4) Command philosophy: stored sequences only
4.1 Command paths

- Primary: Earth → plant (S-band)
- Backup: Shelter → plant (VHF, limited authority)

Two independent command paths ensure survivability.

4.2 Commands invoke routines
Commands:
- do not move valves or rods directly
- invoke pre-verified stored routines
- ~200 sequences
- ~5 steps per sequence
- local interlocks enforced

This prevents unsafe command combinations.

4.3 Redundancy management

The onboard programmer:
- executes sequences
- switches to redundant hardware automatically
- can also be directed by Earth

Autonomy includes communications survivability, not just reactor safety.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlmyVpqk7mw

5) Autonomy
- maximize reliability
- include failure-analysis capability where practical
- avoid unnecessary adaptive complexity

Operational result:
- local self-protection
- graceful degradation
- continued communication under partial failure
- post-outage diagnosability

At polar sites, autonomy expands to include energy-aware scheduling, but safety logic remains dominant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9N1DZwP5jAU

End of Module 4

Small quizz below

Motherfucker
French Wizards Quizzes are too complex to be posted on Telegram

Question 1
In the 1963–1965 lunar nuclear power studies (WANL, CNLM, LESA, Westinghouse), which observation most strongly supports the claim that reactor physics was not the primary development risk?

A. The reactors were designed at relatively low thermal power compared to terrestrial plants.

B. The studies assumed fast-spectrum cores, which reduce moderator mass.

C. Shielding mass estimates were smaller than expected for lunar applications.

D. The presence of RTGs in parallel architectures reduced dependence on the reactor.

E. Criticality control and reactivity behavior were treated as baseline assumptions, while critiques focused on startup, corrosion, and heat rejection.

Question 2

Why does the lunar power plant design rely on stored command sequences executed locally instead of allowing Earth to directly control individual actuators?

A. Because direct actuator commands would require too much communication bandwidth.

B. Because Earth-based operators cannot see the plant’s real-time status clearly enough.

C. Because the plant must remain safe even if communications are delayed, interrupted, or unavailable.

D. Because onboard computers cannot accept direct commands.

E. Because the reactor must operate continuously without shutdown.

Question 3

At a south-polar rim site with ~70–90% solar illumination, which change most increases the importance of Module 4 autonomy features rather than reducing them?

A. The likelihood that the reactor will be cycled on and off, making reliable autonomous startup and restart logic critical.

B. Increased opportunity to run Earth-in-the-loop control.

C. Reduced need for radiators due to lower average reactor output.

D. The availability of solar power for telemetry transmission.

E. The use of RTGs as backup heat sources.

PA - DE - MD - VA - WV - OH - IN - MI - IL - KY - WI
1-24-26

FL - GA - SC - NC

Thickening the canopy

1-24-26

FL - Atlantic
1-24-26

The Pacific
1-24-26

Big Picture

Charlie Hatfield rolling in his grave rn

1-24-26

Big Picture

Analyze your section of the country and see what types of anomalies you can spot - send me anything you find interesting

⬇️⬇️
1-24-26

North - Northeast
1-24-26