Ryan Germany Dodges Quetions At CEIR Summit
https://www.georgiarecord.com/ryan-germany-dodges-quetions-at-ceir-summit/

LIVE: Kari Lake In Court On Election Integrity

https://gettr.com/post/p2hbyha54ce

BREAKING: Maryland Election Technology May Not Be Certified, Requiring Immediate Decertification Of Machines
https://eastongazette.com/2023/05/18/breaking-maryland-election-technology-may-not-be-certified-requiring-immediate-decertification-of-machines/

Dear County GOP Team Leaders, Individual GOP Members, Freedom Alliances, Affiliates, Non-Profits, Patriot Groups, Social Media and Ad-Hoc Committee:

After traveling across Wisconsin most of last week for speaking engagements and individual meetings regarding election integrity updates, we can now give a very brief update and will provide more detailed updates later this week or weekend.

Thank you for the many new email address requests. All email addresses are encrypted and are not shared with anyone. Please feel free to forward our updates and or provide new email recipient requests.

All Eyes on Arizona

Today is a bell-weather day for election integrity across America, but more importantly, in Arizona, as 2022 Republican Gubernatorial Candidate, Kari Lake, and her Legal Team, will be in Court today challenging the blatantly and deliberately falsified hundreds of thousands of absentee ballot signatures (click here - Kari Lake Scores Huge Win as Arizona Election Case Heads to Court (newsweek.com)).

The 2022 Arizona Gubernatorial Race was supposedly decided by just over 17,000 amidst well documented cases of massive election fraud involving manipulation of voting machines just before the election (click here - SMOKING GUN: "This Election Was RIGGED" - Kari Lake Attorneys Say "Clear Misconduct and Intent" Caused 260 of 446 Tabulators to Fail on Election Day - FILING INCLUDED | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson ) and total lack of chain-of-custody for hundreds of thousands of absentee ballots that clearly affected the outcome of the election (click here - "They Dragged Us to Hell and We Are Standing and Fighting Back" - Kari Lake Has THREE Whistleblowers Who Will Testify that 130,000 Did Not Pass Signature Verification -- But Election Officials Counted Them Anyway! | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft).

A lower court dismissed the Election Fraud Lawsuit in December of 2022 (click here -JUST-IN: Maricopa County Judge Confirms Kari Lake is Going Back to Trial May 17, 18, 19 | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson ).

The Election Fraud Lawsuit lost on appeal in early 2023 (click here - Kari Lake loses appeal in Arizona governor race challenge | AP News)

The Election Fraud Lawsuit won at the Arizona Supreme Court when the Court ruled in favor of the Election Fraud Lawsuit and sent it back to the lower court who has ordered the trial to start today involving the falsified signature verification process of absentee ballots (click here - WATCH: Shocking Video Shows Maricopa County's Fraudulent Signature Verification - Worker "Verifies" Signatures in LESS THAN 2 Seconds Per Signature | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson).

The trial is live-streamed here starting at 11:00 A.M. CST - WATCH LIVE FROM MARICOPA COUNTY COURT ROOM: Kari Lake’s Trial on Fraudulent 2022 Election Signature Verification – Begins at 9AM PST | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The results of this 3-day trial could have an effect on our election integrity efforts in Wisconsin, especially involving a full forensic physical and cyber audit.

Best regards,

Jefferson E. Davis
Spokesperson
Election Integrity for Wisconsin Ad-Hoc Committee
Full Forensic Physical and Cyber Audit (FFPCA

WISCONSIN VOTER ALLIANCE UPDATE

More on On-Campus Voting / University of Wisconsin
As I had mentioned in my last writing about on-campus voting there is a move by Civic Nation with their All In initiative and Campus Democracy Challenge to build a massive national database and to effectively use that database to steal the 2024 election.

This couldn’t be done without the full cooperation of college chancellors and presidents of learning institutions. Civic Nation boasts of having a 1,000 campuses on board with them now with all of them involved in their Democracy Challenge. Let’s just focus on the University of Wisconsin’s newly appointed Chancellor Jennifer L. Mnookin. Now, here’s another nonpartisan leader who, according to Federal campaign finance records show that Mnookin has contributed almost $6,000 to Democratic campaigns including Barack Obama in 2008 ($2,000), Joe Biden in 2020 ($500) and Hillary Clinton in 2016 ($300). Her background is solidly Democrat, so much so that in 2022 when it came time for her appointment, some Republicans, including Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, of Rochester, painted Mnookin as a leftist “woke radical” who has consistently donated to Democratic politicians and supports critical race theory.

Now Mnookin has bought into the Civic Nation’s All In on Campus Democracy Challenge lock stock and barrel. Civic Nation does a great job in getting commitments from Chancellors and Presidents across their alleged 1,000 campus members.

Following is a Sep 29, 2022 letter from Civic Nation to Chancellor Mnookin. This was redacted before I received it, so the links do not work. You can see how powerful and controlling Civic Nation is with these Chancellors.

Dear Chancellor Mnookin,

With less than 40 days until Election Day on November 8, we wanted to once again thank you for your nonpartisan commitment to ensuring that all eligible students at University of Wisconsin-Madison learn about and participate in elections.

Your dedication to reaching 100% voter participation among your eligible students is an important contribution to securing the future of a healthy, nonpartisan democratic society. As new resources have developed, we wanted to seize the opportunity to provide you with four steps you can take today to support your nonpartisan engagement at your institution:

WVA Update continued,

1. Reaffirm your commitment to nonpartisan democratic engagement. Join us in making a public statement on social media, a campus post, or other means. As we’ve reached 450 signatories of the Presidents’ Commitment, you now have access to an updated communications toolkit here and press statement here.
2. Engage with the Student Vote Research Network Memo: Best Practices for Encouraging College Student Voter Participation. This document outlines steps institutions and leaders can take to make voting and registration easy, support civic engagement in the curriculum and cocurricular, as well as to highlight your efforts in making a public commitment to nonpartisan democratic engagement.
3. Ensure that your athletic programs have signed the ALL IN, National Association of Basketball Coaches (NABC), and Women’s Basketball Coaches Association (WBCA) Coaches’ Pledge. Signing the pledge not only signals your athletic teams’ support for nonpartisan civic engagement, but also ensures that your campus representatives will have access to key information, resources and initiatives to improve the success rate of your campus voter engagement efforts.
4. Encourage University of Wisconsin-Madison’s students to Pledge to Vote. Research demonstrates that people who pledge to vote and receive reminders of their pledge are more likely to turnout to vote. Share this note on your social media or through campus communications:
a. Calling all (Insert institution handle/hashtag) students, with the 2022 midterm election a month away, I’m asking each of you to make a Pledge to Turnout to Vote this year. To make this commitment sign the #allintovote at ALLINtoVote.org/pledge. As you do, (Insert institution handle/hashtag) your institution will climb on the campus leaderboard. #BeVoteReady

Through these simple steps, you can support your institution with institutionalizing nonpartisan democratic engagement efforts in 2022 and beyond. If ever I or the ALL IN team can be of support, do let us know.

Best,
Jen
Jennifer Domagal-Goldman, Ph.D.
she/her/hers
Executive Director ALL IN Campus Democracy Challenge | Civic Nation



Ron Heuer
President, WVA
www.wisconsinvoteralliance.com

WISCONSIN VOTER ALLIANCE UPDATE - Part III

WisVote System has a Huge Window Open for Cheating
Through our research into the Nursing Homes and specifically data from the 2020 election we questioned the security of the WisVote system concerning the deceased being carried in the database. As of Feb 23, 2023 there were 652,124 deceased people in the WisVote database. This number changes daily as can be expected.

In studying the entire voting process and specifically the WisVote data and how clerks who have access (Fido key, training and WEC authorization) have the wherewithal to change the voting status of voters in that database at any time.

I conducted a survey about two weeks ago with a number of clerks across the state. I wanted to confirm a concern of mine and many others. I had a list of 22 election process questions to ask of the clerks and as always, they were professional and helpful in answering those questions. One of the questions I asked was, is it possible to change the status of a deceased person from “inactive/deceased to active/registered”? And every one of the clerks answered in the affirmative.

If there was a bad actor, a clerk that was intent upon cheating, it would be possible for that clerk to take some of the excess absentee ballots they have printed, a day or two prior to the election, change the status of certain inactive/deceased to active/registered, then vote those. Then a day after the election change their status back to inactive/deceased. And when the canvass was completed, no one would ever find those votes. And, if an audit is completed, there is not a ballot-by-ballot check against the database to check the current status of any one voter. I cannot imagine thousands of votes being done like that, but by using this process there could be hundreds.

This finding supports the idea of splitting the database, moving the deceased out to a separate database that is not accessible. There is no need to see the historical voting information of a deceased voter, and for the few times an error is made by a clerk entering the wrong person being deceased a protocol could be established as to how to update the database with WEC.

Election Integrity’s Biggest Threat
If things were not bad enough for the conservatives of this country given the activities of Arabella Advisors (see my article of April 13), we have big tech/social media companies micro-targeting voters. In an April 30th article written by Dr. Robert Epstein points out why conservatives are being out maneuvered by the left. In this article, he lists all the ways the big tech/social media folks are involved in tilting the election results. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/19608/election-threat-big-tech

Ron Heuer
President, WVA
www.wisconsinvoteralliance.com

Witnessed this same rate of sig verification in Boulder County in 2020 as an election judge. It’s everywhere 🤬

Kari’s attorney Kurt Olsen: “Maricopa’s log file data shows that 11 of these signature verification workers approved 170K signatures at a rate of between 0 and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97% approval rating. That’s not signature review, Your Honor.” 💥

If we wind up with a miraculous remedy to any of our election procedures in the near future, we must never forget the determination shown by Kari Lake and her legal team to keep this pursuit going. It has been over 6 months since "Election" Day and Maricopa is squirming to cover its tracks and praying to their magicians and sorcerers that this judge doesn't find a conscience.

Give these crooks enough to cover up, and they'll eventually hang themselves.

Whistleblower says 298,000 signatures were verified in 36 hours when it should have taken 4-5 days.

“That just doesn’t add up.”

Maricopa’s attorney Thomas Liddy and Election Administrator Ray Valenzuela contradicted themselves so many times today.

First, they say the guy in the 90 second video was fired for approving signatures too quickly and not adhering to his duties.

Then Valenzuela says they've NEVER fired anyone from the signature verification process.

Then Valenzuela said that the video was taken out of context and that the guy was just doing exactly as he was trained to do.

And finally Valenzuela says the guy in the video was moved to a different job for approving signatures too quickly.

Holy hell. I hope the judge is picking up on this!

Welp… Now we know what the prize is for delivering GA for Biden via massive selection fraud. Stacy Abrahms is on the invite list.

So what exactly IS the Sage Group thingie where she’s the CEO? A spin-off of her Happy People staffing org that delivered the boots on the ground in voting centers across GA counties?

Or is it a new food tech company that’s developed lab-grown ballots?

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/05/18/read-list-of-attendees-of-shadowy-bilderberg-meeting-this-week/
READ: List of Attendees of Shadowy Bilderberg Meeting This Week.

Campaign Money Laundering Part 1 of 2: Our super IT team developed a custom software program where the daily transactions from the FEC are graphed of the Smurfs (campaign money laundering).

Best to view it on a large screen. Red lines are the dollar amounts, green lines are the contributions in numbers. It will be interactive on our website in about a wk. O​ne high peak shows 421 contributions in one day. No one sits down and makes 421 contributions in one day; 32,439 contributions in total. From our chart shown, I wrote down some sequential days, showing no. of contributions to political PACS/campaigns for each of those days: 157​​, 139, 176, 215, 172, 181, 189, 239, 202, 216, 196, 237, 222, 240, 256, 249, 288, 256, 249, 288, 213, 264, 8, 15, 5, 3, 6, 8, 12, 9, 15, 11, 24, 7, 24, 4, 10, 12, 17....eventually going back up in the hundreds again repeating the spiking pattern.​

~ Peter Bernegger

Campaign Money Laundering Part 2 of 2: Remember, this is of one elderly, retired gentleman. ​He didn't make these contributions; some evil bad guys did using his name and address w/o his knowledge. I​t clearly shows an automated ramp-up of contributions. It is a computerized algorithm. Patterns like this show up for Smurf after Smurf.

For new followers, see my earlier posts on the whole political campaign money laundering scheme we uncovered. And speaking of followers, please help out, all these informations and research need to get to all the media and news outlets & we need your help to spread the word. Thank you.

~ Peter Bernegger

👆👆👆

"The testing referenced in the Lake v. Hobbs election contest was actually not testing at all, but rather the installation of new memory cards into the tabulator, which had previously been certified..." - Maricopa County

Wow, just wow.

Not only do they admit to installing new memory cards and see no problem with it. (I.e. Secure chains of custody anyone? If they really see no problem with this then manipulating BDFs would totally go unnoticed. Just sayin')

If it's not testing, why would they then process a handful of paper ballots afterwards?

And why is it, that when 50% of them failed to process properly, no one did anything about it? Is a 50% failure rate normal?

Kevin has the receipts. See the second image in the Tweet. 🔥

KN

Since the break, things have heated up tremendously. Forensic expert Erich Speckin testified that in his expert opinion, it is impossible to verify a signature in under 3 seconds. Speckin also alleged that approving a signature takes longer than rejecting a signature.

We have 70,000 ballots approved in under 2 seconds with a rate of 99.87% approval. This is obviously impossible.

The county in cross examination did not even dispute the assertions above. Instead, they spent almost an hour trying to discredit the witness.

I smell panic.

One problem I see for Lake is that she is ALSO tasked with proving that a total lack of signature verification would have altered the outcome of the election by a competent mathematical basis.

Even if it is proven that no signature verification occurred, we still have to prove that the outcome would have been different. A further inspection is needed, which the judge has not granted.