Bitcoin is a Turing complete system even in script.
CSW
Sep 1, 2021
https://ramonquesada.com/bestofcraig/bitcoin-is-a-turing-complete-system-even-in-script-by-csw
CSW
Sep 1, 2021
https://ramonquesada.com/bestofcraig/bitcoin-is-a-turing-complete-system-even-in-script-by-csw
Ramon Quesada
Bitcoin is a Turing complete system even in script. By CSW | Ramon Quesada
Bitcoin is a Turing complete system even in script. CSW Sep 1, 2021 Unfortunately, a major problem stems from a lack of understanding and many common terms today. Turing completeness does not require an infinite tape and, it was not an infinite tape that…
It is interesting to note that a widely decentralised multi-trillion dollar operation has been around for quite some years. These organisations operate with several thousand large institutional holders and a wide Pareto distributed range of individuals. The dematerialised assets are held as tradable tokens. They are controlled by more nodes than bitcoin could ever have. An example referenced in group number one [1] with the link below has around 100 times the number of true nodes as BTC or Ethereum.
1. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/goog/institutional-holdings
These database tokens are held on a distributed ledger with a consensus methodology similar to Proof of Work, pays no dividends and yet is still traded as a security.
There are even indices for them. There is the Facebook and Google cartel that run on the tech indices but there are many other indices as well in these distributed tokenised groups.
Ironically, they are truly decentralised.
The tokens are widely distributed and easily traded. Just ask Robin Hood.
Consensus means what it means
CSW
Sep 1, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630517670375900?thread_ts=1630517670.375900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2951
1. https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/goog/institutional-holdings
These database tokens are held on a distributed ledger with a consensus methodology similar to Proof of Work, pays no dividends and yet is still traded as a security.
There are even indices for them. There is the Facebook and Google cartel that run on the tech indices but there are many other indices as well in these distributed tokenised groups.
Ironically, they are truly decentralised.
The tokens are widely distributed and easily traded. Just ask Robin Hood.
Consensus means what it means
CSW
Sep 1, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630517670375900?thread_ts=1630517670.375900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2951
Nasdaq
Alphabet Inc. Class C Capital Stock (GOOG) Holding Activity, Ownership Summary, & Shareholders | Nasdaq
Find the latest institutional holdings data for Alphabet Inc. Class C Capital Stock (GOOG) including shareholders, ownership summaries, and holding activities at Nasdaq.com.
Forwarded from CSW - Slack Channel (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Blog TC.pdf
111 KB
Has nobody worked out who really was the one who benefited most by the Wired/Gizmodo outing/Doxing?
A person who had confidential information and wanted more.
A person who talked to Core members to aide his scam with their complicity...
A person who started planning a law suit in 2014 as he was not happy with tens of millions of USD nor having to wait to cash in shares.
A person who never visited his brother, bit is happy to fabricate stories and paint me negatively in the media, while avoiding it himself...
Only one person had all the material in the form Wired received it.
That person knew I had several degrees and doctorate, but worked with others like Greggles knowing that I was going to hide it the media hit.
As I unfortunately did.
MM: Ira Kleiman?
The one and only
Web manipulator and affiliate marketing expert.
The one who seeds search engines with fake news for a career
CSW
Sep 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630568124408800?thread_ts=1630568124.408800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2958
A person who had confidential information and wanted more.
A person who talked to Core members to aide his scam with their complicity...
A person who started planning a law suit in 2014 as he was not happy with tens of millions of USD nor having to wait to cash in shares.
A person who never visited his brother, bit is happy to fabricate stories and paint me negatively in the media, while avoiding it himself...
Only one person had all the material in the form Wired received it.
That person knew I had several degrees and doctorate, but worked with others like Greggles knowing that I was going to hide it the media hit.
As I unfortunately did.
MM: Ira Kleiman?
The one and only
Web manipulator and affiliate marketing expert.
The one who seeds search engines with fake news for a career
CSW
Sep 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630568124408800?thread_ts=1630568124.408800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2958
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630568124408800?thread_ts=1630568124.408800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2958
Sep 2, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630568124408800?thread_ts=1630568124.408800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2958
The levelling force of mass compliance that attempts to force us all to be the same has never been stronger. Through Twitter and other methodologies along these lines, we have a system that seeks to make everybody the same and crush individualism. It is for this reason that we must strive harder to be unique.
The meritorious are stamped down to make way for the unearned and unlearned.
CSW
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630648841461300?thread_ts=1630648841.461300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2960
The meritorious are stamped down to make way for the unearned and unlearned.
CSW
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630648841461300?thread_ts=1630648841.461300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2960
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630648841461300?thread_ts=1630648841.461300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2960
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630648841461300?thread_ts=1630648841.461300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2960
CSW
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630685759482800?thread_ts=1630685759.482800&cid=C5131HKFX
Traducción: gd-es
CSW
3 de septiembre de 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630685759482800?thread_ts=1630685759.482800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2962
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630685759482800?thread_ts=1630685759.482800&cid=C5131HKFX
Traducción: gd-es
CSW
3 de septiembre de 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630685759482800?thread_ts=1630685759.482800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2962
NOTE:
UNISWAP INVESTIGATED: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the developer of decentralized exchange Uniswap, seeking information about how investors use the exchange and how it is marketed, according to a Wall Street Journal report citing people familiar with the matter. While detail is still scant regarding what the SEC wants to know, the news is a sign of the regulator showing intent to wield greater oversight of DeFi, something Chairman Gary Gensler has hinted at in recent comments.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/09/03/sec-investigating-uniswap-labs-report/
They are NOT Decentralised
AT ALL
CSW
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630685759482800?thread_ts=1630685759.482800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2962
UNISWAP INVESTIGATED: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the developer of decentralized exchange Uniswap, seeking information about how investors use the exchange and how it is marketed, according to a Wall Street Journal report citing people familiar with the matter. While detail is still scant regarding what the SEC wants to know, the news is a sign of the regulator showing intent to wield greater oversight of DeFi, something Chairman Gary Gensler has hinted at in recent comments.
https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2021/09/03/sec-investigating-uniswap-labs-report/
They are NOT Decentralised
AT ALL
CSW
Sep 3, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630685759482800?thread_ts=1630685759.482800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2962
Coindesk
SEC Investigating Uniswap Labs: Report
The regulator is seeking information about how investors use the decentralized exchange and how it is marketed.
Just a Reminder.
Facebook, Google, Twitter, and even Monsanto have thousands of times more widely distributed voting shares than any possible Blockchain. The nature of every Blockchain is something that limits the number of voting actors who order the transactions. The number of controlling entities in bitcoin and its associated proof of work knockoff systems (e.g. BTC) are never controlled by more than ten parties.
More importantly, it is impossible to make a Blockchain system based on proof of work that will not be limited to a small number of actors who control the system. In particular, a single development group will generally control the actions of any Blockchain, and any denial of this is merely to equivocate the true scenario that is occurring.
Proof of stake is worse. Whilst proof of work is designed to allow economic competition where miners come and go, proof of stake merely forms an oligarchy that favours the incumbents and stops innovation. It is a share-based system that does not allow external competition. But, of course, companies such as Twitter like this because they recognise that new companies appear as Facebook did to MySpace. In a proof of stake world, Twitter would now not need to worry about innovation or losing its place to an upstart.
When you start to understand all of this, you start to understand what is happening with all the court cases and why Twitter and their founders are adamantly supporting COPA and trying to stop innovation.
CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630762728022800?thread_ts=1630762728.022800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2964
Facebook, Google, Twitter, and even Monsanto have thousands of times more widely distributed voting shares than any possible Blockchain. The nature of every Blockchain is something that limits the number of voting actors who order the transactions. The number of controlling entities in bitcoin and its associated proof of work knockoff systems (e.g. BTC) are never controlled by more than ten parties.
More importantly, it is impossible to make a Blockchain system based on proof of work that will not be limited to a small number of actors who control the system. In particular, a single development group will generally control the actions of any Blockchain, and any denial of this is merely to equivocate the true scenario that is occurring.
Proof of stake is worse. Whilst proof of work is designed to allow economic competition where miners come and go, proof of stake merely forms an oligarchy that favours the incumbents and stops innovation. It is a share-based system that does not allow external competition. But, of course, companies such as Twitter like this because they recognise that new companies appear as Facebook did to MySpace. In a proof of stake world, Twitter would now not need to worry about innovation or losing its place to an upstart.
When you start to understand all of this, you start to understand what is happening with all the court cases and why Twitter and their founders are adamantly supporting COPA and trying to stop innovation.
CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630762728022800?thread_ts=1630762728.022800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2964
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630762728022800?thread_ts=1630762728.022800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2964
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630762728022800?thread_ts=1630762728.022800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2964
Natural decentralisation as it applies to Cryptocurrencies comes from a variety of different areas. Firstly, bitcoin has a stable protocol. As a stable protocol, even the issuer and founder, myself, cannot change it.
Secondly, there are no rules that stop you from building anything upon the scripting language of bitcoin that is legal. So if there is something legal that you can build and build and in code that is not violating somebody else’s copyright or patent and that is not designed to break existing legislation actively, nobody can stop you from doing it.
Finally, as long as you don’t steal the database or do other things that are not allowed, you can create any system you want and competition.
That is what decentralised is. But, more importantly, when bitcoin was created, it was set with an IP to IP exchange. That meant individuals could directly exchange funds. It is not because it’s peer-to-peer, which is only true for the nodes in any event; it is because individuals can engage in trade as individuals.
Ironically, when a development group can change any rules for how the system works, the issuer who was always an individual or small group and is always by its very nature a centralised entity remains the individual in control of the centralised system. If you look at BTC or you look at Ethereum, these are merely share based systems that are controlled by a central group who wields power over the system.
there is no limited liabillity in "crypto"
CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630763418024700?thread_ts=1630763418.024700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2966
Secondly, there are no rules that stop you from building anything upon the scripting language of bitcoin that is legal. So if there is something legal that you can build and build and in code that is not violating somebody else’s copyright or patent and that is not designed to break existing legislation actively, nobody can stop you from doing it.
Finally, as long as you don’t steal the database or do other things that are not allowed, you can create any system you want and competition.
That is what decentralised is. But, more importantly, when bitcoin was created, it was set with an IP to IP exchange. That meant individuals could directly exchange funds. It is not because it’s peer-to-peer, which is only true for the nodes in any event; it is because individuals can engage in trade as individuals.
Ironically, when a development group can change any rules for how the system works, the issuer who was always an individual or small group and is always by its very nature a centralised entity remains the individual in control of the centralised system. If you look at BTC or you look at Ethereum, these are merely share based systems that are controlled by a central group who wields power over the system.
there is no limited liabillity in "crypto"
CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630763418024700?thread_ts=1630763418.024700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2966
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630763418024700?thread_ts=1630763418.024700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2966
Sep 4, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630763418024700?thread_ts=1630763418.024700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2966
The mining fee should be as low as 1 Sat
Miners should choose ALONE if they raise this.
Miners discussing this with other miners are colluding.
As low as a node finds to be profitable WITH a subsidised amount.
CSW
Sep 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630832404039700
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2968
Miners should choose ALONE if they raise this.
Miners discussing this with other miners are colluding.
As low as a node finds to be profitable WITH a subsidised amount.
CSW
Sep 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630832404039700
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2968
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Sep 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630832404039700
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2968
Sep 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630832404039700
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2968