US Election Integrity Plan
656 subscribers
442 photos
198 videos
64 files
1.09K links
Colorado-founded, grassroots effort to connect people working together to restore election integrity. Everything we do in Colorado is being templated for use in other states.

Visit useip.org and click “Get Involved” to join the fight!
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Behizy
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: Investigative journalists just caught massive donation FRAUD in Texas. Democrats are using the names of elderly people to solicit donations from dark money donors

This is being discovered nationwide, where are the Sheriffs to investigate?
👍8
Forwarded from Peter Bernegger
Announcement: I have sent a written Notice To Preserve all evidence and records to the Janet For Justice campaign. She is tied in with Smurfs, campaign money laundering, elderly abuse, identity theft, unjust enrichment, election fraud, wire fraud, Bank Secrecy Act violations, & conspiracy to defraud citizens, voters, the state & federal government. And: we have more.

Furthermore, Janet Protasiewicz never said spoke up when the liberal group Wisconsin Takes Action offered $250 to citizens to tell people to vote for her. The offer meets all the required elements to be a bribe per state statute, Janet said nothing. Wis. Takes Action & their officers also violate federal criminal statute 18 USC 597, Janet said nothing. Know that I am taking real action, pls help by donating at the website: electionwatch dot info

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2023-02-27-liberal-group-running-massive-election-bribery-scheme-in-supreme-court-race/

~ Peter Bernegger
🔥3
Forwarded from H.O.T. Wisconsin-Honest-Open-Transparent (Jim Spodick)
Democrat Donation Mules or SMURFS.
These mules are making thousands of donations adding up to millions of dollars by unemployed Americans to Democrat politicians and liberal PACs. Here is what you can do. You may need excel to perform some data collection.
1) Go to the FEC website, Individual Contributions Here

2) Enter the zip code where you live

3) Under "Employer," enter the words unemployed

3) Change the dates to 2017-2023; remember after that to unclick "2021-2022" just above it

4) Upper Right Corner export file you want then download the list to excel

5) In Excel Alphabetize the column which contains the first and last name

6) Just scroll down the list looking for those with say 1,000 or more donations.

7) Pick one name and filter those contributions; put on a new sheet if you want

8) how many contributions? Average per day for the number of days? Total dollar amount?

Here’s what I did...

I first went to the Federal Election website I put in 53403 and just started glancing at the names. I noticed Martha P***** came up several times. I put her name in and found she donated 2,213 times. Martha lived at 1642 P**** Ave., so I looked it up at 1642 P**** Ave. Not only did Martha P***** live there but hundreds of other people. The Bells, Billingsleys, Etc.I also added up the donations from 2017-2023 total $13,313.64 This is Smurf. I added the total donations from zip code 53403 in Racine-s poorest district. It totaled $3,095,417 from 2017-2023. There is a lot of data. This is a huge money laundering operation.
😱32
Forwarded from Peter Bernegger
Great job team, more Smurfs and campaign money laundering by corrupt liberals. Hats off to Chris Gleason & James O'Keefe and many others, some who wish to remain in the background. Americans: we're taking real action behind the scenes.

https://t.me/OKeefeMediaGroup/68

~ Peter Bernegger
🔥8
Forwarded from vDarkness Falls / Light_on_Liberty (vDarkness Falls)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
CNN's Lou Dobbs in 2006 ~"Smartmatic voting machines means our democracy is now for sale, without anyone doing a thing about it."
"American elections ought to be run by American companies. We belive this is a National Security issue."

CNN in 2021 ~"Lou Dobbs of Fox News is a liar, this election was secure." 🙄

Election results that need to be looked into for voter fraud -
Doug Ducey
Brian Kemp
Gretchen Whitmer
Tony Evers
Andrew Cuomo
Gavin Newsome
Mitt Romney
Mike DeWine
Jay Inslee
& WAY more

Joe Biden wasn't the first one to cheat. He's just the doorway to all the others who did. Why do you think they all screamed there wasn't any election fraud? That's the Pandora's box they can't open cuz their own names are inside it. It's how a group of communists amassed control of our country all at once to push the Election Infection agenda.

Cheating isn't limited to the Presidental section on your ballot. It's ALL areas on said ballot.
Why do you think there's such mass panic?

Bring the whole corrupt, disease ridden temple down....

👇👇👇
https://youtu.be/-s9PkuiIw2Q
☝️☝️☝️

ϕ 🧲

@vDarknessFalls
💯8🔥1👏1
Forwarded from Peter Bernegger
The strange world of Federal Elections Commission (FEC) data: the data downloaded from their website versus an API tied into their database can show two different results for the same query; while their website is shown on your monitor, their data can change while you’re watching it (we have screenshots); a contribution which already occurred can be dated in the future; they double count some things; they incorrectly count some things; they count transactions fees as a separate contribution; they have a State named “ZZ”.

When was the last time the FEC audited its own database? And, audited any reports coming to them from PAC’s, committees, or campaigns?

~ Peter Bernegger
👍91
Forwarded from Erin Clements
Vote centers necessitate the use of internet-connected, electronic pollbooks. All of the poll book providers have suites of centralized, all-inclusive software that do everything in the election and voter registration process (even campaign finance reporting!) except shove paper ballots through a scanner. They can even process the tabulator electronic files and geolocate voters.

So depending on how a county sets up their vote centers - they can potentially expose the entire election to the internet and provide ways that ‘results’ can be overwritten. This is happening in NM: https://rumble.com/v1txuhk-poll-pads-add-voters-in-dallas-tx-precinct-after-polls-are-closed.html

This video of the pollbooks adding votes after the close of polls in 2022 is quite powerful: https://rumble.com/v1txuhk-poll-pads-add-voters-in-dallas-tx-precinct-after-polls-are-closed.html <-These were KnowINK pollpads

Certain modules of these suites of software have been shown to be compromised - especially voter registration: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/03/exclusive-bpro-knowink-election-software-found-across-the-country-is-connected-to-the-internet-not-certified-and-its-able-to-backdate-election-records-hawaii/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=exclusive-bpro-knowink-election-software-found-across-the-country-is-connected-to-the-internet-not-certified-and-its-able-to-backdate-election-records-hawaii)

There is no oversight of pollbook software except that provided by CIS - which takes money from Democracy Fund and hires owners of election software to lead teams that decide that non-voting software is safe and secure. (article coming out this evening or tomorrow)

CIS was also part of the scheme to censor discussion of the 2020 election (https://estancia.news/the-albert-sensor-faustian-bargain-orwellian-surveilance-and-censorship-enterprise-foisted-on-unsuspecting-county-election-administrators/)

Vote centers are the devil.
Forwarded from New Mexico Audit Force (Erin Clements)
^This right here is ANOTHER HUGE BOMBSHELL that goes with the Estancia News/Gateway Pundit story from this morning!

A left-wing NGO funds CIS.

CIS pretends to investigate and faux-certify "non-voting" technology - which just so happens to actually control the entire election. The only thing non-voting technology doesn't do is feed paper into a black trashcan.

KnowINK/BPro/Runbeck/VR Systems/ES&S (same as Dominion/Diebold, etc.) all contributed their technology for "study." All those names already strike suspicion into the hearts of every election investigator everywhere.

What if what they were really doing was streamlining the connection between Albert Sensors, Scytl, pollbooks and ensuring that backfilling the "election results" after the election was smoother than it was in 2016 when Trump upset their plans?
👍2
Ahhh, instead of “human error” being the default excuse for unexplained election anomalies, we’re now in the age of AI did it. 🤦‍♀️
🤯5👍1
Forwarded from Kari Lake
Yesterday, Maricopa County released a report about their printer problems that concluded that the printers gained sentience Election Day morning and decided to sabotage 61% of voting locations in primarily red areas.

This is how stupid your election officials think you are.
🤬13😱1