Forwarded from Wendy Rogers
The audit has been referred to the Arizona Attorney General for further action.
Forwarded from Liberty Overwatch (Patriot)
Maricopa County Audit Concludes: ‘Election Should Not Be Certified’
The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity.
Cyber Ninjas writes, “based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable.
Major issues identified:
• There were more than 10,000 double votes across county lines.
• Tens of thousands of ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election and could not have physically received their ballots, legally.
• None of the systems related to elections integrity had numbers that would balance and agree with each other.
• The voter rolls and the registration management process itself have many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election.
• Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which we can find no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address, moved voters, etc.
• Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed.
• There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election.
• There was back dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more.
• Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server.
• Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing.
• Logs appeared to be intentionally rolled over, and all the data in the database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully cleared.
• On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, originals were duplicated more than once, and the Auditors were never provided Chain-of- Custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the Auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results.
• There were substantial statistically significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on- demand printed ballots, as well as a statistically significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail- in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.”
Read 📑 Executive Summary
Watch 📺 Audit Report Hearing
Learn more 🔎🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
The audit report identifies more than 57K questionable votes, intentionally deleted election files, and other suspicious voting machine activity.
Cyber Ninjas writes, “based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable.
Major issues identified:
• There were more than 10,000 double votes across county lines.
• Tens of thousands of ballots cast from individuals who had moved prior to the election and could not have physically received their ballots, legally.
• None of the systems related to elections integrity had numbers that would balance and agree with each other.
• The voter rolls and the registration management process itself have many data integrity issues. For instance, over 200 individuals were easily identifiable as likely being the same person but having two different Voter IDs and voting twice in the election.
• Without access to the County’s detailed records including personally identifiable information and registration systems it is more likely there were many tens of thousands of improper votes in the election from double voters, deceased voters, voters for which we can find no trace in the public records nor association to their voting address, moved voters, etc.
• Proper voter registration law and procedures were not followed.
• There were unexplained large purges of registered voters, right after the election, of people who had voted in the election.
• There was back dating of registrations, adjustments made to historical voting and voter records, unexplained linking of voter registration affidavits to multiple voters and more.
• Files were missing from the Election Management System (EMS) Server.
• Ballot images on the EMS were corrupt or missing.
• Logs appeared to be intentionally rolled over, and all the data in the database related to the 2020 General Election had been fully cleared.
• On the ballot side, batches were not always clearly delineated, duplicated ballots were missing the required serial numbers, originals were duplicated more than once, and the Auditors were never provided Chain-of- Custody documentation for the ballots for the time-period prior to the ballot’s movement into the Auditors’ care. This all increased the complexity and difficulty in properly auditing the results.
• There were substantial statistically significant anomalies identified in the ratio of hand-folded ballots, on- demand printed ballots, as well as a statistically significant increase in provisional ballot rejections for a mail- in ballot already being cast, suggestive of mail-in ballots being cast for voters without their knowledge.”
Read 📑 Executive Summary
Watch 📺 Audit Report Hearing
Learn more 🔎🧵 AZ Thread
@LibertyOverwatchChannel
—
Telegram
Liberty Overwatch
Maricopa County Audit Executive Summary Updated Final Version
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In his closing remarks, AZ Senate Judiciary Chair Warren Petersen identified 8 issues that need to be addressed.
Forwarded from TruthHammer 🙏🇺🇸 (any DM's you get are fake) (TruthHammer888)
Hammer's Opinion on what just happened.
The AZ audit proved:
- numerous state laws were not followed.
- obstruction occurred to prevent a full audit.
- it was impossible to CERTIFY the election.
Attorney General Brnovich now has political cover to:
- seize everthing Maricopa refused to provide.
- conduct a criminal investigation on numerous matters.
The Senate now has political cover to:
- Issue several "findings of fact", recognizing the election was illegally certified.
- Recall the Electors for Biden, and unleash legendary REEEEEEEING.
Based on what was presented so far, the Senate does NOT have the ability to:
- Conclude that Trump won and certify their electors for him (evidence Trump won was NOT presented today).
The AZ audit proved:
- numerous state laws were not followed.
- obstruction occurred to prevent a full audit.
- it was impossible to CERTIFY the election.
Attorney General Brnovich now has political cover to:
- seize everthing Maricopa refused to provide.
- conduct a criminal investigation on numerous matters.
The Senate now has political cover to:
- Issue several "findings of fact", recognizing the election was illegally certified.
- Recall the Electors for Biden, and unleash legendary REEEEEEEING.
Based on what was presented so far, the Senate does NOT have the ability to:
- Conclude that Trump won and certify their electors for him (evidence Trump won was NOT presented today).
Forwarded from General Flynn ️
Exceptional summary of the Maricopa County full forensic audit from the great Wendy Strauch Mahoney at www.uncoverdc.com
Forwarded from General Flynn ️
UncoverDC
Maricopa County Audit Report: Over 57k Votes In Question
Arizona’s Maricopa County forensic audit report presentation began at 4:00 EST Friday in the State Senate showing over 57,000 votes are in question. The Maricopa audit is just one county in Arizona but it is the fourth largest county in terms of population…
Forwarded from Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
Just in case its not clear:
TRUMP WON.
TRUMP WON.
PM: The audit report delivered exactly what I had hoped for. The biggest takeaway was Ben Cotton's presentation of criminal conduct on behalf of those who operate Maricopa County's Dominion Election Management System. Cotton proved that the system connects to the internet, that it allows remote access, and that its anti-virus and security software has never been updated. Most importantly, Cotton provided evidence that the people running the system methodically and repeatedly deleted election data just prior to critical events that could have shown fraud.
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
Thoughts On the Arizona Audit Part 2 - Dominion
The most important takeaway from the Maricopa audit may be that Dominion Voting Systems hardware and software are a cybersecurity nightmare. Outgoing Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri admitted in a leaked conversation that as a brand, Dominion is radioactive. Even if there were no actual problems found with their election management system, public trust in Dominion has been destroyed and trust in the company will likely never be rebuilt.
Since Dominion manages Maricopa's election operation with its own contractors, any fallout from the Attorney General's investigation puts Dominion at risk of suffering further damage to its brand. As Dominion's brand is tarnished, anyone using their hardware and software will come under increasing public scrutiny and criticism.
At some point, the name of the company will have to be ditched and they'll be rebranded, just as they've done in the past. But the damage to Dominion is likely to spread to ES&S and Smartmatic as their election management systems are built on similar architecture. To that point, the forensic audit in Texas should prove interesting since Dominion machines were banned from use in Texas.
The biggest losers from the Maricopa audit may not be the Board of Supervisors as we've suspected. Dominion and other election system manufacturers may suffer the most harm in the long run.
The most important takeaway from the Maricopa audit may be that Dominion Voting Systems hardware and software are a cybersecurity nightmare. Outgoing Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri admitted in a leaked conversation that as a brand, Dominion is radioactive. Even if there were no actual problems found with their election management system, public trust in Dominion has been destroyed and trust in the company will likely never be rebuilt.
Since Dominion manages Maricopa's election operation with its own contractors, any fallout from the Attorney General's investigation puts Dominion at risk of suffering further damage to its brand. As Dominion's brand is tarnished, anyone using their hardware and software will come under increasing public scrutiny and criticism.
At some point, the name of the company will have to be ditched and they'll be rebranded, just as they've done in the past. But the damage to Dominion is likely to spread to ES&S and Smartmatic as their election management systems are built on similar architecture. To that point, the forensic audit in Texas should prove interesting since Dominion machines were banned from use in Texas.
The biggest losers from the Maricopa audit may not be the Board of Supervisors as we've suspected. Dominion and other election system manufacturers may suffer the most harm in the long run.
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
Thoughts on the Arizona Audit Part 4 - Items Missing Or Not Mentioned
The report delivered to the Arizona Senate yesterday is not the final report on the audit. It could be considered an interim report. I say that because many things that were supposed to be turned over to the auditors were not. The list of items not turned over includes splunk logs, routers and network passwords. In addition, only a partial examination of election machines was permitted by the County. Maricopa County has prevented the examination of certain things, which causes me to wonder why. I suspect that the routers, logs and election machines were withheld because they contain the most damning evidence of criminal activity. Fortunately, these items will be turned over for review. At a later date, their contents will be summarized in an additional report to the Senate. (It's possible these items will be impounded by the Attorney General as part of his investigation and made available to the auditors for direct examination.)
You may have noticed that no mention was made in the public report of things like ballot folds and ballots printed on non-standard paper stock. There was no mention of how many voters received mail-in-ballots who did not request them or how many ballots were incorrectly adjudicated. These issues have been discussed previously, but they were not presented to the public yesterday.
We know for a fact there are additional findings from the audit, but for reasons we are not privy to, certain topics were not discussed publicly yesterday.
It's apparent that the audit team took steps to limit bad optics during the presentation of their findings. I would assume that certain matters were omitted from the public report to avoid giving critics things they could criticize. I believe that the matters that were omitted from the public presentation will be submitted to AG Brnovich for his investigation despite the fact that they were not mentioned in the public report.
This is not the end of the Maricopa audit. It is the midway point. It seems likely that more findings will be presented at a future time.
The report delivered to the Arizona Senate yesterday is not the final report on the audit. It could be considered an interim report. I say that because many things that were supposed to be turned over to the auditors were not. The list of items not turned over includes splunk logs, routers and network passwords. In addition, only a partial examination of election machines was permitted by the County. Maricopa County has prevented the examination of certain things, which causes me to wonder why. I suspect that the routers, logs and election machines were withheld because they contain the most damning evidence of criminal activity. Fortunately, these items will be turned over for review. At a later date, their contents will be summarized in an additional report to the Senate. (It's possible these items will be impounded by the Attorney General as part of his investigation and made available to the auditors for direct examination.)
You may have noticed that no mention was made in the public report of things like ballot folds and ballots printed on non-standard paper stock. There was no mention of how many voters received mail-in-ballots who did not request them or how many ballots were incorrectly adjudicated. These issues have been discussed previously, but they were not presented to the public yesterday.
We know for a fact there are additional findings from the audit, but for reasons we are not privy to, certain topics were not discussed publicly yesterday.
It's apparent that the audit team took steps to limit bad optics during the presentation of their findings. I would assume that certain matters were omitted from the public report to avoid giving critics things they could criticize. I believe that the matters that were omitted from the public presentation will be submitted to AG Brnovich for his investigation despite the fact that they were not mentioned in the public report.
This is not the end of the Maricopa audit. It is the midway point. It seems likely that more findings will be presented at a future time.
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
Thoughts on the Arizona Audit Part 4 - Items Missing Or Not Mentioned
The report delivered to the Arizona Senate yesterday is not the final report on the audit. It could be considered an interim report. I say that because many things that were supposed to be turned over to the auditors were not. The list of items not turned over includes splunk logs, routers and network passwords. In addition, only a partial examination of election machines was permitted by the County. Maricopa County has prevented the examination of certain things, which causes me to wonder why. I suspect that the routers, logs and election machines were withheld because they contain the most damning evidence of criminal activity. Fortunately, these items will be turned over for review. At a later date, their contents will be summarized in an additional report to the Senate. (It's possible these items will be impounded by the Attorney General as part of his investigation and made available to the auditors for direct examination.)
You may have noticed that no mention was made in the public report of things like ballot folds and ballots printed on non-standard paper stock. There was no mention of how many voters received mail-in-ballots who did not request them or how many ballots were incorrectly adjudicated. These issues have been discussed previously, but they were not presented to the public yesterday.
We know for a fact there are additional findings from the audit, but for reasons we are not privy to, certain topics were not discussed publicly yesterday.
It's apparent that the audit team took steps to limit bad optics during the presentation of their findings. I would assume that certain matters were omitted from the public report to avoid giving critics things they could criticize. I believe that the matters that were omitted from the public presentation will be submitted to AG Brnovich for his investigation despite the fact that they were not mentioned in the public report.
This is not the end of the Maricopa audit. It is the midway point. It seems likely that more findings will be presented at a future time.
The report delivered to the Arizona Senate yesterday is not the final report on the audit. It could be considered an interim report. I say that because many things that were supposed to be turned over to the auditors were not. The list of items not turned over includes splunk logs, routers and network passwords. In addition, only a partial examination of election machines was permitted by the County. Maricopa County has prevented the examination of certain things, which causes me to wonder why. I suspect that the routers, logs and election machines were withheld because they contain the most damning evidence of criminal activity. Fortunately, these items will be turned over for review. At a later date, their contents will be summarized in an additional report to the Senate. (It's possible these items will be impounded by the Attorney General as part of his investigation and made available to the auditors for direct examination.)
You may have noticed that no mention was made in the public report of things like ballot folds and ballots printed on non-standard paper stock. There was no mention of how many voters received mail-in-ballots who did not request them or how many ballots were incorrectly adjudicated. These issues have been discussed previously, but they were not presented to the public yesterday.
We know for a fact there are additional findings from the audit, but for reasons we are not privy to, certain topics were not discussed publicly yesterday.
It's apparent that the audit team took steps to limit bad optics during the presentation of their findings. I would assume that certain matters were omitted from the public report to avoid giving critics things they could criticize. I believe that the matters that were omitted from the public presentation will be submitted to AG Brnovich for his investigation despite the fact that they were not mentioned in the public report.
This is not the end of the Maricopa audit. It is the midway point. It seems likely that more findings will be presented at a future time.
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
"We're going to TAKE. BACK. OUR. COUNTRY. FROM. THESE. LUNATICS."
~POTUS
~POTUS
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
Trump (as always) promised to extract trillions in reparations from China because of the virus.
(Reparations are typically paid by a nation that loses a war. )
(Reparations are typically paid by a nation that loses a war. )
”Riskit suurempia kuin hyödyt” – Ruotsin lääkärit julkaisivat vastalauseen lasten koronarokotuksista https://mvlehti.net/2021/09/26/riskit-suurempia-kuin-hyodyt-laakarit-ruotsissa-julkaisivat-vastalauseensa-lasten-koronarokotuksista/
Uusi MV-Lehti
"Riskit suurempia kuin hyödyt" - Ruotsin lääkärit julkaisivat vastalauseen lasten koronarokotuksista - Uusi MV-Lehti
Ruotsin Kansanterveysviraston päätös piikittää 12-vuotiaat kokeellisilla Covid-19-piikityksellä on ruotsalaisen lääkäriryhmän mukaan "vakiintuneen tieteen vastaista" ja saattaa johtaa vastaavan katastrofin toistumiseen, kun Anders Tegnell massiivisesti…
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
From the July 15, 2021 AZ Senate hearing:
Per Doug Logan, ballot calibration was off by an average of 1000% leading to bleed-through, which can cause over-votes or inaccurate vote attribution. The County has stated that they use thick VoteSecure paper, which should limit bleed-through. However, the Cyber Ninjas team found a large number of ballots printed on very thin paper stock. The ballots printed on-demand at the voting centers on election day had the worst calibrations issues. More than 168K ballots were affected.
Apparently, this part of the audit has not been completed yet. When the examination is complete, an additional report will be given to the Senate.
Per Doug Logan, ballot calibration was off by an average of 1000% leading to bleed-through, which can cause over-votes or inaccurate vote attribution. The County has stated that they use thick VoteSecure paper, which should limit bleed-through. However, the Cyber Ninjas team found a large number of ballots printed on very thin paper stock. The ballots printed on-demand at the voting centers on election day had the worst calibrations issues. More than 168K ballots were affected.
Apparently, this part of the audit has not been completed yet. When the examination is complete, an additional report will be given to the Senate.
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
⬆️
The issue with thin ballot paper and bleed through is that it often causes ballots to be rejected by tabulation machines. When it's rejected, a ballot is sent to adjudication.
When a ballot is sent to adjudication, a human must decide the intent of the voter. The one performing adjudication has an opportunity to negate the voter's intended selections.
In Maricopa County approximately 200,000 ballots (11%) were sent to adjudication in the 2020 election.
The issue with thin ballot paper and bleed through is that it often causes ballots to be rejected by tabulation machines. When it's rejected, a ballot is sent to adjudication.
When a ballot is sent to adjudication, a human must decide the intent of the voter. The one performing adjudication has an opportunity to negate the voter's intended selections.
In Maricopa County approximately 200,000 ballots (11%) were sent to adjudication in the 2020 election.
Forwarded from Praying Medic (Dave Hayes)
My favorite...
On February 2nd, 2021, the night before Maricopa County's auditors (Pro V& V and SLI) were to begin their audit, the entire election database was purged.
Source (Pg 63)
On February 2nd, 2021, the night before Maricopa County's auditors (Pro V& V and SLI) were to begin their audit, the entire election database was purged.
Source (Pg 63)