IDF drones are heavily opening fire on homes of citizens in Nusseirat camp in the central #Gaza Strip.

An hour ago heavy IOF artillery shelling and gunfire was reported in the eastern areas of the northern #Gaza Strip.


🔗

🔴Hamas:
—
In the name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

We in the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) consider the military operation carried out by the Islamic Republic of Iran against the occupying zionist entity as a natural right and a deserved response to the crime of targeting the Iranian consulate in Damascus and the assassination of a number of Revolutionary Guard leaders there.

As we affirm the natural right of countries and peoples of the region to defend themselves in the face of zionist aggressions, we call upon our Arab and Islamic nation, the free people of the world, and the resistance forces in the region to continue their support for the Al-Aqsa Flood, and the right of our Palestinian people to freedom, independence, and the establishment of their Palestinian state with its capital as Al-Quds.

Islamic Resistance Movement - Hamas
Sunday: 05 Shawwal 1445H
Corresponding: 14 April 2024

[JU]

Netanyahu in the Knesset a few hours before the Iranian attack

https://t.me/warfareanalysis/29643

🔗

📸A picture to record in history

Iran's drones and missiles over the sky of Quds to attack the criminal Zionist regime.

[JU]

📰Haaretz's cover for Sunday chooses an image of the Iranian attack that does not show any missile

[JU]

🔽Which Israeli targets did IRGC missiles hit?

🇮🇷Tehran, IRNA- Ballistic missiles fired by Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guards Corps has targeted the Zionist regime’s Navatim Airbase, located in the south of the occupied territories.

[JU]

🚨Military correspondent for the Hebrew Channel 12:

Saudi Arabia and Jordan were part of the monitoring and response system managed by the United States.

[JU]

🇮🇷A former commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has warned the Israel regime that any stupid act against Iran will end the miserable life of the criminal regime.

[JU]

🔽Iranian Chief of Staff: Our attack led to the destruction of two important Israeli military sites

[JU]

❌Missile sirens ring in the settlements of "Manara" and "Margaliot" in northeastern occupied Palestine.

[JU]

🇴🇲Sultanate of Oman: We are closely following the escalation in the Middle East and call for restraint.

[JU]

Israeli Media suggests that Israel should attack all of the Iranian Oil Fields. At the same time he admits that Israel is too weak to deter anyone from attacking them.

🔗

A very detailed analysis of why Hamas has been sending $300 USD unguided rockets into Israel for the last 10+ years, despite the iron dome.

This also explains just how effective the Iranian attack was:


The financial implications of interception operations, particularly those involving advanced missile systems, are profoundly multi-faceted and extend far beyond the immediate and obvious expenditures. These operations, while essential for national security, entail a labyrinth of direct and indirect costs that ripple through multiple layers of both the economy and society.

Firstly, the direct costs are substantial. Each interception missile, costing up to $2 million, is just the tip of the iceberg. Operating these systems requires a highly specialized workforce, not only in terms of the military personnel directly involved in deployment and operation but also the engineers and support staff responsible for the maintenance and readiness of the equipment. Additionally, these systems are not standalone; they require an infrastructure of radar and communication technology that must be constantly updated and maintained.

The logistics of mobilizing assets like aircraft carriers and managing airspace closures also contribute significantly to the costs. These activities disrupt not only military budgets but also civilian aviation and local economies. For instance, closing airspaces can delay commercial flights, resulting in economic losses for airlines and an indirect impact on industries reliant on timely air transport, such as logistics and supply chains.

Further, the strategic necessity to monitor multiple fronts increases the need for satellite surveillance, aerial reconnaissance, and human intelligence—all requiring substantial investment in technology and human resources. This state of heightened alert drains resources that could be allocated to other critical areas such as education, healthcare, or infrastructure development.

Beyond the immediate operational costs, there are profound long-term economic implications. For countries like Israel, where high-tech industries play a pivotal role in the national economy, the perception of instability or ongoing conflict can deter multinational corporations from investing or maintaining their presence in the market. The recent decision by a tech giant like Samsung to move out of Israel underscores this risk. Such departures not only mean a direct loss of jobs and tax revenue but also a potential decrease in global investor confidence, which can stymie the growth of local startups and dissuade other foreign investments.

The departure of high-tech firms also affects the country's innovation ecosystem. These companies provide not only employment but also platforms for skills development and technological advancements. Their exit can lead to a 'brain drain', where highly skilled workers leave the country in search of stable opportunities elsewhere, further weakening the local economy and its global competitiveness.

Moreover, the long-term societal costs of continuous military engagement are profound. Resources diverted towards defense spending are resources not spent on other societal needs. The psychological impact on the civilian population, living under constant threat and disruption, can also not be underestimated. It affects daily life, mental health, and the social fabric itself.

In conclusion, while the visible costs of interception operations are staggering, the less visible, indirect costs—economic disruptions, the potential flight of international businesses, and the societal toll—can be even more deleterious. The decisions to deploy these systems, therefore, must be weighed not just in the context of immediate security needs but also in terms of long-term national interests and health. Such a nuanced understanding is crucial for policymakers who navigate these complex trade-offs.


Note:

I didn’t write this btw


🔗