CSW - Slack Channel

290 views@RamonQuesada 🌷, 16:19

1/2
What you going to soon find out is that most of what the other side have if not all is a combination of hearsay and character attacks. It is been difficult not responding on much of this for a period of over two years. But for instance, they talk about made up companies in the trust and said that they didn't exist because this is all they have.

This is the part that nobody wants you to look at.
Craig Wright R&D was the original name of the trust. Even though the trust was overseas, I registered these in Australia. As trustee I acted for it is an overseas entity. When they say how this didn't exist, or that the trust didn't exist, that is one little problem. The problem is that I registered it for an Australian business number.

Craig Wright R&D and the other entities as businesses representing the trusts have been registered since 29 February 2000. It was reformed under the trust business name for myself, remembering that a business called Craig Wright is not Craig Wright the person, on 10 February 2007. This is when I started creating bitcoin.

At that point I changed from DeMorgan to using myself as the trustee name. There are multiple other overseas trusts that were registered in Australia.

These all have records. These are not as difficult to check as people think either.

In January 2009 I formed a company called information defence in Australia.
In May 2009 I formed a company called integyrs in Australia.
In June 2009 with other people I formed a company called Greyfog in Australia. Others such as Cloudcroft all followed before Panopticrypt was formed in 2011.

All of these entities were held in trust. That is my shares were held in trust.

What people don't seem to understand is that the legal owner of an asset is the trustee and the trust maintains equitable ownership.

Tulip is simply the renamed version of the trust called Craig Wright R&D and DeMorgan at various times in history.

The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.

The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.

More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.

Bitcoin was created using what is known in legal circles as a unilateral contract, this is a concept that even a junior law student would understand. See carbolic Smoke Ball.

In 2009, there was no millions in bitcoin as some people seem to think. There was around $2 million worth of running computers that was cost coupled with further sunk costs. The value of the bitcoin was nothing. It was not the value of computer hardware, it was only the value that people would be willing to pay for it and that was zero right up until 2010.

The interesting thing that people don't understand in an analysis of partnership, if there was one with Dave, he would owe me money. There isn't of course but the reality is partners have to share cost and profit.

The distribution was created on the launch of bitcoin. It's not the distributor, that is a process. The contract is the issue, I am simply put the issuer.

The distinction here is that bitcoin is issued initially without value and hence in the manner it was issued there isn't all the problems people speculate about. By creating bitcoin and launching it the way I did, all of the increase in value was created after the launch. More importantly, it took a lot of money, time and machines to be able to enable all of this.

CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365