The hardest thing in the world is simple

I strongly believe smart context management would positively impact our AI workflows

> You tell AI write some code
> It writes code
> Code has error
> You tell it to fix the error
> It fixes it

But now that "fixing" is in the context and sitting there not contributing to anything. What we need is this:

> It goes back to the earlier code it sent
> Adds the fix there
> Deletes the messages of you telling it to fix the code

We don't know anything at this point. What if it just follows the pattern of making a mistake and you telling it to fix it.

Or like Antrhopics recent research what if it just takes on the personality of a sloppy dev... What if there was an agent which goes through the context and makes sure that the LLM's 'personality' is competent.

The context manager decides what the long and short term memory needs to be.

Dynamic context. Kinda like us.

Anthropic's research

Post on X

Evolution is nature's way of finding product market fit

- Charles Darwin

AI is wayyyyyy under hyped

I was one of the people on twitter saying gpt-5 will be AGI in the early days of gpt-4: which is now considered an unusable model by any standards

At this moment, we are the bottle neck: Skill Issue

If you look at nations, or groups of people in general, the consensus always happens—or rather, policies always get enacted—after the fact. No action is taken during a decline in birthrate. For a better example: when the birth rate goes from 4 to 3, nobody sounds the alarm. It’s only when it reaches 1 or a negative number that policies start to get passed and the general public agrees that their birthrate is declining.

In the same way nobody is aware of the insane performance leap from gpt-4 to gpt-5.4
> You just need to extrapolate a bit to understand the situation we are in

You have to ignore the consensus of "ai slop" and try to push these models to any limit you can imagine them having

German word for library:

Bibliotek 🗿

New open source drop!!!!
> 6x cheaper than opus

"AGI HAS BEEN ACHIEVED INTERNALLY"

It costs $25 input $125 output 💀

The pentagon really fumbled this one

Not good when AGI is your supply chain risk lol

*meta has joined the chat

Makes you wonder are iterations even worth it... What is the point in winning battles if your gonna lose the war... There may be some wisdom in the stagnation of Apple products.

The empire iterating on different kinds of swords losses to the one that has discovered bows and catapults

> Discovery beats iteration