Since I posted this, it's become apparent to the brainwashed masses in the west. Ukraine never stood any chance of winning. Russia is stronger now than it was in February 2022 when we were told Ukraine not only COULD win (it couldn't), but WAS GOING TO win. Militarily, economically, geostrategically, Russia is in the strongest position in its entire history post-1991. We were lied to. Gullible fools believed it.
π3
Forwarded from Volound (Conor)
Mossad reporting a 7:1 kill ratio in favour of Russia. This is the exact opposite of the 7:1 that Ukraine Department of Defense sources claim. Western media lies rely on a completely fake upside-down world being portrayed in order for their flimsy narratives to have any chance of uptake.
π3
It's now been admitted by everyone of consequence in the west that Ukraine is facing an uphill battle against an artillery overmatch of 10:1. I was claiming this a year ago. It is now publically admitted by our highest political and diplomatic and military elites. It's even worse now than it was then. More Ukrainians are dying today than were dying a year ago, or 2 years ago. This is inevitable when the military situation now is the worst it has ever been for Ukraine. Ukraine's lines are collapsing and Russians are advancing as slowly as possible to minimise casualties on their own side. There is no race against time. The west IS NOT kicking up factories to mass-produce shells and bombs and advanced war machines. The west is looking on with relative apathy. Ukraine is not intended to win. It's intended to weaken and destabilise Russia and it has failed to do this. The reality is that what we have done in Ukraine has completely backfired, bringing forward a timeline of dedollarisation and multipolarity. BRICS is emerging as the new global superalliance. NATO is crumbling just like the Ukrainian front line. We in the west should be ashamed.
π6π1
Also, I'm proud that this was the first thing I ever said on telegram.
πΎ2π«‘1
https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2024/04/27/7453222/
Die Welt quoted an unnamed member of the Ukrainian delegation as saying: "It was the best deal we could have had."
Die Welt writes that Davyd Arakhamiia, a member of the Ukrainian delegation, suggested in November 2023 why the leaders of the two countries had not met. The then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kyiv on 9 April and said that London would "not sign anything" with Putin and that Ukraine should continue fighting. Later, Johnson rejected ever saying that. However, there are reasons to believe that the proposal to provide security guarantees to Ukraine in agreement with Russia failed at this stage.
We abrogated Ukraine's sovereignty and forced a perpetual war.
Die Welt quoted an unnamed member of the Ukrainian delegation as saying: "It was the best deal we could have had."
Die Welt writes that Davyd Arakhamiia, a member of the Ukrainian delegation, suggested in November 2023 why the leaders of the two countries had not met. The then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson arrived in Kyiv on 9 April and said that London would "not sign anything" with Putin and that Ukraine should continue fighting. Later, Johnson rejected ever saying that. However, there are reasons to believe that the proposal to provide security guarantees to Ukraine in agreement with Russia failed at this stage.
We abrogated Ukraine's sovereignty and forced a perpetual war.
Ukrainska Pravda
Die Welt publishes peace deal Ukraine and Russia could have signed in April 2022
Die Welt, a German media outlet, has stated that a peace agreement could have been signed a few weeks after the start of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The conditions for ending the war then were spelled out in a 17-page draft agreement that the parties agreedβ¦
π’1