CSW - Slack Channel
1.1K subscribers
4.21K photos
35 videos
198 files
4.7K links
Download Telegram
Just a Reminder.
Facebook, Google, Twitter, and even Monsanto have thousands of times more widely distributed voting shares than any possible Blockchain. The nature of every Blockchain is something that limits the number of voting actors who order the transactions. The number of controlling entities in bitcoin and its associated proof of work knockoff systems (e.g. BTC) are never controlled by more than ten parties.

More importantly, it is impossible to make a Blockchain system based on proof of work that will not be limited to a small number of actors who control the system. In particular, a single development group will generally control the actions of any Blockchain, and any denial of this is merely to equivocate the true scenario that is occurring.

Proof of stake is worse. Whilst proof of work is designed to allow economic competition where miners come and go, proof of stake merely forms an oligarchy that favours the incumbents and stops innovation. It is a share-based system that does not allow external competition. But, of course, companies such as Twitter like this because they recognise that new companies appear as Facebook did to MySpace. In a proof of stake world, Twitter would now not need to worry about innovation or losing its place to an upstart.

When you start to understand all of this, you start to understand what is happening with all the court cases and why Twitter and their founders are adamantly supporting COPA and trying to stop innovation.

CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630762728022800?thread_ts=1630762728.022800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2964
Natural decentralisation as it applies to Cryptocurrencies comes from a variety of different areas. Firstly, bitcoin has a stable protocol. As a stable protocol, even the issuer and founder, myself, cannot change it.

Secondly, there are no rules that stop you from building anything upon the scripting language of bitcoin that is legal. So if there is something legal that you can build and build and in code that is not violating somebody else’s copyright or patent and that is not designed to break existing legislation actively, nobody can stop you from doing it.

Finally, as long as you don’t steal the database or do other things that are not allowed, you can create any system you want and competition.

That is what decentralised is. But, more importantly, when bitcoin was created, it was set with an IP to IP exchange. That meant individuals could directly exchange funds. It is not because it’s peer-to-peer, which is only true for the nodes in any event; it is because individuals can engage in trade as individuals.

Ironically, when a development group can change any rules for how the system works, the issuer who was always an individual or small group and is always by its very nature a centralised entity remains the individual in control of the centralised system. If you look at BTC or you look at Ethereum, these are merely share based systems that are controlled by a central group who wields power over the system.

there is no limited liabillity in "crypto"

CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630763418024700?thread_ts=1630763418.024700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2966
The mining fee should be as low as 1 Sat

Miners should choose ALONE if they raise this.

Miners discussing this with other miners are colluding.

As low as a node finds to be profitable WITH a subsidised amount.

CSW
Sep 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630832404039700

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2968
Today's reminder.

PoS is proof of Security

Facebook shares are more decentralised than any Cryptocurrency

But, a share is not a democracy

It is not one vote one person

PoS is 51% rule, and the ETH foundation hold more, and and print and sell

Take 60 %, print more, have 65%

Sell 5%, have 60%, rinse and repeat

PoS is simply rule by oligarchy

CSW
Sep 7, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631008393140700?thread_ts=1631008393.140700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2974
The 5 year goal is simple.

10 to the 10

10 billion tps

Costs lower than now

Miners will come.

Easier than what he is doing, not harder

10 million usd a block in fees, why...

0.0001 USD is cheaper than anything else, banking, visa, silicon Valley

At scale, it replaces everything

If they don't join, they become Ford's horses...

CSW
Sep 7, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631025086160200?thread_ts=1631025086.160200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2977
Just as we see all these groups starting to be put in their place for false claims and fraud.

My statement is simple.

Bitcoin has NO scale limits

Within 5 years, 10^10 tps

Fees could be less

Should be less

I know how to scale that far today.

We have a team of over 150 developers, shadders has the role of managing them. He does not have all of the skills necessary to do this himself.

The demand exists now

The system that is BTC ETH etc is too slow, too expensive

At scale, it will consume every other system.

Yes, the BTC airdrop was unexpected

Yes, I was distracted by the ATO and other issues that made things more difficult than it should have been.

But, now patents. Everything needed to do this will no longer be available for their free use. It will force one system and only one.

CSW
Sep 8, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631122930344300?thread_ts=1631122930.344300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2981
My claim.

Bitcoin can do every transaction globally for every system.

Facebook
Google
Shitter
Cash

With less lag or latency

Replace EVERY dark pool

And cost less than any of them

And, if anyone can discredit my claim. I will give them a 100 million USD.

I can also have a site download a 100tb block in 10 seconds.

And, it is not a boast.

Ras pi need not apply

So. Screw the so called competition.

They are more impotent than a 80 year old post op lady boy.

And, my block references are based on a 1k tx size for data.

Think on that.

Consider this a unilateral contract, it is not a boast. It is not advertising. If you discredit me, it is real.

Feel free to let Shitter know

We should thank COPA for the global media platform where they will ensure that this is known globally

And Jack for being so VERY stupid to start this

I have created 3000+ patents - the funds are not an issue

CSW
Sep 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1631200191403800?thread_ts=1631200191.403800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2984