I left the management bitcoin once. I did that with the simple notion that nobody would change my bloody protocol. I won't make that mistake again. As much as I have other things that I would like to do, I won't be leaving the management of ensuring bitcoin stays set until it is too big to be changed.
So, the simple fact of the matter is that you're not getting rid of me, these people are not getting rid of me and I will not and I emphasise not allow changes to my damn protocol
I don't really care what you want to do
the simple fact of the matter is if you need to change my protocol or fuck around with it
the answer is too fuck off
CSW
Jul 15, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626346763010600?thread_ts=1626346763.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2708
So, the simple fact of the matter is that you're not getting rid of me, these people are not getting rid of me and I will not and I emphasise not allow changes to my damn protocol
I don't really care what you want to do
the simple fact of the matter is if you need to change my protocol or fuck around with it
the answer is too fuck off
CSW
Jul 15, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626346763010600?thread_ts=1626346763.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2708
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 15, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626346763010600?thread_ts=1626346763.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2708
Jul 15, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626346763010600?thread_ts=1626346763.010600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2708
https://twitter.com/CryptoBull2020/status/1415771260089511941?s=20
Ripple Labs Can Question Former SEC Official in Suit Over XRP
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-15/ripple-labs-can-question-former-sec-official-in-suit-over-xrp
As they should have. The judge made a correct decision.
You are neglecting the fact that this is a good outcome. ETH is a security, the SEC has people who own some of these assets and that is a form of bias that needs to be investigated.
There is no reason that is logically valid to claim that ETH is not a security, and in reality, it stinks to high heaven as an illegal security offer. Once PoS is implemented, there is no way not to consider it a security.
The SEC is not a court. They don’t make decisions, they badly enforce many things, and it is necessary for the court to rule on these areas.
it is not the SEC they should be worried about
it is the entire ICO scam market
CSW
Jul 16, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626389237048500?thread_ts=1626389237.048500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2713
Ripple Labs Can Question Former SEC Official in Suit Over XRP
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-07-15/ripple-labs-can-question-former-sec-official-in-suit-over-xrp
As they should have. The judge made a correct decision.
You are neglecting the fact that this is a good outcome. ETH is a security, the SEC has people who own some of these assets and that is a form of bias that needs to be investigated.
There is no reason that is logically valid to claim that ETH is not a security, and in reality, it stinks to high heaven as an illegal security offer. Once PoS is implemented, there is no way not to consider it a security.
The SEC is not a court. They don’t make decisions, they badly enforce many things, and it is necessary for the court to rule on these areas.
it is not the SEC they should be worried about
it is the entire ICO scam market
CSW
Jul 16, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626389237048500?thread_ts=1626389237.048500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2713
Twitter
CryptoBull
BOMBSHELL NEWS: the judge ruled in FAVOR of #Ripple and AGAINST the SEC. Ripple can now question former SEC Director of finance about why the SEC decided Ethereum is not a security, yet claims #XRP is. The SEC is about to be EXPOSED!!!
The difficulty that has evolved alongside the SillyCon Valley move to advertising is directly aligned with the nature of how they raise money to buy companies.
It is in itself a form of monopolistic capture. The larger entities can buy out potential competitors. It is a form of mercantilism based on advertising revenue. They don’t want to see something like bitcoin and the solution that I developed because they have created a system based on the capture of power and market share analogous to how mercantilist governments would capture the supply of gold as a measure of monetary value and wealth.
CSW
Jul 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626537674230200?thread_ts=1626345276.001700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2721
It is in itself a form of monopolistic capture. The larger entities can buy out potential competitors. It is a form of mercantilism based on advertising revenue. They don’t want to see something like bitcoin and the solution that I developed because they have created a system based on the capture of power and market share analogous to how mercantilist governments would capture the supply of gold as a measure of monetary value and wealth.
CSW
Jul 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626537674230200?thread_ts=1626345276.001700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2721
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626537674230200?thread_ts=1626345276.001700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2721
Jul 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626537674230200?thread_ts=1626345276.001700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2721
1/4
Well,
Due to action by Kleiman and also COPA, I’m going to have to disclose all of my qualifications and what I’m doing. I am about to graduate a few more, but I should have completed twenty postgraduate degrees by the time the COPA trial comes on, including four doctorates.
Additionally, I have several undergraduate qualifications in a variety of fields. For example, I am a trained sommelier, I have completed my chef apprenticeship, I am trained as a motor mechanic specialising in agricultural equipment and heavy machinery, I have my armoury certificate, all up, I have another hundred plus certificates and diplomas that I never track because the not postgraduate level.
My qualifications at a Masters level will include
English literature,
economics and econometrics,
finance,
law,
history,
art,
computer science,
mathematics,
data science,
logistics,
philosophy,
education and pedagogy,
criminal justice,
archaeology,
electrical engineering
and psychology.
I had never planned on telling people all of this nor letting people know. So, being that the cat is going to get out of the bag, I will give everyone a little heads up on what’s going to come out.
I have been enrolled in up to 25 University qualifications simultaneously.
I do not know how many degrees I have. My first degree was obtained back in the 1990s, and I have no record of it anymore, nor do I care. I have completed degrees with a 4.0 GPA on US standards, but I don’t do that all the time, and I only do it when I find the material interesting.
People wanted to know and understand me.
Last year, I wrote 4.4 million words give or take.
The aspect of all of this that few people understand is that, unlike in social media claims, all of the statements here will be put to the test in court.
The ability to accuse someone is the basis of PoSM. To falsely accuse an individual anonymously requires no effort. You simply make the claim that person X was accused of doing action Y. In order to make such a claim requires no element of truth or even for an individual to test the validity of the claim.
I stated how I had at least 10 degrees. I have more. However, even after proving this by demonstrating all of my qualifications, people on social media still falsely claim that these are fabricated.
This is why PoSM (proof of social media) is so incredibly divisive and insidious. This is why we are entering a world of non-truth. Social media destroys truth and is the ideal socialist weapon in creating a world of 1984.
Unfortunately for COPA and others, I am not like them. I am not the individual who sits at home wishing, I am the person who does. I am the individual who has taken up to 25 university qualifications simultaneously. I am the person who has studied over 100 different fields and disciplines. I am the person that they never believed could exist.
Unfortunately for COPA and core and all of those in Silicon Valley who believe in power and control and that they can dictate the actions of others, I am not that person.
Unfortunately for all of those people, despite my desire to remain unknown world has deemed it necessary for my life to be exposed. As a consequence, in the next couple years you’re about to learn just how much a single human can do. It is more than you will believe.
I am terribly sorry, COPA et al., but you’re all about to discover what you have decided to take on, and it is not what you thought. I am that thing that you were afraid to exist. I am the creator of bitcoin, but beyond that, I am everything that Silicon Valley fears.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Well,
Due to action by Kleiman and also COPA, I’m going to have to disclose all of my qualifications and what I’m doing. I am about to graduate a few more, but I should have completed twenty postgraduate degrees by the time the COPA trial comes on, including four doctorates.
Additionally, I have several undergraduate qualifications in a variety of fields. For example, I am a trained sommelier, I have completed my chef apprenticeship, I am trained as a motor mechanic specialising in agricultural equipment and heavy machinery, I have my armoury certificate, all up, I have another hundred plus certificates and diplomas that I never track because the not postgraduate level.
My qualifications at a Masters level will include
English literature,
economics and econometrics,
finance,
law,
history,
art,
computer science,
mathematics,
data science,
logistics,
philosophy,
education and pedagogy,
criminal justice,
archaeology,
electrical engineering
and psychology.
I had never planned on telling people all of this nor letting people know. So, being that the cat is going to get out of the bag, I will give everyone a little heads up on what’s going to come out.
I have been enrolled in up to 25 University qualifications simultaneously.
I do not know how many degrees I have. My first degree was obtained back in the 1990s, and I have no record of it anymore, nor do I care. I have completed degrees with a 4.0 GPA on US standards, but I don’t do that all the time, and I only do it when I find the material interesting.
People wanted to know and understand me.
Last year, I wrote 4.4 million words give or take.
The aspect of all of this that few people understand is that, unlike in social media claims, all of the statements here will be put to the test in court.
The ability to accuse someone is the basis of PoSM. To falsely accuse an individual anonymously requires no effort. You simply make the claim that person X was accused of doing action Y. In order to make such a claim requires no element of truth or even for an individual to test the validity of the claim.
I stated how I had at least 10 degrees. I have more. However, even after proving this by demonstrating all of my qualifications, people on social media still falsely claim that these are fabricated.
This is why PoSM (proof of social media) is so incredibly divisive and insidious. This is why we are entering a world of non-truth. Social media destroys truth and is the ideal socialist weapon in creating a world of 1984.
Unfortunately for COPA and others, I am not like them. I am not the individual who sits at home wishing, I am the person who does. I am the individual who has taken up to 25 university qualifications simultaneously. I am the person who has studied over 100 different fields and disciplines. I am the person that they never believed could exist.
Unfortunately for COPA and core and all of those in Silicon Valley who believe in power and control and that they can dictate the actions of others, I am not that person.
Unfortunately for all of those people, despite my desire to remain unknown world has deemed it necessary for my life to be exposed. As a consequence, in the next couple years you’re about to learn just how much a single human can do. It is more than you will believe.
I am terribly sorry, COPA et al., but you’re all about to discover what you have decided to take on, and it is not what you thought. I am that thing that you were afraid to exist. I am the creator of bitcoin, but beyond that, I am everything that Silicon Valley fears.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
1/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
2/4
Artificial intelligence and machine learning cannot approach the range of what a human can do. They are not even remotely close. So, in part, we are reducing what people do to create equality and control others. All of this is insidious, for equality does not mean all are equal as there are always a few at the top. As with all forms of socialism, that promoted by silicon valley and techno communism leaves the incumbent wealthy in Silicon Valley in control of the rest of us. To do this, they require a compliant population and people who are not educated.
Vocational training is not education.
Teams do not create. Committees don’t build knowledge.
Computers are not within 100 years of coming close to the human mind's capabilities, and few want to admit this. As a result, all of the so-called investigations and tests on artificial intelligence are complete fabrications.
The false narrative about groups and teams and leadership completely and utterly misses all of the aspects of human creativity and development. It promotes the socialist concept that all people are equal and that we are a tabula rasa that only requires more training to have everyone equal and the equivalent of Einstein. This concept is complete and utter bullshit.
The reality is anything but equal. As something that these people will understand, the top programmers do 100 times the work of an average programmer. Still, more importantly, they create in such a manner that even 100,000 average programmers given 100,000 years would never achieve.
The concept of a great man theory is highly contested not because it is not true but because it goes against the egalitarian concept that we can all achieve an equal result. It goes against the concept that we will all achieve greatness if we have more to start with. The opposition to this theory is a completely evil concept that brings down society to the level of the troglodyte.
I started poor. I was not advantaged. I was the child of a single mother who had her firstborn taken before I was conceived as she was an unwed Catholic mother.
This is what they don’t want you to believe or understand. They want you to think that government and a few individuals such as those in Silicon Valley need to help equalise things so that people like me have a chance. The reality is, I achieved despite these individuals and their social workers. They did nothing but make my life harder, and it is the difficulty that made me achieve more.
In part, the dearth of scientific advancement that we have seen in the last fifty years is derived from the belief that scientific development needs to be made in teams. Teams kill creativity. Whilst a team can develop an idea and maintain it, teams don’t have ideas. Teams don’t create anything of value, they only maintain that which has been created by individuals.
So no, bitcoin was not created by a team. A team could not create Bitcoin. Bitcoin can be maintained and developed by a team, but it would never be built in the first place if a team was developed to create something like it.
Very simply, groups don’t create.
Individuals do
Those opposed to meritocracy and who seek equity are not looking at lifting individuals out of poverty. Instead, they are looking at keeping the status quo.
There are more scientific advancements yet to happen, and anyone could believe. In physics, chemistry, every imaginable field. And these will not be discovered because of teams; they will be discovered when we go back to teaching philosophy and rational thought in a proper liberal education the same way that individuals such as Einstein were taught in the past.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
2/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Artificial intelligence and machine learning cannot approach the range of what a human can do. They are not even remotely close. So, in part, we are reducing what people do to create equality and control others. All of this is insidious, for equality does not mean all are equal as there are always a few at the top. As with all forms of socialism, that promoted by silicon valley and techno communism leaves the incumbent wealthy in Silicon Valley in control of the rest of us. To do this, they require a compliant population and people who are not educated.
Vocational training is not education.
Teams do not create. Committees don’t build knowledge.
Computers are not within 100 years of coming close to the human mind's capabilities, and few want to admit this. As a result, all of the so-called investigations and tests on artificial intelligence are complete fabrications.
The false narrative about groups and teams and leadership completely and utterly misses all of the aspects of human creativity and development. It promotes the socialist concept that all people are equal and that we are a tabula rasa that only requires more training to have everyone equal and the equivalent of Einstein. This concept is complete and utter bullshit.
The reality is anything but equal. As something that these people will understand, the top programmers do 100 times the work of an average programmer. Still, more importantly, they create in such a manner that even 100,000 average programmers given 100,000 years would never achieve.
The concept of a great man theory is highly contested not because it is not true but because it goes against the egalitarian concept that we can all achieve an equal result. It goes against the concept that we will all achieve greatness if we have more to start with. The opposition to this theory is a completely evil concept that brings down society to the level of the troglodyte.
I started poor. I was not advantaged. I was the child of a single mother who had her firstborn taken before I was conceived as she was an unwed Catholic mother.
This is what they don’t want you to believe or understand. They want you to think that government and a few individuals such as those in Silicon Valley need to help equalise things so that people like me have a chance. The reality is, I achieved despite these individuals and their social workers. They did nothing but make my life harder, and it is the difficulty that made me achieve more.
In part, the dearth of scientific advancement that we have seen in the last fifty years is derived from the belief that scientific development needs to be made in teams. Teams kill creativity. Whilst a team can develop an idea and maintain it, teams don’t have ideas. Teams don’t create anything of value, they only maintain that which has been created by individuals.
So no, bitcoin was not created by a team. A team could not create Bitcoin. Bitcoin can be maintained and developed by a team, but it would never be built in the first place if a team was developed to create something like it.
Very simply, groups don’t create.
Individuals do
Those opposed to meritocracy and who seek equity are not looking at lifting individuals out of poverty. Instead, they are looking at keeping the status quo.
There are more scientific advancements yet to happen, and anyone could believe. In physics, chemistry, every imaginable field. And these will not be discovered because of teams; they will be discovered when we go back to teaching philosophy and rational thought in a proper liberal education the same way that individuals such as Einstein were taught in the past.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
2/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
3/4
Einstein created thought experiments. Decades later, these were proven, but they started in each case as a thought. All of the science that was required existed at the time of Galileo. It was not as people tell you the right time. The right time existed 200 years before when relativity was finally put on paper and could be 200 years more if it wasn’t for Einstein.
These advancements are not going to be found by groups but by individuals. These advancements will not be found by large teams with multibillion-dollar equipment but by individuals working alone.
Consequently, those individuals who drive society forward have the right to choose where their money goes, where their wealth goes and what they own should be more. As a result, the world is better than it has ever been. The world is cleaner, and there is less pollution, and there has been in the last thousand years. This is because of growth.
This is because of economic development and rational thought. This is what is being attacked.
In the team approach, individuals are relegated to a secondary place, and their ideas never come to be tested. Unusual ideas such as bitcoin now and relativity in the past are not accepted at first and sometimes take decades to be understood. They are fought by people who don’t want and seek something else. Consequently, any time there is a team, the development of ideas will always be muted.
The people in a team will consider the social aspects of what they say. Anything that is purely different or controversial will be subjected to a muted response to ensure that the social interaction does not lead to negative feedback and feelings. Individuals who could achieve something on their own will do less in teams because they will not want to be put in front of the social rejection that can ensue, which is a natural part of team development.
I achieved something and managed to develop bitcoin because I was ostracised and considered an outsider that you wanted to work with. My concepts of economic security were considered to be obscure at best and downright crazy by many. The people who called me a clown in 2009 and 2010 did so because I argued risk and security need to be measured through economic means and systems need to be secured not in perfection and seeking to spend on every system but rather through economic allocations.
Equally, the problems that have occurred with bitcoin and the development of completely asinine projects such as BTC and later Ethereum and the paths that these systems are going on result from committee rule.
If you know that the average person will not do much different to what you do and that you can make a small incremental difference, and that is all that matters if the group will accept you just for that, then there is no reason to achieve more. Therefore, there is no reason to keep working to the level that I have done.
Individuals achieve something when they need to achieve it for personal reasons. This can be a combination of status and wealth but without that he rewards, nothing is achieved. Einstein didn’t do all we needed to do because of money but equally he patented inventions and ended up quite wealthy. People fail to note this little point.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
3/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Einstein created thought experiments. Decades later, these were proven, but they started in each case as a thought. All of the science that was required existed at the time of Galileo. It was not as people tell you the right time. The right time existed 200 years before when relativity was finally put on paper and could be 200 years more if it wasn’t for Einstein.
These advancements are not going to be found by groups but by individuals. These advancements will not be found by large teams with multibillion-dollar equipment but by individuals working alone.
Consequently, those individuals who drive society forward have the right to choose where their money goes, where their wealth goes and what they own should be more. As a result, the world is better than it has ever been. The world is cleaner, and there is less pollution, and there has been in the last thousand years. This is because of growth.
This is because of economic development and rational thought. This is what is being attacked.
In the team approach, individuals are relegated to a secondary place, and their ideas never come to be tested. Unusual ideas such as bitcoin now and relativity in the past are not accepted at first and sometimes take decades to be understood. They are fought by people who don’t want and seek something else. Consequently, any time there is a team, the development of ideas will always be muted.
The people in a team will consider the social aspects of what they say. Anything that is purely different or controversial will be subjected to a muted response to ensure that the social interaction does not lead to negative feedback and feelings. Individuals who could achieve something on their own will do less in teams because they will not want to be put in front of the social rejection that can ensue, which is a natural part of team development.
I achieved something and managed to develop bitcoin because I was ostracised and considered an outsider that you wanted to work with. My concepts of economic security were considered to be obscure at best and downright crazy by many. The people who called me a clown in 2009 and 2010 did so because I argued risk and security need to be measured through economic means and systems need to be secured not in perfection and seeking to spend on every system but rather through economic allocations.
Equally, the problems that have occurred with bitcoin and the development of completely asinine projects such as BTC and later Ethereum and the paths that these systems are going on result from committee rule.
If you know that the average person will not do much different to what you do and that you can make a small incremental difference, and that is all that matters if the group will accept you just for that, then there is no reason to achieve more. Therefore, there is no reason to keep working to the level that I have done.
Individuals achieve something when they need to achieve it for personal reasons. This can be a combination of status and wealth but without that he rewards, nothing is achieved. Einstein didn’t do all we needed to do because of money but equally he patented inventions and ended up quite wealthy. People fail to note this little point.
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
3/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
4/4
Technically I am still a pastor as I have never announced it, but I don't go by that and I don't is the title Reverend don't think I deserve it at the moment.
I have a lot of things to fix my problems because I caused
these through my actions and my neglect of the system the early days
if I had done more at the start, if I'd came out earlier than many of the problems would not be at the same level and many of the problems that are surrounding bitcoin and that half enabling crime would not have occurred
so, for now I don't call myself pastor Wright or reverent Wright
It is better to be depressed as a human than to be a happy dog.
More importantly...
I did this while I was building / founding companies.
I had a farm - tractors break down
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Technically I am still a pastor as I have never announced it, but I don't go by that and I don't is the title Reverend don't think I deserve it at the moment.
I have a lot of things to fix my problems because I caused
these through my actions and my neglect of the system the early days
if I had done more at the start, if I'd came out earlier than many of the problems would not be at the same level and many of the problems that are surrounding bitcoin and that half enabling crime would not have occurred
so, for now I don't call myself pastor Wright or reverent Wright
It is better to be depressed as a human than to be a happy dog.
More importantly...
I did this while I was building / founding companies.
I had a farm - tractors break down
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
4/4
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724
Jul 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1626683458279600?thread_ts=1626683458.279600&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2724