Fingerprints of Fraud for New Mexico

Jeff O'Donnell's paper and video discussing the proof of digital manipulation in the CVRs in several states came out yesterday. I understand he's going to be updating them with CVRs from more states as he has time.

New Mexico doesn't have to wait though. We discussed digital manipulation in New Mexico's elections in the Otero Audit that was published last year:

https://dow9ovycsk6w7.cloudfront.net/media_items/69241-Otero_County_Audit_Report.pdf?1660596423 (See page 113 and following. Plus Appendix I)

We are presently working on compiling a short report with more information from 2022 CVRs. More importantly, our updated report will include information from recent articles that reveal how our elections are being monitored through "Albert Sensors" by a private company with ample ties to the radical left. The report can be easily delivered to all your county clerks, commissioners, and our crooked SOS.

Analysis of CVRs reveals irrefutable evidence of an impossible arrangement of votes in jurisdictions across the country.

There are only a few explanations for what we are seeing in the CVRs:

(1) subversion of the election file by a corrupt vendor upstream, independent of any election worker’s actions downstream;

(2) access and manipulation of the election management system through tools that shouldn’t be there in the first place (Microsoft SQL) via non-existent passwords, weak credentials, or use of compromised USB drives in data transfers; and

(3) use of uncertified internet connected software that has centralized virtually every aspect of our elections, from inflating voter rolls, manipulating votes, to overwriting election results at the local level. BPro/KnowInk/Tenex/VR Systems all provide the functionality to do all of the above NOW.

All three provide explanations for what we are seeing in the CVRs. The third explanation, however, is where subversion will take place going forward.

The Department of Homeland Security and the radical left NGO “Center for Internet Security” (CIS) have centralized our elections and most people don’t even know it. It has never been easier to subvert the vote at a nation-state level.

The RESTRICT act seeks to make this centralized power a permanent fixture in our elections.

2023 SENATE BILL 70 - Continued

Voter registration in high schools
Prior to 2011 Wisconsin Act 240, state law required that all public high schools be used for voter registration for enrolled students and members of the high school staff. Prior law also authorized voter registration to take place at a private high school or a tribal school that operates high school grades if requested by the principal. The bill reinstates those provisions.
Under the bill, the municipal clerk must notify the school board of each school district in which the municipality is located that high schools will be used for voter registration. The school board and the clerk then appoint at least one qualified voter at each high school to be a special school registration deputy. The bill allows students and staff to register at the school on any day that classes are regularly held. The deputies promptly forward the registration forms to the clerk and the clerk adds qualified voters to the registration list. The clerk may reject a registration form, but the clerk must notify the registrant and inform the registrant of the reason for being rejected. Under the bill, a form completed by an individual who will be 18 years of age before the next election and who is otherwise qualified to vote must be filed in such a way so that the individual is automatically registered to vote when the
individual is 18.
Finally, the bill allows a principal of a private high school or tribal school that operates high school grades to request that the municipal clerk appoint a qualified voter at the school to be a special school registration deputy. Under the bill, the clerk must appoint a special school registration deputy if the clerk determines that the private high school or tribal school has a substantial number of students residing in the municipality.

Alleged to Have Conspired to Cast False and Illegal Ballots in Elections Held in 2021, in Violation of Rensselaer County Voters’ Rights

ALBANY, NEW YORK – Richard W. Crist, age 55, of Nassau, New York; James R. Gordon, age 42, of North Greenbush, New York; and Leslie A. Wallace, age 35, of Troy, New York, were arrested and arraigned today on an indictment charging them with conspiring to violate the rights of Rensselaer County voters in connection with elections held in 2021.

United States Attorney Carla B. Freedman and Janeen DiGuiseppi, Special Agent in Charge of the Albany Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), made the announcement.
Crist is the Director of Operations for Rensselaer County, Gordon is the Director of the Bureau for Central Services of Rensselaer County, and Wallace works for the Rensselaer County Executive’s Office. 

The indictment (copy attached) alleges that during local elections held in 2021, Crist, Gordon and Wallace conspired to use their official positions, and actual and apparent authority over Rensselaer County employees, to obtain absentee ballots in voters’ names through fraud and intimidation; these voters did not intend to request absentee ballots, nor did they seek voting assistance from Crist, Gordon or Wallace.

Crist, Gordon and Wallace then conspired to cast false and illegal votes in these voters’ names in primary and general elections held in Rensselaer County in 2021. Their conduct violated the constitutional rights of Rensselaer County voters to have their votes counted equally as compared to votes cast by other voters, and made it more likely that the defendants’ preferred candidates would win the elections.

Gordon is also charged with one count of witness tampering, and Wallace is also charged with one count of making false statements.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-ndny/pr/rensselaer-county-officials-indicted-civil-rights-conspiracy

Senate bill 70 eliminates the 14 day period to submit an absentee ballot. This is nuts and an attempt by Democrats to steal more votes. To view click here and see page 46.

Voting absentee in person
LRB-2035/1 ALL:all
Current law allows an individual to complete an absentee ballot in person no earlier than 14 days preceding the election and no later than the Sunday preceding the election. The bill eliminates the 14-day restriction on how soon a person may complete an absentee ballot in person.

Georgia.  Gov. Brian Kemp signed the “Election Integrity Act of 2021” (SB 202) into law in 2021.

Despite the law being in place, however, Dekalb County, the fourth largest county in Georgia, may have made a willing effort to circumvent that law by utilizing the the county government instead of the elections board to request the grant.

A Georgia elections board may have violated state law when it accepted $2 million from a Mark Zuckerberg-linked group, a watchdog group claimed in a letter obtained by Fox News Digital.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/gov-kemp-signs-new-anti-corruption-legislation-to-reinforce-a-2021-law-in-georgia/

Just offering some rebuttals to the common misconceprions about election security.

Judge Amy Totenberg's Courtroom Back In The Election Spotlight
https://www.georgiarecord.com/judge-amy-totenbergs-courtroom-back-in-the-election-spotlight/

Election Integrity Analyst Chris Gleason Appears With Emerald Robinson To Discuss Palm Beach County Election Shenanigans
https://miamiindependent.com/election-integrity-analyst-chris-gleason-appears-with-emerald-robinson-to-discuss-palm-beach-county-election-shenanigans/

From Lake’s Arizona Appeals Court Reply Brief:
Counting the number of ballots recorded on the Runbeck created “MC Inbound—Receipt of Delivery” forms for early ballots delivered to Runbeck on and after Election Day documents only263,379 early ballots received by Runbeck. Hobbs.Appx:123- In comparison, the “MC Incoming Scan Receipts” Hobbs (Hobbs.App:132-61) cites in her brief, documentsthe total number of early ballots scanned for signature verification at Runbeck as 298,942, the same figure reported by the Runbeck whistleblower noted in Lake’s opening brief at 18. In other words, the very “MC Inbound Receipt of Delivery” forms that Hobbs points to as chain of custody, fail to document any record of delivery or receipt of the other 35,563 ballots scanned at Runbeck, an inexplicable discrepancy that far exceeds the margin between Hobbs and Lake.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/just-in-arizona-supreme-court-issues-joke-sanctions-against-kari-lake-over-accurate-claim-of-35563-unaccounted-for-ballots-fraudulent-signatures-to-go-back-to-trial-order-included/

Pro Tip: A good way to stop giving clicks to media you don’t want to support is to archive the link you want to share on Wayback machine then share the archived link rather than the original link.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2023/05/07/britain-voter-id-no-mass-disenfranchisement/
England Introduced Voter ID. There Was No Mass Disenfranchisement.

Many people recoil from affirming election integrity as the key issue of our time. In fact, I’ve met too many candidates recently who thought they could win by not pissing people off by bringing up the very issue that keeps them from winning.

If we don’t fix it, none of our other policy positions matter.

Failure to attempt to remedy this issue results in the guaranteed collapse of our country, a constitutional Republic.

You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.

From Lake’s Arizona Appeals Court Reply Brief:
Counting the number of ballots recorded on the Runbeck created “MC Inbound—Receipt of Delivery” forms for early ballots delivered to Runbeck on and after Election Day documents only263,379 early ballots received by Runbeck. Hobbs.Appx:123- In comparison, the “MC Incoming Scan Receipts” Hobbs (Hobbs.App:132-61) cites in her brief, documentsthe total number of early ballots scanned for signature verification at Runbeck as 298,942, the same figure reported by the Runbeck whistleblower noted in Lake’s opening brief at 18. In other words, the very “MC Inbound Receipt of Delivery” forms that Hobbs points to as chain of custody, fail to document any record of delivery or receipt of the other 35,563 ballots scanned at Runbeck, an inexplicable discrepancy that far exceeds the margin between Hobbs and Lake.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/just-in-arizona-supreme-court-issues-joke-sanctions-against-kari-lake-over-accurate-claim-of-35563-unaccounted-for-ballots-fraudulent-signatures-to-go-back-to-trial-order-included/

When you vote early, you make it easy for them to calculate how many more ballots they need to win!

I know what you are thinking.... Maricopa County.

They did that in Maricopa to try and teach us a lesson. "Vote early, because that's easier for us!"

And it was obvious. If those people voted early, we wouldn't know for a fact it was stolen, like we do now.

Hot damn.

Maybe I’m dreaming, but we just may be about to get Miracle Number 1.

Kari Lake and team in office. That would leave Miracle Number 2 for next fall.

Now you know why the media whores are pushing sympathy for MaRICOpa County.

https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/status/1656348693971488769?s=20

👆👆👆

⚠️ This Twitter thread deserves a lot more attention

It perfectly demonstrates why slog files are so important.

Here is the summary, but please read the Twitter thread for full context.

- The tabulators used on election day in Maricopa's 2022 general election (supposedly) passed their Logic and Accuracy Tests (LAT) with flying colors!

- The slogs show that the tabulators were "tested" again after being certified and before election day AND reported many failures

(Let's rephrase that to make it crystal clear.)

🚨The slogs clearly indicate that the tabulators, that were already previously "certified", were failing to process numerous "test" ballots. The exact same ballots that were going to be used on election day.

This means they fully knew, days before the election, that the majority of election day tabulators were going to fail and cause untold chaos. They knew!

If this is not criminal intent... what is?

———

(Here is a copy/paste from the end of a previous post that needs to be read multiple times.)

If tabulators malfunction on election day, it simply means their LAT was woefully inadequate and frankly irrelevant.

⚠️ It also means the election results for that county should automatically be null and void. Period.

The election should be carried out again, until the tabulators can be made to work flawlessly, or when paper ballots are counted by hand (😉).

Any county that has malfunctioning tabulators or printers should automatically be disqualified.

🚨We really need to raise the bar of what is acceptable.

Similarly, if a county refuses to hand over the slog files for each and every tabulator that was used to count the ballots, the county must be disqualified.

We must demand full and complete transparency, and NOT tolerate anything less.

———

KN for @ElectionFraud20_org

After further review, there is no way in hell ballot harvesting is going to win a national election. The numbers are heavily disadvantageous, and the math shows it completely.

This is not my admonition not to "collect" any ballots - it is my attempt to inject reality into the consultant class call for mass ballot harvesting, as if those who count votes don't know how to do math.

https://skeshel.substack.com/p/were-heading-straight-for-the-ballot