Forwarded from ⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽 (S P)
UPDATE 1115 EST - Judge orders ballots unsealed. Parties to appear at ballot storage location 10am May 28th. Ballots will be scanned at 600 dpi or higher. Protocol to be determined.
This is how we do it. Find the irregularities and force it through the courts.
Forwarded from Gateway Pundit
Breaking: Georgia Judge Calls for Forensic Audit of Fulton County Ballots After Large Discrepancies Found in Ballot Batches
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-georgia-judge-calls-forensic-audit-fulton-county-ballots-large-discrepancies-21-found-ballot-batches/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-georgia-judge-calls-forensic-audit-fulton-county-ballots-large-discrepancies-21-found-ballot-batches/
The Gateway Pundit
Breaking: Georgia Judge Calls for Forensic Audit of Fulton County Ballots After Large Discrepancies Found in Ballot Batches | The…
Georgia Judge Amero granted the motion to unseal the ballots, but will only allow the Fulton County employees themselves to audit or scan the ballots to a 600dpi uncompressed resolution.
Forwarded from Arizona Conservatives Take Action (Patriot)
BREAKING: GA JUDGE ALLOWS FURTHER SCAN OF MAIL-IN BALLOT INSPECTION IN FULTON COUNTY…GROUND ZERO OF ELECTION FRAUD…
In today’s Georgia audit hearing, Henry County, GA judge, the Honorable Brian J. Amero ruled that Plaintiffs (VoterGA.org, Garland Favorito et al) will be allowed access to the physical mail-in ballots in Fulton County, which could show massive election fraud in GA during the 2020 presidential election cycle, and the follow-on runoff that decided control of the U.S. Senate for the Democrat Party, leading to full control of the American government.
In the hearing, lawyers for VoterGA.org described large discrepancies (21%) between the number of ballot batches reported by the GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who certified the election, and the number of ballot batches actually provided by court-ordered access in the previous April hearing in the case.
VoterGA.org has been examining the ballot images at a low resolution since the hearing in April, and declared they need the actual physical ballots to understand the number of counterfeit ballots certified.
Fulton County attorneys pushed for a sampling of the ballots instead of access to all of the ballots. They particularly objected to access to physical ballots.
Fulton County attorneys also objected to expert witnesses testifying the number of ballot batches certified by Secretary of State Raffensperger in the previous ‘risk limiting audit’ were significantly different from the actual number of ballot image batches that were provided by state and county officials in court-ordered discovery in April.
Shockingly, attorneys for Fulton County declared ‘the county has no control over its election tablulation process.’ [Sounds a lot like Maricopa County, AZ]
A high number of ballots appear to have been counted twice,” declared the expert witness. There was an error rate in the batch data of 21%”
The ‘risk limiting audits’ conducted previously in the state of GA by SoS Raffensperger were shown in today’s hearing to be severely compromised.
The GA Attorney General’s office testified citizens have no right to audit the vote.
The results of ballot analysis in this case could show the U.S. Senate, and the presidency of the United States, were fraudulently certified.
Read 👉🔗 CD Media
In today’s Georgia audit hearing, Henry County, GA judge, the Honorable Brian J. Amero ruled that Plaintiffs (VoterGA.org, Garland Favorito et al) will be allowed access to the physical mail-in ballots in Fulton County, which could show massive election fraud in GA during the 2020 presidential election cycle, and the follow-on runoff that decided control of the U.S. Senate for the Democrat Party, leading to full control of the American government.
In the hearing, lawyers for VoterGA.org described large discrepancies (21%) between the number of ballot batches reported by the GA Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger who certified the election, and the number of ballot batches actually provided by court-ordered access in the previous April hearing in the case.
VoterGA.org has been examining the ballot images at a low resolution since the hearing in April, and declared they need the actual physical ballots to understand the number of counterfeit ballots certified.
Fulton County attorneys pushed for a sampling of the ballots instead of access to all of the ballots. They particularly objected to access to physical ballots.
Fulton County attorneys also objected to expert witnesses testifying the number of ballot batches certified by Secretary of State Raffensperger in the previous ‘risk limiting audit’ were significantly different from the actual number of ballot image batches that were provided by state and county officials in court-ordered discovery in April.
Shockingly, attorneys for Fulton County declared ‘the county has no control over its election tablulation process.’ [Sounds a lot like Maricopa County, AZ]
A high number of ballots appear to have been counted twice,” declared the expert witness. There was an error rate in the batch data of 21%”
The ‘risk limiting audits’ conducted previously in the state of GA by SoS Raffensperger were shown in today’s hearing to be severely compromised.
The GA Attorney General’s office testified citizens have no right to audit the vote.
The results of ballot analysis in this case could show the U.S. Senate, and the presidency of the United States, were fraudulently certified.
Read 👉🔗 CD Media
CDM
BREAKING: GA JUDGE ALLOWS FURTHER SCAN OF MAIL-IN BALLOT INSPECTION IN FULTON COUNTY...GROUND ZERO OF ELECTION FRAUD...CASE COULD…
BREAKING: GA JUDGE ALLOWS FURTHER SCAN OF PHYSICAL MAIL-IN BALLOT INSPECTION IN FULTON COUNTY...GROUND ZERO OF ELECTION FRAUD.
Forwarded from Free State Colorado
17 Benjamin Franklin Quotes on Tyranny, Liberty, and Rights
"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God" (proposed by Franklin for the motto of the Great Seal of the United States).
"From a persuasion that equal liberty was originally the portion, it is still the birthright of all men."
"Every man…is, of common right, and by the laws of God, a freeman, and entitled to the free enjoyment of liberty."
"All the property that is necessary to a man for the conservation of the individual… is his natural right which none can justly deprive him of."
"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
READ THE REST: https://fee.org/articles/17-benjamin-franklin-quotes-on-tyranny-liberty-and-rights/
"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God" (proposed by Franklin for the motto of the Great Seal of the United States).
"From a persuasion that equal liberty was originally the portion, it is still the birthright of all men."
"Every man…is, of common right, and by the laws of God, a freeman, and entitled to the free enjoyment of liberty."
"All the property that is necessary to a man for the conservation of the individual… is his natural right which none can justly deprive him of."
"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
READ THE REST: https://fee.org/articles/17-benjamin-franklin-quotes-on-tyranny-liberty-and-rights/
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Arizona Conservatives Take Action (Patriot)
Dominion Contract Confirms What We Already Knew: Dominion is in Control
There was some hype yesterday about the Maricopa Dominion contract. Sadly, it was not a “nuclear bomb.” However the contract does point to serious questions about County election procedures and security and supports claims that Dominion is in charge:
* Dominion plays a “key role” in Maricopa County’s “Tabulation and Results Reporting,” as warrior Shelby Busch points out in her illuminating interview with Aaron Wagner. This corroborates what we heard during the November AZ election hearing in which observers testified that 2 Dominion employees “ran the entire election” and took external drives with early vote totals offsite at night. Coincidentally, Tabulation Results Reporting files were among those shown to have been deleted by the AZ audit team.
* The County is not allowed to investigate their own machines beyond simple logic & accuracy tests conducted by Dominion-affiliated firms. This is insane.
* Dominion source code is held in protected escrow custody and ONLY SoS Hobbs can access it and ONLY under limited circumstances i.e. in the event that Dominion is incapacitated. Interestingly, this stipulation violates Arizona’s own Election Procedures Manual, which states that the source code must be made available in the event of an audit.
* Dominion provided all network hubs, switches etc. to be set up as a stand-alone system, not connected to ANY OTHER system. So the County’s claims that router access would reveal private law enforcement information suggests that they are either incompetent and failed follow the self-contained internal network guidelines, they are catastrophically ignorant about network security, or they are liars. All the more reason to find a way to enforce the subpoena.
In her Dominion contract tweet summarizing “the goods,” Shelby also mentions that “the voting machines can be accessed through the internet.” However, we could not find the reference for this claim in the contract. The words “internet” and “remote” are listed in a few places but they didn’t provide much insight:
- page 24 states that the “Democracy Suite EMS will be hosted exclusively on the customers own internal network… that will not be connected to the internet.”
- page 34 of the contract regarding election support references “remote service availability.” However, no further details are given except for references to staff support phone numbers.
- page 35 of the contract discusses the “issuance of ballots through a remote accessible option…. where a ballot can be provided to a voter remotely.” However the contract goes on to state that this process does not require an internet connection.
Sources:
👉 Nuclear bomb
👉 AZ hearing testimony 1
👉 AZ hearing testimony 2
👉 Deleted files
👉 Logic & accuracy test limitations
👉 Source code restrictions
👉 Dominion provided the network
👉 AZ Alliance summary tweet
👉 Busch Wagner Interview
👉 Dominion Contract
👉 Election Procedures Manual
——-
There was some hype yesterday about the Maricopa Dominion contract. Sadly, it was not a “nuclear bomb.” However the contract does point to serious questions about County election procedures and security and supports claims that Dominion is in charge:
* Dominion plays a “key role” in Maricopa County’s “Tabulation and Results Reporting,” as warrior Shelby Busch points out in her illuminating interview with Aaron Wagner. This corroborates what we heard during the November AZ election hearing in which observers testified that 2 Dominion employees “ran the entire election” and took external drives with early vote totals offsite at night. Coincidentally, Tabulation Results Reporting files were among those shown to have been deleted by the AZ audit team.
* The County is not allowed to investigate their own machines beyond simple logic & accuracy tests conducted by Dominion-affiliated firms. This is insane.
* Dominion source code is held in protected escrow custody and ONLY SoS Hobbs can access it and ONLY under limited circumstances i.e. in the event that Dominion is incapacitated. Interestingly, this stipulation violates Arizona’s own Election Procedures Manual, which states that the source code must be made available in the event of an audit.
* Dominion provided all network hubs, switches etc. to be set up as a stand-alone system, not connected to ANY OTHER system. So the County’s claims that router access would reveal private law enforcement information suggests that they are either incompetent and failed follow the self-contained internal network guidelines, they are catastrophically ignorant about network security, or they are liars. All the more reason to find a way to enforce the subpoena.
In her Dominion contract tweet summarizing “the goods,” Shelby also mentions that “the voting machines can be accessed through the internet.” However, we could not find the reference for this claim in the contract. The words “internet” and “remote” are listed in a few places but they didn’t provide much insight:
- page 24 states that the “Democracy Suite EMS will be hosted exclusively on the customers own internal network… that will not be connected to the internet.”
- page 34 of the contract regarding election support references “remote service availability.” However, no further details are given except for references to staff support phone numbers.
- page 35 of the contract discusses the “issuance of ballots through a remote accessible option…. where a ballot can be provided to a voter remotely.” However the contract goes on to state that this process does not require an internet connection.
Sources:
👉 Nuclear bomb
👉 AZ hearing testimony 1
👉 AZ hearing testimony 2
👉 Deleted files
👉 Logic & accuracy test limitations
👉 Source code restrictions
👉 Dominion provided the network
👉 AZ Alliance summary tweet
👉 Busch Wagner Interview
👉 Dominion Contract
👉 Election Procedures Manual
——-
Telegram
Arizona Conservatives Take Action
This is HILARIOUS! Brilliant overlay of today’s takedown onto an old film of Hitler
Forwarded from Arizona Conservatives Take Action (Patriot)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Nobody believes that child-sniffer got 80M votes.”
Forwarded from Arizona Conservatives Take Action (Patriot)
Via @AZInformer:
BREAKING: Hearing Set On Demand For State Senate/Cyber Ninja Contracts and Records | AZ Law
"1) Superior Court Judge Mike Kemp has set a Thursday hearing on American Oversight's public records request lawsuit. The group is demanding that State Senate President Karen Fann be required to turn over all requested public records surrounding the Senate's/Cyber Ninjas' audit/recount of the November 2020 election in Maricopa County.
The return hearing will be at 10AM on May 27.
Here is the 🔗 Complaint that was filed earlier this week, including the records requests and the correspondence back and forth with the attorneys for the State Senate."
——
BREAKING: Hearing Set On Demand For State Senate/Cyber Ninja Contracts and Records | AZ Law
"1) Superior Court Judge Mike Kemp has set a Thursday hearing on American Oversight's public records request lawsuit. The group is demanding that State Senate President Karen Fann be required to turn over all requested public records surrounding the Senate's/Cyber Ninjas' audit/recount of the November 2020 election in Maricopa County.
The return hearing will be at 10AM on May 27.
Here is the 🔗 Complaint that was filed earlier this week, including the records requests and the correspondence back and forth with the attorneys for the State Senate."
——
Blogspot
THIS WEEK IN ELECTION AUDIT LEGAL NEWS: Hearing Set On Demand For State Senate/Cyber Ninja Contracts and Records
Nonprofit news and podcast about Arizona legal news & courts. Opinions/decisions, including Arizona Supreme Court, 9th Circuit, U.S. Supreme Court.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Arizona Conservatives Take Action (Patriot)
Dominion Contract Confirms What We Already Knew: Dominion is in Control
There was some hype yesterday about the Maricopa Dominion contract. Sadly, it was not a “nuclear bomb.” However the contract does point to serious questions about County election procedures and security and supports claims that Dominion is in charge:
* Dominion plays a “key role” in Maricopa County’s “Tabulation and Results Reporting,” as warrior Shelby Busch points out in her illuminating interview with Aaron Wagner. This corroborates what we heard during the November AZ election hearing in which observers testified that 2 Dominion employees “ran the entire election” and took external drives with early vote totals offsite at night. Coincidentally, Tabulation Results Reporting files were among those shown to have been deleted by the AZ audit team.
* The County is not allowed to investigate their own machines beyond simple logic & accuracy tests conducted by Dominion-affiliated firms. This is insane.
* Dominion source code is held in protected escrow custody and ONLY SoS Hobbs can access it and ONLY under limited circumstances i.e. in the event that Dominion is incapacitated. Interestingly, this stipulation violates Arizona’s own Election Procedures Manual, which states that the source code must be made available in the event of an audit.
* Dominion provided all network hubs, switches etc. to be set up as a stand-alone system, not connected to ANY OTHER system. So the County’s claims that router access would reveal private law enforcement information suggests that they are either incompetent and failed follow the self-contained internal network guidelines, they are catastrophically ignorant about network security, or they are liars. All the more reason to find a way to enforce the subpoena.
In her Dominion contract tweet summarizing “the goods,” Shelby also mentions that “the voting machines can be accessed through the internet.” However, we could not find the reference for this claim in the contract. The words “internet” and “remote” are listed in a few places but they didn’t provide much insight:
- page 24 states that the “Democracy Suite EMS will be hosted exclusively on the customers own internal network… that will not be connected to the internet.”
- page 34 of the contract regarding election support references “remote service availability.” However, no further details are given except for references to staff support phone numbers.
- page 35 of the contract discusses the “issuance of ballots through a remote accessible option…. where a ballot can be provided to a voter remotely.” However the contract goes on to state that this process does not require an internet connection.
Sources:
👉 Nuclear bomb
👉 AZ hearing testimony 1
👉 AZ hearing testimony 2
👉 Deleted files
👉 Logic & accuracy test limitations
👉 Source code restrictions
👉 Dominion provided the network
👉 AZ Alliance summary tweet
👉 Busch Wagner Interview
👉 Dominion Contract
👉 Election Procedures Manual
——-
There was some hype yesterday about the Maricopa Dominion contract. Sadly, it was not a “nuclear bomb.” However the contract does point to serious questions about County election procedures and security and supports claims that Dominion is in charge:
* Dominion plays a “key role” in Maricopa County’s “Tabulation and Results Reporting,” as warrior Shelby Busch points out in her illuminating interview with Aaron Wagner. This corroborates what we heard during the November AZ election hearing in which observers testified that 2 Dominion employees “ran the entire election” and took external drives with early vote totals offsite at night. Coincidentally, Tabulation Results Reporting files were among those shown to have been deleted by the AZ audit team.
* The County is not allowed to investigate their own machines beyond simple logic & accuracy tests conducted by Dominion-affiliated firms. This is insane.
* Dominion source code is held in protected escrow custody and ONLY SoS Hobbs can access it and ONLY under limited circumstances i.e. in the event that Dominion is incapacitated. Interestingly, this stipulation violates Arizona’s own Election Procedures Manual, which states that the source code must be made available in the event of an audit.
* Dominion provided all network hubs, switches etc. to be set up as a stand-alone system, not connected to ANY OTHER system. So the County’s claims that router access would reveal private law enforcement information suggests that they are either incompetent and failed follow the self-contained internal network guidelines, they are catastrophically ignorant about network security, or they are liars. All the more reason to find a way to enforce the subpoena.
In her Dominion contract tweet summarizing “the goods,” Shelby also mentions that “the voting machines can be accessed through the internet.” However, we could not find the reference for this claim in the contract. The words “internet” and “remote” are listed in a few places but they didn’t provide much insight:
- page 24 states that the “Democracy Suite EMS will be hosted exclusively on the customers own internal network… that will not be connected to the internet.”
- page 34 of the contract regarding election support references “remote service availability.” However, no further details are given except for references to staff support phone numbers.
- page 35 of the contract discusses the “issuance of ballots through a remote accessible option…. where a ballot can be provided to a voter remotely.” However the contract goes on to state that this process does not require an internet connection.
Sources:
👉 Nuclear bomb
👉 AZ hearing testimony 1
👉 AZ hearing testimony 2
👉 Deleted files
👉 Logic & accuracy test limitations
👉 Source code restrictions
👉 Dominion provided the network
👉 AZ Alliance summary tweet
👉 Busch Wagner Interview
👉 Dominion Contract
👉 Election Procedures Manual
——-
Telegram
Arizona Conservatives Take Action