If I was an investor and had the opportunity I would happily invest 100% of my portfolio into major ai companies (open ai, anthropic, groq, moonshot...) even at this stage
The sentiment right now is that they are bubbles about to implode
My gut tells me otherwise
The sentiment right now is that they are bubbles about to implode
My gut tells me otherwise
Karpathy is soooo right
> How good is your planning?
> How good is your short/long term memory?
> How much do you care?
Imagine creating a detailed memory palace on what you want to get done and constantly updating it... Literally GOD MODE
(...also being able to recall past sessions 🫠)
The landscape has completely changed
Those niche skills matter more than anything now
> How good is your planning?
> How good is your short/long term memory?
> How much do you care?
Imagine creating a detailed memory palace on what you want to get done and constantly updating it... Literally GOD MODE
(...also being able to recall past sessions 🫠)
The landscape has completely changed
Those niche skills matter more than anything now
YouTube
Skill Issue: Andrej Karpathy on Code Agents, AutoResearch, and the Loopy Era of AI
What happens when AI agents can design experiments, collect data, and improve — without a human in the loop? Andrej Karpathy joins Sarah Guo on the state of models, the future of engineering and education, thinking about impact on jobs, and his project AutoResearch:…
We need to bring back blimps
Its one of the most exciting modes of transport to come out of a dynamic era
Think about all the advancements in AI and nano tech...
Autonomy, Efficiency and very hard to crash... Its better than telling people to go on autonomous planes which are practically cruise missiles.
Its one of the most exciting modes of transport to come out of a dynamic era
Think about all the advancements in AI and nano tech...
Autonomy, Efficiency and very hard to crash... Its better than telling people to go on autonomous planes which are practically cruise missiles.
I strongly believe smart context management would positively impact our AI workflows
> You tell AI write some code
> It writes code
> Code has error
> You tell it to fix the error
> It fixes it
But now that "fixing" is in the context and sitting there not contributing to anything. What we need is this:
> It goes back to the earlier code it sent
> Adds the fix there
> Deletes the messages of you telling it to fix the code
We don't know anything at this point. What if it just follows the pattern of making a mistake and you telling it to fix it.
Or like Antrhopics recent research what if it just takes on the personality of a sloppy dev... What if there was an agent which goes through the context and makes sure that the LLM's 'personality' is competent.
The context manager decides what the long and short term memory needs to be.
Dynamic context. Kinda like us.
> You tell AI write some code
> It writes code
> Code has error
> You tell it to fix the error
> It fixes it
But now that "fixing" is in the context and sitting there not contributing to anything. What we need is this:
> It goes back to the earlier code it sent
> Adds the fix there
> Deletes the messages of you telling it to fix the code
We don't know anything at this point. What if it just follows the pattern of making a mistake and you telling it to fix it.
Or like Antrhopics recent research what if it just takes on the personality of a sloppy dev... What if there was an agent which goes through the context and makes sure that the LLM's 'personality' is competent.
The context manager decides what the long and short term memory needs to be.
Dynamic context. Kinda like us.
AI is wayyyyyy under hyped
I was one of the people on twitter saying gpt-5 will be AGI in the early days of gpt-4: which is now considered an unusable model by any standards
At this moment, we are the bottle neck: Skill Issue
If you look at nations, or groups of people in general, the consensus always happens—or rather, policies always get enacted—after the fact. No action is taken during a decline in birthrate. For a better example: when the birth rate goes from 4 to 3, nobody sounds the alarm. It’s only when it reaches 1 or a negative number that policies start to get passed and the general public agrees that their birthrate is declining.
In the same way nobody is aware of the insane performance leap from gpt-4 to gpt-5.4
> You just need to extrapolate a bit to understand the situation we are in
You have to ignore the consensus of "ai slop" and try to push these models to any limit you can imagine them having
I was one of the people on twitter saying gpt-5 will be AGI in the early days of gpt-4: which is now considered an unusable model by any standards
At this moment, we are the bottle neck: Skill Issue
If you look at nations, or groups of people in general, the consensus always happens—or rather, policies always get enacted—after the fact. No action is taken during a decline in birthrate. For a better example: when the birth rate goes from 4 to 3, nobody sounds the alarm. It’s only when it reaches 1 or a negative number that policies start to get passed and the general public agrees that their birthrate is declining.
In the same way nobody is aware of the insane performance leap from gpt-4 to gpt-5.4
> You just need to extrapolate a bit to understand the situation we are in
You have to ignore the consensus of "ai slop" and try to push these models to any limit you can imagine them having
👍5👎4
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"AGI HAS BEEN ACHIEVED INTERNALLY"
The pentagon really fumbled this one
Not good when AGI is your supply chain risk lol
Not good when AGI is your supply chain risk lol