Just IELTS
880 subscribers
17 photos
2 videos
221 files
210 links
๐Ÿ”Enhance your skills๐Ÿ”
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ–Š โ€˜We should introduce laws to make businesses and state services employ equal numbers of male and female workers in every department or area of the company.โ€™
How far do you support this idea? Give reasons for your answer, and support your essay with ideas and examples from your own experience.

The issue of equality for men and women at work is still widely debated, despite the extensive legislation that now exists in many countries. Personally, I do not feel that imposing a numerical target for gender is a sensible idea, and I will explain why.

Firstly, we have to consider whether equal numbers of men and women really wish to do every job which is available. For example, few women wish to be airline pilots, and only a minority of school teachers are male. If we impose a law on airlines or schools, where will they find the people to fill these posts willingly? Furthermore, there is the huge issue of the existing workforce. Would it be right to dismiss a worker because he or she is of a certain gender, in order to create a statistically perfect balance? The effects would be disastrous for many hard-working people. Finally, I believe we should find ways to encourage equality of opportunity through support and guidance, rather than top-down legislation. For instance, improved child care facilities and subsidies would probably encourage more women into parts of the workforce which may currently be difficult to enter.

I do understand the opposing view, which is that legislation is the quickest and most effective way to achieve gender equality. Nevertheless, I feel that the disruptive effects of โ€˜overnightโ€™ legislation would destabilise society and hinder many peopleโ€™s prospects.

Overall, I believe that equality is an excellent goal for society to strive for. Above all, though, I think that this needs to be a gradual process, based on careful support rather than sudden legislation.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
๐Ÿ–Š โ€œPrison is the only truly effective form of punishment, because it separates criminals from society.โ€
To what extent do you support this view?

There is no doubt that we need to find effective forms of punishment for criminals, and also find ways to protect citizens from the threat of crime. I personally feel that prison is only one of a range of options we should use, and is not always the most effective.

Firstly, I do not accept that all criminals need to be separated from society. Juvenile and minor offenders can be punished through fines, community service or other non-custodial means. This is cheaper than prison, and prevents the damage to the criminalโ€™s family which in itself could generate further social problems. Furthermore, by keeping these small-scale criminals in society, we can try to rehabilitate them, for example through training or education programmes. This will help to reduce re-offending in future.

Besides this, if offenders are believed to be a threat to their fellow citizens, there are ways of containing them such as electronic tagging, curfews or regular reporting to the police. Such methods have been shown to be effective in reducing criminal behaviour and are themselves quite a strong punishment, as they restrict an offenderโ€™s freedom greatly. Finally, we should remember that prisons are to some extent โ€˜schools of crimeโ€™ and in many cases prisoners end their jail terms as more capable and determined criminals than when they entered.

Of course, it is true that in certain cases we need to both punish criminals and isolate them from other people. I recognise that violent or dangerous people need to be imprisoned โ€“ yet I believe this applies to a small minority of instances.

To conclude, I feel that prison is a last resort in cases where there is no alternative. This does not make it the only effective punishment, but rather the most severe among a variety of possibilities.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
๐Ÿ–Š Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?

Although riding a bicycle is clearly a better way to protect the environment than using other types of vehicles, not many people around the world prefer this means of transport. There are several causes of this unpopularity, and some solutions could be proposed to promote the usage of bicycles.

To begin with, there are several reasons why few people use bicycles to travel on a regular basis. Firstly, since modern life is getting much busier than in the past, individuals nowadays want to spend as little time on transport as possible. Therefore, they prefer to use other types of vehicles such as motorbikes or cars which would take less time. Secondly, cycling is more physically demanding than riding a motorbike or driving a car. This tends to discourage people from choosing this method, especially on a hot and sunny day or when they have to travel a long distance.

Several actions can be taken to increase the popularity of bicycles. The first solution would be to make it more costly to own a motorbike or a car. This can be done by increasing the price of petrol or raising tax on these vehicles. As a result, more people would choose bicycles as their primary means of transport. Additionally, more lanes should be built to serve only cyclists, which would make it much faster to travel with bicycles. The final solution is to launch campaigns to raise citizensโ€™ awareness of the harmful effects of motorbikes and cars on the environment, and this could encourage people to cycle more often.

In conclusion, there are some reasons why bicycles are becoming less common in todayโ€™s world, and solutions should be produced early to promote this environmentally friendly means of transport.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
We remind you that you can publish your essays on our channel.

๐Ÿ“ Important.
To do this, send your work in the form of text or a document ๐Ÿ“„ (pictures and photos are not accepted!โŒ)

๐Ÿ—ฟ @PerfectReceptionBot ๐Ÿ—ฟ
Just IELTS pinned ยซWe remind you that you can publish your essays on our channel. ๐Ÿ“ Important. To do this, send your work in the form of text or a document ๐Ÿ“„ (pictures and photos are not accepted!โŒ) ๐Ÿ—ฟ @PerfectReceptionBot ๐Ÿ—ฟยป
๐Ÿ–Š Some people say that the best way to improve health is to do regular exercise? Discuss this topic and give your own opinion.

Improving overall health and increasing the life expectancy can be connected with doing frequent exercise as the most important method. In my opinion, I consider that exercise is the most effective, whereas I also believe that keeping on a diet is very necessary.
There are the number of lifestyle changes that can make to improve health and increase the life expectancy like quite smoking , reducing stress and doing a regularly exercise. However the most effective and beneficial way to insuring the overall health is attending with the sport. Because, it has been confirming as the key to improving your circulation by many researches and has been practicing as the best method. For example, my brother is very serious about his morning sport, so he has not been a critically ill in his life. In addition, daily exercise can be very efficacious to suppress the psychological disorder such as obesity. Because, while we are doing any exercise or playing sport games, we can reduce the amount of extra flesh in our body which can be cause for overweight.
It is widely known that eating balanced diet can develop the peopleโ€™s health. For many years, the physicians have been trying to teaching about the benefits of eating nutrient dense foods. Because, they contain the nutrients which can very necessary to keep and improve the health . Another interesting fact is that fiber which is found in cereals, fruits and vegetables, contributes to keeping our digestive system healthy.
In conclusion, regular exercises are the most widely-choosing for developing health. However, it also appears to be favorable to maintaining nutrient diet for health insurance.

Written by Samandar
#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
โœ’๏ธ The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts on families and societies?

It is true that modem families do not have meals together as often as in the past. Reasons for this vary, and there are several impacts on both households and the community as a whole.

Family members today rarely eat meals together because of several causes. The hectic work schedule is often considered the main reason why individuals now tend to resort to prepared meals to save time for work. As such, the tradition that parents came back from work to cook lunch for children is no longer preferable in many countries, and this also explains why the fast food industry is developing fast in this country. Another contributing factor is that culinary skills are no longer passed on to younger generations. Food outlets and restaurants today offer a wide range of food choices that can satisfy even fussy eaters, meaning that cooking is not necessarily a skill that young people need to learn to cook for the family.

The gradual disappearance of family meals has several effects. Firstly, having meals with family members is a great chance for them to bond with each other, so parents have less time to talk with their children, and spouses also lose an opportunity to share daily stories. On the social level, some traditions may be lost as a result of people eating out too often. Family values might not be appreciated when people do not feel the need to come back home after work for a meal. On special occasions such as New Year Eve, family feasts serve as an important event, and it is regretful that this tradition is gradually disappearing.
In conclusion, various factors are attributable to the disappearance of family meals. This has several damaging effects on both families and societies.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
โœ’๏ธ Many people today are worried about โ€˜cybercrimeโ€™ such as hacking and identity theft. What problems does โ€˜cybercrimeโ€™ cause, and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take?

Cybercrime is a cause of widespread concern today, as so many people use technology to store and transmit sensitive data. There are a number of problems that people suffer as a result of these crimes, but also some straightforward measures we can take to protect ourselves.

Perhaps the worst problem stemming from this is the financial impact. If someone has his or her bank account emptied, or has false credit lines created under their name, they are potentially liable for large sums of money. Even if they can avoid the consequences, their bank or finance company has to cover the losses, which can damage their performance. A further problem is the way in which these stolen funds are used to subsidize other crimes, such as drug distribution or even terrorism. Once the money enters the criminal networks, we have no way of knowing how it will be used. Finally, there is the problem of anxiety and stress caused to the innocent victims of these crimes. The initial shock is often followed by months or years or legal wrangling, paperwork and a sense of insecurity.

Turning to possible solutions, probably the most effective measure is to improve personal security, ranging from passwords to the shredding of documents. This denies the criminals the raw materials to work with. Secondly, we should raise awareness of the risks among the elderly or the very young โ€“ two groups who are often specifically targeted โ€“ via publicity and public education. Ultimately, however, it is the financial companies who can make the greatest contribution, by increasing their security and detection systems โ€“ ideally in partnership with the police.

Overall, the problems caused are both financial and social, and the solutions should involve coordinated action by individuals, corporations and the state.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
โœ’๏ธ Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings, while others argue that it is wrong. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some assert that studies related to drugs should be conducted on animals so as to enhance the general health among people. However, I totally disagree with the point of view that any sort of tests on living creatures would be cruel to the wildlife.

First and foremost, there is no escaping fact that government should do myriad actions to achieve better results in terms of public welfare. But it seems an absurd idea to test new medications on animals. More specifically, most of the animals' organisms do not correspond with humans, meaning that new methods of administering various antibiotics should be structured and enforced for so-called laboratories where animals are entangled in cages. For instance, in some of African countries basic drug researches are being held on volunteers chosen by tribes who live in primitive conditions.

Secondly, after being injected several times animals eventually possess immune to the drugs. As an outcome, even though investigations bear satisfying fruits, no one can assure that how those medicines affect on individual's health at best, and at worst these can lead the public to suffer further problems l, namely cardiovascular diseases or even obesity. Moreover, I opine that it would be completely unacceptable for animal rights, while scientists themselves are trying to preserve animals from extinction and restore the precious fauna.

In conclusion, although the fact that carrying out drug, based tests on wild animals have been the most common way to introduce new medications to the public, I consider it rather biased and prejudiced opinion as animals play essential part in ecological chain.

Written by Shadow ๅƒIแŽถๅ„ใ„’ไน‡ๅฐบ
#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
โœ’๏ธ In many countries, financial crime involving identity theft is increasing. What are the causes of this trend, and what effect does identity theft have on the victims involved?

There is no doubt that identity fraud is a great concern, especially in western countries where people are most at risk. I think there are two main causes, and a number of damaging effects.

The major cause is probably the almost universal use of digital technology to store financial data and undertake financial transactions. It is surprisingly easy for criminals to obtain personal information about a possible victim, and then to use this information to impersonate the target. Because bank accounts and loans can be applied for digitally, without the need for face-to-face contact, the criminals are able to apply for financial products remotely, often before the victim is even aware of the attack. The second key cause is, I believe, the increasing probability of โ€˜traditionalโ€™ crimes (such as armed robbery, mugging or burglary) being detected. When criminals see the widespread use of CCTV, DNA profiling and fingerprinting, they are less inclined to indulge in such old-fashioned crimes. Rather, they prefer the lower risk and more profitable use of data-based crimes.

The effects on the unfortunate victims can be quite devastating. Firstly, there is the loss of money from bank accounts or by being connected to a fraudulent loan. In some cases, this can take years for the victim to pay back or resolve with the banks and the authorities. Secondly, there is the damage to their credit rating, which means they may find it impossible to obtain legitimate credit in future. In extreme cases, peopleโ€™s employment prospects can even be damaged as well, as they find themselves profiled as a financial risk.

Overall, the presence of technology and the decline of โ€˜traditionalโ€™ crimes are the key causes behind this trend. The effects on the victims involve long-term financial hardship in many instances.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
โœ’๏ธ Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? And how to increase its popularity?

The unpopularity of using bicycle in numerous places has been brought into question although there is little doubt about its friendly effects on the environment compared to cars or airplanes. The reasons for this are varied and several feasible solutions would be proposed in the essay below.

There are two main underlying explanations for the uncommon use of bicycles. Firstly, it would consume a considerable amount of time to travel by this means of transport, which, according to many, justifies the price of potential environmental damage caused by other types of vehicles. This is because it fails to benefit dwellers of major cities in particular when their pace of working life would eclipse the values of using bicycles to the environment. Secondly, modern people are becoming less concerned about the negative impact that their daily use of cars and public transportation would inflict on their surroundings. Therefore, it is rather impractical to expect cycling in cities, or even the countryside.

The government play a vital role in encouraging the use of this environmentally friendly vehicle. They could conduct monthly green days that by law require citizens to cycle to work to get people involved in protecting their environment. In the long term, such an initiative would help to gradually form a habit of cycling among occupied individuals. More importantly, propagation via various means of media along with optional courses about the advantages of cycling to the environment at schools seem imperative to heighten social awareness of this matter.

In conclusion, cycling, regardless of its positive influences on the environment, has become a rare picture in the modern world for a number of reasons; and the government should take immediate actions to improve this situation.

#ieltsessay
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ
๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“ Useful vocabulary and structures: ๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿปโ€๐ŸŽ“

โ€ขThe uncommon use of bicycles

โ€ขTo fail to benefit major city dwellers in particular

โ€ขTo eclipse the values of using bicycles to the environment

โ€ขTo be rather impractical to expect cycling

โ€ขThe use of this environmentally friendly vehicle

โ€ขMonthly green days

โ€ขForm a habit of cycling

#vocabulary
๐Ÿš€ Share with friends! ๐Ÿš€
๐Ÿ‘‰ Join for More ๐Ÿ‘ˆ