The Guardian UK:

Hundreds of mostly pro-Palestine protesters have been arrested since the UK Home Office redefined the sort of protest that could be restricted by the police, allowing it where there is merely a “more than minor” hindrance to people’s daily lives.

In their legal challenge to the regulations, the National Council for Civil Liberties, also known as Liberty, argued that they represented “a constitutionally unprecedented attempt on the part of the executive to achieve by the back door through delegated legislation what it was unable to achieve by the front”.

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman was found to have both acted outside her powers and to have failed to consult properly over regulations that would be likely to increase prosecutions of protesters by a third. Shortly before her resignation last year, Braverman used so-called Henry VIII powers to lower the threshold for the police to impose restrictions on protests.

The change, redefining what could be regarded as “serious disruption” and therefore liable to conditions, had been made after the House of Lords had rejected the same change, proposed months earlier in a heavily debated and scrutinised new Public Order Act.

The Home Office said it would appeal against the ruling.

Lately, they are losing all the appeals.

[RT]

Romanian senator denounces planned UNGA anti-Serb resolution

The upcoming vote on a Western-backed UN General Assembly resolution on the 1995 Srebrenica events, scheduled for May 23, to unfairly label Serbia as "a genocidal nation" has a hidden agenda, senator of the Romanian parliament and leader of S.O.S. Romania party Diana Iovanovici Șoșoacă believes.

She said, “The resolution against Serbia is a classic example of how the collective West wants to bring to their knees the states that affirm their independence. It is important that all countries that want to resist the advancement of the West take a stand and defend Serbia. It is not only about Serbia but about all free countries that can be condemned at any moment if the collective West gets angry and wishes to tarnish and marginalize them”.

She says the resolution, formally proposed by Germany and Rwanda, is nothing but “the collective West's way of inventing culprits on the basis of which to colonize other states.”

The draft resolution suggests declaring July 11 as "the International Day of Reflection and Commemoration of the 1995 Genocide in Srebrenica", with annual observance to condemn the "denial of this genocide."

The tragedy of Srebrenica was a part of the Bosnian War. In July 1995, after Serb militias encircled a Muslim enclave of Srebrenica, about 8,000 local Bosnian Muslims went missing, though some experts argue these numbers are inflated. The Western media instantly declared them ‘massacred’ by Serbs. While Belgrade and Banja Luka acknowledge the killings, they reject the label "genocide."

Context:
• The UN resolution does not acknowledge the role the Dutch blue helmets, in charge of protecting civilians, had in the massacre by not acting against it
• President of Serbia, Aleksandar Vučić, won the elections in December 2023
• The elections were followed by riots, which he said were instigated by “foreign services”
• He wants to forego joining the EU in favour of the BRICS
• Germany and Rwanda have strong ties to Israel

The whole system is rigged, but now it’s easier to spot them.

[RT]

✍️: Ezzat Al-Rishq

We said and still say that the occupying state fears nothing as much as it fears the truth and resistance.

As for the resistance, led by the Qassam Brigades, it is the Nazi army tasting the horrors in the field.

As for the truth, it is a historical enemy of the usurping entity that was established and founded on lying and stealing land, revealing its ugly, criminal face.

The inability of Netanyahu’s army in the face of resistance prompted him to commit massacres against civilians, and his inability and confusion in the face of the truth prompted him to abuse the media and kill its workers.

The occupying state's goods are lies, murder and abuse.

Our observations on the editorial policies of some foreign news agencies and media are many, yet we have been and are still demanding that Arab and foreign media be allowed to enter Gaza without restrictions or conditions.

We condemned in a clear and official statement the terrorism of the occupation authorities with the Associated Press, but at the same time I was not surprised by the repression and media restrictions.

It should be noted that AP was founded in May 1848. It is 100 years older than Israel. Perhaps it is an additional factor that deepens the entity’s hatred for everything that has a history and roots.

[A.k]