Zionist Channel 13:

“Shin Bet announces the arrest of a person in Israel against the backdrop of a very serious security issue.”

[J]

⚡️Photo of a completely destroyed burning Zionist military bulldozer near the Egypt-Gaza border in Rafah.

[G&T]

The Cradle has a great article comparing the American plan for South Vietnam to the occupation’s plan for Gaza.

Highlights:

Any effective post-war plan must realistically consider the conditions and power dynamics that have emerged from a conflict because the success of a “day after” strategy relies heavily on acknowledging and adapting to them.

The US strategy in the Vietnam War (Strategic Hamlet Program, aimed at creating “fortified villages” to reduce the influence of the North Vietnam-supported National Liberation Front (NLF) on rural villagers) failed because it didn’t account for the complex social and cultural dynamics of Vietnamese rural life.

The NLF exploited the program’s failures as propaganda, highlighting the incompetence of the US-backed South Vietnamese government.

The occupation’s plan for Gaza reportedly includes:
📌A transition process to be overseen by a steering committee led by the US and its allied Arab partners.
📌An international force (including Egypt, Jordan, the UAE, and Morocco) to oversee security
📌A US command providing control, and logistics support from outside Gaza.
📌A compliant Palestinian force to be established to gradually take on local security responsibilities.

This mirrors the US strategy that failed in Vietnam in the 60s.

The Financial Times hinted that Israel is preparing to test these “Hamas-free bubbles” in Al-Atatra, Beit Hanoun, and Beit Lahia. According to Lebanese daily Al-Akhbar, the occupation is openly coordinating with the Palestinian security services to “create a wide circle of communication with specific Gazan families, businessmen and local companies,” and the goal is to “form the nucleus of an alternative authority.”

The occupation hopes that the “bubbles” can then be expanded southward.

It is highly likely that these “bubbles” will incur into the same problems as the Strategic Hamlet Program, as the Palestinian factions refuse to let any international or Arab force enter the Gaza Strip.

Furthermore, an opinion poll published last month by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research showed that 75 percent of Gaza’s population opposes the deployment of an Arab security force and that Hamas still garners significant popularity in the region.

[RT]

If the terrorist ISIS believes it represents Sunni Islam (in reality, it is an American creation that benefited from the experiences of the Algerian secular regime, which created "Islamic" groups to kill its opponents and terrorize "Islamic political parties" in the 1990s), then the Wahhabi ideology is the most dangerous ideology that has affected Muslims.

Wahhabi ideology does not adhere to the Sunnah in any of its takfiri rulings. Their attack on the Shia is in itself against Islam:

- If the Shia are Muslims, they should not be harmed.

- If they are not Muslims, their rights must be protected.

Islam is unequivocal that civilians must never be harmed, and it is absolutely forbidden to attack or demolish places of worship.

The takfir of an entire group by the majority of Sunni scholars is meant to warn Muslims against a particular deviation of a sect, and it does not mean that every individual belonging to that sect is a non-believer.

Takfir among the majority of Sunni scholars has rules and is not collective. The only authorized entity is a Muslim judge under a Muslim government.

The individual is debated first, then presents their evidence, is given a chance to repent, and is granted time. If they decide to leave Islam, they are given the choice between emigrating from the lands of Islam (which are governed by Islam) or facing punishment.
And this only applies if this individual PUBLICLY stated that he’s LEAVING Islam.

This is because allegiance to religion equates to allegiance to the state in this context. Betraying religion is betraying the state.

If someone is originally a non-Muslim, they have rights and duties. One of these rights is absolute protection and complete freedom to practice their religion. They even have the right to their own courts based on their religion.

One of these duties is to contribute to the state treasury. Muslims pay what is known as zakat to the public treasury, while non-Muslims pay what is known as jizya. If they choose not to pay it, that is their right, but they will not receive public services or protection from the ruling government.

As for the terrorist group ISIS, all their ideology is built on the extremist, deviant Saudi Wahhabi ideology.

Which their “scholars” are Saudi agents used and directed by the US intelligence.

So F these terrorists

[V]