Exam prompt, 8.03.2025 🆕
In many countries a large percentage of food is being wasted.
What do you think are the causes of this problem?
What measures could best be taken to solve it?
Being on the rise, food waste has grown into a pressing issue all around the world. This worrying trend is largely driven by two major factors and can be alleviated if a set of socio-economic and environmental policies are implemented.
The root causes of ever-rising food waste, to a firm extent, are irrational aesthetic food standards. With the rise of social media presence in our lives, sharing videos and photos of exotic and aesthetically pleasant foods has become a norm, not to mention culinary attitudes shifting towards more intricate food textures and flavors. When such high expectations are not met, perfectly fit for consumption food is discarded, as it is on various TV shows where prominent chefs, in the pursuit of gaining popularity, attempt to showcase a healthy repertoire of culinary skills they possess. Modern influencers and bloggers are another culprit in this case, since they also often promote unreasonable practices, such as excessive purchasing of food and inefficient handling of leftovers in restaurants and cafes, or even at home. Although there are other reasons at play, from ineffective food transportation and inadequate storage facilities to overproduction, they account only for only a minority of cases.
However challenging this situation may be, there are countermeasures that could potentially mitigate it. One of these is fostering the incentivization of mindful distribution of surplus food—simply put, governmental influence on providing tax deductions or other financial bonuses to individuals and enterprises constantly reducing their food wastage can serve as a powerful tool. The other approach, which might be closely related to the one above, is legislative reforms encompassing environmental repercussions of food disposal; once stringent regulations—for example fines and certain restrictions—are to be factored into policies that regulate wastage of food in supply chains, consumers are bound to adhere to them not to run afoul of the law. In some supermarket chains of Germany, such initiatives have gained traction, with edible food being redistributed via apps to combat food insecurity in the disadvantaged regions. To maximize the efficacy of these methods, big-name companies along with renowned celebrities may also be involved, as part of endorsements or marketing campaigns, to aid governing bodies in stimulating public interest and efforts in diminishing food loss, but the costs incurred might not be always affordable.
In summary, having polarized across the world, the problem of food waste can be attributed to harsh standards of food aesthetics and the pursuit of boosting the standing. If authorities are to take a number of severe yet effective measures in the legislative and socio-economic realms, the adverse phenomenon will probably be ameliorated.
P.S.🔼 The bold are components that bolster T/R
#essay
#novelty
In many countries a large percentage of food is being wasted.
What do you think are the causes of this problem?
What measures could best be taken to solve it?
Being on the rise, food waste has grown into a pressing issue all around the world. This worrying trend is largely driven by two major factors and can be alleviated if a set of socio-economic and environmental policies are implemented.
The root causes of ever-rising food waste, to a firm extent, are irrational aesthetic food standards. With the rise of social media presence in our lives, sharing videos and photos of exotic and aesthetically pleasant foods has become a norm, not to mention culinary attitudes shifting towards more intricate food textures and flavors. When such high expectations are not met, perfectly fit for consumption food is discarded, as it is on various TV shows where prominent chefs, in the pursuit of gaining popularity, attempt to showcase a healthy repertoire of culinary skills they possess. Modern influencers and bloggers are another culprit in this case, since they also often promote unreasonable practices, such as excessive purchasing of food and inefficient handling of leftovers in restaurants and cafes, or even at home. Although there are other reasons at play, from ineffective food transportation and inadequate storage facilities to overproduction, they account only for only a minority of cases.
However challenging this situation may be, there are countermeasures that could potentially mitigate it. One of these is fostering the incentivization of mindful distribution of surplus food—simply put, governmental influence on providing tax deductions or other financial bonuses to individuals and enterprises constantly reducing their food wastage can serve as a powerful tool. The other approach, which might be closely related to the one above, is legislative reforms encompassing environmental repercussions of food disposal; once stringent regulations—for example fines and certain restrictions—are to be factored into policies that regulate wastage of food in supply chains, consumers are bound to adhere to them not to run afoul of the law. In some supermarket chains of Germany, such initiatives have gained traction, with edible food being redistributed via apps to combat food insecurity in the disadvantaged regions. To maximize the efficacy of these methods, big-name companies along with renowned celebrities may also be involved, as part of endorsements or marketing campaigns, to aid governing bodies in stimulating public interest and efforts in diminishing food loss, but the costs incurred might not be always affordable.
In summary, having polarized across the world, the problem of food waste can be attributed to harsh standards of food aesthetics and the pursuit of boosting the standing. If authorities are to take a number of severe yet effective measures in the legislative and socio-economic realms, the adverse phenomenon will probably be ameliorated.
P.S.
#essay
#novelty
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#streams
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💋7🆒3❤🔥2
Substitutе tools 'so' and 'the other' ✔️
➖ Task 1️⃣
China and Russia topped the list in all the years. While the Asian country saw no change to the end, standing at a high of 87%, so was the other, at 86%.
➖ Task2️⃣
The trend, however, is bound to entail worsened wellbeing and therefore long-term health implications. Simply put, the former effect, one that takes a heavy toll on the young's mental well-being due to lack of socialization, is totally detrimental, if not deterred, and so is the other, which might lead to mental disorders.
P.S.The perks of such chunks are conciseness, grammatical prowess and a smoother flow.
#novelty
China and Russia topped the list in all the years. While the Asian country saw no change to the end, standing at a high of 87%, so was the other, at 86%.
The trend, however, is bound to entail worsened wellbeing and therefore long-term health implications. Simply put, the former effect, one that takes a heavy toll on the young's mental well-being due to lack of socialization, is totally detrimental, if not deterred, and so is the other, which might lead to mental disorders.
P.S.
#novelty
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥2
Map by an examiner.pdf
86.7 KB
#examiners_script
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤2
How to use it
- One of these reasons is that, in pursuit of financial gains, people invest heavily in cryptostocks, because this way they expect to have high returns in the near term.
- One of these reasons is that, in pursuit of financial gains, people invest heavily in cryptostocks, mostly for high returns from this source in the near term.
P.S. What you have with this is conciseness, a wide range of grammatical structures and a smoother flow
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤3❤🔥1👍1
Task 2 (28.03 exam).pdf
66.8 KB
I'll drop soon 2-3 more essays. Take notes, jot down vocab, and practice with the learned 💎
You still might have these topics on the exam🖥
#essay
You still might have these topics on the exam
#essay
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤4🔥2⚡1❤🔥1💋1
28.03 exam Task 2.pdf
17.9 KB
#essay
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤🔥2❤1👍1
Young children should be punished in the same way as adults if they commit a serious crime (such as a violent attack or a robbery).
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Juvenile delinquency has been long debated, with some suggesting that the punishment for it should be as harsh as that for crimes committed by adults if young perpetrators resorted to a violent attack or a robbery. While I acknowledge some efficacy of this policy, I do not fully support it, as there are other, more effective approaches to take.
Holding young criminals as much as responsible for felonies as their adult counterparts can serve as a deterrent for others in society. Once the message that violent offenders, regardless of their age, are treated equally harsh, potential criminals are likely to reconsider their lifestyle due to the fear of imprisonment instilled. Besides, considering the duration of the sentence that young offenders are to be given for such heinous crimes as a brutal assault and a robbery, which is years in many countries, if not most, they are less likely to prefer those unlawful acts.
However compelling this argument may sound, I think its’ flaws are too consequential to be overlooked. Naturally, long jail time can definitely ruin the lives of the young imprisoned, as once released, they are not to be as enthusiastic and trainable as they were before, thus leading them to struggle securing a job. This poor employment prospect, ultimately, is bound to limit their social mobility. Prolonged sentence can also reduce the possibility of successful re-integration into society, because long years of exposure to a prison regimen and environment renders imprisoned youth overly adjusted to them.
Therefore, I contend that crime prevention measures and social programs should be set in place. With authorities assigning well-positioned bodies to monitor and curb criminal activity by building direct communication with the young repeatedly turning to misdemeanors or other vulnerable groups alike, communities in their neighborhoods are less likely to become plagued with crime. This counter-measure can be further enhanced if youth are to have regular counselling with psychologists, so that a helping hand is given when necessary. Given these policies, juvenile delinquency can be more productively curtailed.
In summary, though efficient to a degree, the standpoint that juvenile offenders should receive an identical punishment as adult offenders is not entirely valid in light of its trade-offs – poor social mobility and more challenging post-release adjustment for ex-prisoners. In my opinion, preventing crime and implementing social initiatives in the first place can be more sensible alternatives.
#essay
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Juvenile delinquency has been long debated, with some suggesting that the punishment for it should be as harsh as that for crimes committed by adults if young perpetrators resorted to a violent attack or a robbery. While I acknowledge some efficacy of this policy, I do not fully support it, as there are other, more effective approaches to take.
Holding young criminals as much as responsible for felonies as their adult counterparts can serve as a deterrent for others in society. Once the message that violent offenders, regardless of their age, are treated equally harsh, potential criminals are likely to reconsider their lifestyle due to the fear of imprisonment instilled. Besides, considering the duration of the sentence that young offenders are to be given for such heinous crimes as a brutal assault and a robbery, which is years in many countries, if not most, they are less likely to prefer those unlawful acts.
However compelling this argument may sound, I think its’ flaws are too consequential to be overlooked. Naturally, long jail time can definitely ruin the lives of the young imprisoned, as once released, they are not to be as enthusiastic and trainable as they were before, thus leading them to struggle securing a job. This poor employment prospect, ultimately, is bound to limit their social mobility. Prolonged sentence can also reduce the possibility of successful re-integration into society, because long years of exposure to a prison regimen and environment renders imprisoned youth overly adjusted to them.
Therefore, I contend that crime prevention measures and social programs should be set in place. With authorities assigning well-positioned bodies to monitor and curb criminal activity by building direct communication with the young repeatedly turning to misdemeanors or other vulnerable groups alike, communities in their neighborhoods are less likely to become plagued with crime. This counter-measure can be further enhanced if youth are to have regular counselling with psychologists, so that a helping hand is given when necessary. Given these policies, juvenile delinquency can be more productively curtailed.
In summary, though efficient to a degree, the standpoint that juvenile offenders should receive an identical punishment as adult offenders is not entirely valid in light of its trade-offs – poor social mobility and more challenging post-release adjustment for ex-prisoners. In my opinion, preventing crime and implementing social initiatives in the first place can be more sensible alternatives.
#essay
👍2❤🔥1🥰1