WISCONSIN VOTER ALLIANCE UPDATE - Part III

WisVote System has a Huge Window Open for Cheating
Through our research into the Nursing Homes and specifically data from the 2020 election we questioned the security of the WisVote system concerning the deceased being carried in the database. As of Feb 23, 2023 there were 652,124 deceased people in the WisVote database. This number changes daily as can be expected.

In studying the entire voting process and specifically the WisVote data and how clerks who have access (Fido key, training and WEC authorization) have the wherewithal to change the voting status of voters in that database at any time.

I conducted a survey about two weeks ago with a number of clerks across the state. I wanted to confirm a concern of mine and many others. I had a list of 22 election process questions to ask of the clerks and as always, they were professional and helpful in answering those questions. One of the questions I asked was, is it possible to change the status of a deceased person from “inactive/deceased to active/registered”? And every one of the clerks answered in the affirmative.

If there was a bad actor, a clerk that was intent upon cheating, it would be possible for that clerk to take some of the excess absentee ballots they have printed, a day or two prior to the election, change the status of certain inactive/deceased to active/registered, then vote those. Then a day after the election change their status back to inactive/deceased. And when the canvass was completed, no one would ever find those votes. And, if an audit is completed, there is not a ballot-by-ballot check against the database to check the current status of any one voter. I cannot imagine thousands of votes being done like that, but by using this process there could be hundreds.

This finding supports the idea of splitting the database, moving the deceased out to a separate database that is not accessible. There is no need to see the historical voting information of a deceased voter, and for the few times an error is made by a clerk entering the wrong person being deceased a protocol could be established as to how to update the database with WEC.

Election Integrity’s Biggest Threat
If things were not bad enough for the conservatives of this country given the activities of Arabella Advisors (see my article of April 13), we have big tech/social media companies micro-targeting voters. In an April 30th article written by Dr. Robert Epstein points out why conservatives are being out maneuvered by the left. In this article, he lists all the ways the big tech/social media folks are involved in tilting the election results. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19608/election-threat-big-tech

Ron Heuer
President, WVA
www.wisconsinvoteralliance.com

Witnessed this same rate of sig verification in Boulder County in 2020 as an election judge. It’s everywhere 🤬

Kari’s attorney Kurt Olsen: “Maricopa’s log file data shows that 11 of these signature verification workers approved 170K signatures at a rate of between 0 and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97% approval rating. That’s not signature review, Your Honor.” 💥

If we wind up with a miraculous remedy to any of our election procedures in the near future, we must never forget the determination shown by Kari Lake and her legal team to keep this pursuit going. It has been over 6 months since "Election" Day and Maricopa is squirming to cover its tracks and praying to their magicians and sorcerers that this judge doesn't find a conscience.

Give these crooks enough to cover up, and they'll eventually hang themselves.

Whistleblower says 298,000 signatures were verified in 36 hours when it should have taken 4-5 days.

“That just doesn’t add up.”

Maricopa’s attorney Thomas Liddy and Election Administrator Ray Valenzuela contradicted themselves so many times today.

First, they say the guy in the 90 second video was fired for approving signatures too quickly and not adhering to his duties.

Then Valenzuela says they've NEVER fired anyone from the signature verification process.

Then Valenzuela said that the video was taken out of context and that the guy was just doing exactly as he was trained to do.

And finally Valenzuela says the guy in the video was moved to a different job for approving signatures too quickly.

Holy hell. I hope the judge is picking up on this!

Welp… Now we know what the prize is for delivering GA for Biden via massive selection fraud. Stacy Abrahms is on the invite list.

So what exactly IS the Sage Group thingie where she’s the CEO? A spin-off of her Happy People staffing org that delivered the boots on the ground in voting centers across GA counties?

Or is it a new food tech company that’s developed lab-grown ballots?

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/05/18/read-list-of-attendees-of-shadowy-bilderberg-meeting-this-week/
READ: List of Attendees of Shadowy Bilderberg Meeting This Week.

Campaign Money Laundering Part 1 of 2: Our super IT team developed a custom software program where the daily transactions from the FEC are graphed of the Smurfs (campaign money laundering).

Best to view it on a large screen. Red lines are the dollar amounts, green lines are the contributions in numbers. It will be interactive on our website in about a wk. O​ne high peak shows 421 contributions in one day. No one sits down and makes 421 contributions in one day; 32,439 contributions in total. From our chart shown, I wrote down some sequential days, showing no. of contributions to political PACS/campaigns for each of those days: 157​​, 139, 176, 215, 172, 181, 189, 239, 202, 216, 196, 237, 222, 240, 256, 249, 288, 256, 249, 288, 213, 264, 8, 15, 5, 3, 6, 8, 12, 9, 15, 11, 24, 7, 24, 4, 10, 12, 17....eventually going back up in the hundreds again repeating the spiking pattern.​

~ Peter Bernegger

Campaign Money Laundering Part 2 of 2: Remember, this is of one elderly, retired gentleman. ​He didn't make these contributions; some evil bad guys did using his name and address w/o his knowledge. I​t clearly shows an automated ramp-up of contributions. It is a computerized algorithm. Patterns like this show up for Smurf after Smurf.

For new followers, see my earlier posts on the whole political campaign money laundering scheme we uncovered. And speaking of followers, please help out, all these informations and research need to get to all the media and news outlets & we need your help to spread the word. Thank you.

~ Peter Bernegger

👆👆👆

"The testing referenced in the Lake v. Hobbs election contest was actually not testing at all, but rather the installation of new memory cards into the tabulator, which had previously been certified..." - Maricopa County

Wow, just wow.

Not only do they admit to installing new memory cards and see no problem with it. (I.e. Secure chains of custody anyone? If they really see no problem with this then manipulating BDFs would totally go unnoticed. Just sayin')

If it's not testing, why would they then process a handful of paper ballots afterwards?

And why is it, that when 50% of them failed to process properly, no one did anything about it? Is a 50% failure rate normal?

Kevin has the receipts. See the second image in the Tweet. 🔥

KN

Since the break, things have heated up tremendously. Forensic expert Erich Speckin testified that in his expert opinion, it is impossible to verify a signature in under 3 seconds. Speckin also alleged that approving a signature takes longer than rejecting a signature.

We have 70,000 ballots approved in under 2 seconds with a rate of 99.87% approval. This is obviously impossible.

The county in cross examination did not even dispute the assertions above. Instead, they spent almost an hour trying to discredit the witness.

I smell panic.

One problem I see for Lake is that she is ALSO tasked with proving that a total lack of signature verification would have altered the outcome of the election by a competent mathematical basis.

Even if it is proven that no signature verification occurred, we still have to prove that the outcome would have been different. A further inspection is needed, which the judge has not granted.

This “collapse” of the voting machine infrastructure is planned. The voting machines will only stay in place long enough for the transition to blockchain voting. Blockchain voting is a horrible substitution for voting machines.
Blockchain voting testing is already in the works… do not be fooled!

Poulos believes that regardless of the recent Fox News defamation victory, which saw the news outlet pay Dominion $787.5 million, the public outcry against the company will result in contractors opting to go elsewhere for their voting systems in the future.

He believes: “Whenever the next time a customer chooses to buy a new system—because every eight years or so, you replace your voting system for obsolescence and for certification issues—they’ll just say, ‘Man, it’s just not worth going through the hassle just to buy Dominion.’”

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/05/21/dominion-ceo-says-company-will-soon-collapse-were-not-worth-the-hassle/

Your vote is sacred.

It's sickening to see Maricopa County water it down like this.

"You are about to see 90 seconds of the signature verification process where one person is verifying signatures as fast as they can load. Compared to the person sitting next to him."

Subscribe and share👉 @KariLakeAZ

Per AZ Rep Jones:

This morning, all 15 AZ counties received a letter from Senator Borrelli informing them that they cannot use machines in the upcoming 2024 presidential election. The legislature has plenary power over federal elections according to the US Constitution. SCR1037 is already in play.

(My input: tees up the next big court battle in AZ, and a perfect time to put this out with it hitting the fan in the Lake case).