So the judge did not disagree with what was presented as being problematic what he did say is there was no evidence of intent to defraud or steal the election
https://acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:4eac0883-e1de-3fdf-9257-5163ca9897e4

Today on Badland Media's Why We Vote at 5pm EST:

Kari Lake's expert witness Clay Parikh joins us to talk about his testimony in an exclusive after the judges unreasonable dismissal!

https://rumble.com/v22je76-why-we-vote-ep-9-tue-500-pm-et-.html

Kari Lake's notice of appeal
⬇️

https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/4571

SCOTUS to Consider Taking Case on Constitutionality of Mail-In Voting:

The U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to consider reviewing the case on the grounds of whether the mail-in voting portion of Act 77 violates the U.S. Constitution.

If the Supreme Court determines that the act is unconstitutional, that would invalidate no-excuse mail-in voting in the state [PA].

Gregory Teufel, the attorney representing the petitioners, told The Lancaster Patriot that he is hopeful the case will be heard.

The issue is an important one, Teufel declared. “It’s one that could have far-reaching effect, because there are mail-in voting laws that violate the U.S. Constitution in the same way as Pennsylvania’s does across the country.”

The problem with these mail-in voting laws, Teufel said, is that they fail to specify a place for someone to vote when they vote by mail, which violates Article 1, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution. The election clause in that section states, “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.”

Teufel said that this clause mandates that states must specify places where federal elections are held. Because the mail-in voting law in Pennsylvania does not specify a place, it essentially allows a voter to vote from anywhere in the world. By requiring a set location, the law allows people to observe the voting process and, he said, “verify that there is nothing being done incorrectly, no corruption, no bribery, no intimidation, et cetera, happening.”

https://www.thelancasterpatriot.com/scotus-to-consider-taking-case-on-constitutionality-of-mail-in-voting/

Crossword puzzle related to the recent court case in AZ. Will post the answers tomorrow.

Here is the Lake v Hobbs crossword with the answers on page 2, as promised.

Happy New Year!

The EAC's Technical Guidelines Development Committee is having their annual meeting on Jan 26th. Could be interesting to listen in. Here is more info.

There is also a public hearing on Feb 8th. Here are those details.

118th CONGRESS vote is another CAA production
9 votes go to other (jordan)
10 to BIggs
McCarthy loses by 9 votes.
19 ALLOCATED elsewhere.
Symbology is their downfall.
#EnjoyTheShow anyone pretending this isn't fixed and is nail biting is AN ACTOR.

TURN THEM OFF.

19 again. Who is buying this CAA production. WE SAID NO DEALS.
NOW let's FLIP the SCRIPT by SHREDDING IT.

This is a 5 star meme
@WILFmoseder

What....the.... actual......fuck


https://www.axios.com/local/denver/2022/01/04/jared-polis-president-colorado-governor