Footage showing the impact of 4 Iranian ballistic missiles to U.S. military infrastructure at Muwaffaq Salti Airbase in Jordan.

The IRGC announced targeting the USS "Delbert D. Black" and USS "John Paul Jones" guided-missile destroyers with anti-ship ballistic missiles, which they claim suffered "significant damage", in response to the earlier U.S. attacks on Iranian oil tankers.

—❗️🇸🇦/🇾🇪/🇵🇰 Pakistan’s Defense Minister: ‘If Yemen’s attacks against Saudi Arabia continue, we may be forced to activate the mutual defense treaty’

@Middle_East_Spectator

Large-scale Russian attack on Mykolaiv City.

At least 11 S8000 Banderol cruise missiles and 2 operator-controlled Geran-4 jet-drones were used in the attack, resulting in large fires breaking out.

Earlier in the night, Approximately 6 Russian KAB glide-bombs struck a target just south of the city.

The Jordanian Army falsely claimed that 18 out of 20 Iranian ballistic missiles were shot down, while 2 others fell in "open areas".

This is despite there being a video of 4 Iranian ballistic missile impacts to Muwaffaq Salti Airbase, and confirmation of strikes in Aqaba, southern Jordan.

Additionally, it is known that at least 30 ballistic missiles were launched by Iran in today's attack, which could suggest that at least 12 impacted.

Heavy Iranian Air Force fighter jet activity over Tehran right now.

The IRGC released footage showing the launch of 3-4 anti-ship ballistic missiles towards the U.S. Navy USS "Delbert D. Black" and USS "John Paul Jones" guided-missile destroyers, which they claim suffered "significant damage".

A fire can be seen burning in Novorossiysk, Russia, following Ukrainian long-range UAV strikes.

Targets included the port, the government prosecutor's office, and the oil terminal.

An Iranian ballistic missile bypasses several Patriot PAC-3 interceptor missiles before striking a U.S. military base in Jordan.

Iskander-M threat from Bryansk.

Unconfirmed reports of an Iranian drone strike on an oil tanker docked off the coast of Dubai, UAE.

Seeing 'mappers' trying to justify themselves for not showing Ukrainian gains north of Lyman over the past ~3 months is honestly hilarious.

Especially when their excuse is 'I knew about it, but I didn't show it due to OpSec... AMK showed the Ukrainian gains, therefore he is a Russian propagandist'

Bro, just say you didn't know and your map is fantasy 😇

Also, basic map specific 'OpSec' against a power with satellites, a vast intelligence network, a crazy thing called a radio.... and units dedicated to frontline location and situations.... Give me a break 🤣

The whole OPSEC thing is real at the beginning of these operations, as it can create some delays in Russian responses, but beyond that the main "OPSEC" consideration is not showing individual positions Ukraine captured to keep the soldiers safe. Anyone who is mapping these counteroffensives without using their own information from the ground is not putting anyone at risk.

I covered the counteroffensive from the day after it was launched on May 22, and made regular updates on it throughout the next 3.5 months up to now. While the chronology is likely not perfect due to a lack of information, and the frontline will never be 100% accurate, I was still one of the only people in the world who did this. And the thing is, I probably only put around 80-100 hours of work into these Lyman posts during the 3.5-month period. Sure, I had to dig deeper due to the OPSEC regime in place, but it was absolutely doable. Technically anyone else could have done this, but it was only really me and a couple other people (Suriyak and Thorkill).

There's a fine balance with this sort of stuff. Yes, OPSEC is very real in today's war - far more so than in 2022, 2023, 2024, or even 2025. When very few soldiers are actually on the "line of contact", mapping a position as controlled based on your info from the ground can actually endanger them. But after the higher Russian command is aware of the counteroffensive, pretending it's not happening is useless, and only mapping precise control zones is the dangerous part. So I do understand why such an influential mapping project like Deepstate didn't post any updates on it as even if they were to purposefully show a very simplified or incorrect frontline, it could still be used by some lower command for targeting positions, potentially putting Ukrainian soldiers at risk. But ordinary OSINTers aren't going to change anything as long as they are purely using open sources for their mapping, like me.

In my opinion, there is another reason for this beyond the very real issues surrounding OPSEC. If you map a 4-month-long counteroffensive in a single update, even if you specify that it took place over 4 months, it still creates a subconscious illusion for some that it was a lightning counteroffensive. It also means that the heavy casualties taken are largely ignored.

I wonder if the U.S. will respond to today's massive Iranian ballistic missile attack, or if they will prove once again that Iranian deterrence is extremely effective.

The interceptor missile stockpiles keep getting lower and lower, and production rates are nowhere near being able to keep up.

It's crazy to think that the U.S. burned through over 2 months worth of Patriot PAC-3 interceptors during today's massive Iranian ballistic missile attack.