It's as if the scientific method was created for agentic systems!!!

They could utilize it better than US!!!

Do you realize how insane that is

Before you strike your enemy
Ask Claude where to strike

- Sun Tzu

You now have the computational power in your laptop of which a few decades back was the pinnacle of what scientists could run their experiments on

This is not an ad for Morse Law

What I want to emphasize is that now you have, not only more compute than those scientists but also more intelligence in your hands

I never cared about CPU before I only looked at the GPUs (for gaming) But now i am so grateful for my beloved cores

Thank you intelligence in the sky

Thank you Morse law 🙇

I don't know how I missed this

gpt 5-4 mini beats claude in coding

and the open source labs are just around the corner

irl prompt injection 😆

Neurons that fire together wire together

If I was an investor and had the opportunity I would happily invest 100% of my portfolio into major ai companies (open ai, anthropic, groq, moonshot...) even at this stage

The sentiment right now is that they are bubbles about to implode

My gut tells me otherwise

Karpathy is soooo right

> How good is your planning?
> How good is your short/long term memory?
> How much do you care?

Imagine creating a detailed memory palace on what you want to get done and constantly updating it... Literally GOD MODE
(...also being able to recall past sessions 🫠)

The landscape has completely changed

Those niche skills matter more than anything now

The hardest thing in the world is simple

I strongly believe smart context management would positively impact our AI workflows

> You tell AI write some code
> It writes code
> Code has error
> You tell it to fix the error
> It fixes it

But now that "fixing" is in the context and sitting there not contributing to anything. What we need is this:

> It goes back to the earlier code it sent
> Adds the fix there
> Deletes the messages of you telling it to fix the code

We don't know anything at this point. What if it just follows the pattern of making a mistake and you telling it to fix it.

Or like Antrhopics recent research what if it just takes on the personality of a sloppy dev... What if there was an agent which goes through the context and makes sure that the LLM's 'personality' is competent.

The context manager decides what the long and short term memory needs to be.

Dynamic context. Kinda like us.

Anthropic's research

Post on X

Evolution is nature's way of finding product market fit

- Charles Darwin

AI is wayyyyyy under hyped

I was one of the people on twitter saying gpt-5 will be AGI in the early days of gpt-4: which is now considered an unusable model by any standards

At this moment, we are the bottle neck: Skill Issue

If you look at nations, or groups of people in general, the consensus always happens—or rather, policies always get enacted—after the fact. No action is taken during a decline in birthrate. For a better example: when the birth rate goes from 4 to 3, nobody sounds the alarm. It’s only when it reaches 1 or a negative number that policies start to get passed and the general public agrees that their birthrate is declining.

In the same way nobody is aware of the insane performance leap from gpt-4 to gpt-5.4
> You just need to extrapolate a bit to understand the situation we are in

You have to ignore the consensus of "ai slop" and try to push these models to any limit you can imagine them having

German word for library:

Bibliotek 🗿

New open source drop!!!!
> 6x cheaper than opus

"AGI HAS BEEN ACHIEVED INTERNALLY"