This is now CONFIRMED to be COUNTY WIDE in Dallas County, TX. We also have strong evidence that it happened in other states. More to come.

https://rumble.com/v1txuhk-poll-pads-add-voters-in-dallas-tx-precinct-after-polls-are-closed.html

Alaska - 1/30th the amount of votes as Florida.

Still counting. Wonder why?

Oh, the votes coming by mail were more favorable for your opponent than you expected in a state that legally runs election counts for a week?

When will you guys start calling this third world trash what it is? They are pre-counting YOUR votes and taking a week to get around it.

THE STEAL: It Happened Again - Votes from Third Party Candidate Disappear Hours After Being Reported

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/steal-happened-votes-third-party-candidate-disappear-hours-reported/

Listen to Obama in 2008 talking about voting machines and election fraud.

Our election system in America is corrupted, completely broken, and every single American should be totally embarrassed for our country right now, I don’t care which political party affiliation you are. Anyone who tells you any different is being dishonest. There should be a 100 percent hand recount of every single election that just occurred this past Tuesday to restore confidence. Otherwise, we stand to lose the USofA as we know it.

A columnist in Nevada wanted to test the integrity of their mail in ballot signature verification checks so he got 11 voters to put his signature instead of theirs on their ballot. 6 we’re accepted as valid. Mail in ballots are a threat to fair elections!
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/victor-joecks/victor-joecks-clark-county-accepted-my-signature-on-6-mail-ballot-envelopes-2674184/

Karizona - What would you do if you were a thief?

You have a serious predicament and need to choose between two equally bad scenarios. What would you do? (Seriously, Let us know in the comments)

1. Cheat harder, (potentially) get caught and (potentially) lose everything

2. Don't cheat harder and lose everything

———

As we pointed out in a previous post based on the primary results, there is no way any Republican candidates will lose their respective races. The Republicans have a 18% margin over the Democrats.

———

What is astounding here, is how effective the media is at making people believe all these races are tight, when in reality, there is nothing further from the truth. In a free and fair election all the Republican candidates would have already won, declared victory and their opponents gracefully conceded defeat.

So what is taking them so long to count the votes?

They need time to figure out their best move. The move that will minimize the damage.

That is why I believe the most likely scenarios is option 1.

They know the media will provide them with enough cover, and the judiciary will stone-wall any challenges.

(Side note: Election results should never be certified until the whole chain of custody can be categorically and entirely validated from start to finish. The implications of this are profound and it will require a post of its own. Suffice it to say our ability to verify the full chain of custody is currently ZERO. In fact it is worse that zero. It's negative. The whole election system is designed to be vulnerable and make it impossible to easily and quickly verify the integrity of the whole chain of custody. There is just enough semblance of "security" designed into the system to re-assure casual onlookers that everything is "safe and secure". Nothing could be further from the truth. Make no mistake, it is intentionally #BadByDesign.)

———

If they decided to go with option 2, it will be because they have figured out a way, and possibly taken the necessary measures (over the week end) to destroy as much evidence from 2020 AND 2022 as possible.

What else should we be anticipating?

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

Chain of Custody - Is the only thing that really matters

Being able to quickly and easily verify the full chain of custody is the only thing that really matters when it comes to certifying the integrity of the election results. Everything else is noise.

# Guidelines

Here are some guidelines to achieve this:

- Keep the system as simple as possible (but not simpler) so everyone who participates fully understand how everything works and can be assured their vote will be properly counted

- Everyone should be able to verify the integrity of the chain of custody for themselves (without having to trust an intermediary)

- Verifying the chain of custody must be quick, easy AND complete.

- Anything that adds extra complexity should be removed. This automatically disqualifies mail-in voting, machines, large precincts and ballot layouts with too many races

- Upholding integrity becomes harder over longer periods of time, so elections should be held on one day, not weeks

- Results should be published within hours of the polls closing

———

We need an election system that has no apparent flaws. This should be a non-negotiable.

If there are perceived flaws there can be no trust.

If there are simple means of addressing a flaw, they should be immediately implemented.

People should be encouraged to find and discuss potential flaws in the system, or at least explain how "in theory" a potential vulnerability could exist.

These concerns must never be dismissed but properly addressed so everyone can have full confidence in the election system.

# In Summary

Being able to categorically and completely validate the chain of custody is the ONLY thing that matters when it comes to election integrity. If you can NOT quickly and easily validate the entire chain of custody, you really do NOT have a free and fair election. Period. (No matter how much gaslighting you are subjected to.)

We must demand to see tangible proof of this after each election.

An election can NOT be certified until the chain of custody is proven to be secure.

⚠️ Currently, there is no way of proving, let alone verifying that the chain of custody is secure from start to finish. ⚠️

👉 This is a monumental problem that needs to receive more public attention.

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

CAUSE OF ARIZONA’S MASSIVE 30% MACHINE TABULATOR FAILURE IDENTIFIED-DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECTING REPUBLICANS AND ASSURING DELAY IN COUNTING

Expert, Dan Sundin, has honed in on the likely cause of why 30% of the tabulators in Arizona could not process the majority of Republican ballots on Election Day.

During the 2022 General Election, the election programming was set up to process 20” long ballots. This was a change from the 2020 General and the 2022 Primary ballots, which were 19” long - an inch shorter.

So when Arizona election officials say they don’t know what happened on November 8th because everything was the same as Arizona’s primary - this isn’t true.

The ballot size wasn’t the same.

Why does that matter?

The sample ballot pdf’s published by Maricopa County and the Runbeck-printed ballots used for mail-in voting were correctly made to to 20” length in the 2022 General. So there have been no problems processing Democrat-leaning, mail-in ballots.

However, the ballot on demand printers used for in-person voting only have 19" trays that contain 19” ballot paper.

This means, that for in-person voting, the official ballot image had to be compressed to fit on smaller paper than it was built for.

Compression causes the ink to be a little lighter than it should be, and thus affects how the tabulators read the ballot.

Maricopa County directed some voting centers to increase how dark the printing was, and this helped the problem somewhat.

The bigger problem, however, is that compressing the image skews where the ovals end up on the paper. The tabulators use a digital map to know where to look for votes. If the ovals aren’t where they belong, the tabulator won’t be able to find them, or will misread them. This problem will cause the tabulators to improperly read ovals, or not be able to read the ballot at all.

This is what most likely caused the high rejection rate and why so many ballots ended up having to be set aside in Drawer 3 - which led to another set of problems, and a lot of delay.

We all know delay favors fraud.

The equipment tabulating ballots at the MCTEC center is different than the Dominion ICP tabulators used for in-person, Election Day voting. Those scanners are more forgiving for shrunk/skewed ballots and are able to be manually adjudicated by election workers. That’s likely why we’re not seeing the same problems in the processing of ballots which were cast early in-person.

It’s clear that whatever logic and accuracy testing was done in Arizona to get ready for Election Day wasn’t a real world test.

The logic and accuracy test used pristine, pre-printed ballots that were professionally printed offsite and fed into the Dominion ICP tabulators to make sure they were working.

A real logic and accuracy test, however, would have used ballots printed on-site by the ballot-on-demand printers. That would have been a genuine end-to-end test, and it would have caught what ended up being a massive problem.

Since Republicans are more likely to vote in person on Election Day, they were disproportionately affected and disenfranchised by the incompetence of the election officials. Failing to correctly test the system to understand the effect of changing the ballot size was a fatal error. This amounted to a massive violation of voters’ constitutional rights, which requires equal protection under the law.

This issue didn’t affect the Democrat-leaning mail-in ballots. The Democrat-leaning, early in-person ballots are processed at the MCTEC Center on equipment more able to process the skewed images and manually adjudicate problem ballots.

We don’t know if all this was intentional or not. But the poorly-designed process and failure to properly test equipment under real world conditions have led to yet another third-world election in Arizona.

It’s worth noting that hand counting would not be affected in the slightest by a skewed ballot. Get rid of the machines.

Expert, Dan Sundin, who provided the analysis above, has over 40 years experience in information systems technology and was a key contributor to New Mexico’s 500 + page comprehensive election fraud report. We are grateful for his continued efforts.

Oh Orange County SOE Bill Cowles has some splaining to do...

https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/01/fl-democrat-election-official-claimed-he-didnt-know-anything-about-ballot-harvesting-problems-this-video-says-otherwise/

Orange County SOE Bill Cowles is on video acknowledging ballot harveting and just warning that the drop boxes will be under surveillance.