Quick questions about Merkle Tree in Bitcoin Blocks:
When TXes are put into blocks, is the Merkle Tree formed as a multi branch tree or is it formed as a linear branch sort of sequentially?
Binary tree
no, the miner will not be able to make a linear path
no a linear path is a shit idea
please stop trying to change my protocol
I keep saying this, set in stone
there are reasons for every aspect of bitcoin that I have spent many years developing
no I haven't had time to explain every little bit of it to everyone
no it is not more efficient to change
no a linear path will not work
yes, a linear path increases the amount of computation exponentially
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_logarithm
the verification of a linear path requires for any entries that you require verification of [(n-1)/2]+1 subsequent entries
every single time you want to do something
no not a binary logarithm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_tree#:~:text=In%20computer%20science%2C%20a%20binary,child%20and%20the%20right%20child.&text=It%20is%20also%20possible%20to,is%20an%20ordered%2C%20rooted%20tree
the Merkle tree is a full binary tree and is also known as a complete binary tree
verification at scale is many times more efficient
what do you mean by three steps away
you don't need to make the proof you need to path
this is bites of information
Try 4,000,000,000,000 TX in a block
10,000,000,000 a second x 3600 at the extreme is required in time
Think on that
Jun 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624354285373300?thread_ts=1624354285.373300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2623
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2625
When TXes are put into blocks, is the Merkle Tree formed as a multi branch tree or is it formed as a linear branch sort of sequentially?
Binary tree
no, the miner will not be able to make a linear path
no a linear path is a shit idea
please stop trying to change my protocol
I keep saying this, set in stone
there are reasons for every aspect of bitcoin that I have spent many years developing
no I haven't had time to explain every little bit of it to everyone
no it is not more efficient to change
no a linear path will not work
yes, a linear path increases the amount of computation exponentially
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_logarithm
the verification of a linear path requires for any entries that you require verification of [(n-1)/2]+1 subsequent entries
every single time you want to do something
no not a binary logarithm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_tree#:~:text=In%20computer%20science%2C%20a%20binary,child%20and%20the%20right%20child.&text=It%20is%20also%20possible%20to,is%20an%20ordered%2C%20rooted%20tree
the Merkle tree is a full binary tree and is also known as a complete binary tree
verification at scale is many times more efficient
what do you mean by three steps away
you don't need to make the proof you need to path
this is bites of information
Try 4,000,000,000,000 TX in a block
10,000,000,000 a second x 3600 at the extreme is required in time
Think on that
Jun 22, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624354285373300?thread_ts=1624354285.373300&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2623
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2625
Wikipedia
Binary logarithm
mathematical function
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW Jun 22, 2021 https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624388365403300?thread_ts=1624388365.403300&cid=C5131HKFX https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2626
TechCrunch
No, NFTs aren’t copyrights
When artists sell their digitally minted artwork as a non-fungible token, they usually aren’t selling the underlying copyright — but there are overlaps.
WO2017145009A1.pdf
336.6 KB
INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
(19) World Intellectual Property
Organization
International Bureau
31 August 2017
(19) World Intellectual Property
Organization
International Bureau
31 August 2017
I do not support diversity or multiculturalism.
I support national sovereignty and separate paths that compete.
This has nothing to do with colour as race DOES NOT EXIST.
Culture matters, when people come to the USA, UK etc, they leave their Culture.
Mixing food is not like blocks of non integrated people.
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624532489059700?thread_ts=1624532489.059700&cid=C5131HKFX
I support national sovereignty and separate paths that compete.
This has nothing to do with colour as race DOES NOT EXIST.
Culture matters, when people come to the USA, UK etc, they leave their Culture.
Mixing food is not like blocks of non integrated people.
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624532489059700?thread_ts=1624532489.059700&cid=C5131HKFX
Note,
Bitcoin is not about decentralised nodes.
There cannot ever be more than 2016 nodes.
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624559208105800?thread_ts=1624559208.10
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2636
Bitcoin is not about decentralised nodes.
There cannot ever be more than 2016 nodes.
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624559208105800?thread_ts=1624559208.10
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2636
Note,
Bitcoin is not about decentralised nodes.
There cannot ever be more than 2016 nodes.
Oligarchy requires a scenario where nodes are not replaced...
PoS
And, if you cannot find at LEAST one block each difficulty period, you CANNOT be profitable
No profit, no mining.
The hash rate is set by all nodes, the difficulty adjusts even if there are nodes that are low powered and should not earn.
In that, if 3000 nodes provide hash, then the 2016 that earn must be more efficient or they lose money
The 984 that exist still cause difficulty adjustment even though they fail to ever get a block
In this, the remaining 2016 push the others out
Then, it consolidates more
Possible, but long term...
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624559208105800?thread_ts=1624559208.10
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2636
Bitcoin is not about decentralised nodes.
There cannot ever be more than 2016 nodes.
Oligarchy requires a scenario where nodes are not replaced...
PoS
And, if you cannot find at LEAST one block each difficulty period, you CANNOT be profitable
No profit, no mining.
The hash rate is set by all nodes, the difficulty adjusts even if there are nodes that are low powered and should not earn.
In that, if 3000 nodes provide hash, then the 2016 that earn must be more efficient or they lose money
The 984 that exist still cause difficulty adjustment even though they fail to ever get a block
In this, the remaining 2016 push the others out
Then, it consolidates more
Possible, but long term...
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624559208105800?thread_ts=1624559208.10
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2636
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
Note,
Bitcoin is not about decentralised nodes.
There cannot ever be more than 2016 nodes.
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624559208105800?thread_ts=1624559208.10
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2636
Bitcoin is not about decentralised nodes.
There cannot ever be more than 2016 nodes.
CSW
Jun 24, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624559208105800?thread_ts=1624559208.10
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2636
❤1
Encryption allows a party to validly argue that lost keys deem the data inaccessible.
But, there is no encryption in Bitcoin
More, no Blockchain system can be encrypted
You see... you validate clear data
CSW
Jun 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624924335433300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2643
But, there is no encryption in Bitcoin
More, no Blockchain system can be encrypted
You see... you validate clear data
CSW
Jun 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624924335433300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2643
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jun 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624924335433300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2643
Jun 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1624924335433300
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2643