Protocol revenue β tokenholder revenue
P/F, P/S are protocol-level, not token-level metrics.
We introduce Effective Multipliers, accounting:
- token revenue (not protocol revenue)
- cashflow-receiving token supply instead of circulating supply
It is designed for: How expensive is the token relative to the cashflow it captures?
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2011937946459345361
P/F, P/S are protocol-level, not token-level metrics.
We introduce Effective Multipliers, accounting:
- token revenue (not protocol revenue)
- cashflow-receiving token supply instead of circulating supply
It is designed for: How expensive is the token relative to the cashflow it captures?
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2011937946459345361
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
Pricing the Revenue: Effective Revenue Multipliers
π1
The State of Cashflow Pricing:
- Buyback revenue is generally more expensive than direct fee sharing (except $PUMP)
- Owning $1 of tokens in $CRV, $AERO, $PENDLE, or $YB earns up to 3-7x yield vs. average buybacks
- The $UNI revenue is 28 times more expensive than $CRV and 74 times more expensive than $AERO.
Details in our recent research piece:
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2015931557995758017?s
- Buyback revenue is generally more expensive than direct fee sharing (except $PUMP)
- Owning $1 of tokens in $CRV, $AERO, $PENDLE, or $YB earns up to 3-7x yield vs. average buybacks
- The $UNI revenue is 28 times more expensive than $CRV and 74 times more expensive than $AERO.
Details in our recent research piece:
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2015931557995758017?s
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
Valuing Cashflow Without Narratives
π1
Which tokens drive more value?
Revenue pricing overview by Stacy Muur
https://x.com/stacy_muur/status/2016335173345026422?s=46
Revenue pricing overview by Stacy Muur
https://x.com/stacy_muur/status/2016335173345026422?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
Stacy Muur (@stacy_muur) on X
If you invest $10,000 in AERO, you get $4,167/year in actual yield.
If you invest $10,000 in UNI, you get $56/year.
@valueverse_ai research compares revenue efficiency across major DeFi tokens β
Two types of DeFi revenue models:
β’ Fee-sharing: You lockβ¦
If you invest $10,000 in UNI, you get $56/year.
@valueverse_ai research compares revenue efficiency across major DeFi tokens β
Two types of DeFi revenue models:
β’ Fee-sharing: You lockβ¦
π1
$CRV $YB $AERO $VELO epochs completion soon
New data & updated multipliers coming
New data & updated multipliers coming
π1
$HYPE value structure has much more functions than is presented by Defillama
Some investors miss it
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2016772813450035201
Some investors miss it
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2016772813450035201
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
$HYPE has not only buybacks:
- staking in validators (2%, 43.8% $HYPE is staked)
- HyperEVM/HyperCore burns
- It's powerful discount token (up to 40% fees discount)
- and more (link in comment)
Complicated? $HYPE Revenue Multiplier -> one magnitude to trackβ¦
- staking in validators (2%, 43.8% $HYPE is staked)
- HyperEVM/HyperCore burns
- It's powerful discount token (up to 40% fees discount)
- and more (link in comment)
Complicated? $HYPE Revenue Multiplier -> one magnitude to trackβ¦
π1
TL;DR:
Defillama tried to do utility mapping, but even for biggest & most known projects -> incorrect
Valueverse does it better
https://x.com/vasily_sumanov/status/2016779448444735757?s=20
Defillama tried to do utility mapping, but even for biggest & most known projects -> incorrect
Valueverse does it better
https://x.com/vasily_sumanov/status/2016779448444735757?s=20
X (formerly Twitter)
Vasily Sumanov (@vasily_sumanov) on X
The brief review of @DefiLlama's "Token Rights":
- $CRV incomplete (+ holders' revenue data is wrong)
- $HYPE utility incomplete
- $AERO incorrect, none of at lest three revenue sources are there (+ incorrect holders' revenue data)
The correct $CRV is belowπ
- $CRV incomplete (+ holders' revenue data is wrong)
- $HYPE utility incomplete
- $AERO incorrect, none of at lest three revenue sources are there (+ incorrect holders' revenue data)
The correct $CRV is belowπ
π1
We estimate that the number of DeFi assets with solid fundamentals is < 20.
The good news is that this number will rise to the hundreds (or even thousands) in one to two years.
By identifying them early, we can find fundamental gems.
β’ For example, $CVX made dollars per token since launch and rose to $50.
β’ $AERO, priced at $0.03, earned $0.22 per token in cash flow in the following years.
These assets exist, and we just need to analyze them quickly and make the right moves.
β’ Clear input data
β’ Revenue multipliers (not F/S, P/S, and all that legacy stuff).
β’ Growth models accounting for dilution.
A kind of a plan for Revenue Meta
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2016792140224074022
The good news is that this number will rise to the hundreds (or even thousands) in one to two years.
By identifying them early, we can find fundamental gems.
β’ For example, $CVX made dollars per token since launch and rose to $50.
β’ $AERO, priced at $0.03, earned $0.22 per token in cash flow in the following years.
These assets exist, and we just need to analyze them quickly and make the right moves.
β’ Clear input data
β’ Revenue multipliers (not F/S, P/S, and all that legacy stuff).
β’ Growth models accounting for dilution.
A kind of a plan for Revenue Meta
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2016792140224074022
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
Truly, only few ones have a value
Less than 20 tokens with tangible revenue & value (add $CRV, $YB, $AERO, $PENDLE) to your list
And itβs for entire DeFi!
Less than 20 tokens with tangible revenue & value (add $CRV, $YB, $AERO, $PENDLE) to your list
And itβs for entire DeFi!
β€2π1π₯1π―1
Poor data analysis = information asymmetry
Any asymmetry is an advantage
https://x.com/vasily_sumanov/status/2016831785842463051?s=46
Any asymmetry is an advantage
https://x.com/vasily_sumanov/status/2016831785842463051?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
Vasily Sumanov (@vasily_sumanov) on X
I had a call with a TradFi guy.
- Data reporting is poor and inaccurate.
- The quality of 99% of assets is poor.
- The majority of projects will never be considered "a business."
We need to do better.
- Data reporting is poor and inaccurate.
- The quality of 99% of assets is poor.
- The majority of projects will never be considered "a business."
We need to do better.
π1
Btw The DAO is back with Vitalik in multisig
https://x.com/thedaofund/status/2016898906915811488
The Second Chanceπ
https://x.com/thedaofund/status/2016898906915811488
The Second Chanceπ
X (formerly Twitter)
thedao.fund (@thedaofund) on X
TheDAO is back. BULLISH
A decade later, weβre opening a new chapter.
TheDAO Security Fund: activating 75,000+ ETH to strengthen Ethereum security.
https://t.co/VV3cH313TE
A decade later, weβre opening a new chapter.
TheDAO Security Fund: activating 75,000+ ETH to strengthen Ethereum security.
https://t.co/VV3cH313TE
π2
Who earns when everything is going down?
DEX tokens
DEXes literally have been printing fees today. An overview coming soon.
DEX tokens
DEXes literally have been printing fees today. An overview coming soon.
π4
Cashflow Machines
Market down -> they print even more fees
The price could decline, but, unlike with other assets, holders receive fees for owning them.
The key to building wealth in a more fundamental paradigm is to buy future revenue while itβs cheap and receive it all the way through, while the market will reprice assets back.
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2017690176630501474?s=46
Market down -> they print even more fees
The price could decline, but, unlike with other assets, holders receive fees for owning them.
The key to building wealth in a more fundamental paradigm is to buy future revenue while itβs cheap and receive it all the way through, while the market will reprice assets back.
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2017690176630501474?s=46
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
Some assets made huge revenue from volatility today
Revenue vs. price -> it's what matters rn.
Time to explore cashflow machines.
Revenue vs. price -> it's what matters rn.
Time to explore cashflow machines.
π₯4β€1π1
Itβs it time to dig into Molt ecosystem AI tokens?
Curious if they have cashflow or at least some utility
Curious if they have cashflow or at least some utility
β€6
Volatility pays DEX tokens, especially those that effectively capture revenue
Analysis of other ones $CRV $AERO etc comes soon
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2018408359855337948
Analysis of other ones $CRV $AERO etc comes soon
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2018408359855337948
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
How tokens of liquidity protocols benefit from recent volatility?
See the revenue captured by @yieldbasis's $YB in the last few days. Next fee distribution epochs will be big ones.
Data for other tracked tokens $CRV $AERO $PUMP $HYPE $UNI comes soon
See the revenue captured by @yieldbasis's $YB in the last few days. Next fee distribution epochs will be big ones.
Data for other tracked tokens $CRV $AERO $PUMP $HYPE $UNI comes soon
π4π2
You asked, we listened.
We've opened an adjacent group for everyone to discuss, question, or share research.
https://t.me/+utqeEzcra7hhMmYy
We've opened an adjacent group for everyone to discuss, question, or share research.
https://t.me/+utqeEzcra7hhMmYy
Telegram
Valueverse Forum
Youβve been invited to join this group on Telegram.
π₯5π1
It's time for a new stuff.
Crazy volatility happened and huge $ of mcap was wiped out.
Which tokens (and their holders) made money on that?
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2019892046597861720?s=20
Crazy volatility happened and huge $ of mcap was wiped out.
Which tokens (and their holders) made money on that?
https://x.com/valueverse_ai/status/2019892046597861720?s=20
X (formerly Twitter)
Valueverse (@valueverse_ai) on X
Revenue from Volatility: The Red Week Exploration
π₯2
BASE eco is fueled up with the new batch of emerging revenue-generating assets with AI and novel Defi solutions
All of them are super early
Thinking to do a dedicated report for that
All of them are super early
Thinking to do a dedicated report for that
β€10π₯1