Send the Right Signal
This semester, as I juggle through 5 projects simultaneously, I am understanding the importance of teammates more and more. Obviously, they define what results you will end up with. You canβt do everything the team should have done - you canβt compensate for their shortcomings. Sometimes, you think like - paying to Claude little more would have given me results for way cheaper and faster. Less time explaining, less time checking.
So, having these observations, it makes you think. How could I maximize my chances of getting teammates that can perform on par with me and help me grow? One answer I found is - send a clear, right signal to the people searching for you. Spend time with people and let them know who you are: what interests you have and what you have accomplished. Before, I thought it is better to keep the profile low, not let others know. Otherwise, I thought, it was braggy and arrogant. Before, I kept things quiet to the point that people would describe me as a βblack boxβ. Now, I see clearly that talking about what you have done, at the right time and to the right people, can emperically effect whether you become successful or not. So, yeah, good teammates don't find black boxes. They find signals they can recognize.
This semester, as I juggle through 5 projects simultaneously, I am understanding the importance of teammates more and more. Obviously, they define what results you will end up with. You canβt do everything the team should have done - you canβt compensate for their shortcomings. Sometimes, you think like - paying to Claude little more would have given me results for way cheaper and faster. Less time explaining, less time checking.
So, having these observations, it makes you think. How could I maximize my chances of getting teammates that can perform on par with me and help me grow? One answer I found is - send a clear, right signal to the people searching for you. Spend time with people and let them know who you are: what interests you have and what you have accomplished. Before, I thought it is better to keep the profile low, not let others know. Otherwise, I thought, it was braggy and arrogant. Before, I kept things quiet to the point that people would describe me as a βblack boxβ. Now, I see clearly that talking about what you have done, at the right time and to the right people, can emperically effect whether you become successful or not. So, yeah, good teammates don't find black boxes. They find signals they can recognize.
β€13π3π₯3
Just received a project offer from a Stanford lab.
Incredible, 4 years back couldn't even think this would be possible.
Incredible, 4 years back couldn't even think this would be possible.
β€29π₯18π3π1
Sharing is much appreciated. Here you can register for the event.
LinkedIn
πΉJoin us for the June edition of Guest of Honor Academic Series, featuring πΊπΈπ¨π¦πΊπΏ Russ Salakhutdinov, UPMC Professor of Computerβ¦
πΉJoin us for the June edition of Guest of Honor Academic Series, featuring πΊπΈπ¨π¦πΊπΏ Russ Salakhutdinov, UPMC Professor of Computer Science at Carnegie Mellon University, ex Vice President of Research at Meta and Ex Director of AI Research at Apple
βΎοΈProf.β¦
βΎοΈProf.β¦
β€3π₯2
Burn the forest until it works
Am I the only one finding out about this so late? There was a source code leakage from Claude Code, 2 months ago. It is quite interesting to see the inner details of what makes Anthropic's Claude persistently smarter than OpenAI's Codex. Most important takeaways:
- Claude Code was written, yes, by Claude Code itself. A random walkthrough shows how the system is cumbersome and lacks logical precision - signature of LLM generated code. Anthropic's way to build: Generate the code. If it doesnt work, generate again. So, burn the forest until the code works. Have a look at this article for more details.*
- The whole system is not pure deep learning. Some parts are old-school symbolic AI. And this is important. Apparently, it is a proof that making the models ever bigger is not gonna solve problems of LLMs.
*it is ironic how the company that talks most about safety is not taking safety seriously
Am I the only one finding out about this so late? There was a source code leakage from Claude Code, 2 months ago. It is quite interesting to see the inner details of what makes Anthropic's Claude persistently smarter than OpenAI's Codex. Most important takeaways:
- Claude Code was written, yes, by Claude Code itself. A random walkthrough shows how the system is cumbersome and lacks logical precision - signature of LLM generated code. Anthropic's way to build: Generate the code. If it doesnt work, generate again. So, burn the forest until the code works. Have a look at this article for more details.*
- The whole system is not pure deep learning. Some parts are old-school symbolic AI. And this is important. Apparently, it is a proof that making the models ever bigger is not gonna solve problems of LLMs.
*it is ironic how the company that talks most about safety is not taking safety seriously
π₯5β€1
Had the first meeting with my Stanford supervisors.
Impression - overwhelmed with their thought lead. You feel the difference.
Impression - overwhelmed with their thought lead. You feel the difference.
π₯13β€βπ₯5π1
"Study hard what interests you the most in the most undisciplined, irreverent and original manner possible."
Richard Feynman
Richard Feynman
β€17β€βπ₯4π1
Intuition is a compressed way of looking at some phenomenon, an easy way to understand something. You observe again and again that people who do real innovations often have very robust intuition on the topic. So you wonder how could one get more of it?
Many physicists think of Feynman when the word intuition comes up. He was very good at giving intuitions for complex phenomena. One wonders how Feynman did it. But you barely find anything from his own words, except that he was good at imagination.
So, what to do? There is a scientist called Stephen Wolfram (I was listening to his appearance on Lex Fridman's podcast). It turns out Wolfram was a younger colleague and friend of Feynman's at Caltech. He gave some insights about Feynman's intuition that you cannot find elsewhere:
- First, Feynman knew that you cannot compress everything into simple intuitions β not everything can be reduced to a child-level analogy. (This is similar to the line often attributed to Einstein: everything should be made as simple as possible, but not ever simpler.)
- Then, Feynman was very good at calculating. He would do complex calculations/simulations on paper or in his head, fast, then see the overall picture, then come up with a post-hoc intuition for the phenomenon. BUT because he thought calculation was easy, he would simply not mention the many days he spent calculating.
So the important point: to get intuition you need to work in the weeds / fight in the trenches, then you understand what is happening, then you get the intuition. Usually there is no shortcut, and often the intuition you end up with is not child-level easy.
Many physicists think of Feynman when the word intuition comes up. He was very good at giving intuitions for complex phenomena. One wonders how Feynman did it. But you barely find anything from his own words, except that he was good at imagination.
So, what to do? There is a scientist called Stephen Wolfram (I was listening to his appearance on Lex Fridman's podcast). It turns out Wolfram was a younger colleague and friend of Feynman's at Caltech. He gave some insights about Feynman's intuition that you cannot find elsewhere:
- First, Feynman knew that you cannot compress everything into simple intuitions β not everything can be reduced to a child-level analogy. (This is similar to the line often attributed to Einstein: everything should be made as simple as possible, but not ever simpler.)
- Then, Feynman was very good at calculating. He would do complex calculations/simulations on paper or in his head, fast, then see the overall picture, then come up with a post-hoc intuition for the phenomenon. BUT because he thought calculation was easy, he would simply not mention the many days he spent calculating.
So the important point: to get intuition you need to work in the weeds / fight in the trenches, then you understand what is happening, then you get the intuition. Usually there is no shortcut, and often the intuition you end up with is not child-level easy.
β€9π₯3π2β€βπ₯1
Research opportunity
I am starting a research project and am looking for assistants. The topic is on AI for education. If you are an undergraduate or even high school student looking to publish as a first author, this is your chance.
Traits we are looking for: critical thinking; grit (in Uzbek "tishlaganini uzib oladigan"π); some math, tutoring and coding background are nice to have.
Interested - apply here:
https://forms.gle/BadWxohKuaUY39G26
Deadline - July 15th
I am starting a research project and am looking for assistants. The topic is on AI for education. If you are an undergraduate or even high school student looking to publish as a first author, this is your chance.
Traits we are looking for: critical thinking; grit (in Uzbek "tishlaganini uzib oladigan"π); some math, tutoring and coding background are nice to have.
Interested - apply here:
https://forms.gle/BadWxohKuaUY39G26
Deadline - July 15th
π7β€βπ₯2β€2
It is very hard to beat the person who is doing it for fun.
Peter Steinberger
Developer of OpenClaw
p.s. Peter built solo what a battery of startups were trying to build and couldn't - an agent present everywhere in your devices. His explanation for why the startups couldn't beat him: "They take themselves too seriously".
Peter Steinberger
Developer of OpenClaw
p.s. Peter built solo what a battery of startups were trying to build and couldn't - an agent present everywhere in your devices. His explanation for why the startups couldn't beat him: "They take themselves too seriously".
β€7β€βπ₯6π3π₯1
Oh mani yorim dardi-darmonim,
Soβra jonim berayin borim.
Oh mani yorim san begβuborim,
Mani doim senda hayolim.
--β----------β-β-----------------------
Oh my beloved, the cure of my pain,
Ask, and I'll give you my life, all I have.
Oh my beloved - my pure one, you,
Always, my thoughts are with you.
Soβra jonim berayin borim.
Oh mani yorim san begβuborim,
Mani doim senda hayolim.
--β----------β-β-----------------------
Oh my beloved, the cure of my pain,
Ask, and I'll give you my life, all I have.
Oh my beloved - my pure one, you,
Always, my thoughts are with you.
π9π₯4β€2π€1π1
A person is a city
We grew up hearing tales of evil characters that do everything only with bad intentions. But as we grow - we realize that people are not white or black; a person is never singular. Rather he is a city of multiple characters. City where many entities take over in different times. City where both good and bad coexist. City where the bad vies for power and pays cheap tribute to the revolting good, and yet - always claims the title of nobility. City where the good is always present and never disappears. Like a lantern that might get covered in dust. But continues to shine in the hopes that one day - it will light all the city.
We grew up hearing tales of evil characters that do everything only with bad intentions. But as we grow - we realize that people are not white or black; a person is never singular. Rather he is a city of multiple characters. City where many entities take over in different times. City where both good and bad coexist. City where the bad vies for power and pays cheap tribute to the revolting good, and yet - always claims the title of nobility. City where the good is always present and never disappears. Like a lantern that might get covered in dust. But continues to shine in the hopes that one day - it will light all the city.
π₯8β€7π―3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There it starts!
Y Combinator + San Francisco vibes
Y Combinator + San Francisco vibes
π₯19β€4π4
Case for building a startup
Building a startup, if you can, beats almost anything else on the table. The Cursor guys make the case clean: co-founder Sualeh Asif's stake is now worth $2.7 billion, four years after starting Anysphere. Do the math and you see he was doing $56 million per month. Compare that to a $20k capped salary at Google. This is a 3000x difference.
Sualeh is Pakistani. He did math olympiads before MIT. So, he has a lesson to share with us, and the lesson is not - become the hustling, talkative, self-proclaimed Steve Jobs who talks a vision without substance. It is - study, build real depth in something hard. Bring an actual skill to the table, math, engineering, research, whatever it is, and pair with people who have equally strong skills. A startup is real skills compounding into something big, not a personality performance. That's the trade worth making.
Building a startup, if you can, beats almost anything else on the table. The Cursor guys make the case clean: co-founder Sualeh Asif's stake is now worth $2.7 billion, four years after starting Anysphere. Do the math and you see he was doing $56 million per month. Compare that to a $20k capped salary at Google. This is a 3000x difference.
Sualeh is Pakistani. He did math olympiads before MIT. So, he has a lesson to share with us, and the lesson is not - become the hustling, talkative, self-proclaimed Steve Jobs who talks a vision without substance. It is - study, build real depth in something hard. Bring an actual skill to the table, math, engineering, research, whatever it is, and pair with people who have equally strong skills. A startup is real skills compounding into something big, not a personality performance. That's the trade worth making.
π₯21π2β€βπ₯1π1