🔴 A 285% increase in the number of Israelis who left the country permanently

[NP]

🔴 Hezbollah Scenes from the operation to target a Merkava tank at the Hadab Yarin site of the Israeli enemy army on the Lebanese-Palestinian border

[G&T]

Duck 🦆

[V]

👑 From the youth of Yemen to the oppressed children of Gaza.. "Your cause is our cause and an unbreakable pledge that we will carry the banner of revenge for you and victory for your oppression in the coming days."

[Auto gen subtitles]

[G&T]

🇾🇪 https://t.me/warfareanalysis

More on the ICJ ruling and its consequences:

There is a precedent, dated 21 June 1971, in which the ICJ ruled a similar advisory opinion on an occupation (Namibia vs South Africa).

The Court found that
1. the continued presence of South Africa in Namibia was illegal
2. South Africa was under an obligation to withdraw its administration immediately
3. States Members of the United Nations were under an obligation to recognize the illegality of the occupation and the invalidity of its acts on behalf of or concerning the occupied
4. States Members were to refrain from any acts implying recognition of the legality of, or lending support or assistance to, such presence and administration.
5. Non Member States were to give assistance in the action taken by the United Nations with regard to Namibia.

Comment:
It looks like today’s ruling cannot be contested, as it is based on a solid precedent. Furthermore, this ruling can be used by you immediately if the authorities harass you at protests or if you get sued for slander or called an anti-semite. Plus, it has the potential of being used for suing businesses that trade with the occupation.


IMPORTANT:
From today on, even those IOF soldiers who didn’t go to combat could be charged with partaking in apartheid.
• If you live in a country that has signed the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (like most states in the ME, except Saudi and UAE, but including Egypt, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan), lucky you.
• If you don’t but your country is part of the ICC, apartheid is prosecuted as a war crime or a crime against humanity through the ICC.


Remember that

1) Palestine has accepted the jurisdiction of the ICC so any act of apartheid done in the Occupied Territories by anyone can be punished by the ICC.
2) Any national of any country under the ICC can be punished for any war crime or crime against humanity anywhere

‼️It is counterintuitive but suing a “small fish” first (for example an IOF soldier who just came back to your country) might be way more important than a "big name", and on two counts: for one, s/he is unlikely to enjoy the same protection as a “big fish” and, for two, s/he might use something in self-defense that incriminates a bigger fish (like, for example, a military procedure or an order they were given) or helps discover a trail of responsibilities in his/her higher-ups that can lead to charging more important people despite their "friends".

[RT]