1/2
A little something that will come out because of all of these trials that I didn’t particularly want to discuss because it’s personal involves some of what happened in 2016. When I made the deals that I made, I thought that the people investing wanted to grow nChain and make it into something independently. I discovered that this was not the case. The truth behind what was happening is that people wanted to do a deal valued at around US$1 billion as an investment that would have made and chained part of a Silicon Valley group.
Part of what I’m doing is a threat. If they had locked me in and completed that deal, my concept of making a micro payment system would have been stillborn.
Although US$1 billion is a lot of money and would have made many things in life a lot easier, and by that, I mean cash, not assets and valuation, sometimes the cost is too high.
Silicon Valley has become an isolated conclave of advertising capture. They call big data and machine learning an intelligence system that will solve problems; the reality is exactly the opposite. Nothing that is being developed at the moment in the realm of AI (actual ignorance) is not about solving the issues people believe in; it is anything but close to being a general intelligence. Rather, the true reality is that they are creating systems that make more effective advertising constructs.
To have taken the offering 2016 would have made me cash-flush and solved many problems in itself. Only at the cost of my soul, so to speak. Only in giving up everything they care about and supporting the very thing that I think is one of the worst aspects of Silicon Valley right now. In effect, it would have been taking the money to give up everything I care about and work for.
Ironically, I would have been more aligned with people like Greg had chosen to take money from Silicon Valley.
I created the system, and then I didn’t ensure that it continued the way that I wanted to. I have many other things I would like to do but cannot due to the obligations of developing the system along the correct lines.
Whilst it seems to many, especially with the Silicon Valley mentality, that you take the money and everything is good. This is an utterly ass-ended approach. The reality is that when you earn money in a business, it is not just for what has occurred in the past, but it is a prepayment towards the future. When you are rewarded with riches for concepts that you have created or businesses that you have built the money is not merely a reward for the past. This is an error in how people think.
The reality is that you are being paid in advance for what you are to do.
The reward of wealth for capitalism and the related activities is both payments for the job you have done and a prepayment for what you are being set to do.
Many people fail to understand that this is a concept that needs to be taught through the educational process. In addition, people need to understand that wealthy capitalists do not merely gain capital for what they have done but on a promise of what they are to build in the future.
Capitalism is not the problem.
The lack of education around what is moral and virtuous is the issue. We need to start teaching the people who are going to be leaders that they have an obligation. When you are given great wealth and great power, it comes with an obligation to use that on what you promised. When you are paid money to build something, and then you pivot, you are deceiving people and breaching your promise. The truth is, it would be more honest and more virtuous and better overall not to have people pivot in the Silicon Valley fashion but rather to fail. What you are being paid to do is try and continue to try until you either succeed or run out of money.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
A little something that will come out because of all of these trials that I didn’t particularly want to discuss because it’s personal involves some of what happened in 2016. When I made the deals that I made, I thought that the people investing wanted to grow nChain and make it into something independently. I discovered that this was not the case. The truth behind what was happening is that people wanted to do a deal valued at around US$1 billion as an investment that would have made and chained part of a Silicon Valley group.
Part of what I’m doing is a threat. If they had locked me in and completed that deal, my concept of making a micro payment system would have been stillborn.
Although US$1 billion is a lot of money and would have made many things in life a lot easier, and by that, I mean cash, not assets and valuation, sometimes the cost is too high.
Silicon Valley has become an isolated conclave of advertising capture. They call big data and machine learning an intelligence system that will solve problems; the reality is exactly the opposite. Nothing that is being developed at the moment in the realm of AI (actual ignorance) is not about solving the issues people believe in; it is anything but close to being a general intelligence. Rather, the true reality is that they are creating systems that make more effective advertising constructs.
To have taken the offering 2016 would have made me cash-flush and solved many problems in itself. Only at the cost of my soul, so to speak. Only in giving up everything they care about and supporting the very thing that I think is one of the worst aspects of Silicon Valley right now. In effect, it would have been taking the money to give up everything I care about and work for.
Ironically, I would have been more aligned with people like Greg had chosen to take money from Silicon Valley.
I created the system, and then I didn’t ensure that it continued the way that I wanted to. I have many other things I would like to do but cannot due to the obligations of developing the system along the correct lines.
Whilst it seems to many, especially with the Silicon Valley mentality, that you take the money and everything is good. This is an utterly ass-ended approach. The reality is that when you earn money in a business, it is not just for what has occurred in the past, but it is a prepayment towards the future. When you are rewarded with riches for concepts that you have created or businesses that you have built the money is not merely a reward for the past. This is an error in how people think.
The reality is that you are being paid in advance for what you are to do.
The reward of wealth for capitalism and the related activities is both payments for the job you have done and a prepayment for what you are being set to do.
Many people fail to understand that this is a concept that needs to be taught through the educational process. In addition, people need to understand that wealthy capitalists do not merely gain capital for what they have done but on a promise of what they are to build in the future.
Capitalism is not the problem.
The lack of education around what is moral and virtuous is the issue. We need to start teaching the people who are going to be leaders that they have an obligation. When you are given great wealth and great power, it comes with an obligation to use that on what you promised. When you are paid money to build something, and then you pivot, you are deceiving people and breaching your promise. The truth is, it would be more honest and more virtuous and better overall not to have people pivot in the Silicon Valley fashion but rather to fail. What you are being paid to do is try and continue to try until you either succeed or run out of money.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
2/2
If you are successful, you will have built something difficult to do and hard to copy and worth the effort to achieve. If you fail, you fail honestly. Your job is not to protect money and build money but rather to build something of value. The role of a true capitalist and entrepreneur is to lead their business to the end they promised. It is not merely to make more money. Profit is a signalling device. But, it is not the end goal. This is what people mixed up. Profit itself is not the goal but is only a measurement tool.
There is a reason we don’t have flying cars. There is a reason that virtual reality systems are not available. The problem is the Silicon Valley mentality of pivoting. When you mix this with the Wall Street mentality of a profit at any cost, you have an incredibly detrimental system. It moves away from being capitalism into a new form of mercantilism. It is merely about creating a larger pile of money in a zero-sum game. This is anticapitalism, for capitalism is about building and growth.
A capitalist makes a bigger pie. A mercantilist seeks a larger slice of the existing pie. These are very different outcomes.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
If you are successful, you will have built something difficult to do and hard to copy and worth the effort to achieve. If you fail, you fail honestly. Your job is not to protect money and build money but rather to build something of value. The role of a true capitalist and entrepreneur is to lead their business to the end they promised. It is not merely to make more money. Profit is a signalling device. But, it is not the end goal. This is what people mixed up. Profit itself is not the goal but is only a measurement tool.
There is a reason we don’t have flying cars. There is a reason that virtual reality systems are not available. The problem is the Silicon Valley mentality of pivoting. When you mix this with the Wall Street mentality of a profit at any cost, you have an incredibly detrimental system. It moves away from being capitalism into a new form of mercantilism. It is merely about creating a larger pile of money in a zero-sum game. This is anticapitalism, for capitalism is about building and growth.
A capitalist makes a bigger pie. A mercantilist seeks a larger slice of the existing pie. These are very different outcomes.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
To be honest, when I was a pastor, I was utterly terrible at the job. I did care, but anyone who knows me will know that I’m not exactly the best people person. Nevertheless, the coffee church session that I held on Sunday evenings worked out quite well. It was more interactive, and rather than preaching at people; it was more akin to Sunday school for adults.
The main benefit I gave was through orders and oversight. I acted as the local Treasurer for the group of churches and helped maintain the records and accounts, make sure that the bills were paid, make sure that the rates were paid and made sure that the churches stayed solvent. On top of that, oversight of the financial services organisation helps ensure that it wasn’t corrupt and that ministers could gain access to housing. Further, the required charitable donations and payments could be made.
Aquinas discussed the difference between folk religion and a more refined theology. Unfortunately, whilst I can engage in detailed theological expositions and talk about the rational and logical aspects, I am utterly devoid of the ability to express a basic feeling from the heart of what all this means to the common everyday person.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
The main benefit I gave was through orders and oversight. I acted as the local Treasurer for the group of churches and helped maintain the records and accounts, make sure that the bills were paid, make sure that the rates were paid and made sure that the churches stayed solvent. On top of that, oversight of the financial services organisation helps ensure that it wasn’t corrupt and that ministers could gain access to housing. Further, the required charitable donations and payments could be made.
Aquinas discussed the difference between folk religion and a more refined theology. Unfortunately, whilst I can engage in detailed theological expositions and talk about the rational and logical aspects, I am utterly devoid of the ability to express a basic feeling from the heart of what all this means to the common everyday person.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081815/how-does-eurobond-work.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurobond.asp
Investopedia has a simple description of Eurobonds.
Eurobonds are electronically issued bearer instruments that act as a stable currency defined bearer bond.
When we talking about stable coins, there is an issuer. Contrary to what people translate and there is no such thing as a decentralised stable coin. In fact there can't be a decentralised stable coin. The notion is an impossibility.
The links above help describe this topic in a form that people understand right now. The entire stable coin concept is merely the issue of the Eurobond instrument while lying about the source of issue. For instance, tether is not backed but it is rather a debt instrument. USDC is also and unbacked debt instrument. They like to say how old are using a Blockchain so this makes it different. The Blockchain is merely the database. It doesn't matter how the data is recorded.
Hopefully having a read through these pages will give you a better understanding of what stable coins really are and why they are already regulated.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626855159498300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2734
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurobond.asp
Investopedia has a simple description of Eurobonds.
Eurobonds are electronically issued bearer instruments that act as a stable currency defined bearer bond.
When we talking about stable coins, there is an issuer. Contrary to what people translate and there is no such thing as a decentralised stable coin. In fact there can't be a decentralised stable coin. The notion is an impossibility.
The links above help describe this topic in a form that people understand right now. The entire stable coin concept is merely the issue of the Eurobond instrument while lying about the source of issue. For instance, tether is not backed but it is rather a debt instrument. USDC is also and unbacked debt instrument. They like to say how old are using a Blockchain so this makes it different. The Blockchain is merely the database. It doesn't matter how the data is recorded.
Hopefully having a read through these pages will give you a better understanding of what stable coins really are and why they are already regulated.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626855159498300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2734
Investopedia
How Does a Eurobond Work?
Contrary to its name, a eurobond is not necessarily from Europe. Learn how eurobonds work and their benefits and risks.
Just a little something people don't him to understand.
To be a patent troll requires tthat you purchase other people's patents. the sort of thing that Jack Dorsey has done before. BBy definition you can't tthe a patent troll when you are actively inventing things
https://cointelegraph.com/news/square-launches-cryptocurrency-patent-alliance-to-fight-the-trolls
"Of the more than 5,800 applications for blockchain patents filed last year, only 3% were granted."
The point on that comment is where they are saying that only 3% are granted ignores one little point... that is averaging industry
nChain doesn't have 3%
Our number will be closer to 80% when we are done
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626872246013000?thread_ts=1626872246.013000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2737
To be a patent troll requires tthat you purchase other people's patents. the sort of thing that Jack Dorsey has done before. BBy definition you can't tthe a patent troll when you are actively inventing things
https://cointelegraph.com/news/square-launches-cryptocurrency-patent-alliance-to-fight-the-trolls
"Of the more than 5,800 applications for blockchain patents filed last year, only 3% were granted."
The point on that comment is where they are saying that only 3% are granted ignores one little point... that is averaging industry
nChain doesn't have 3%
Our number will be closer to 80% when we are done
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626872246013000?thread_ts=1626872246.013000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2737
Cointelegraph
Square launches cryptocurrency patent alliance to fight the trolls
Square is launching a consortium to pool patents and democratize access to innovative blockchain technologies
Much of the defence presented by COPA hangs on an argument that because I released bitcoin under at MIT license (which they are basically arguing is the same as a GNU licence) that this means that I agreed that the protocol could be changed.
Now, when a argue that I had intended for many different versions of node software to exist with different protocols, "I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea."
They seem to ignore what I actually said
Then again, this is their entire case.
an important little factor that people miss is that I was not talking about home user utilisation here
The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses
I have categorically stated that the licence is compatible and good for commercial use
not everyone at home running their free licence but commercial
I'm going to enjoy finally getting to go through court and pull apart all of the changes that that made in BTC and all of the lies that are being created since 2011 around bitcoin
I mean, their arguing that annyone can fork the softwaree and make different protocols and that this is okay
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
As I stated, I don't want my software forked
what I wanted was a single protocol
remember, when people threatened to send large volummes of transactions to the network including movies or even Lady Gaga videos, I simply explained that this is fine that is what transaction fees are for
in case you don't understand this, when I stated that I don't care if someone sends gigabytes of data tto the network I was very simply stating that I really don't care if there are gigabyte blocks because people pay for them
When people make the claim that I started this in response to the global financial crisis they completely ignore one little point
Since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn't resist to keep thinking about it. Much more of the work was designing than coding.
I have been working on the code since 2007
that was prior to the global financial crisis and I'm not a time traveller ( for that matter I don't believe time traveller is possible)
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Now, when a argue that I had intended for many different versions of node software to exist with different protocols, "I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea."
They seem to ignore what I actually said
Then again, this is their entire case.
an important little factor that people miss is that I was not talking about home user utilisation here
The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses
I have categorically stated that the licence is compatible and good for commercial use
not everyone at home running their free licence but commercial
I'm going to enjoy finally getting to go through court and pull apart all of the changes that that made in BTC and all of the lies that are being created since 2011 around bitcoin
I mean, their arguing that annyone can fork the softwaree and make different protocols and that this is okay
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
As I stated, I don't want my software forked
what I wanted was a single protocol
remember, when people threatened to send large volummes of transactions to the network including movies or even Lady Gaga videos, I simply explained that this is fine that is what transaction fees are for
in case you don't understand this, when I stated that I don't care if someone sends gigabytes of data tto the network I was very simply stating that I really don't care if there are gigabyte blocks because people pay for them
When people make the claim that I started this in response to the global financial crisis they completely ignore one little point
Since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn't resist to keep thinking about it. Much more of the work was designing than coding.
I have been working on the code since 2007
that was prior to the global financial crisis and I'm not a time traveller ( for that matter I don't believe time traveller is possible)
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism legislative package
First published on
20 July 2021
6th Directive on AML/CFT (AMLD 6)
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210720-anti-money-laundering-countering-financing-terrorism_en
First published on
20 July 2021
6th Directive on AML/CFT (AMLD 6)
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210720-anti-money-laundering-countering-financing-terrorism_en
Finance
Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism legislative package
Beating financial crime: Commission overhauls anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism rules
The only way Bitcoin is decentralised and non-trust is beased on the protocol being fixed.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_ts=1626880032.027500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2746
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_ts=1626880032.027500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2746
It's time we had the same thing for money. With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless.
What this refers to is what Bitcoin can do. Bitcoin is NOT a currency nor even e-currency. It is a commodity, electronic cash.
BUT...
You can build a currency ON Bitcoin IN Script.
Mann on money
Currency is a legal term of art.
the question was argued and debated because of the Euro and Stirling choice bill of 2001.
If this bill was accepted, it would have conferred a unilateral right upon the debtor to discharge a Stirling obligation by payment of euros
currency means current money
to be currency, it needs to be the legally accepted form of money that is in general use within a particular country
foreign currency of course is currency that is accepted in other countries
so, unless bitcoin is widely accepted and even able to be used in the payment of bills to government as well as small casual payments as cash, when that is that the majority of some countries use is in bitcoin, then bitcoin will not be currency
Cash is a form of money in notes or coins. Bitcoin is created in a form of a digital coin and under the electronic transactions act the ability to substitute electronic methodologies for paper is considered viable in the UK hence making this legally something that can be cash
unlike popular opinion in many areas cash does not need to be a form of legal tender but it needs to be imediately final
I final what I mean is that it is not like a cheque that needs to be taken and processed somewhere else
when you are handed a cash transaction you have the final value in the final form
Not always, script enables the creation of predefined systems that ensure that double spending cannot occur if that needs to be implemented
For instance, using multi-signature scripts allows for the signing and distribution of transactions in a chain. Through this, a combination of payment channels and signing can create a system that does not allow for any double spends.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2747
What this refers to is what Bitcoin can do. Bitcoin is NOT a currency nor even e-currency. It is a commodity, electronic cash.
BUT...
You can build a currency ON Bitcoin IN Script.
Mann on money
Currency is a legal term of art.
the question was argued and debated because of the Euro and Stirling choice bill of 2001.
If this bill was accepted, it would have conferred a unilateral right upon the debtor to discharge a Stirling obligation by payment of euros
currency means current money
to be currency, it needs to be the legally accepted form of money that is in general use within a particular country
foreign currency of course is currency that is accepted in other countries
so, unless bitcoin is widely accepted and even able to be used in the payment of bills to government as well as small casual payments as cash, when that is that the majority of some countries use is in bitcoin, then bitcoin will not be currency
Cash is a form of money in notes or coins. Bitcoin is created in a form of a digital coin and under the electronic transactions act the ability to substitute electronic methodologies for paper is considered viable in the UK hence making this legally something that can be cash
unlike popular opinion in many areas cash does not need to be a form of legal tender but it needs to be imediately final
I final what I mean is that it is not like a cheque that needs to be taken and processed somewhere else
when you are handed a cash transaction you have the final value in the final form
Not always, script enables the creation of predefined systems that ensure that double spending cannot occur if that needs to be implemented
For instance, using multi-signature scripts allows for the signing and distribution of transactions in a chain. Through this, a combination of payment channels and signing can create a system that does not allow for any double spends.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2747
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2747
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2747
Right. Otherwise we couldn't have a finite limit of 21 million coins, because there would always need to be some minimum reward for generating. In a few decades when the reward gets too small, the transaction fee will become the main compensation for nodes. I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.
See:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329
https://archive.is/3MLgg
And BTC will not be long at this point
I did and I made comments about this on the bitcoin forum in the early days
if that was the case then you couldn't have a set issue and you would have to have a continuing issue over time
I allowed for more bitcoin to be issued continuously you are then creating the scenario where the system can be updated and changed
in that, you are adding myself back in as an intermediary
more important, if you are doing these continuous updates there is no way that you can justify saying that they need to stay at a certain level
I can state that you can't add more bitcoin because the entire system has been created with a set amount that was issued prior to the launch
I tried to explain this in 2010 online but nobody understood me
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880184029200?thread_ts=1626880184.029200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2749
See:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=48.msg329#msg329
https://archive.is/3MLgg
And BTC will not be long at this point
I did and I made comments about this on the bitcoin forum in the early days
if that was the case then you couldn't have a set issue and you would have to have a continuing issue over time
I allowed for more bitcoin to be issued continuously you are then creating the scenario where the system can be updated and changed
in that, you are adding myself back in as an intermediary
more important, if you are doing these continuous updates there is no way that you can justify saying that they need to stay at a certain level
I can state that you can't add more bitcoin because the entire system has been created with a set amount that was issued prior to the launch
I tried to explain this in 2010 online but nobody understood me
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880184029200?thread_ts=1626880184.029200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2749
Forgot to add the good part about micropayments. While I don't think Bitcoin is practical for smaller micropayments right now, it will eventually be as storage and bandwidth costs continue to fall. If Bitcoin catches on on a big scale, it may already be the case by that time. Another way they can become more practical is if I implement client-only mode and the number of network nodes consolidates into a smaller number of professional server farms. Whatever size micropayments you need will eventually be practical. I think in 5 or 10 years, the bandwidth and storage will seem trivial.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880587031600
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2751
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880587031600
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2751
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880587031600
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2751
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880587031600
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2751