I'm gonna call this a different name though. Strategy pattern doesn't suits it.
Any of these represents the intent more efficiently:
- Parsed value generation pattern
- Data passing pattern
- Data controlling flow
- Context passing

I like the Context Passing since it matches with the above routing system I'm about to design.

Let me know in the @webpp_discuss group if you have a better name for it.

You can find another one hour and half video of me working on the project here:
https://www.aparat.com/v/gay0q

First stages of implementing the new routing system idea.

Full video: https://www.aparat.com/v/8Rvcj

4hours of me working on this project:

https://www.aparat.com/v/wAGx3

I just found out that I've been mistakenly recording the live coding video with this image on top of everything. 😂

@webpp

I find happiness in finding bugs in IDEs. 🤣

https://twitter.com/the_moisrex/status/1257796596726726658?s=20

Let's see how much time it will take CLion to fix it 😁
The tweet!

I need to write something like this for every type I introduce in the framework. See compiler developers? I need C++20's "concepts" now!

If you know a way I can use them fully, please say so in the @webpp_discuss. Thanks.

Oh, would you look at that! Clang 10 supports it and GCC 9.3.0 needs -fconcepts to work.

I need some macro magic to use these in the CMake and also in the project fully.

Well not in my project you don't! 😂

Seems like GCC 9.3.0 with -fconcepts is no good. There's a bug.
I haven't tested the new version 10 that came out today which doesn't need the -fconcepts though.

Clang 10.0.0 works fine though.

GCC 10.1.0 works just fine.
https://godbolt.org/z/7Z7cWh

Just made the core library header-only.
Hopefully I won't regret it later.
If you don't like it, tell me in the @webpp_discuss so we can talk about it.

The project's minimum compiler requirements:
I haven't tested other compilers though!