This can be utilized for main answer writing, and you can learn a forward-looking approach from this video.

While reviewing the answer sheets of various aspirants, including the topper and those who didn't make it to the mains result list, I observed that many candidates possess good content but struggle with proper representation according to the question's requirements.

Some candidates include content that was not even asked, failing to adhere to the specified dimensions. It's crucial to focus on what the question demands, rather than writing everything one knows.

Others write in a disorganized manner, lacking a timeline, proper structure, and the use of relevant keywords. In contrast, the topper writes succinctly, addressing all dimensions specified in the question.

Some aspirants forget to substantiate their arguments, neglecting to provide examples where needed. It's essential to support points with relevant examples.

Lastly, some candidates mention incorrect or outdated data, emphasizing the importance of using accurate information.

Introductions and conclusions serve as the first and last impressions. Some aspirants make a poor impression by writing haphazardly.