I am already in the process of starting a few new companies.

NChain isn't going away of course but I have been researching in different areas to extend everything.

bitcoin is the foundation that allows me to do many other areas that I've been interested in

one of these is food

I have a few patents that have already been filed on urban farming and technologies to do with changing how we produce and distribute within society

none of that would have worked if I didn't have a system that will allow for the tracking of each independent input without any fraud

further, I have been studying civil engineering and I've just completed my postgraduate certificate in battery engineering that will be part of a Masters in science in electrical engineering at Colorado

I know that battery engineering and food does not seem tto be connected to most people

It is

so, I don't want to waste money firing fucking rockeets into space that are not ready to do anything

I want to change the world

we can build more efficient systems that use far less water and far less chemicals in the production of vegetables allowing for systems that provide much more while being fresher and tastier

Right now the luxury items that are being withheld are good food

the poor get calories

they don't have heritage tomatoes

that will change

people may find this stupid

but personally, I think delivering food that peopple want to eat that is healthy it is fresh and that does not destroy the ecosystem without all tthe bullshit around climate change is important

the funny thing is one of the courses I have been doing as environmental science

Not the crap and environmentalists do but real microbiology based on analysis so that you can create systems based on hydroponics and more that deliver

CSW
Aug 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629569297468300?thread_ts=1629569297.468300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2916

CSW
Aug 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629619486045600?thread_ts=1629619486.045600&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2918

CSW
Aug 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629623748047900?thread_ts=1629623748.047900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2919

There is a very simple answer to the welfare problem. Rather than giving money for nothing, the dole for not doing work, have people work to earn the money they have as a safety net. Then, if they are wealthy and don’t need to take money from the government, they can draw down on the properties. If they are disabled, there are things such as call centre work that can be done even in wheelchairs.

We have severe forestry problems that could be solved by clearing underbrush rather than building up over the years. In addition, we have infrastructure problems with roads.

Give people three days a week to work if they want to get unemployment benefits or other such benefits. In the other two days, they can take training or interview for jobs.

Provide free vocational training for individuals every few years. Not training in critical race theory for training to be a plumber, be a road worker, be an electrician, be an engineer, or even be a mathematician if the person has the skills.

In this, there is no longer any benefit from being a welfare mother. However, for the issue of child care, while this is occurring, there will be other mothers who can be trained as childcare workers who will give their time to get their welfare check and gain experience.

Don't pay them if they don't participate

No work. No pay. It is very simple

You don't have to agree, you can grumble, you can complain.

The work to live will simply make paid work seem much better. It is not a reward. It is the default to gain money.

More, anyone on government handouts should not vote.

CSW
Aug 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629623748047900?thread_ts=1629623748.047900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2919

CSW
Aug 22, 2021 19:58
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629649041159600?thread_ts=1629645056.126100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2921

1/2
there is no room for small miners in the long run

there never was

I stated over a decade ago that this ends with data centres

if you can't raise $1 billion then don't be a miner.

Honestly, everybody keeps thinking this is about raspberry pies and home users

it bloody isn't

miners are meant to be big

not mildly big fucking huge

that is the nature of the bloody system it is designed to allow a smalll and I mean very small global group of competing companies

not tens of thousands

tens to hundreds

there cannot be more than 2000 nodes

it is impossible to have more than 2000 nodes in the system

moreover because of Pareto distributions...

the reality is there will never be more than 100 nodes in the system

even to do that will require specialisation

if you wanted to be a minor then you should have invested money right from the last bloody decade ago

not a single companny in the BTC and Ethereum ccommunity will be here in a decade

every singlee one of them are too small and too small-minded

bitcoin does not democratise finance

iit was never supposed to democratise finance

iit was never supposed to democratise finance

iit was never supposed to democratise finance

if you have that idea bloody move on and get a fucking clue

I'm sick of it

I'm tired of this bullshit

I have no inkling of being nice to anyone ever again on this topic

by not being nice I don't even mean giving a flying fuck

if you want me to fucking snub you

keep up with this crap

it is a commercial system

it follows legally enforceable rules

it is not a system that can ever be anonymized

it is designed to completely but fuck criminals

by that I mean whether you like it or not drop the soap gang rape level everybody knows who they are and will take advantage of them in prison level criminal retribution

that's what bitcoin is designed to do

if you don''t like that

invent something that isn't a Blockchaain because every Blockchain will end up that way

if you think bitcoin should be anti-government....

Fuck off

the reality is that government is incredibly necessary and incredibly important but in here is the but

it needs to be delivered in a manner that is not happening right now

the right have lost the plot

they are basically enabling the left

Conservative government needs to start delivering government and not juust shiting on government

by that I mean that they need to develop strategies to deliver better government and not just complain that governments to big

Do something that helps people don't complain do

so, if you don't feel this way...

Too bad Blockchain is here to stay and at this point in time there is no way on earth that anyone can in any way change this trajectory

no one

not ever know how no way

it was the simple answer for you

If you don't like it. If you want to see miners act differently.

Become one. Invest compete

If not.

Honestly shut the fuck up and accept that miners will do this.

If it is not illegal and it is in the rules it doesn't matter

the end

Calvin is involved with the mining company taal

as a consequence, he will promote is mining company

that is not the same thing as the system

if you can't get this you really need to spend some time learning business

let me make this really simple

I have zero interest in pandering to your concerns. if you don't like how bitcoin works, I don't care

so let me make this entirely cleaar

the whining fucking and ends

the very simple condition for me being here is I want zero fucking whining

if you want to whine

fuck off

I really am beyondd sick and tired of this

@Joel Dalais (MetaNet)

I want people to understand that if they want to be here in a place where I am that I'm sick and tired of this crap and I don't wwant paranoid shit in my life

if people want to discuss this they are free to

away from bloody me

because and make this utterly clear

CSW
Aug 22, 2021 19:58
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629649041159600?thread_ts=1629645056.126100&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2921

2/2
if this keeps going I'm leaviing

if people who bring this up and don't stop after a ssecond warning continue I won't be here

not I will give you another warning ever

if I see a person not kicked

permanently

for ever

never to come back

never to have any involvement in my life again

then I'm gone

aand you can all have a circle jerk without me

are we fucking clear

CSW
Aug 22, 2021 19:58
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629649041159600?thread_ts=1629645056.126100&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2921

CSW
Aug, 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629657416202400?thread_ts=1629657416.202400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2924

They want to make this utterly clear to everyone.
The structure and how bitcoin is set up is predefined. There is no debate. There is no voting nor group analysis on how it should be. The system doesn’t change. It is a system that can integrate external rules, but this doesn’t mean that the protocol needs to change to do that. So, if you believe you should have a say if you believe that you have something important to add, too bad. You don’t. When I was creating bitcoin, you were not there. When I spent money and nearly went bankrupt, you were not there. When I was struggling to make the system survive, you were not there. So, consequently, when it did matter and when you could have had a say… You are not there.

What this means is that you missed your opportunity. The system doesn’t need to be changed; it needs to be expanded, and the best way to do this is through competition. The simple answer to this problem is that you either compete or fuck off. This is a very simple concept.

I’m not here to be your servant. I am here while I’m running the scientific research process in a global company. I am here while I am studying 19 degrees, and last year it was up to 25 and trying to start other companies while simultaneously managing multiple lawsuits.

I have written over 1600 white papers that have led to multiple patents per White Paper, which is still being processed. By the time I finish, I will have more than 10,000 patents in various fields, and all of that takes time. I’m here to try and go over issues with people and try and help, but my time is not free, and it is not without cost to me. So, let me make this absolutely clear, you have no right to ask me anything.

I am not a fucking Communist. I am not a fucking left-wing liberal with his head up his ass. I really don’t give a shit if you think that your opinion is going to change my life, it won’t.

So, if I don’t want to be involved in some sort of bullshit conversation then I don’t want to be involved in it.

When I say this I’m not asking.

am not a fucking Communist. I am not a fucking left-wing liberal with his head up his ass. I really don’t give a shit if you think that your opinion is going to change my life, it won’t.
The simple answer here is that you can go off and fucking bullshit to your hearts content elsewhere. Not here.
If you think that you should treat this as a public forum, it isn’t… Honestly then fuck off.

To those who keep telling me to be nicer.
Fuck off..

Honestly, if I hear another person tell me to be nice.
I am fucking leaving

the only way that I'm going to stay here is if this is an environmment where I don'tt heaar peeoplle ttelll me how fuckiing nice I sshoulld be or help fucking helpful I should be.

my time my money

my fucking rules

if you don't like this

enjoy because I won't be here

this is not an ultimatum this is not a discussion this is the way the fucking world works

if you are too much of a fucking snowflake to accept that then I don't give a flying fuck

but you can explain to everyone that you've pissed off by getting rid of me

I don't need or want you to give me different opinions on wwhat you think my politic should be or my demeanour should be

I have been doing more degrees than any of you will ever do in your life even in the last year. In this process I have gone to both right wing and middle-of-the-road and leftt-wing universities

I have studied critical race theory and I have studied women's studies

I am everything and I don't want this place to be anything but a safe place and that means discussing the reality of bitcoin and not bitching about what you think it should be

if you think otherwise

fuck off

if you don't agree

fuck off

if you want to argue with me

get the fuckk ouut of my liffe foreverr

by argue I mean this bullshit crap that is not a real argument

CSW
Aug, 22, 2021 20:36
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629657416202400?thread_ts=1629657416.202400&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2924

2/2
if you did not hhavve a logically sound basis and yoou are not just rehashing crap then honestly move on

there are billions of flicking bloody telegram groups

find one

I am off for the night and I expect no more from any of this shit

thee simple answer that none of you seem to get is that you are sitting in a forum casually talking with a guy who has more inventions than Tesla and Einstein and

Edison combined

and if you don't like that

piss off

I'm not here to make you a friend

very simply put, I'm not interested in your crap if you don't like things

very very simply put I don't need to be here and more importantly I won't be if people keep coming up with bullshit stories that are anti-competitive

I don't want to be in the same planet as socialist assholes

sso I certainly won't be in the same forums

The fucking end

CSW
Aug, 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629657416202400?thread_ts=1629657416.202400&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2924

CSW
Aug 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629710402298900?thread_ts=1629710402.298900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2927

1/2
I would like to make something very clear as we go forward. Bitcoin is not a community project. Bitcoin has never been a community project. Bitcoin will never be a community project.

The entire concept of decentralized finance that is being promoted is a scam. There is no such thing as equality, and equality is not fair. Bitcoin is not designed to promote any socialist crap around equality or egalitarian bull shit. If you don’t like how bitcoin works, too bad. It is capitalist, is competitive and is based on my philosophy of life.

I’ve stated this before, and I will state it again.
Bitcoin is not anti-bank; it is not anti-government, and it is not designed to enable get rich quick schemes, Ponzi’s or financial fraud. Instead, it is designed to aid in money laundering and tracing cases and for law enforcement to freeze and seize when necessary.

The protocol in bitcoin is the contract. Contracts are binding, and if you believe that something breaches the contract, there is a way of determining this, which is called the legal process and court.

If you are not a miner, a.k.a. node, then quite frankly, what are you complaining about? The players in the system are the ones that need to be concerned, not the home users.
If you see a problem, you can take action against a node if it breaches the rules and you are affected.

That is if you are. Otherwise, none of your God damn business.

From a user point of view, or you care about is that your transaction is processed, that you are not being double spend, that you have not been cheated. The rest is none of your God damn concern. You can monitor the network or you want and try and find where people are doing things wrong and if you want you can take action. It’s called a court of law.

After spending twelve years publicly promoting this at my own expense, having spent a decade before that working on this at my own expense, I am utterly fed up with people who have no skin in the game whining about it. I have no time for it any more and I won’t put up with that at all.

If you have an issue, do something about it and shut the fuck up.

Firstly, there are stupid questions. There are fucking dumb ass stupid questions that shouldn’t be answered because they are too stupid to consider. Questions that have been answered fifty times are just as bad.

If you think you have a right, stick your head up your ass and see if you can breathe.

If you have not invested money in my system, then I have no obligation to you.
If you think that owning some bitcoin is investing, then you are too dumb for me to answer. Investing is building systems. Gambling is speculating. If you don’t get the difference, I don’t have the time for you.

I do a lot of time to people who ask sensible questions and even sometimes those who asked completely stupid questions that haven’t been asked before. However, I do not owe you anything. If you think that using my system means that I have an obligation to you beyond making sure that the unilateral contract and protocol as such are upheld, you have something to learn.

If you think you are owed by being nice to you because you’re here, you have fucking two brain cells that need to be drowned in alcohol because they’re already fucking worthless.

I give a shit about my system. I give enough of a shit that I’ve sacrificed time for my family throughout my life, that have merely been bankrupted multiple times, that my children have gone without on many occasions in order to build this.

So quite frankly, if you want a bitch about what you think nodes should be doing. If you want to complain to me that the system doesn’t work the way you wanted to. Honestly, go fuck yourself. But fuck off from here first.

CSW
Aug 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629710402298900?thread_ts=1629710402.298900&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2927

2/2
I said last night that I was not going to put up with any of this anymore, and I’m making sure that you understand this. I give a lot of time to a lot of people. That does not make me obligated to do so. If you think otherwise, go fuck yourself.

If you think that my being capitalist and wanting people use my system means I have to be nice to you.
Go fuck yourself and go fuck your mother. Do that in true Chinese crappy ASIC making fashion.

I hope I’m clear.
As far as I’m concerned, this is zero tolerance.

Those who ask stupid questions and piss me off more than once can go fuck themselves. Because they won’t be in anywhere that I am and if they’re in here I won’t be.

CSW
Aug 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629710402298900?thread_ts=1629710402.298900&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2927

CSW
Aug 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629719373312300?thread_ts=1629719373.312300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2930

1/2
Wonder why I get angry when people do stupid things and make stupid comments; I want you to think about what it will be like to have people shit on you and your invention for ten years plus.

Now that everything I say is picked apart by morons who cherry-pick parts of the conversation, I want you to think. I want you to consider how people then spend their life telling me how bitcoin should work. I want you to consider that maybe I’ve heard it all before.

I want you to remember that I proposed bitcoin is a combination of a legal research project in 2007 that was accepted and a subsequent dissertation for my masters in statistics that was rejected. Back then, I was told that it’s all been done before, and it was nothing special.

I want you to think that maybe years of being told by every man and their dog, including friends and family, about how you’re wasting your life probably means that I’ve heard all of your arguments about the problems with bitcoin before you even heard about bitcoin. Before you even knew that it existed, even if you were there in 2009, I’d already heard your arguments.

So when you try and tell me the bitcoin needs to be encrypted or that the communication channels need to be secured between nodes and the Internet, been there done that don’t care.

IP to IP exchange of transactions needs authentication to ensure that the individuals talking have not had a man in the middle attack. However, even this does not require encryption. It does not require TLS and other tunnels to make it secure. Other methodologies work, particularly where the individuals already know each other or have some other key, a transaction can be exchanged securely without any encryption ever existing.

The main reason I liked IP to IP over IPV6, if it ever gets to be working, was that it includes an authentication header mode. The same can be implemented in IPsec. In addition, it does not require encryption.

Before you pre-empt me and try and tell me that you need encryption to ensure privacy and to protect communications, I will simply tell you that you’re utterly wrong.

You do not need encryption to secure communications.

You do not need encryption to ensure privacy.

You do not need encryption on webpages

TLS and other forms of encryption over the web including SSL.3 are inefficient and can be replaced

when you're going to a website you can retain private information and exchannnges without ever needing to encrypt

so, all of the bull shit that you hear is wrong

you need to be able to authenticate and validate data

you do not need encryption for this

when you are sending information back and forwards between websites, you do not need encryption to stop individuals from viewing and modifying the data that is being sent back and forth between the user and the server

all any of this does is make life morre difficult for the people running the site

in fact, you can run Web servers for banking applications without ever encrypting data

and it can be even more secure than any web application today

and if you think I'm wrong, I don't give a shit you need to learn something more

To those who believe otherwise I will quote a little bit of Hamlet by Shakespeare...

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.

yes, it is possible to make a distributed certificate authority that removes all of the existing vulneraabilities and problems that are a feature of PKI

and I say they are a feature because this is the key aspect of PKI that makes it vulnerable

in fact, there is no reason to suppose that everything needs to be kept on a serveer side application and that the current cliient side processinng can be shared and accessed using a web wallet type appplicaation

PKI is vulnerable to many many problems that being just one of them

CSW
Aug 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629719373312300?thread_ts=1629719373.312300&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2930

2/2
you can have an identity key structure that will allow for the creation of cookie type data that is stored on your system that can be fed back when needed to the server

this can be completely private without going through existing encryption schemeas and can be updated in a manner that provides both an evidence trail and traderr traciing capabiilitiess while simultaneously maintaining privacy

you could theoreticallyy even have an open telnet type protocol that can be monitored by system administrators over seccure links that is not available to others that uses token exchanges that are secure and cannot be replicated or copied

in that way, you could completely authenticate telnet while having it open and in clear text

any use of privilege would be authenticated

SSH

I have thought about all of this and there are better ways of doing it

the use of SSH greatly restricted the ability of a system administrator to monitor and control the security of the system

it becomes much easier to monitor attacks using telnet than it does SSH but, the probllem here is that people can hijack sessions and replicate information

all of that can be protected and stopped

if you don't have a Blockchain then you don't have the time limitations on replay

all of this requires a Blockchain even when you then have payment channels and other methodologies

trust me, every single thing I'm talking about here is the antithesis of whatt the cypherpuunk movement wants

they want anonymity

they want anarchy

I don't

When you have a real debate I don't miind. If you're willing to support your claims with evidence and to honestly debate I'm very happy to have a debate.

honestly means that when there are counterexamples you admitt it

The reason people say that I've changed my mind on certain topics ( which by the way does not include anything to do with bitcoin) is that I do not stick to dogma and update my belief structure and my knowledge as I find tthings that are new

there will always be areas that people disagree because knowledge is not complete in any field

but, there are things that are easily discrediited

CSW
Aug 23, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629719373312300?thread_ts=1629719373.312300&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2930

CSW
Aug 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629837329397200?thread_ts=1629837329.397200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2933

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/db7b8908-05c9-11ec-a644-d92df3a28bb3?shareToken=d509427e01e16a31c4434f7e70a8f22c

CSW
Aug 26, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629961866007000

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2934

CSW
Aug 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630302195244700?thread_ts=1630302195.244700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2935

1/3
The really big thing that all the people who hate me don’t want to start asking is why Satoshi has not come out anonymously and signed a block or done something else that would discredit me if I am not Satoshi.

There is never any evidence or logical reason put forth. The entirety of the attacks against me are based on ad hominem and other logical fallacies. When I demonstrate errors in their arguments, we move into special pleading. They move the goalposts and avoids creating exceptions for when their claims are demonstrated to be false. When they talk about anything I’ve said, they make it into a strawman, which is a form of misrepresenting someone else’s argument to make it easier to attack.

They continually beg to create circular arguments about decentralisation that include an appeal to (false) authority based on the premise that Satoshi must be a cypherpunk. Yet, no evidence was ever presented that Satoshi is a cypherpunk. Rather, they make easily debunked claims and then create a fallacy of composition and division where the creative assumption that what is true about one part of bitcoin must apply to all parts of bitcoin. That is, there is a component used in digital signature algorithms that also applies to cryptography, so therefore, it must be encrypted. But, such an assumption is false. For example, hashing is also used in managing databases, as are digital signature algorithms without these being encrypted.

The attacks against me being Satoshi form no true Scotsman arguments. If you say that I did something, I can’t be at or can’t be something because that’s not what a true believer would do.

The ad hominem attack also leads to the genetic attack. In this, the crypto-anarchists claim that because I’m bad (in their worldview), my arguments must be bad (for everybody). Yet, there is a reason why the genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy. Whilst I am not the character they want to make me into, the source of an argument isn’t a valid attack against an argument. So, for example, to say but Hitler was a vegetarian, so, therefore, vegetarians are wrong is not a good argument. Even the argument of personal incredulity is irrelevant because just because you don’t understand something does not make it false.

Even the move to appeal to emotion is itself a fallacy. This, in part, is used with a Tu quoque so that they can neglect to make an argument at all.

So very simple for them, they can claim that Satoshi might be dead. But, that claim comes with counter-attacks. It assumes that Satoshi has no family, nobody who cared for him, and that person was an isolated individual who left no evidence or people in that individual’s life who could know anything about bitcoin. They will claim Hal Finney, but there’s a problem with Hal Finney that can be easily demonstrated in court. Hal Finney wasn’t able to post throughout much of 2010. This was when I was most active as Satoshi online publicly. At times when direct updates were being made, Hal Finney was in an NMRi machine which precludes using a computer, of course.

Another all sorts of other claims of this sort, and all of those are easy to be discredited. But before you even get there, the assumption has a logical contradiction. They are assuming that somebody such as Hal Finney that is creating an evidence trail that can be used in collecting improving the proof of evidence over time as its extended, would also want to lie to their family. And this is a key point. Hiding that level of involvement in creating bitcoin from your family and all of the motions of how it was created and what you own is in fact a form of lying.

CSW
Aug 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630302195244700?thread_ts=1630302195.244700&cid=C5131HKFX
1/3
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2935

2/3
So the claim about Satoshi being hidden begs the question of why Satoshi doesn’t do anything if I’m not Satoshi. If you think about it momentarily, all Satoshi would need to do to discredit me under the code is law mantra is to start sending messages using the original bitcoin keys and prove that the PGP key wasn’t changed in 2011 and find some form of evidence linking it earlier. Show my claim that the Genesis block doesn’t have a key to be false, for instance.

The alternative claim could even be made that if Satoshi did exist and wasn’t me, Satoshi clearly supports what I’m doing. Of course, this will be cherry-picked and taken out of context because I am Satoshi, but this could be altered to read differently without the full phrase that I’m saying in the sentence.

So, if the claim being made by those who oppose me that I’m not Satoshi was, in fact, true, and the second claim that Satoshi also does not believe in having bitcoin under the law is also true; why doesn’t Satoshi or Satoshi’s family or Satoshi’s friends or somebody in Satoshi’s life come forth and simply state how I am doing wrong.

This is a question for them, and they go to court. But, you see, courts don’t work by social media. There is no proof of social media (PoSM) in an English court.

The claim that bitcoin can allow anonymity and that you can use taught to hide your transactions must itself be taken into account when we consider the claim that Satoshi is afraid of posting using the Genesis block (which doesn’t have a key, but they argue does) with a so-called signed message. If they are correct, logically, Satoshi (me) would be able to easily and completely anonymously send out a message discrediting me.
Why is there no message?

Ironically, they’re arguing that Satoshi isn’t me but supports what I’m doing. If you think about it logically for two minutes, you will start to understand that if I’m not Satoshi, then Satoshi completely supports me. You will come to understand that if I’m not Satoshi, Satoshi agrees with my using the courts to discredit the cypherpunk mantra that “code is law” and to redistribute BTC using a legal process.

Satoshi can sign is not something that works in court. To form a signature, you need to have an identity before creating a signature. So, Satoshi consigned doesn’t work in a court of law. To use a digital signature algorithm for signing requires that you prove that you have held the key and have identified prior to the time that you are starting to have first obtained it.

That is, in 2008, I would have needed to legally notarise a document categorically proving my identity to be able to sign using one of the early keys now. Possession doesn’t give you the ability to assume identity. Moreover, a digital signature algorithm doesn’t create a digital signature until after the key is registered. Moreover, even if the key is registered you can only create a digital signature after the time that it was first registered.

The most significant thing to remember is that the case is not being tried on Twitter or other social media; it is tried in a court of law. Logic and not social media claims matter.

like copyright, and other person can go to court and contest ownership

@B They say Satoshi could be dead, but as I said, this comes with counterarguments in itself. Satoshi must then be an unknown individual without family.

Satoshi must be completely secretive and have no evidence. There cannot be any computers. There cannot be any other information that Satoshi left. You are not thinking this through adequately when you make that statement. Remember, this will be in a court of law. It is no good simply saying that anymore. If Satoshi died, there would be computers and other records.

CSW
Aug 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1630302195244700?thread_ts=1630302195.244700&cid=C5131HKFX
2/3
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2935