"...on 10 February 2007. This is when I started creating bitcoin."
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2366
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2366
OP_PushData <Data>
IF
Value = <data>
OR
Value = Hash(Hash<data>)
SPV can be extended to allow the option of supplying either the data or the hash of the data. Transactions can be constructed that differ because some parts of the branch have been pruned but not others allowing for a SPV node that hold the complete data while the miners hold only the hash.
I have to assume that people are not getting this yet
SPV can have a subset of the entire Blockchain linked using the block headers
By this, a complete set of data in an archive can be verified as well as made to be accessed quickly
The SPV node holding the data can charge for access.
The rate of access is something that people will pay for. if you want a quick computation, you pay more money.
Nodes that are holding selected components out of the entire Blockchain can still validate everything in the Blockchain that they hold without any of the other transactions that they don't care about or that they are not being paid to hold
You need to understand that when I say an overlay network can be created doesn't necessarily mean that it is separate from the Blockchain but rather that it has only a component of the entire set.
That is a subset of the entire set of blocks can be issued and served separately
I have to stop assuming people understand what I think is simple.
The section on SPV and Pruning are not mutually exclusive
Yes.
It is connected to miners, has a limited set of data
This is all, on chain.
The option is to have slow but forever. Fast but limited
You can choose what you serve up.
SPV does not need just to be your data, others can also save parts of the Blockchain
The process is Ble to be managed in any combination you can imagine
CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621358072009500?thread_ts=1621358072.009500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2367
IF
Value = <data>
OR
Value = Hash(Hash<data>)
SPV can be extended to allow the option of supplying either the data or the hash of the data. Transactions can be constructed that differ because some parts of the branch have been pruned but not others allowing for a SPV node that hold the complete data while the miners hold only the hash.
I have to assume that people are not getting this yet
SPV can have a subset of the entire Blockchain linked using the block headers
By this, a complete set of data in an archive can be verified as well as made to be accessed quickly
The SPV node holding the data can charge for access.
The rate of access is something that people will pay for. if you want a quick computation, you pay more money.
Nodes that are holding selected components out of the entire Blockchain can still validate everything in the Blockchain that they hold without any of the other transactions that they don't care about or that they are not being paid to hold
You need to understand that when I say an overlay network can be created doesn't necessarily mean that it is separate from the Blockchain but rather that it has only a component of the entire set.
That is a subset of the entire set of blocks can be issued and served separately
I have to stop assuming people understand what I think is simple.
The section on SPV and Pruning are not mutually exclusive
Yes.
It is connected to miners, has a limited set of data
This is all, on chain.
The option is to have slow but forever. Fast but limited
You can choose what you serve up.
SPV does not need just to be your data, others can also save parts of the Blockchain
The process is Ble to be managed in any combination you can imagine
CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621358072009500?thread_ts=1621358072.009500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2367
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621358072009500?thread_ts=1621358072.009500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2367
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621358072009500?thread_ts=1621358072.009500&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2367
230 of which countries articular which law?
Protection For 'Good Samaritan' Blocking and Screening of Offensive Material
I am presuming at the moment you're talking about the Communications act 1934 telecommunications act amended 1996
USC forty-seven S 230?
if so, it is not abusing the rule of law it is the rule of law
Do I agree with the law, no but that's a different issue
now it is a stupid rather asinine law that protects the wrong people and provides negative outcomes but, it is a law and it is being applied
people should stand up against it was is rather stupid and an asinine law but that's a different matter and I am not American
It was a poorly drafted law
CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621361792014900?thread_ts=1621361792.014900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2370
Protection For 'Good Samaritan' Blocking and Screening of Offensive Material
I am presuming at the moment you're talking about the Communications act 1934 telecommunications act amended 1996
USC forty-seven S 230?
if so, it is not abusing the rule of law it is the rule of law
Do I agree with the law, no but that's a different issue
now it is a stupid rather asinine law that protects the wrong people and provides negative outcomes but, it is a law and it is being applied
people should stand up against it was is rather stupid and an asinine law but that's a different matter and I am not American
It was a poorly drafted law
CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621361792014900?thread_ts=1621361792.014900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2370
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621361792014900?thread_ts=1621361792.014900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2370
May 18, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621361792014900?thread_ts=1621361792.014900&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2370
Is that the end?
https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1394767921591857154?s=19
https://twitter.com/CobraBitcoin/status/1394767921591857154?s=19
"also notice that I'm not listed anywhere in that wiki thing".
CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621402725057700?thread_ts=1621402725.057700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2375
CSW
May 19, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1621402725057700?thread_ts=1621402725.057700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2375
There is NO such thing as mixing to hide Bitcoin.
Laws of the following and Tracy through a mixture have existed for centuries. They are well and truly decided. Bitcoin is not anything like an account based system. It is indivisible property. Each and every single token can be tracked. You don't need to know which particular token is owned but if you receive stolen bitcoin, a percentage of what you may think you own actually belongs to someone else.
If Alice sends 9 bitcoin that are stolen (AS) and 9 that are okay (AG) to 3 addresses the following scenario occurs:
AS (9) - B (6)
AG (9) - C (6)
D (6)
Here, half of the bitcoin is tainted. The reality is that each of the UTXO's, B, C and D will have received stolen property. Each of the UTXO's, B, C and D will be able to be followed. The law of following and tracing applies. The true owner of the stolen bitcoin does not lose the bitcoin. They now have a claim against both Alice and the three recipients.
AML - Know your customer - all exists in law
Bitcoin is cash, cash rules apply
And, stollen goods remain stollen goods.
If there is notice (see Alert key) then, that is it
CSW
Jun 9, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591698313216200?thread_ts=1591698313.216200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2379
Laws of the following and Tracy through a mixture have existed for centuries. They are well and truly decided. Bitcoin is not anything like an account based system. It is indivisible property. Each and every single token can be tracked. You don't need to know which particular token is owned but if you receive stolen bitcoin, a percentage of what you may think you own actually belongs to someone else.
If Alice sends 9 bitcoin that are stolen (AS) and 9 that are okay (AG) to 3 addresses the following scenario occurs:
AS (9) - B (6)
AG (9) - C (6)
D (6)
Here, half of the bitcoin is tainted. The reality is that each of the UTXO's, B, C and D will have received stolen property. Each of the UTXO's, B, C and D will be able to be followed. The law of following and tracing applies. The true owner of the stolen bitcoin does not lose the bitcoin. They now have a claim against both Alice and the three recipients.
AML - Know your customer - all exists in law
Bitcoin is cash, cash rules apply
And, stollen goods remain stollen goods.
If there is notice (see Alert key) then, that is it
CSW
Jun 9, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591698313216200?thread_ts=1591698313.216200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2379
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jun 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591698313216200?thread_ts=1591698313.216200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2379
Jun 9, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591698313216200?thread_ts=1591698313.216200&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2379
Most importantly, not a single thread of PoSM matters.
No matter how much they attacked me, no matter how much they make false statements about me and no matter how much they tell social media and Twitter that I'm a bad man and all the other silly stories it won't matter a shred.
Their entire world is about to come crashing down.
Think about it.
There is no scenario here where bitcoin core does not end up writing changes to the Blockchain. There is no scenario here where this bitcoin is not going to be recovered. It does not matter how many times they mix it or try and move it, it will be subject to a court order and the developers in bitcoin core and bitcoin ABC will either implement changes or will be irrelevant.
The nodes will either implement changes that there directed to implement or their equipment will be seized. It is after all a monetary value that courts can award and if those miners don't want to do the act, they can pay the money in lieu of doing the act. They will find themselves out of money very quickly if they don't follow the court orders that are going to come ended up in contempt.
Then think about what gets told to their minions.
They have been advertising bitcoin is being a system outside of state and government, a system that allows you to commit crimes, a system that allows you to have money that no one can touch no matter what.
They promoted not as a system of digital electronic cash but of a system that is anonymous money that nobody can take from you. Nobody can take it even if they commit crimes with according to the false mantra that is promoted.
And soon, that entire fabrication comes crashing down.
CSW
Jun 12, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591983751447100?thread_ts=1591983751.447100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2384
No matter how much they attacked me, no matter how much they make false statements about me and no matter how much they tell social media and Twitter that I'm a bad man and all the other silly stories it won't matter a shred.
Their entire world is about to come crashing down.
Think about it.
There is no scenario here where bitcoin core does not end up writing changes to the Blockchain. There is no scenario here where this bitcoin is not going to be recovered. It does not matter how many times they mix it or try and move it, it will be subject to a court order and the developers in bitcoin core and bitcoin ABC will either implement changes or will be irrelevant.
The nodes will either implement changes that there directed to implement or their equipment will be seized. It is after all a monetary value that courts can award and if those miners don't want to do the act, they can pay the money in lieu of doing the act. They will find themselves out of money very quickly if they don't follow the court orders that are going to come ended up in contempt.
Then think about what gets told to their minions.
They have been advertising bitcoin is being a system outside of state and government, a system that allows you to commit crimes, a system that allows you to have money that no one can touch no matter what.
They promoted not as a system of digital electronic cash but of a system that is anonymous money that nobody can take from you. Nobody can take it even if they commit crimes with according to the false mantra that is promoted.
And soon, that entire fabrication comes crashing down.
CSW
Jun 12, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1591983751447100?thread_ts=1591983751.447100&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2384
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel