OP_PushData <Data>
IF
       Value = <data>
OR
       Value = Hash(Hash<data>)

SPV can be extended to allow the option of supplying either the data or the hash of the data. Transactions can be constructed that differ because some parts of the branch have been pruned but not others allowing for a SPV node that hold the complete data while the miners hold only the hash.

I have to assume that people are not getting this yet

SPV can have a subset of the entire Blockchain linked using the block headers

By this, a complete set of data in an archive can be verified as well as made to be accessed quickly

The SPV node holding the data can charge for access.

The rate of access is something that people will pay for. if you want a quick computation, you pay more money.

Nodes that are holding selected components out of the entire Blockchain can still validate everything in the Blockchain that they hold without any of the other transactions that they don't care about or that they are not being paid to hold

You need to understand that when I say an overlay network can be created doesn't necessarily mean that it is separate from the Blockchain but rather that it has only a component of the entire set.

That is a subset of the entire set of blocks can be issued and served separately

I have to stop assuming people understand what I think is simple.

The section on SPV and Pruning are not mutually exclusive

Yes.
It is connected to miners, has a limited set of data

This is all, on chain.

The option is to have slow but forever. Fast but limited

You can choose what you serve up.

SPV does not need just to be your data, others can also save parts of the Blockchain

The process is Ble to be managed in any combination you can imagine

CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621358072009500?thread_ts=1621358072.009500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2367

CSW Slack SPV
https://t.me/joinchat/f719TCttk5Y2NzBk

CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621361792014900?thread_ts=1621361792.014900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2370

230 of which countries articular which law?

Protection For 'Good Samaritan' Blocking and Screening of Offensive Material

I am presuming at the moment you're talking about the Communications act 1934 telecommunications act amended 1996

USC forty-seven S 230?

if so, it is not abusing the rule of law it is the rule of law

Do I agree with the law, no but that's a different issue

now it is a stupid rather asinine law that protects the wrong people and provides negative outcomes but, it is a law and it is being applied

people should stand up against it was is rather stupid and an asinine law but that's a different matter and I am not American

It was a poorly drafted law

CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621361792014900?thread_ts=1621361792.014900&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2370

Is that the end?
https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1394767921591857154?s=19

CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621401651054800?thread_ts=1621401651.054800&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2373

"also notice that I'm not listed anywhere in that wiki thing".

CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621402725057700?thread_ts=1621402725.057700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2375

Craig Wright Patent - nChain
https://t.me/CSW_Patent

CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621405877060900

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2377

Cobra Bitcoin
https://t.me/joinchat/VNOTBvWDr9d8ZCTc

CSW
Jun 9, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591698313216200?thread_ts=1591698313.216200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2379

There is NO such thing as mixing to hide Bitcoin.

Laws of the following and Tracy through a mixture have existed for centuries. They are well and truly decided. Bitcoin is not anything like an account based system. It is indivisible property. Each and every single token can be tracked. You don't need to know which particular token is owned but if you receive stolen bitcoin, a percentage of what you may think you own actually belongs to someone else.

If Alice sends 9 bitcoin that are stolen (AS) and 9 that are okay (AG) to 3 addresses the following scenario occurs:
    AS (9) -     B (6)        
    AG (9) -     C (6)
            D (6)

Here, half of the bitcoin is tainted. The reality is that each of the UTXO's, B, C and D will have received stolen property. Each of the UTXO's, B, C and D will be able to be followed. The law of following and tracing applies. The true owner of the stolen bitcoin does not lose the bitcoin. They now have a claim against both Alice and the three recipients.

AML - Know your customer - all exists in law

Bitcoin is cash, cash rules apply

And, stollen goods remain stollen goods.

If there is notice (see Alert key) then, that is it

CSW
Jun 9, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591698313216200?thread_ts=1591698313.216200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2379

CSW Mixing BitCoin
https://t.me/joinchat/g60zvmNd7NY5Zjc0

CSW
Jun 12, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591983357446200?thread_ts=1591983357.446200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2382

Most importantly, not a single thread of PoSM matters.

No matter how much they attacked me, no matter how much they make false statements about me and no matter how much they tell social media and Twitter that I'm a bad man and all the other silly stories it won't matter a shred.

Their entire world is about to come crashing down.

Think about it.

There is no scenario here where bitcoin core does not end up writing changes to the Blockchain. There is no scenario here where this bitcoin is not going to be recovered. It does not matter how many times they mix it or try and move it, it will be subject to a court order and the developers in bitcoin core and bitcoin ABC will either implement changes or will be irrelevant.

The nodes will either implement changes that there directed to implement or their equipment will be seized. It is after all a monetary value that courts can award and if those miners don't want to do the act, they can pay the money in lieu of doing the act. They will find themselves out of money very quickly if they don't follow the court orders that are going to come ended up in contempt.

Then think about what gets told to their minions.

They have been advertising bitcoin is being a system outside of state and government, a system that allows you to commit crimes, a system that allows you to have money that no one can touch no matter what.

They promoted not as a system of digital electronic cash but of a system that is anonymous money that nobody can take from you. Nobody can take it even if they commit crimes with according to the false mantra that is promoted.

And soon, that entire fabrication comes crashing down.

CSW
Jun 12, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591983751447100?thread_ts=1591983751.447100&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2384

CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621433138127500?thread_ts=1621433138.127500&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2387

1/2
I should let people know that I have a Masters degree in financial econometrics from the University of London.

So, I understand the move that happens from shares to bonds when the interest rate increases.

We are going into a period after a lockdown where people are going to start interacting with the market all over again.

Goods and services have not been produced but will go into demand.

Cars haven't been sold in the last year and now people will be updating their vehicles.

The demand for vehicles will follow the same demand for other goods with the end result that inflation is going to rise.

This will occur over all goods and services as the market opens up

We have "printed money" in order to pretend to keep the economy going and now we're going to have people spending that money all at once

Inflation doesn't happen when you print money it happens when people spend the money that they have been given

When inflation starts to rise people move away from risky assets such as shares and go into safe assets such as bonds

The risskiest asset on the market as BTC

shares are going to continue to plunge

and those assets that call themselves Cryptocurrencies that are based on a pure concept of trading are about to find themselves having more than a haircut

by a haircut I mean razor across the throat for most of them

about 6 inches deep and through the jugular on both sides

For those of you who like a little bit of Latin like myself....

Carpe jugulum...

The real test of when bonds will kick in is around 4% by 5% it starts to beccome a bloodbath as people move over and the share price starts diminishing and bonds go uup in value

between four and 5% the system becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy

it is times like this that flush most of the industry and start the slide to what we saw in 1999 and between that period and 2001

At the end of this period, those organisations but have a viable business reason to exist that are looking at profit go up in value

This is where building something like nChain starts to pay off

Just as Amazon survived the crash twenty years ago, because they concenntrated on scale and achieving profitability and growing their business

so will a very few industries

The opening up of economies following a slowdown and a large injection of free capital will lead to a huge increase at least comparatively in inflation for a world that is used to nearly 0 inflation

all I can say is I wouldn't want to be something like coinbase right now

@Roh
This is a time when if you pick the right assets you will make a lot of money if you picked the wrong ones you will lose a lot of money.

Those who have no appetite for risk will go into bonds and they will still increase their value.

Those selecting risky assets will find that they either win big time or lose and if they try and balance between a spread

they are going to lose

So, you will find that if you have a managed portfolio it will go down in value

So, if you select the right growth asset that survives all of this you will find yourself very well-off if you don't you will find yourself bankrupt.

If you train hedge on those that have assets the negatives will still wipe out all of the gains from the growth asset.

So, there is no benefit in a distributed portfolio of shares or other risky assets including Cryptocurrencies right now.

If you choose right, you will win
if you choose wrong you will lose

I know where my investment will remain.

And I can assure you, at the end of all this I will be fine.

Then again contrary to what most people think, I managed to manage my risk.

I always understand all of the information that is available good and bad negative and positive hidden and not hidden.

CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621433138127500?thread_ts=1621433138.127500&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2387

2/2
When you see the hundred papers I'm about to publish on a variety of topics and you read just how much I have read in the last year, consider that for every book on history or other topics that are not related to my work there will be at least five or six times the amount of reading into topics directly related to what I'm doing and you might come to understand just how much research I really do.

But, even then I doubt it

The following is a weekly discussion post or rather not the following but the previous

in a weekly discussion where I am asked in a masters level and not my doctoral level what my opinion is on foreign policy in the altered states in the early Republic I go out there and I find source material and not just read textbooks read what the people at the time said

The problem is, it's not something that people should be doing for themselves

You're asking about how to manage risk and choose investments.

Tthe answer is to grow slowly and understand what you're building.

don't gamble

Stop expecting to be rich by the time you're thirty. If you are, good

The onnly way that you should be getting richer by the time you are thirty is if you invent something or your part of some company that invent something that has a way of changing the world and that doesn't mean Facebook because I mean changing it for the better the entire shit show that a silicon valley has created skewed idea of investment

Stop looking at other people with envy, be happy to spend fifty years working and if you want more, you willing to risk everything not in gambling but in building something

invest in yourself

the the best that you can possibly be in everything you do

When you have time spare, develop yourself in some way

Never believe people who tell you that formal education is a waste of time or money.

The reality is that you cannot truly learn without others to act as your foil

if you want to learn don't just take what is said but really learn

This is why I take courses I disagree with. not just so that I could say I disagree with them but to truly find the heart of the argument and in most things that are valid points to an argument, and to understand all of the aspects that are being argued

In this, you will not only learn something new but also how to argue and how to engage with people even if it's only at an academic and expert level

The simple answer is the best investment you will ever make is in yourself.

No matter what happens nobody can take away your education.

Even if you go bankrupt, there are opportunities that will be available for you if you are educated and trained and skilled.

CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621433138127500?thread_ts=1621433138.127500&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2387

CSW
May 20, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621509353240100?thread_ts=1621509353.240100&cid=C5131HKFX