1/4
Well,
Due to action by Kleiman and also COPA, I’m going to have to disclose all of my qualifications and what I’m doing. I am about to graduate a few more, but I should have completed twenty postgraduate degrees by the time the COPA trial comes on, including four doctorates.
Additionally, I have several undergraduate qualifications in a variety of fields. For example, I am a trained sommelier, I have completed my chef apprenticeship, I am trained as a motor mechanic specialising in agricultural equipment and heavy machinery, I have my armoury certificate, all up, I have another hundred plus certificates and diplomas that I never track because the not postgraduate level.
My qualifications at a Masters level will include
English literature,
economics and econometrics,
finance,
law,
history,
art,
computer science,
mathematics,
data science,
logistics,
philosophy,
education and pedagogy,
criminal justice,
archaeology,
electrical engineering
and psychology.
I had never planned on telling people all of this nor letting people know. So, being that the cat is going to get out of the bag, I will give everyone a little heads up on what’s going to come out.
I have been enrolled in up to 25 University qualifications simultaneously.
I do not know how many degrees I have. My first degree was obtained back in the 1990s, and I have no record of it anymore, nor do I care. I have completed degrees with a 4.0 GPA on US standards, but I don’t do that all the time, and I only do it when I find the material interesting.
People wanted to know and understand me.
Last year, I wrote 4.4 million words give or take.
The aspect of all of this that few people understand is that, unlike in social media claims, all of the statements here will be put to the test in court.
The ability to accuse someone is the basis of PoSM. To falsely accuse an individual anonymously requires no effort. You simply make the claim that person X was accused of doing action Y. In order to make such a claim requires no element of truth or even for an individual to test the validity of the claim.
I stated how I had at least 10 degrees. I have more. However, even after proving this by demonstrating all of my qualifications, people on social media still falsely claim that these are fabricated.
This is why PoSM (proof of social media) is so incredibly divisive and insidious. This is why we are entering a world of non-truth. Social media destroys truth and is the ideal socialist weapon in creating a world of 1984.
Unfortunately for COPA and others, I am not like them. I am not the individual who sits at home wishing, I am the person who does. I am the individual who has taken up to 25 university qualifications simultaneously. I am the person who has studied over 100 different fields and disciplines. I am the person that they never believed could exist.
Unfortunately for COPA and core and all of those in Silicon Valley who believe in power and control and that they can dictate the actions of others, I am not that person.
Unfortunately for all of those people, despite my desire to remain unknown world has deemed it necessary for my life to be exposed. As a consequence, in the next couple years you’re about to learn just how much a single human can do. It is more than you will believe.
I am terribly sorry, COPA et al., but you’re all about to discover what you have decided to take on, and it is not what you thought. I am that thing that you were afraid to exist. I am the creator of bitcoin, but beyond that, I am everything that Silicon Valley fears.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Well,
Due to action by Kleiman and also COPA, I’m going to have to disclose all of my qualifications and what I’m doing. I am about to graduate a few more, but I should have completed twenty postgraduate degrees by the time the COPA trial comes on, including four doctorates.
Additionally, I have several undergraduate qualifications in a variety of fields. For example, I am a trained sommelier, I have completed my chef apprenticeship, I am trained as a motor mechanic specialising in agricultural equipment and heavy machinery, I have my armoury certificate, all up, I have another hundred plus certificates and diplomas that I never track because the not postgraduate level.
My qualifications at a Masters level will include
English literature,
economics and econometrics,
finance,
law,
history,
art,
computer science,
mathematics,
data science,
logistics,
philosophy,
education and pedagogy,
criminal justice,
archaeology,
electrical engineering
and psychology.
I had never planned on telling people all of this nor letting people know. So, being that the cat is going to get out of the bag, I will give everyone a little heads up on what’s going to come out.
I have been enrolled in up to 25 University qualifications simultaneously.
I do not know how many degrees I have. My first degree was obtained back in the 1990s, and I have no record of it anymore, nor do I care. I have completed degrees with a 4.0 GPA on US standards, but I don’t do that all the time, and I only do it when I find the material interesting.
People wanted to know and understand me.
Last year, I wrote 4.4 million words give or take.
The aspect of all of this that few people understand is that, unlike in social media claims, all of the statements here will be put to the test in court.
The ability to accuse someone is the basis of PoSM. To falsely accuse an individual anonymously requires no effort. You simply make the claim that person X was accused of doing action Y. In order to make such a claim requires no element of truth or even for an individual to test the validity of the claim.
I stated how I had at least 10 degrees. I have more. However, even after proving this by demonstrating all of my qualifications, people on social media still falsely claim that these are fabricated.
This is why PoSM (proof of social media) is so incredibly divisive and insidious. This is why we are entering a world of non-truth. Social media destroys truth and is the ideal socialist weapon in creating a world of 1984.
Unfortunately for COPA and others, I am not like them. I am not the individual who sits at home wishing, I am the person who does. I am the individual who has taken up to 25 university qualifications simultaneously. I am the person who has studied over 100 different fields and disciplines. I am the person that they never believed could exist.
Unfortunately for COPA and core and all of those in Silicon Valley who believe in power and control and that they can dictate the actions of others, I am not that person.
Unfortunately for all of those people, despite my desire to remain unknown world has deemed it necessary for my life to be exposed. As a consequence, in the next couple years you’re about to learn just how much a single human can do. It is more than you will believe.
I am terribly sorry, COPA et al., but you’re all about to discover what you have decided to take on, and it is not what you thought. I am that thing that you were afraid to exist. I am the creator of bitcoin, but beyond that, I am everything that Silicon Valley fears.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
2/4
Artificial intelligence and machine learning cannot approach the range of what a human can do. They are not even remotely close. So, in part, we are reducing what people do to create equality and control others. All of this is insidious, for equality does not mean all are equal as there are always a few at the top. As with all forms of socialism, that promoted by silicon valley and techno communism leaves the incumbent wealthy in Silicon Valley in control of the rest of us. To do this, they require a compliant population and people who are not educated.
Vocational training is not education.
Teams do not create. Committees don’t build knowledge.
Computers are not within 100 years of coming close to the human mind's capabilities, and few want to admit this. As a result, all of the so-called investigations and tests on artificial intelligence are complete fabrications.
The false narrative about groups and teams and leadership completely and utterly misses all of the aspects of human creativity and development. It promotes the socialist concept that all people are equal and that we are a tabula rasa that only requires more training to have everyone equal and the equivalent of Einstein. This concept is complete and utter bullshit.
The reality is anything but equal. As something that these people will understand, the top programmers do 100 times the work of an average programmer. Still, more importantly, they create in such a manner that even 100,000 average programmers given 100,000 years would never achieve.
The concept of a great man theory is highly contested not because it is not true but because it goes against the egalitarian concept that we can all achieve an equal result. It goes against the concept that we will all achieve greatness if we have more to start with. The opposition to this theory is a completely evil concept that brings down society to the level of the troglodyte.
I started poor. I was not advantaged. I was the child of a single mother who had her firstborn taken before I was conceived as she was an unwed Catholic mother.
This is what they don’t want you to believe or understand. They want you to think that government and a few individuals such as those in Silicon Valley need to help equalise things so that people like me have a chance. The reality is, I achieved despite these individuals and their social workers. They did nothing but make my life harder, and it is the difficulty that made me achieve more.
In part, the dearth of scientific advancement that we have seen in the last fifty years is derived from the belief that scientific development needs to be made in teams. Teams kill creativity. Whilst a team can develop an idea and maintain it, teams don’t have ideas. Teams don’t create anything of value, they only maintain that which has been created by individuals.
So no, bitcoin was not created by a team. A team could not create Bitcoin. Bitcoin can be maintained and developed by a team, but it would never be built in the first place if a team was developed to create something like it.
Very simply, groups don’t create.
Individuals do
Those opposed to meritocracy and who seek equity are not looking at lifting individuals out of poverty. Instead, they are looking at keeping the status quo.
There are more scientific advancements yet to happen, and anyone could believe. In physics, chemistry, every imaginable field. And these will not be discovered because of teams; they will be discovered when we go back to teaching philosophy and rational thought in a proper liberal education the same way that individuals such as Einstein were taught in the past.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
2/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Artificial intelligence and machine learning cannot approach the range of what a human can do. They are not even remotely close. So, in part, we are reducing what people do to create equality and control others. All of this is insidious, for equality does not mean all are equal as there are always a few at the top. As with all forms of socialism, that promoted by silicon valley and techno communism leaves the incumbent wealthy in Silicon Valley in control of the rest of us. To do this, they require a compliant population and people who are not educated.
Vocational training is not education.
Teams do not create. Committees don’t build knowledge.
Computers are not within 100 years of coming close to the human mind's capabilities, and few want to admit this. As a result, all of the so-called investigations and tests on artificial intelligence are complete fabrications.
The false narrative about groups and teams and leadership completely and utterly misses all of the aspects of human creativity and development. It promotes the socialist concept that all people are equal and that we are a tabula rasa that only requires more training to have everyone equal and the equivalent of Einstein. This concept is complete and utter bullshit.
The reality is anything but equal. As something that these people will understand, the top programmers do 100 times the work of an average programmer. Still, more importantly, they create in such a manner that even 100,000 average programmers given 100,000 years would never achieve.
The concept of a great man theory is highly contested not because it is not true but because it goes against the egalitarian concept that we can all achieve an equal result. It goes against the concept that we will all achieve greatness if we have more to start with. The opposition to this theory is a completely evil concept that brings down society to the level of the troglodyte.
I started poor. I was not advantaged. I was the child of a single mother who had her firstborn taken before I was conceived as she was an unwed Catholic mother.
This is what they don’t want you to believe or understand. They want you to think that government and a few individuals such as those in Silicon Valley need to help equalise things so that people like me have a chance. The reality is, I achieved despite these individuals and their social workers. They did nothing but make my life harder, and it is the difficulty that made me achieve more.
In part, the dearth of scientific advancement that we have seen in the last fifty years is derived from the belief that scientific development needs to be made in teams. Teams kill creativity. Whilst a team can develop an idea and maintain it, teams don’t have ideas. Teams don’t create anything of value, they only maintain that which has been created by individuals.
So no, bitcoin was not created by a team. A team could not create Bitcoin. Bitcoin can be maintained and developed by a team, but it would never be built in the first place if a team was developed to create something like it.
Very simply, groups don’t create.
Individuals do
Those opposed to meritocracy and who seek equity are not looking at lifting individuals out of poverty. Instead, they are looking at keeping the status quo.
There are more scientific advancements yet to happen, and anyone could believe. In physics, chemistry, every imaginable field. And these will not be discovered because of teams; they will be discovered when we go back to teaching philosophy and rational thought in a proper liberal education the same way that individuals such as Einstein were taught in the past.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
2/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
3/4
Einstein created thought experiments. Decades later, these were proven, but they started in each case as a thought. All of the science that was required existed at the time of Galileo. It was not as people tell you the right time. The right time existed 200 years before when relativity was finally put on paper and could be 200 years more if it wasn’t for Einstein.
These advancements are not going to be found by groups but by individuals. These advancements will not be found by large teams with multibillion-dollar equipment but by individuals working alone.
Consequently, those individuals who drive society forward have the right to choose where their money goes, where their wealth goes and what they own should be more. As a result, the world is better than it has ever been. The world is cleaner, and there is less pollution, and there has been in the last thousand years. This is because of growth.
This is because of economic development and rational thought. This is what is being attacked.
In the team approach, individuals are relegated to a secondary place, and their ideas never come to be tested. Unusual ideas such as bitcoin now and relativity in the past are not accepted at first and sometimes take decades to be understood. They are fought by people who don’t want and seek something else. Consequently, any time there is a team, the development of ideas will always be muted.
The people in a team will consider the social aspects of what they say. Anything that is purely different or controversial will be subjected to a muted response to ensure that the social interaction does not lead to negative feedback and feelings. Individuals who could achieve something on their own will do less in teams because they will not want to be put in front of the social rejection that can ensue, which is a natural part of team development.
I achieved something and managed to develop bitcoin because I was ostracised and considered an outsider that you wanted to work with. My concepts of economic security were considered to be obscure at best and downright crazy by many. The people who called me a clown in 2009 and 2010 did so because I argued risk and security need to be measured through economic means and systems need to be secured not in perfection and seeking to spend on every system but rather through economic allocations.
Equally, the problems that have occurred with bitcoin and the development of completely asinine projects such as BTC and later Ethereum and the paths that these systems are going on result from committee rule.
If you know that the average person will not do much different to what you do and that you can make a small incremental difference, and that is all that matters if the group will accept you just for that, then there is no reason to achieve more. Therefore, there is no reason to keep working to the level that I have done.
Individuals achieve something when they need to achieve it for personal reasons. This can be a combination of status and wealth but without that he rewards, nothing is achieved. Einstein didn’t do all we needed to do because of money but equally he patented inventions and ended up quite wealthy. People fail to note this little point.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
3/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Einstein created thought experiments. Decades later, these were proven, but they started in each case as a thought. All of the science that was required existed at the time of Galileo. It was not as people tell you the right time. The right time existed 200 years before when relativity was finally put on paper and could be 200 years more if it wasn’t for Einstein.
These advancements are not going to be found by groups but by individuals. These advancements will not be found by large teams with multibillion-dollar equipment but by individuals working alone.
Consequently, those individuals who drive society forward have the right to choose where their money goes, where their wealth goes and what they own should be more. As a result, the world is better than it has ever been. The world is cleaner, and there is less pollution, and there has been in the last thousand years. This is because of growth.
This is because of economic development and rational thought. This is what is being attacked.
In the team approach, individuals are relegated to a secondary place, and their ideas never come to be tested. Unusual ideas such as bitcoin now and relativity in the past are not accepted at first and sometimes take decades to be understood. They are fought by people who don’t want and seek something else. Consequently, any time there is a team, the development of ideas will always be muted.
The people in a team will consider the social aspects of what they say. Anything that is purely different or controversial will be subjected to a muted response to ensure that the social interaction does not lead to negative feedback and feelings. Individuals who could achieve something on their own will do less in teams because they will not want to be put in front of the social rejection that can ensue, which is a natural part of team development.
I achieved something and managed to develop bitcoin because I was ostracised and considered an outsider that you wanted to work with. My concepts of economic security were considered to be obscure at best and downright crazy by many. The people who called me a clown in 2009 and 2010 did so because I argued risk and security need to be measured through economic means and systems need to be secured not in perfection and seeking to spend on every system but rather through economic allocations.
Equally, the problems that have occurred with bitcoin and the development of completely asinine projects such as BTC and later Ethereum and the paths that these systems are going on result from committee rule.
If you know that the average person will not do much different to what you do and that you can make a small incremental difference, and that is all that matters if the group will accept you just for that, then there is no reason to achieve more. Therefore, there is no reason to keep working to the level that I have done.
Individuals achieve something when they need to achieve it for personal reasons. This can be a combination of status and wealth but without that he rewards, nothing is achieved. Einstein didn’t do all we needed to do because of money but equally he patented inventions and ended up quite wealthy. People fail to note this little point.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
3/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
4/4
Technically I am still a pastor as I have never announced it, but I don't go by that and I don't is the title Reverend don't think I deserve it at the moment.
I have a lot of things to fix my problems because I caused
these through my actions and my neglect of the system the early days
if I had done more at the start, if I'd came out earlier than many of the problems would not be at the same level and many of the problems that are surrounding bitcoin and that half enabling crime would not have occurred
so, for now I don't call myself pastor Wright or reverent Wright
It is better to be depressed as a human than to be a happy dog.
More importantly...
I did this while I was building / founding companies.
I had a farm - tractors break down
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Technically I am still a pastor as I have never announced it, but I don't go by that and I don't is the title Reverend don't think I deserve it at the moment.
I have a lot of things to fix my problems because I caused
these through my actions and my neglect of the system the early days
if I had done more at the start, if I'd came out earlier than many of the problems would not be at the same level and many of the problems that are surrounding bitcoin and that half enabling crime would not have occurred
so, for now I don't call myself pastor Wright or reverent Wright
It is better to be depressed as a human than to be a happy dog.
More importantly...
I did this while I was building / founding companies.
I had a farm - tractors break down
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
1/2
A little something that will come out because of all of these trials that I didn’t particularly want to discuss because it’s personal involves some of what happened in 2016. When I made the deals that I made, I thought that the people investing wanted to grow nChain and make it into something independently. I discovered that this was not the case. The truth behind what was happening is that people wanted to do a deal valued at around US$1 billion as an investment that would have made and chained part of a Silicon Valley group.
Part of what I’m doing is a threat. If they had locked me in and completed that deal, my concept of making a micro payment system would have been stillborn.
Although US$1 billion is a lot of money and would have made many things in life a lot easier, and by that, I mean cash, not assets and valuation, sometimes the cost is too high.
Silicon Valley has become an isolated conclave of advertising capture. They call big data and machine learning an intelligence system that will solve problems; the reality is exactly the opposite. Nothing that is being developed at the moment in the realm of AI (actual ignorance) is not about solving the issues people believe in; it is anything but close to being a general intelligence. Rather, the true reality is that they are creating systems that make more effective advertising constructs.
To have taken the offering 2016 would have made me cash-flush and solved many problems in itself. Only at the cost of my soul, so to speak. Only in giving up everything they care about and supporting the very thing that I think is one of the worst aspects of Silicon Valley right now. In effect, it would have been taking the money to give up everything I care about and work for.
Ironically, I would have been more aligned with people like Greg had chosen to take money from Silicon Valley.
I created the system, and then I didn’t ensure that it continued the way that I wanted to. I have many other things I would like to do but cannot due to the obligations of developing the system along the correct lines.
Whilst it seems to many, especially with the Silicon Valley mentality, that you take the money and everything is good. This is an utterly ass-ended approach. The reality is that when you earn money in a business, it is not just for what has occurred in the past, but it is a prepayment towards the future. When you are rewarded with riches for concepts that you have created or businesses that you have built the money is not merely a reward for the past. This is an error in how people think.
The reality is that you are being paid in advance for what you are to do.
The reward of wealth for capitalism and the related activities is both payments for the job you have done and a prepayment for what you are being set to do.
Many people fail to understand that this is a concept that needs to be taught through the educational process. In addition, people need to understand that wealthy capitalists do not merely gain capital for what they have done but on a promise of what they are to build in the future.
Capitalism is not the problem.
The lack of education around what is moral and virtuous is the issue. We need to start teaching the people who are going to be leaders that they have an obligation. When you are given great wealth and great power, it comes with an obligation to use that on what you promised. When you are paid money to build something, and then you pivot, you are deceiving people and breaching your promise. The truth is, it would be more honest and more virtuous and better overall not to have people pivot in the Silicon Valley fashion but rather to fail. What you are being paid to do is try and continue to try until you either succeed or run out of money.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
A little something that will come out because of all of these trials that I didn’t particularly want to discuss because it’s personal involves some of what happened in 2016. When I made the deals that I made, I thought that the people investing wanted to grow nChain and make it into something independently. I discovered that this was not the case. The truth behind what was happening is that people wanted to do a deal valued at around US$1 billion as an investment that would have made and chained part of a Silicon Valley group.
Part of what I’m doing is a threat. If they had locked me in and completed that deal, my concept of making a micro payment system would have been stillborn.
Although US$1 billion is a lot of money and would have made many things in life a lot easier, and by that, I mean cash, not assets and valuation, sometimes the cost is too high.
Silicon Valley has become an isolated conclave of advertising capture. They call big data and machine learning an intelligence system that will solve problems; the reality is exactly the opposite. Nothing that is being developed at the moment in the realm of AI (actual ignorance) is not about solving the issues people believe in; it is anything but close to being a general intelligence. Rather, the true reality is that they are creating systems that make more effective advertising constructs.
To have taken the offering 2016 would have made me cash-flush and solved many problems in itself. Only at the cost of my soul, so to speak. Only in giving up everything they care about and supporting the very thing that I think is one of the worst aspects of Silicon Valley right now. In effect, it would have been taking the money to give up everything I care about and work for.
Ironically, I would have been more aligned with people like Greg had chosen to take money from Silicon Valley.
I created the system, and then I didn’t ensure that it continued the way that I wanted to. I have many other things I would like to do but cannot due to the obligations of developing the system along the correct lines.
Whilst it seems to many, especially with the Silicon Valley mentality, that you take the money and everything is good. This is an utterly ass-ended approach. The reality is that when you earn money in a business, it is not just for what has occurred in the past, but it is a prepayment towards the future. When you are rewarded with riches for concepts that you have created or businesses that you have built the money is not merely a reward for the past. This is an error in how people think.
The reality is that you are being paid in advance for what you are to do.
The reward of wealth for capitalism and the related activities is both payments for the job you have done and a prepayment for what you are being set to do.
Many people fail to understand that this is a concept that needs to be taught through the educational process. In addition, people need to understand that wealthy capitalists do not merely gain capital for what they have done but on a promise of what they are to build in the future.
Capitalism is not the problem.
The lack of education around what is moral and virtuous is the issue. We need to start teaching the people who are going to be leaders that they have an obligation. When you are given great wealth and great power, it comes with an obligation to use that on what you promised. When you are paid money to build something, and then you pivot, you are deceiving people and breaching your promise. The truth is, it would be more honest and more virtuous and better overall not to have people pivot in the Silicon Valley fashion but rather to fail. What you are being paid to do is try and continue to try until you either succeed or run out of money.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
2/2
If you are successful, you will have built something difficult to do and hard to copy and worth the effort to achieve. If you fail, you fail honestly. Your job is not to protect money and build money but rather to build something of value. The role of a true capitalist and entrepreneur is to lead their business to the end they promised. It is not merely to make more money. Profit is a signalling device. But, it is not the end goal. This is what people mixed up. Profit itself is not the goal but is only a measurement tool.
There is a reason we don’t have flying cars. There is a reason that virtual reality systems are not available. The problem is the Silicon Valley mentality of pivoting. When you mix this with the Wall Street mentality of a profit at any cost, you have an incredibly detrimental system. It moves away from being capitalism into a new form of mercantilism. It is merely about creating a larger pile of money in a zero-sum game. This is anticapitalism, for capitalism is about building and growth.
A capitalist makes a bigger pie. A mercantilist seeks a larger slice of the existing pie. These are very different outcomes.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
If you are successful, you will have built something difficult to do and hard to copy and worth the effort to achieve. If you fail, you fail honestly. Your job is not to protect money and build money but rather to build something of value. The role of a true capitalist and entrepreneur is to lead their business to the end they promised. It is not merely to make more money. Profit is a signalling device. But, it is not the end goal. This is what people mixed up. Profit itself is not the goal but is only a measurement tool.
There is a reason we don’t have flying cars. There is a reason that virtual reality systems are not available. The problem is the Silicon Valley mentality of pivoting. When you mix this with the Wall Street mentality of a profit at any cost, you have an incredibly detrimental system. It moves away from being capitalism into a new form of mercantilism. It is merely about creating a larger pile of money in a zero-sum game. This is anticapitalism, for capitalism is about building and growth.
A capitalist makes a bigger pie. A mercantilist seeks a larger slice of the existing pie. These are very different outcomes.
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
Jul 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626768342395800?thread_ts=1626768342.395800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2729
To be honest, when I was a pastor, I was utterly terrible at the job. I did care, but anyone who knows me will know that I’m not exactly the best people person. Nevertheless, the coffee church session that I held on Sunday evenings worked out quite well. It was more interactive, and rather than preaching at people; it was more akin to Sunday school for adults.
The main benefit I gave was through orders and oversight. I acted as the local Treasurer for the group of churches and helped maintain the records and accounts, make sure that the bills were paid, make sure that the rates were paid and made sure that the churches stayed solvent. On top of that, oversight of the financial services organisation helps ensure that it wasn’t corrupt and that ministers could gain access to housing. Further, the required charitable donations and payments could be made.
Aquinas discussed the difference between folk religion and a more refined theology. Unfortunately, whilst I can engage in detailed theological expositions and talk about the rational and logical aspects, I am utterly devoid of the ability to express a basic feeling from the heart of what all this means to the common everyday person.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
The main benefit I gave was through orders and oversight. I acted as the local Treasurer for the group of churches and helped maintain the records and accounts, make sure that the bills were paid, make sure that the rates were paid and made sure that the churches stayed solvent. On top of that, oversight of the financial services organisation helps ensure that it wasn’t corrupt and that ministers could gain access to housing. Further, the required charitable donations and payments could be made.
Aquinas discussed the difference between folk religion and a more refined theology. Unfortunately, whilst I can engage in detailed theological expositions and talk about the rational and logical aspects, I am utterly devoid of the ability to express a basic feeling from the heart of what all this means to the common everyday person.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626854542497800?thread_ts=1626854542.497800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2732
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/081815/how-does-eurobond-work.asp
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurobond.asp
Investopedia has a simple description of Eurobonds.
Eurobonds are electronically issued bearer instruments that act as a stable currency defined bearer bond.
When we talking about stable coins, there is an issuer. Contrary to what people translate and there is no such thing as a decentralised stable coin. In fact there can't be a decentralised stable coin. The notion is an impossibility.
The links above help describe this topic in a form that people understand right now. The entire stable coin concept is merely the issue of the Eurobond instrument while lying about the source of issue. For instance, tether is not backed but it is rather a debt instrument. USDC is also and unbacked debt instrument. They like to say how old are using a Blockchain so this makes it different. The Blockchain is merely the database. It doesn't matter how the data is recorded.
Hopefully having a read through these pages will give you a better understanding of what stable coins really are and why they are already regulated.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626855159498300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2734
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/eurobond.asp
Investopedia has a simple description of Eurobonds.
Eurobonds are electronically issued bearer instruments that act as a stable currency defined bearer bond.
When we talking about stable coins, there is an issuer. Contrary to what people translate and there is no such thing as a decentralised stable coin. In fact there can't be a decentralised stable coin. The notion is an impossibility.
The links above help describe this topic in a form that people understand right now. The entire stable coin concept is merely the issue of the Eurobond instrument while lying about the source of issue. For instance, tether is not backed but it is rather a debt instrument. USDC is also and unbacked debt instrument. They like to say how old are using a Blockchain so this makes it different. The Blockchain is merely the database. It doesn't matter how the data is recorded.
Hopefully having a read through these pages will give you a better understanding of what stable coins really are and why they are already regulated.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626855159498300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2734
Investopedia
How Does a Eurobond Work?
Contrary to its name, a eurobond is not necessarily from Europe. Learn how eurobonds work and their benefits and risks.
Just a little something people don't him to understand.
To be a patent troll requires tthat you purchase other people's patents. the sort of thing that Jack Dorsey has done before. BBy definition you can't tthe a patent troll when you are actively inventing things
https://cointelegraph.com/news/square-launches-cryptocurrency-patent-alliance-to-fight-the-trolls
"Of the more than 5,800 applications for blockchain patents filed last year, only 3% were granted."
The point on that comment is where they are saying that only 3% are granted ignores one little point... that is averaging industry
nChain doesn't have 3%
Our number will be closer to 80% when we are done
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626872246013000?thread_ts=1626872246.013000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2737
To be a patent troll requires tthat you purchase other people's patents. the sort of thing that Jack Dorsey has done before. BBy definition you can't tthe a patent troll when you are actively inventing things
https://cointelegraph.com/news/square-launches-cryptocurrency-patent-alliance-to-fight-the-trolls
"Of the more than 5,800 applications for blockchain patents filed last year, only 3% were granted."
The point on that comment is where they are saying that only 3% are granted ignores one little point... that is averaging industry
nChain doesn't have 3%
Our number will be closer to 80% when we are done
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626872246013000?thread_ts=1626872246.013000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2737
Cointelegraph
Square launches cryptocurrency patent alliance to fight the trolls
Square is launching a consortium to pool patents and democratize access to innovative blockchain technologies
Much of the defence presented by COPA hangs on an argument that because I released bitcoin under at MIT license (which they are basically arguing is the same as a GNU licence) that this means that I agreed that the protocol could be changed.
Now, when a argue that I had intended for many different versions of node software to exist with different protocols, "I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea."
They seem to ignore what I actually said
Then again, this is their entire case.
an important little factor that people miss is that I was not talking about home user utilisation here
The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses
I have categorically stated that the licence is compatible and good for commercial use
not everyone at home running their free licence but commercial
I'm going to enjoy finally getting to go through court and pull apart all of the changes that that made in BTC and all of the lies that are being created since 2011 around bitcoin
I mean, their arguing that annyone can fork the softwaree and make different protocols and that this is okay
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
As I stated, I don't want my software forked
what I wanted was a single protocol
remember, when people threatened to send large volummes of transactions to the network including movies or even Lady Gaga videos, I simply explained that this is fine that is what transaction fees are for
in case you don't understand this, when I stated that I don't care if someone sends gigabytes of data tto the network I was very simply stating that I really don't care if there are gigabyte blocks because people pay for them
When people make the claim that I started this in response to the global financial crisis they completely ignore one little point
Since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn't resist to keep thinking about it. Much more of the work was designing than coding.
I have been working on the code since 2007
that was prior to the global financial crisis and I'm not a time traveller ( for that matter I don't believe time traveller is possible)
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Now, when a argue that I had intended for many different versions of node software to exist with different protocols, "I don't believe a second, compatible implementation of Bitcoin will ever be a good idea."
They seem to ignore what I actually said
Then again, this is their entire case.
an important little factor that people miss is that I was not talking about home user utilisation here
The MIT license is compatible with all other licenses and commercial uses
I have categorically stated that the licence is compatible and good for commercial use
not everyone at home running their free licence but commercial
I'm going to enjoy finally getting to go through court and pull apart all of the changes that that made in BTC and all of the lies that are being created since 2011 around bitcoin
I mean, their arguing that annyone can fork the softwaree and make different protocols and that this is okay
I know, most developers don't like their software forked, but I have real technical reasons in this case.
As I stated, I don't want my software forked
what I wanted was a single protocol
remember, when people threatened to send large volummes of transactions to the network including movies or even Lady Gaga videos, I simply explained that this is fine that is what transaction fees are for
in case you don't understand this, when I stated that I don't care if someone sends gigabytes of data tto the network I was very simply stating that I really don't care if there are gigabyte blocks because people pay for them
When people make the claim that I started this in response to the global financial crisis they completely ignore one little point
Since 2007. At some point I became convinced there was a way to do this without any trust required at all and couldn't resist to keep thinking about it. Much more of the work was designing than coding.
I have been working on the code since 2007
that was prior to the global financial crisis and I'm not a time traveller ( for that matter I don't believe time traveller is possible)
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626874459016800?thread_ts=1626874459.016800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2739
Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism legislative package
First published on
20 July 2021
6th Directive on AML/CFT (AMLD 6)
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210720-anti-money-laundering-countering-financing-terrorism_en
First published on
20 July 2021
6th Directive on AML/CFT (AMLD 6)
https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/210720-anti-money-laundering-countering-financing-terrorism_en
Finance
Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism legislative package
Beating financial crime: Commission overhauls anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism rules
The only way Bitcoin is decentralised and non-trust is beased on the protocol being fixed.
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_ts=1626880032.027500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2746
CSW
Jul 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626880032027500?thread_ts=1626880032.027500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2746