Authentic Answers
412 subscribers
103 photos
200 videos
23 files
326 links
Offical Telegram Channel Of @AuthenticAnswers

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

✦ Authentic and True

From the Scholars to You ✦

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Dār as-Salafiyyah | دار السلفية (ابن أحمد)
#tawḥīd #ʿUdhr_bil_Jahl

Imām Al-Barbahārī said:

We do not expel anyone from the people of the qiblah from Islām until he rejects a verse from the Book of Allah, or rejects something from the narrations of the Messenger of Allah, or sacrifices to other than Allah, or prays to other than Allah.

If he does any of these, it becomes obligatory upon you to declare him outside of Islām. If he does none of that, he is a believing Muslim in name but not in reality.

[Sharḥ al-Sunnah by Imām Al-Barbahārī (41)]
8👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Shaykh al ‘Allāmah ‘Abdullah al Ghunaymān [may Allah preserve him] said:

«And the highness of Allah —Most High —is very clear. It has preceded that al Bukhārī, may Allah have mercy on him, indicated by what he recorded in this chapter that Allah’s highness — Most High — and His being above all creation are established by the Qurān, the Sunnah, the consensus, the intellect, and the Fitrah. As for their establishment through the Qurān and the Sunnah, then that is clear. As for consensus, he alluded to it with the story of Zaynab…

So there is no excuse for anyone who denies Allah’s highness, and for those who reject His highness and His attributes, for they say: these texts were not intended in their real and apparent understood meanings

‎شرح كتاب التوحيد من صحيح
‎البخاري للشيخ عبدالله الغنيمان جـ ١ صـ ٣٩٥،٣٩٨

https://t.me/salafiyyahnajd1
5👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Does the Excuse of Ignorance Mean We Call the Mushrikīn Muslims?

Shaykh Imam AbdulAziz ibn Baz (d. 1420 AH) said:

س: ما حكم من قال: إن من يدعون الأولياء الصالحين هم مسلمون؟

ج: حكمه أنه يبين له أن هذا كفر وضلال، إذا أصر صار كافراً مثلهم يبين له كفرهم وضلالهم،

Question:
What is the ruling on someone who says: “Those who call upon the righteous saints are Muslims”?

Answer:
His ruling is that it should be made clear to him that this (his claim that they are Muslims) is disbelief and misguidance. If he insists (on calling them Muslims), then he becomes a disbeliever like them.

Source:
Fatāwā Nūr ʿalā al-Darb by Ibn Bāz, Edited by: al-Shuwayʿir Vol: 2, Page: 96.
---
https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/11560/حكم-من-قال-بان-الذين-يدعون-الاولياء-مسلمون
---
https://shamela.ws/book/107/585

═════ ❁✦❁ ═════
YouTube Channel👇
https://m.youtube.com/@AuthenticAnswers

Telegram👇
https://t.me/AuthenticAnswers

WhatsApp 👇
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7Q4A1JJhzYiIdkCB41

TikTok 👇
https://www.tiktok.com/@authenticanswers

Internet Archives 👇
https://archive.org/details/@authenticanswers

#quotes #takfeer #iman #kufr #murjiah #excuse_of_ignorance
8
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
الولاء والبراء إنما يكون في كتاب الله وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم وعقيدة سلف الأمة ، فلا يجوز لأحد أن يوالي ويعادي في الأشخاص أيا كانوا ، والجماعات الحزبية

(الإخوان المسلمون والسرورية والتبليغ وغيرهم ) والفرق

الضالة ؛كالمرجئة والخوارج ، والطرق الصوفية المحدثة ، والقبائل ،

فكل هذا من التفريق بين الأمة وامتحانها بما لم يأمر الله به ولا رسوله ،

وإنما الواجب أن يقدم من قدمه الله ورسوله ؛ ويؤخر من أخره الله ورسوله ، ويحب ماأحبه الله ورسوله ، ويبغض ماأبغضه الله ورسوله ٠

انظر / الوصية الكبرى لابن تيمية (ص١٥٥-١٥٦) ٠
قناة الدكتور أيمن العنقري
الولاء والبراء إنما يكون في كتاب الله وسنة رسوله صلى الله عليه وسلم وعقيدة سلف الأمة ، فلا يجوز لأحد أن يوالي ويعادي في الأشخاص أيا كانوا ، والجماعات الحزبية (الإخوان المسلمون والسرورية والتبليغ وغيرهم ) والفرق الضالة ؛كالمرجئة والخوارج ، والطرق الصوفية…
Shaykh Ayman al ‘Anqari said:

Loyalty and disavowal (al-walāʾ wa-al-barāʾ)
must be based on the Book of Allāh, the Sunnah of His Messenger ﷺ, and the creed of the Salaf of this Ummah.

It is not allowed for anyone to give loyalty or show enmity based on people — whoever they are — or based on partisan groups like the Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwān al-Muslimūn), the Surūrīs, the Tablīghīs, or others.

Nor is it allowed with misguided sects like the Murjiʾah, the Khawārij, the innovated Ṣūfī orders, or even tribal loyalties.

All of this is from dividing the Ummah and testing it with things Allāh and His Messenger ﷺ never commanded.

What is wajib is to give precedence to those whom Allāh and His Messenger gave precedence to, delay those whom Allāh and His Messenger delayed, love what Allāh and His Messenger love, and hate what Allāh and His Messenger hate.

See: al-Waṣiyyah al-Kubrā by Ibn Taymiyyah (p. 155–156).

═════ ❁✦❁ ═════
YouTube Channel👇
https://m.youtube.com/@AuthenticAnswers

Telegram👇
https://t.me/AuthenticAnswers

WhatsApp 👇
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7Q4A1JJhzYiIdkCB41

TikTok 👇
https://www.tiktok.com/@authenticanswers

Internet Archives 👇
https://archive.org/details/@authenticanswers

#khawarij #murjiah #bidah
3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Authentic Answers
Photo
Is It Obligatory to Declare the Mushrikīn Disbelievers — And What Is the Ruling on Doubting Them?

Is There Any Difference Between Jews, Christians, and Those Who Claim Islam While Committing Shirk?

Shaykh Ṣāliḥ al-Fawzān said:

Whoever doubts the kufr of the mushrikīn in general whether they are idol worshipers, Jews, Christians, or those who ascribe themselves to Islam while committing shirk with Allah you must believe in their kufr (meaning in those who have doubt its shirk).

For everyone who commits shirk with Allah and worships alongside Him anything else, such as trees, stones, idols, statues, graves, or tombs, is a mushrik kāfir, and it is obligatory to judge them as disbelievers, even if they claim Islam and say, “Lā ilāha illa Allāh, Muḥammad Rasūl Allāh.

Because shirk nullifies the two testimonies, contradicts Islam, and corrupts tawḥīd.

So it is obligatory upon the Muslim to declare takfīr on the mushrikīn who worship other than Allah whether they are Arabs or non-Arabs, whether they are Jews, Christians, or people who claim to be Muslims.

This is a belief that is not open for compromise.

Whoever does not declare the mushrikīn disbelievers becomes an apostate kāfir like them, because he treats īmān and kufr as the same making no distinction between them and this makes him a kāfir.

The same ruling applies to whoever doubts the kufr of the mushrikīn and says, “I do not know if they are kuffār or not.”

Such a person becomes a kāfir because he is hesitant in his dīn, wavering between kufr and īmān, and does not differentiate between them.

Source:
Sharḥ Nawāqiḍ al-Islām — page 80

═════ ❁✦❁ ═════
YouTube Channel👇
https://m.youtube.com/@AuthenticAnswers

Telegram👇
https://t.me/AuthenticAnswers

WhatsApp 👇
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7Q4A1JJhzYiIdkCB41

TikTok 👇
https://www.tiktok.com/@authenticanswers

Internet Archives 👇
https://archive.org/details/@authenticanswers

#quotes #takfeer #iman #kufr #murjiah #excuse_of_ignorance #al_fawzan
5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Imām ‘Abdul Rahman bin Hasan [may Allah have mercy on him] said:

«And He said regarding him that he (peace be upon him) said:
“And I will leave you and those you invoke other than Allah.” (Maryam 19:48)
So it is obligatory to separate from shirk and its people by disavowing both, as He explicitly stated:
“There has already been for you an excellent pattern in Ibrāhīm and those with him, when they said to their people, ‘Indeed, we are disassociated from you and from whatever you worship other than Allah. We have denied you, and there has appeared between us and you animosity and hatred forever until you believe in Allah alone.’” (Al Mumtahanah 60:4)
And those “with him” are the Messengers, as mentioned by Ibn Jarīr.

And this verse contains everything our Shaykh (may Allah have mercy on him) mentioned: urging toward Tawhīd, negating shirk, showing allegiance to the people of Tawhīd, and declaring takfīr upon the one who abandons it by committing shirk that contradicts it. For whoever commits shirk has abandoned Tawhīd, since they are two opposites that cannot coexist, so whenever shirk is present, Tawhīd is absent.

And He the Most High said regarding the condition of the one who commits Shirk:

“And he has made for Allah equals to mislead [people] from His way. Say, ‘Enjoy your disbelief for a little; indeed, you are of the companions of the Fire.’”
(Az-Zumar 39:8)

Thus Allah declared him a disbeliever for taking equals, and they are partners in worship. And the verses like this are many. Thus one is not a monotheist except by negating shirk, disavowing it, and making takfīr of whoever commits it.»

الدرر السنية في الأجوبة النجدية جـ ٢ صـ ٢٠٤

https://t.me/salafiyyahnajd1
3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A good practical example:

A brother sent this from his work training.

Ignorance of these rules is negligence, and negligence does not excuse a person in the Shariah or even in secular law from being held accountable.

At the very least, we would say that he is negligent and call him such, even if no disciplinary action is taken.

But the Murjiah do not accept this. They refuse even to describe him as negligent, despite the fact that he violated the rules.

═════ ❁✦❁ ═════
YouTube Channel👇
https://m.youtube.com/@AuthenticAnswers

Telegram👇
https://t.me/AuthenticAnswers

WhatsApp 👇
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7Q4A1JJhzYiIdkCB41

TikTok 👇
https://www.tiktok.com/@authenticanswers

Internet Archives 👇
https://archive.org/details/@authenticanswers

#murjiah #iman #kufr
👍3