Boebert’s statement:

Excellent illustration from Dan Schultz (the Precinct Strategy) of how the common sense reforms proposed by many (including myself) would get around the manufactured corruption of modern election infrastructure.

I enjoyed this graphic.

All Republican Governors should immediately begin the process of ENDING MAIL IN BALLOTS (which are fraught with corruption, and always will be!) EXCEPT FOR FAR AWAY MILITARY AND PEOPLE WITH A PROVEN ILLNESS, GETTING VOTER I.D. AND SAME DAY VOTING WITH ALL PAPER BALLOTS. This effort should be all out and start immediately. Governors have the power and authority to do this. GET IT DONE, or we will never have honest elections in our Country again!

BREAKING: Election Integrity Activist Gleason Submits Massive FOIA Request As Florida Legislature Tries To Change Law To Block Election Fraud Evidence Release
https://miamiindependent.com/breaking-election-integrity-activist-gleason-submits-massive-foia-request-as-florida-legislature-tries-to-change-law-to-block-election-fraud-evidence-release/

Laundered money was funneled to democratic candidates from Amalgamated Bank in New York this is just one of many. Get out the vote, churches, vendors, campaigns and a host of others. Massive fraud.

BREAKING: Investigative journalists just caught massive donation FRAUD in Texas. Democrats are using the names of elderly people to solicit donations from dark money donors

This is being discovered nationwide, where are the Sheriffs to investigate?

Announcement: I have sent a written Notice To Preserve all evidence and records to the Janet For Justice campaign. She is tied in with Smurfs, campaign money laundering, elderly abuse, identity theft, unjust enrichment, election fraud, wire fraud, Bank Secrecy Act violations, & conspiracy to defraud citizens, voters, the state & federal government. And: we have more.

Furthermore, Janet Protasiewicz never said spoke up when the liberal group Wisconsin Takes Action offered $250 to citizens to tell people to vote for her. The offer meets all the required elements to be a bribe per state statute, Janet said nothing. Wis. Takes Action & their officers also violate federal criminal statute 18 USC 597, Janet said nothing. Know that I am taking real action, pls help by donating at the website: electionwatch dot info

https://newstalk1130.iheart.com/featured/common-sense-central/content/2023-02-27-liberal-group-running-massive-election-bribery-scheme-in-supreme-court-race/

~ Peter Bernegger

Democrat Donation Mules or SMURFS.
These mules are making thousands of donations adding up to millions of dollars by unemployed Americans to Democrat politicians and liberal PACs. Here is what you can do. You may need excel to perform some data collection.
1) Go to the FEC website, Individual Contributions Here

2) Enter the zip code where you live

3) Under "Employer," enter the words unemployed

3) Change the dates to 2017-2023; remember after that to unclick "2021-2022" just above it

4) Upper Right Corner export file you want then download the list to excel

5) In Excel Alphabetize the column which contains the first and last name

6) Just scroll down the list looking for those with say 1,000 or more donations.

7) Pick one name and filter those contributions; put on a new sheet if you want

8) how many contributions? Average per day for the number of days? Total dollar amount?

Here’s what I did...

I first went to the Federal Election website I put in 53403 and just started glancing at the names. I noticed Martha P***** came up several times. I put her name in and found she donated 2,213 times. Martha lived at 1642 P**** Ave., so I looked it up at 1642 P**** Ave. Not only did Martha P***** live there but hundreds of other people. The Bells, Billingsleys, Etc.I also added up the donations from 2017-2023 total $13,313.64 This is Smurf. I added the total donations from zip code 53403 in Racine-s poorest district. It totaled $3,095,417 from 2017-2023. There is a lot of data. This is a huge money laundering operation.

Great job team, more Smurfs and campaign money laundering by corrupt liberals. Hats off to Chris Gleason & James O'Keefe and many others, some who wish to remain in the background. Americans: we're taking real action behind the scenes.

https://t.me/OKeefeMediaGroup/68

~ Peter Bernegger

CNN's Lou Dobbs in 2006 ~"Smartmatic voting machines means our democracy is now for sale, without anyone doing a thing about it."
"American elections ought to be run by American companies. We belive this is a National Security issue."

CNN in 2021 ~"Lou Dobbs of Fox News is a liar, this election was secure." 🙄

Election results that need to be looked into for voter fraud -
Doug Ducey
Brian Kemp
Gretchen Whitmer
Tony Evers
Andrew Cuomo
Gavin Newsome
Mitt Romney
Mike DeWine
Jay Inslee
& WAY more

Joe Biden wasn't the first one to cheat. He's just the doorway to all the others who did. Why do you think they all screamed there wasn't any election fraud? That's the Pandora's box they can't open cuz their own names are inside it. It's how a group of communists amassed control of our country all at once to push the Election Infection agenda.

Cheating isn't limited to the Presidental section on your ballot. It's ALL areas on said ballot.
Why do you think there's such mass panic?

Bring the whole corrupt, disease ridden temple down....

👇👇👇
https://youtu.be/-s9PkuiIw2Q
☝️☝️☝️

⚡ϕ 🧲

@vDarknessFalls

After Mail-In Midterm Mess, Gov. Lombardo Backs Bill To Restore Integrity To Nevada’s Election System

READ: https://thefederalist.com/2023/04/07/after-mail-in-midterm-mess-gov-lombardo-backs-bill-to-restore-integrity-to-nevadas-election-system/ • @FDRLSTT

https://twitter.com/lwvcolorado/status/1642934421690155009?s=46&t=wD-WXoVyg9BDsKREq-BwtQ

This is going to be good! Anyone want to get on a group chat during this event?

I’m def going to be listening!

The strange world of Federal Elections Commission (FEC) data: the data downloaded from their website versus an API tied into their database can show two different results for the same query; while their website is shown on your monitor, their data can change while you’re watching it (we have screenshots); a contribution which already occurred can be dated in the future; they double count some things; they incorrectly count some things; they count transactions fees as a separate contribution; they have a State named “ZZ”.

When was the last time the FEC audited its own database? And, audited any reports coming to them from PAC’s, committees, or campaigns?

~ Peter Bernegger