Vaccine talk
13 subscribers
449 photos
126 videos
19 files
468 links
All about vaccines.
Download Telegram
The science isn't settled. Well actually. It's never been done. Take a listen to this. Absolutely astonishing.
omicron-variant-vaccine-resistance-pdf.pdf
273.9 KB
omicron-variant-vaccine-resistance-pdf.pdf
From Dr. Mecola
☝️
Another SARS-CoV-2 variant dubbed Omicron has reportedly arisen in fully “vaccinated” patients in Botswana. Handfuls of cases have also emerged in other areas of the world
Thats one way
Photo from Michael Cupido
Nuremberg trials. This is what's happening behind the scenes
Forwarded from David Avocado Wolfe
Mercola is bad ass.
☝️
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny lays out a load of work on 20 mechanisms of injury from the jab
Forwarded from YumNaturals Emporium Amandha Vollmer (Amandha Vollmer)
1) The idea of viruses existence was created after observation of bacteria. Some of them died, and there were small elements that were called "phages" because it was thought they were responsible for the "death" of the bacteria.

2) "Phages" is from the Greek φαγεῖν (phagein) meaning "to devour". In reality these phages were small elements that indeed form when bacteria does not get enough nutrients, or has to process toxic materials. Phages are not the cause of the death of the bacteria, but its way of survival.

3) Since there were "bacterio-phages" or "bacteriological viruses", or so the first virologists believed at least, it couldn't and wouldn't be different for that viruses in human cells. This is a non sequitur (a logical fallacy "it does not follow"), but it was the basic hypothesis.

4) However, these are and remain hypotheses because "viruses" have never been photographed in isolated form or biochemically demonstrated at once from the "isolate". This has been a legal fact since the Oberlandesgericht (German higher court) of Stuttgart (verdict 16 Feb 2016-12 U 63/15)

5) The reason we do think viruses exist is because the academic community, based on what they think what a virus should look like, given the false analogy with the model of the "phages", constructs these viruses themselves based on pieces of previously described genetic information, and store them in a database.

6) These genome descriptions, i.e. are not based on direct observations, but on a conceptual model that exists completely virtually in the heads of virologists, and through consensus process certain genetic sequences are attributed.

7) Real science, however, does not work through consensus, but through control experiments. These experiments not yet been done yet, and even the scientific institutes that are legally obliged to implement them have not yet implemented them.

Dr. Lanka did have it done at its own expense, and it shows that the hypothetical factor "virus" cannot be responsible for the death of those cells. They also die without the so-called "virus" being given.

9) This is deliberately kept silent, for obvious reasons. Researchers who come up with results that contradict the consensus are excommunicated, and their findings are completely ignored and, despite a court ruling, banned from the news.

10) Finally, the PCR test used to test people for the "virus" is unscientific because they are adjusted in such a way that no, multiple or many positive cases will be demonstrated depending on the number of times the test cycle is restored.

This is the short summary of what Dr. Lanka says:

One more thing to add to this is a horrific aspect, and that is the suffering of animal. All that people think they know about the alleged "infection" diseases come from animals testing.

To cause the effect that one wants to see (the results of a so-called "infection"), they are indescribable atrocities done to animals, of which I will spare you the details. Read the article for that.

If this still makes any sense - namely to isolate the virus as a cause of illness - there is still a conclusion somewhere that can be drawn. But even here, every control experiment is missing!

Conclusion: until today, there is no scientific evidence that viruses make people (or animals) sick.
Forwarded from Dr Naomi Wolf
​​Are covid “vaccines” giving people AIDS? Immune system functions are dropping around 5% EACH WEEK in those who were vaccinated

The latest data from the United Kingdom’s PHE Vaccine Surveillance Report suggests that people who have been “fully vaccinated” for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) are losing about five percent of their immune systems per week.

Doubly injected people between the ages of 40 and 70 have already lost about 40 percent of the immune system capacity from the moment they get injected.

“If this continues then 30-50 year-olds will have 100% immune system degradation, zero viral defence by Christmas and all doubly vaccinated people over 30 will have lost their immune systems by March next year,” reports .

There is no denying, based on the data, that fully vaccinated people now suffer from what appears to be acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, more popularly known as AIDS. Their immune systems are fading away, which many have been warning would be the case.

“People aged 40-69 have already lost 40% of their immune system capability and are losing it progressively at 3.3% to 6.4% per week,”

Interestingly, the worst-off demographic is people aged 40-49, who are suffering total immune system loss in about nine weeks.

Elderly people over the age of 80 last about 20 weeks, while the 50-59 age category only gets about 15 weeks.

“Everybody over 30 will have lost 100% of their entire immune capability (for viruses and certain cancers) within 6 months,” warns The Exposé.

“30-50 year-olds will have lost it by Christmas. These people will then effectively have full blown acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and destroy the NHS (National Health Service).”

Getting a “booster” shot will only speed up the death process

It is not just that the jabs do not provide the claimed amount of protection against the Fauci Flu. The fact of the matter is that they provide no protection at all in the long term and actually destroy a person’s immune system.

“Pfizer originally claimed a 95% efficiency for their vaccine (calculated as in the last column above). The figures above indicate that their figures may well have been correct immediately after vaccination (the younger age groups have had the vaccine for the shortest time),” The Exposé explains.

“But the figures above also show that the vaccines do NOT merely lose efficiency over time down to zero efficiency, they progressively damage the immune system until a negative efficiency is realised. They presently leave anybody over 30 in a worse position than they were before vaccination.”

People who take the Biden “Booster” shots will only accelerate this process by adding even more immune-destroying chemicals to their bodies. The downward spiral will move even faster, in other words, the more shots a person gets.

“If we do nothing about this, it will only get much worse than we ever could have imagined,” wrote one Exposé commenter. “I, for one, appreciate all who have stood against and continue to stand against this tyranny.”

“The spike protein hijacks your mitochondria … forever,” wrote another. “Mitochondria is the heart of your immune system. Essentially, it takes over your immune system. The spike proteins are the bioweapons. Your own immune system becomes a deadly weapon. This is HIV on steroids.”

Others echoed these same sentiments, noting that it is painfully obvious what the agenda is. How anyone could argue with a straight face that this is all for “public health” remains a mystery.

Subscribe ➡️⬇️➡️ @naomirwolf