CSW - Slack Channel
1.1K subscribers
4.21K photos
35 videos
198 files
4.7K links
Download Telegram
Just as we see all these groups starting to be put in their place for false claims and fraud.

My statement is simple.

Bitcoin has NO scale limits

Within 5 years, 10^10 tps

Fees could be less

Should be less

I know how to scale that far today.

We have a team of over 150 developers, shadders has the role of managing them. He does not have all of the skills necessary to do this himself.

The demand exists now

The system that is BTC ETH etc is too slow, too expensive

At scale, it will consume every other system.

Yes, the BTC airdrop was unexpected

Yes, I was distracted by the ATO and other issues that made things more difficult than it should have been.

But, now patents. Everything needed to do this will no longer be available for their free use. It will force one system and only one.

CSW
Sep 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631122930344300?thread_ts=1631122930.344300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2981
My claim.

Bitcoin can do every transaction globally for every system.

Facebook
Google
Shitter
Cash

With less lag or latency

Replace EVERY dark pool

And cost less than any of them

And, if anyone can discredit my claim. I will give them a 100 million USD.

I can also have a site download a 100tb block in 10 seconds.

And, it is not a boast.

Ras pi need not apply

So. Screw the so called competition.

They are more impotent than a 80 year old post op lady boy.

And, my block references are based on a 1k tx size for data.

Think on that.

Consider this a unilateral contract, it is not a boast. It is not advertising. If you discredit me, it is real.

Feel free to let Shitter know

We should thank COPA for the global media platform where they will ensure that this is known globally

And Jack for being so VERY stupid to start this

I have created 3000+ patents - the funds are not an issue

CSW
Sep 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631200191403800?thread_ts=1631200191.403800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2984
Participant Information Sheet
You are invited to participate in research being conducted by Dr Craig Wright, studying at Arden University on Cognitive Psychology.

This sheet provides you with information about the research and what you will be required to do. You should read this sheet in full, and ask any questions you have, before consenting to participate.

https://research.sc/task/4638969
In November, because of the court case, I will be explaining bitcoin at a level that nobody has ever heard before. I will explain how bitcoin can scale to global levels and how it could have done this ten years ago. More, I will explain how even an army of raspberry pi systems could have created a network that would scale into the tens of gigabytes. No new special hardware technology, the native aspects of bitcoin that were always incorporated into the system. I will also explain how SPV and IP to IP were a necessary part of this and that Core and failing to understand bitcoin destroyed their own goals.

Antonopoulos and other so-called experts will talk about what they think bitcoin should be. I will stand up and explain the technology at a depth that nobody has been able to comprehend, given twelve years of utter failure to understand my technology.

I will explain how setting up a non-Merkle tree structure would have made small blocks more efficient.

000000           TX1
000001           TX2
000010           TX3
000011           TX4
000100           TX5


Ironically, you will find that it turns out that a hash of an indexed list is more secure than a Merkle tree. Every time you do a hash of a hash, you reduce the security of the system. So, it is not as people claim that a Merkle tree is a security feature. A single SHA256 hash is more secure than any Merkle tree will ever be. What people fail to understand is that a single hash of the entire indexed list is in fact more secure than a hash structure and that would be more relevant to making a small fast distribution system.

There is one and only one reason for incorporating a Merkle tree structure into bitcoin.

Scaling

The inclusion of the balanced binary tree structure known as a Merkle tree now is purely to allow for scale processing of transactions and the ability to horizontally scale.

P: "Kleiman or COPA?"

Both

Kleiman is first

You, them, everyone has all had a decade and some.

And nobody understands my invention still

So, court, you can have it explained

I could explain how to a 5 year old

And, when I do, you will kick yourself

CSW
Sep 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631258882457300?thread_ts=1631258882.457300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2991
👍1
I could have had people download 100 GB blocks on ADSL 2 lines across raspberry pi’s a decade ago with no new special technology other than what was in the original version of bitcoin code and a little bit of ingenuity using Linux and existing systems that any raspberry pi from a decade ago would have run.

The entire group of experts that so-called understand bitcoin are absolutely clueless. We are more than a decade into my invention being run and still not one of them has figured out even in the slightest

So, when we go to court I am going to enjoy making everyone of them look like complete and utter fools

Because very simply this is what they are.
It is like having a plumber who doesn’t know how to use a wretch except these guys are more useless than that

CSW
Sep 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631259885459500?thread_ts=1631259885.459500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2993
In November, the true evidence, not the Twitter evidence, will come out.

When people find out that I don’t have a single criminal conviction in my life for anything and that the so-called tax offences were not against me, but work company audits because we used bitcoin that was later dropped when it was discovered that certain people in the government had falsified evidence to get something to stop my companies, that the reality was that the government audits cost the government money and not the other way round and that I never received cash from the government, I wonder what people are going to say…

I’ve pointed out before, but no one seems to understand that over $20 million, there is no cash rebate in Australia; there is only the ability to have a tax deduction. So, claims that I defrauded the government out of $50 million are rather asinine when you think that there is no partial claim for a company with a turnover of more than $20 million.

Honestly, think this through.
The claim is that I received a tax rebate of $50 million. The tax rebate of that size would require a $200 million turnover. $200 million is far bigger than $20 million. In fact with $20 million, the biggest rebate you can get is in the order of $5 million.
The turnover of my Australian companies was in the order of 350 million. We had over fifty staff. So, when you start investigating the claims, and you act a little bit rationally, something that never happened on Twitter, you start to see that Twitter is not a terribly good source of evidence.

But it doesn’t matter what I say here.
What matters all come out in the court and then taught you will discover that there is in fact nothing. The criminal matters. No tax evasion. In fact, you will find out I’m far more boring than you can imagine. Sorry

The thing that nobody thinks about.

I write 600 to 700 papers a year. I’m doing over 20 degrees and I have not been out of university since I was a teenager. Note that that sort of excludes a little bit of time when I had cancer, but that wasn’t really out of  university.

Last year, while working and with all of the other issues, I did seventy-three subjects simultaneously in one semester. Consequently, I’d like to know when I have the time to be this super villain that they all like to claim that I am?

It has been years - this is the end

CSW
Sep 12, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631454160021500?thread_ts=1631454160.021500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2995
In regards to El Salvador, as BTC scales the fees are going to increase significantly. Lightning is not a solution and is merely a methodology to enable things to be moved off chain such that records can be lost and in time this is going to lead to the implementation of KYC facilities and AML that will be pegged to lightning channels. It will not differ at all from banking and large central hubs such as those that square want to set up will exist.

The fees are already increasing more than the fees for international remittances via banking and Western Union but more importantly, this will only continue to grow larger and more unwieldy. Over time, as BTC becomes forced upon unwilling public in that country, many enlightening channels will be lost and the fractional reserve banking system that they are creating in the wallet will lose billions that will go to criminal groups rather than the people in that country.

CSW
Sep 13, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631560074070600?thread_ts=1631560074.070600&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2999
Forwarded from CSW 300 Gallery (@RamonQuesada 🌷)