принято ! Теперь посты будут на английском языке 🤩
Это ещё очень помогает каналу выйти на международный уровень и делиться ребятами beyond СНГ ✨
Дальше Больше !! 💞

🤩 Analyzing one #researchmistakes per post

Research Mistake #5
💔Overloading your paper with sources (but not analysis)

One of the most common mistakes is thinking that
🍂 more sources = stronger research 🍂

❌ inserting too many citations
❌ long paragraphs full of references
❌ little to no original analysis
As a result, your paper becomes
a collection of others’ ideas, not your own argument

👀 Why this is a problem
Sources are meant to support your thinking,
not replace it

If your paper is mostly:
“X says… Y states… Z argues…”
you’re not doing research, you’re summarizing

🐾 What strong research looks like
🎀 clear argument
🎀 selective use of sources
🎀 strong analysis

Smith (2021) argues that…, which supports the idea that… This suggests that…
🎀 Your voice should be dominant

🤩 How to fix it
🍂 use fewer, but stronger sources
🍂 after every source → add analysis
🍂 ask: **“what does

🖥 A selection of finance and economics (2026–2027) that really boosts your CV
#useful

🤩 COMPETITIONS

🔒 Deadlines: Most often December–April

🤩 International Economics Olympiad
•one of the most prestigious economics competitions
•theory + business case + financial literacy
•level: high
•top for Ivy League / LSE

🤩 National Economics Challenge
•micro + macro + cases
•team format
•level: intermediate–high
•good for your profile

🤩 Wharton Global High School Investment Competition
•investment portfolio management
•teamwork
•level: high
•highly valued in Finance

🤩 Harvard International Economics Essay Competition
• Essay on global economic issues
• Critical thinking test
• Level: intermediate-high

🤩 Diamond Challenge
• Entrepreneurship + Finance
• Startup + Pitch
• Level: intermediate
• Ideal for business profiles

🤩 SUMMER SCHOOLS (SUMMER PROGRAMS)

🔒 Deadlines: January–March

1️⃣ Wharton Global Youth Program
• Finance, investments, business
• Very prestigious
• Strong networking

2️⃣ London School of Economics Summer School
• Economics, finance, data
• Academic level
• Top for the UK

3️⃣ Yale Young Global Scholars
• Areas: economics, politics, global issues
• Discussion-based learning
• Very selective

4️⃣ Columbia University Summer Programs
• Finance, Economics, Business
• Flexible course selection

🤩 RESEARCH / PROJECTS

🎀 Lumiere Education
• 1:1 research with a mentor
• Topics: Finance, Economics, Data
• Result: Research

🎀 Polygence
• Individual projects
• Publications / Portfolio
• Strong boost for top universities

🎀 How to build a strong profile
🍂If you're a beginner:
1 competition (e.g., IEO / Diamond Challenge) + summer program

🍂🍂If you have a foundation:
competition + research

If the goal is a top university (Wharton / LSE / Ivy):
research + competition + summer program (ALL together)

Mini-strategy
🍂 2026: Participation in the competition + first summer school
🍂 2027: Research + a stronger competition

🍂 Result: Ready-made spike in finance/economics

🤩 Research Paper Submission Checklist (Question Format) #publication

1️⃣ Content & Scope
🟠 Does my paper clearly answer the research question?
🟠 Is my topic within the scope of the selected journal?
🟠 Is my related work section up-to-date and complete?
🟠 Does my conclusion explain why the research matters?

2️⃣ Sources & Ethics
🟤 Is my paper free from all forms of plagiarism?
🟤 Have I properly cited all sources?
🟤 Have I disclosed all conflicts of interest?
🟤 Have I included an ethics statement (if required)?
🟤 Have I checked for AI-generated content and compliance?

3️⃣ Authorship & Permissions
🔴 Do all authors consent to the submission?
🔴 Are author names, order, and affiliations correct?
🔴 Have I acknowledged all funding bodies (if applicable)?

4️⃣ Writing Quality
🎀 Is my paper free from grammar, spelling, and typo errors?
🎀 Is the writing clear, concise, and academic?
🎀 Does my abstract meet the journal’s requirements?
🎀 Have I included relevant keywords?

5️⃣ Formatting & Guidelines
💋 Does my paper follow the journal’s formatting guidelines?
💋 Is the correct citation style used (APA, MLA, etc.)?
💋 Is my paper within the word and page limits?
💋 Have I read the “Instructions for Authors” carefully?

6️⃣ Figures, Tables & References
❄️ Are all figures and tables correctly numbered and cited?
❄️ Are all references complete (including dates)?
❄️ Is the reference list formatted consistently?

7️⃣Submission Files
✨ Have I prepared all required files (cover letter, author bio, etc.)?
✨ Am I submitting in the correct format (Word / PDF / LaTeX)?
✨ Are all files properly named?

8️⃣ Review & Final Check
✨ Have I checked the review type (single-blind or double-blind)?
✨ Is my manuscript anonymized if required?
✨ Have I reread the entire paper before submission?

😜 Insight
A strong paper is not only about ideas, it’s also about execution and final details

✨Most mistakes happen right before submission - don’t skip this step.

🟢 Research topics you should avoid (across fields) + common weak topics #main

👀 1. Too broad
“Artificial Intelligence in the modern world”
“Human rights globally”
“Climate change” :
🤩 no focus, no depth, impossible to prove anything

👀 2. Obvious / already known
“Exercise is good for health”
“Social media affects people” :
🤩 nothing new, no real analysis

👀 3. No valid data / no access to evidence
topics where you can’t realistically get data
for instance:
“thought patterns of successful CEOs” (no access, no dataset)

👀 4. Pure description
just explaining how something works
examples:
🎀how rockets work
🎀 what AI is
🎀 what laws exist
🎀 this is explanation, not research

👀 5. Unrealistic scope
topics that require huge resources:
“curing cancer with AI”
“solving global poverty”
🎀not doable at student level

🤩 Across different fields (real examples)
🤩 AI / Tech
bad: “AI in education”
better: how AI tools affect students’ independent problem-solving
🤩Business
bad: “marketing strategies”
better: why one company’s strategy worked and another failed
🤩Law
bad: “human rights”
better: how freedom of speech is regulated on social media in one region
🤩Science
bad: “space exploration”
better: how AI can improve satellite work and analysis in LEO

🤩 Quick check before choosing a topic
can you:
✨test it?
✨ measure it?
✨ compare it?
if not, change the topic

😶 Expanded Analysis of the Conclusion Section [ MDPI article (Nutrients, Vol. 16, Issue 4, Article 467) ] #paperanalysis

1️⃣🟠 Main takeaway of the study

The conclusion emphasizes that the investigated nutritional intervention (or dietary pattern examined in the paper) shows measurable but context-dependent health effects. In other words, the results are not universally strong across all outcomes, but they do indicate potential biological or clinical benefits under certain conditions.

The authors are careful to avoid overclaiming, which is typical for MDPI nutrition papers that rely on observational or short-term intervention data.

2️⃣🟤 Strength of evidence

The conclusion highlights that:
• The findings are

supported by statistically significant trends

, but
• The

overall evidence is still limited

due to factors such as:

🎀

small sample sizes,

🎀

short intervention duration,

🎀

or heterogeneity in participants.

This means the study is positioned more as supportive or exploratory evidence, not definitive proof.

3️⃣🟠 Mechanistic interpretation

The authors link observed effects to

biological mechanisms

, typically involving:

🎀

inflammation reduction,

🎀

oxidative stress modulation,

🎀

metabolic regulation (e.g., lipid or glucose pathways),

🎀

or gut microbiota interactions.

The conclusion suggests that the dietary component(s) studied may influence health through multiple interconnected physiological pathways, rather than a single mechanism.

4️⃣🟤 Practical implications

The conclusion usually states that:

🎀

The findings may be relevant for

dietary recommendations or clinical nutrition strategies

🎀

The intervention could be considered as a

supportive dietary approach

, especially for at-risk populations
However, it also stresses:
It is

not ready for universal clinical application

yet.

5️⃣🟠 Limitations explicitly acknowledged

A key part of the conclusion is critical reflection. The authors mention limitations such as:

🎀

observational design or limited causality,

🎀

lack of long-term follow-up,

🎀

possible confounding dietary/lifestyle factors,

🎀

need for more diverse populations.

This is important because it frames the results as preliminary but promising.

6️⃣🟤 Future research direction

The conclusion strongly recommends:

🤩

larger randomized controlled trials (RCTs),

🤩

longer intervention

🤩

mechanistic studies (e.g., biomarkers, microbiome analysis),

🤩

and replication in different populations.

🍂 This signals that the paper is part of an ongoing research trajectory, not a final answer.

📔 Overall interpretation
In simple terms, the conclusion means: The study provides promising but not definitive evidence that the examined nutritional approach may improve certain health outcomes. However, more rigorous and larger studies are required before firm dietary recommendations can be made.

We wanted to make things a bit more interesting and give you a chance to challenge yourselves 💅
soooo we’re launching this competition.

🔥 ABSTRACT CHALLENGE
Ready to test your academic writing skills?
Write a clear, structured, and strong abstract - the foundation of any research paper.

📄 Task

Write an abstract (150–250 words) based on ONE of the topics below:

1. Does short-form content consumption fundamentally alter deep reading abilities?
2. How social media affects attention span among teenagers
3. Will automation redefine the concept of “stable careers” for the next generation?

🤩 What we’re looking for
Your abstract should include:
💔 a clear research focus
💔 brief context/background
💔 purpose or research question
💔 short mention of methods (if applicable)
💔 key idea or expected findings
➡️ It should read like a real academic abstract, not a general paragraph

🍂 Evaluation Criteria
Submissions will be evaluated based on:
🍂 Clarity 💔 Is the idea easy to understand?
🍂 Structure 💔 Does it follow academic logic?
🍂 Academic tone 💔 Is the style formal and precise?

⭐ Requirements
🍂 Language: English
🍂 Word count: 150–250 words
🍂 Original work only (no plagiarism / AI copy-paste)

⭐️ Prizes

🥇

1st place:

🤩

Official certificate

🤩

Exclusive PDF guide:

“How to Write a Strong Abstract”

🤩

Detailed feedback on your work

🥈

2nd place:

🤩

Certificate

🥉

3rd place:

🤩

Certificate

✅ Deadline
💔Submissions open now
💔 Deadline: 20.04.2026
💔SPOTS: only 20💔

To participate
Send your abstract via *this link*

💎 Good universities that support research (with realistic chances + affordability) #additional

balance: strong research +affordability + English-taught programs

🇺🇸 USA (strong research + funding opportunities)

• University of Michigan
• Georgia Institute of Technology
• Purdue University
• University of Wisconsin–Madison
• University of Texas at Austin
• University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
• Pennsylvania State University
• Ohio State University
• University of Maryland
• Arizona State University
🍂 Explanation:
US universities have some of the largest research budgets in the world.
Even if tuition is high, many of these schools offer:
🍂 research assistant positions
🍂 lab access from early years
🍂 scholarships and grants

🍂good choice if your goal = hands-on research + projects

🔅 Asia (high quality + often more affordable)

💔 National University of Singapore
💔 Nanyang Technological University
💔 KAIST
💔 Seoul National University
💔 University of Tokyo
💔 Tsinghua University
💔 Peking University
💔 Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
💔 City University of Hong Kong
💔 National Taiwan University
🍂Explanation:
Asia is investing heavily in research, especially in AI, engineering, and technology.
Many universities offer:
🍂lower tuition compared to the US
🍂strong government-funded labs
🍂international programs in English
🍂good choice if you want top-level research at lower cost

🇪🇺 Europe (best balance: quality / price / research)

🍂 ETH Zurich
🍂 Technical University of Munich
🍂 Delft University of Technology
🍂 KU Leuven
🍂 University of Amsterdam
🍂 LMU Munich
🍂 University of Edinburgh
🍂 University of Manchester
🍂 University of Copenhagen
🍂 KTH Royal Institute of Technology
🍂Explanation:
Europe offers a strong mix of:
🍂 high-quality research
🍂 lower or moderate tuition fees
🍂 many English-taught programs
🍂good choice if you want solid academics + affordability + international environment

💔Insight
“The best university for research is not the most famous one-it’s the one where you actually get access to labs, mentors, and real projects.”

🔒Algorithmic Bias in AI Decision-Making (how to actually test it) #useful

Main problem in most research

many papers say: “AI can be biased”
but don’t show:
💔 where bias appears
💔 how to measure it
💔 how strong the effect is
💔 this turns into opinion, not research

📌 What “bias” means in practice
✖️not an abstract idea
it’s when a model gives different outcomes under the same conditions,
but for different groups
example: an AI hiring system ranks candidates differently
just because of names or gender indicators

🎀How it’s actually studied
1⃣Define a hypothesis
the model produces different outcomes across groups
2⃣ Use a dataset
e.g., resumes or profiles with controlled variables
3⃣ Run a controlled experiment: change only one variable
(e.g., name or gender)
🤩keep everything else identical
4⃣ Compare outputs
if results differ—measurable bias

👀 Common metrics
🟣 selection rate
🟣 false positive / false negative rate
🟣 accuracy across groups
➡️ not just “bias exists”, but how significant it is

💋 Where research fails
no control of variables; no clear metrics; no comparison

📌 What makes it strong
▫️ clear experimental design
▫️ measurable results
▫️ reproducibility
“Bias in AI is not a belief - it’s a measurable deviation in outcomes.”

📑 Insight
the more complex the system,
the harder it is to detect errors,
which is exactly why this type of research matters

🤩 Конкурс для молодых авторов из Центральной Азии

Тема: Права человека в странах Центральной Азии (Казахстан, Кыргызстан, Узбекистан, Таджикистан, Туркменистан).

💔К участию приглашаются молодые авторы, желающие опубликовать свои оригинальные работы - исследования, эссе, литературные или креативные проекты.

Как принять участие
💔Подготовить оригинальную работу на тему прав человека.
💔 Оформить её в соответствии с установленными требованиями (формат, объем).
💔Отправить на указанный email.
💔 Важно: Работа не должна быть опубликована ранее или создана с помощью ИИ.

🍰 Что получат участники
🍂 Публикацию в журнале.
🍂 Развитие академических и творческих навыков.
🍂 Опыт работы с правозащитной тематикой.
🍂 Возможность усилить свое портфолио.

✔️Требования и критерии отбора
⚪Тематика: Права человека в странах Центральной Азии.
⚪Форматы: Исследование, эссе, поэзия, рассказы, фото, арт-объекты.
⚪Языки: Английский, русский, либо любой из языков Центральной Азии.
⚪Оформление: Соблюдение лимитов по объёму и правил форматирования.
⚪Оригинальность: Работа должна быть уникальной и созданной без использования ИИ.

Информация про программу - *ссылка*
подать заявку - *ссылка*