Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
ππ πππππΏ π½π π½πππππ ππ πΏπππ πππ πππππ ππππππππ ππππππ πΌππΏ ππΌππ πππ πΎπππππππππΎππ
β Theodore John Kaczynski
β Theodore John Kaczynski
π₯8
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
Primitive life was more fulfilling because their lives were woven into community, nature and and purposeful tasks such as hunting and providing for your family. Primitive man was not burdened by alienating work, chronic stress or complex societal hierarchies. Their needs were simple, their relationships direct, and their sense of purpose came naturally from survival, cooperation and belonging.
Return to the natural ways of life.
Return to the natural ways of life.
π4π―2π₯1
Forwarded from ANTI TECH TALK
"Technological society leads to increasing numbers of people who cannot adapt to the inhuman rhythm of modern life with its emphasis on specialization. A class of people is growing up who are unexploitable because they are not worth employing even for the minimum wage. Technological progress makes whole categories of people useless without making it possible to support them with the wealth produced by the progress."
- Jacques Ellul
- Jacques Ellul
π₯4
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
New technologies often appear optional when first introduced, but eventually society restructures itself in such a way that these technologies become necessary just to survive. Take the internet for example, it would be almost impossible to get by without using the internet. Even if one completely eliminates internet usage in his personal life, most jobs still require internet usage. There is simply no way of getting around the internet. The same would apply for transhumanism. Likely even moreso, since the changes brought by transhumanism are even greater than those which were brought by the internet. Even if in the highly unlikely scenario that transhumanism was optional, due to it increasing the efficiency of the human by such a large magnitude, individuals who embraced transhumanism will be propagandized as superior, with those remaining in their natural forms socially ostracized. We see this today as those without the newest belongings, especially those that are technological, as less than others.
π₯5
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
[...] It is not the primitive man, who has used his body daily for practical purposes, who fears the deterioration of age, but the modern man, who has never had a practical use for his body beyond walking from his car to his house. It is the man whose need for the power process has been satisfied during his life who is best prepared to accept the end of that life.
ISAIF, paragraph 71.
ISAIF, paragraph 71.
π₯7
The changes in the climate can be used for lowering the faith in Industrial society and technology. Whether the climate is primary driven by humans or largely natural processes doesn't matter. Our civilization can't adapt to the fast changes and soon problems like overpopulation, crowding, lack of resources, widespread diseases and pests will show as unavoidable obstacles to the System. This is the time that we should establish our revolutionary cells and start spreading propaganda. In the desperate moments people will be desperate for solutions and we will give them the right solution!
β€βπ₯3
This is a chat for everyone seriously believing in strictly anti tech ideas. Read the rules before joining
The waste that Industrial society creates will plague humanity for centuries to come. This is clear example how the system doesn't care about human health and freedom but work autonomously for it's own survival. There will be a time when only the highest mountains will have clear water sources , because only there will not be leaking of the various toxins and waste of the Industry.
Revolutionaries should, again, use this as argument against Technological society and the deadly consequences that it creates for the wilderness and humans. We should be ready to survive such conditions and help the people who are willing to fight against the System and it's loyal supporters!
Revolutionaries should, again, use this as argument against Technological society and the deadly consequences that it creates for the wilderness and humans. We should be ready to survive such conditions and help the people who are willing to fight against the System and it's loyal supporters!
π₯1
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
184. Nature makes a perfect counter-ideal to technology for several reasons. Nature (that which is outside the power of the system) is the opposite of technology (which seeks to expand indefinitely the power of the system). Most people will agree that nature is beautiful; certainly it
has tremendous popular appeal. The radical environmentalists already hold an ideology that exalts nature and opposes technology.30 It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical
utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. *Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating.*
has tremendous popular appeal. The radical environmentalists already hold an ideology that exalts nature and opposes technology.30 It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical
utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. *Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating.*
π₯1π1
Forwarded from Ted Kaczynski
The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
π₯5
https://cleantechtimes.com/farming-is-becoming-impossible-britains-800m-harvest-disaster-sparks-fears-of-a-collapsing-food-system/?amp=1
After the collapse of Industrial civilization,especially agriculture and food industry in general,the only option for many people will be hunter gathering at least in the first years of the collapse. Many of the livestock animals in farms will die from starvation or predators and these who survive thankfully to humans protecting them will be small percentage due to the return of bushes and forests in the lands used for agriculture.
This consequently will create a situation in which people in the mountain or forest regions will rely mostly on what they hunt or gather. The Anarcho-primitivist dream is achievable if we attack the right target,and this is the modern industrial agriculture practices,geo modified organisms and biotechnologies
After the collapse of Industrial civilization,especially agriculture and food industry in general,the only option for many people will be hunter gathering at least in the first years of the collapse. Many of the livestock animals in farms will die from starvation or predators and these who survive thankfully to humans protecting them will be small percentage due to the return of bushes and forests in the lands used for agriculture.
This consequently will create a situation in which people in the mountain or forest regions will rely mostly on what they hunt or gather. The Anarcho-primitivist dream is achievable if we attack the right target,and this is the modern industrial agriculture practices,geo modified organisms and biotechnologies
Cleantech Times
Farming is becoming impossibleβ: Britainβs Β£800m harvest disaster sparks fears of a collapsing food system - Cleantech Times
Britain has faced one of its toughest farming years in decades, with heat and drought causing huge damage to the countryβs crops. The losses
π₯3
"Getting back to your letter, now, I notice that you asked, βwhat do we do to get this revolution to go in the right direction?β I wish there were a simple answer to that question, but there isnβt, so all I can do is give you a few ideas. If and when the system collapses, whether it does so spontaneously or through revolution, I think itβs a pretty safe bet that there will be violence, and that physical force will play an important role in determining what group, what ideology comes out on top. I am by no means an admirer of Mao Zedong, but I think he was quite right when he said that βpower grows out of the barrel of a gun.β If the extreme right β or any other groups, for that matter β arm themselves, then I have to hope that the people who support our ideas will be better armed and better prepared to fight than their rivals are.
But, what is much more important, we will have to out-recruit the rival groups. That is, we have to try to get more people on our side than they have. My guess is that the real, incorrigible racists and extreme right-wingers are a very small minority, and that many of their followers are with them more-or-less by accident. I suspect that many of these followers are people who are deeply dissatisfied with the present system, but arenβt very bright and get involved in nazi or similar movements just because they donβt know where else to turn. It may be that if we reach out to these people we may be able to recruit some of them to our point of view."
-Ted Kaczynski
But, what is much more important, we will have to out-recruit the rival groups. That is, we have to try to get more people on our side than they have. My guess is that the real, incorrigible racists and extreme right-wingers are a very small minority, and that many of their followers are with them more-or-less by accident. I suspect that many of these followers are people who are deeply dissatisfied with the present system, but arenβt very bright and get involved in nazi or similar movements just because they donβt know where else to turn. It may be that if we reach out to these people we may be able to recruit some of them to our point of view."
-Ted Kaczynski
π₯5
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The system will inevitably destroy itself, but do not take this a sense of security. The collapse may be hindered by opposing forces that will try to reinforce the defense of the techno-industrial system. The collapse will only happen when the system is sufficiently unstable, and our movement strong enough to strike. We will have to out-recruit the rival groups. That is, we have to try to get more people on our side than they have.
π₯7
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
Benson, Ragnar _ Ragnars Urban Survival.pdf
29.6 MB
This one is definitely worth reading
π₯3
Forwarded from ANTI-TECH APOSTLESπ οΈ
"A great revolution is brewing. What this means is that the necessary preconditions for revolution are being created. Whether the revolution will become a reality will depend on the courage, determination, persistence, and effectiveness of revolutionaries".
- Theodore John Kaczynski (The Road To Revolution)
- Theodore John Kaczynski (The Road To Revolution)
β€βπ₯10
Contrary to what some politically correct scientists will tell you,the reason why human population is increasing is largely due to the industrial progress and the increase in food production in particular. I can't stop hearing about the idea(raised by social justice "environmenalists") that we somehow will help the environment if we find a way to feed all the people on Earth, which is impossible. Even if we somehow manage to feed all the excess population in the world we will not solve the world hunger , because these populations, following natural reproduction dynamics, will increase,due to the available new resources. The only way to stop the unnatural human growth is to destroy the means that create or transport food supply! This is not Misanthropy,this is reality!
π₯9
ANTI TECH TALK
foodpop(1).pdf
This is very good study proving t above stated facts. Not only this ,but shows the correlation with increased food production, increased human population and the deterioration of food, water, land, air resources and biodiversity.
Forwarded from Anti Tech Revolt π²
"Of these concerns, climate change is perhaps the most troubling. A 2009 report by a UN affiliated think tank projects that, without drastic migration actions, climate change will cause "Much of civilization to collapse", for large proportions of the world. Here we have the ultimate irony: a technological civilization created and powered by fossil fuels, which ends up being so disruptive to the global climate that it destroyes itself. Along the way we will have eliminated thousands of other species, and put our own existence at risk. Perhaps a kind of cosmic justice is at work after all.
Theodore John Kaczynski (Technological Slavery)
Theodore John Kaczynski (Technological Slavery)
π₯5
"Civilization is capable of making Earth uninhabitable for humans and the majority of living species. Historical civilizations self-destructed before causing global damage, but global industrial civilization has been far more damaging than its predecessors. We no longer have the option of waiting it out. There is nowhere left to go. Civilization will collapse one way or another, and it's our job to insure that something is left afterward." -Deep Green resistance , Derrick Jenson
π₯3π2