for information as occurs commonly in email requests.
[1] Hyde v Wrench (1840) 3 Beav 334
[2] Stevenson v McLean (1880) 5 QBD 346
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
Sep 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632223262400500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3040
The reason that I called my trust and some of the companies Tulip is directly related to the change in a commodity to a speculative derivative. The truth of the Tulip bubble was that the contracts being issued were a pure future contract on a commodity. The government officials who had speculated on these looked to lose a lot of money. Consequently, those officials changed the nature of the contract from a futures contract into an option. In doing this, they had the right not to pay.
If you think about an options contract is worth far far less than a futures contract. I won’t go into the pricing models, but a paper by Amin and Jarrow (1992) documents some of the issues.
Amin, K. I., & Jarrow, R. A. (1992). Pricing Options On Risky Assets In A Stochastic Interest Rate Economy 1. Mathematical Finance, 2(4), 217-237.
The introduced legislation altered the value of saving the government official from bankruptcy but equally collapsed the entire market.
Few people understand this, but as Thompson (2007) demonstrates, tulipmania was just a period when futures contracts had been converted into option exercise contracts worth a fraction of the original value.
Thompson, E.A. The tulipmania: Fact or artifact?. Public Choice 130, 99–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9074-4
From the myth about tulipmania, the lie and falsities that people promote, when you look at this, you start to see how important stable commodities really are. Changing commodities and the contracts around them can collapse economies.
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632413758013600?thread_ts=1632413758.013600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3042
If you think about an options contract is worth far far less than a futures contract. I won’t go into the pricing models, but a paper by Amin and Jarrow (1992) documents some of the issues.
Amin, K. I., & Jarrow, R. A. (1992). Pricing Options On Risky Assets In A Stochastic Interest Rate Economy 1. Mathematical Finance, 2(4), 217-237.
The introduced legislation altered the value of saving the government official from bankruptcy but equally collapsed the entire market.
Few people understand this, but as Thompson (2007) demonstrates, tulipmania was just a period when futures contracts had been converted into option exercise contracts worth a fraction of the original value.
Thompson, E.A. The tulipmania: Fact or artifact?. Public Choice 130, 99–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9074-4
From the myth about tulipmania, the lie and falsities that people promote, when you look at this, you start to see how important stable commodities really are. Changing commodities and the contracts around them can collapse economies.
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632413758013600?thread_ts=1632413758.013600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3042
SpringerLink
The tulipmania: Fact or artifact?
Public Choice - The famous tulipmania, which saw the reported prices of several breeds of tulip bulbs rise to above the value of a furnished luxury house in 17th century Amsterdam, was an artifact...
digital identity is firewalled from the Blockchain but evidence of the identity and changes to it may be protected
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
Sep 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632414792015800
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3047
the outcome of the Florida trial will despite what you've been told, determine that I am in fact the creator of bitcoin
CSW
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
CSW
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049
Sep 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632501981114500
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3049