Today, police of Republika Srpska have driven federal police out of a building in the Banja Luka, the capital of Republika Srpska, according to reports
President Milorad Dodik called on Serbian members of the federal police &courts to resign &join the government of RS. "We have ensured them a job, while preserving their legal status, ranks, &positions."
The people who, according to pieces of paper, are in charge did not respond by exerting their authority physically. "Bosnian officials have filed suit against these laws in the Constitutional Court. The European Union has backed the suit"
The reality of politics is that if you have the loyalty of most of the men with guns in your territory, you can just do things. You are the law.
Unilateral secession does not wait for permission.
President Milorad Dodik called on Serbian members of the federal police &courts to resign &join the government of RS. "We have ensured them a job, while preserving their legal status, ranks, &positions."
The people who, according to pieces of paper, are in charge did not respond by exerting their authority physically. "Bosnian officials have filed suit against these laws in the Constitutional Court. The European Union has backed the suit"
The reality of politics is that if you have the loyalty of most of the men with guns in your territory, you can just do things. You are the law.
Unilateral secession does not wait for permission.
One of the 2 parts of Bosnia is demonstrating the mechanics of seceding without permission this week. Republika Srpska passed state laws to ignore federal officials and courts. They are creating de facto autonomy without waiting for de jure permission. A good 1st step toward secession, then annexation by Serbia.
"I will not go to their political court because Serbs no longer go to inquisitions! ...Srpska is not and never will be anyone’s colony! We are our own on our own, we decide for ourselves" ~president of Republika Srpska (RS), after sentenced to 1 yr in prison & 6yr politics ban
Last night, RS President Dodik signed more laws into effect: one bans the (Bosnia) federal court, prosecutor's office and police from working in Republika Srpska
"I will not go to their political court because Serbs no longer go to inquisitions! ...Srpska is not and never will be anyone’s colony! We are our own on our own, we decide for ourselves" ~president of Republika Srpska (RS), after sentenced to 1 yr in prison & 6yr politics ban
Last night, RS President Dodik signed more laws into effect: one bans the (Bosnia) federal court, prosecutor's office and police from working in Republika Srpska
Our new article: The Right is headed in the wrong direction because it assumes that if the Left is the problem, then all we need to do is fight the Left
Jesus explained why this kind of thinking is wrong in Luke 14:31-32: https://redstatesecession.org/can-the-american-right-win/
Jesus explained why this kind of thinking is wrong in Luke 14:31-32: https://redstatesecession.org/can-the-american-right-win/
This excellent article explains why the US is divided. I believe that red america and blue america are in a process of ethnogenesis, so that Right-leaning whites are merging into a single ethnicity, and so are certain left-leaning types. Surprisingly, there are few marriages between a Dem & a Republican.
I don't expect a red-state federation to be a single "nation" but I think each state can handle their own citizenship and cultural issues. https://substack.com/home/post/p-157465346
I don't expect a red-state federation to be a single "nation" but I think each state can handle their own citizenship and cultural issues. https://substack.com/home/post/p-157465346
Substack
The Death of America’s Creed: Why "National Values" Can’t Hold a Fractured Society Together
As beliefs shift and demographics change, the U.S. creed is being redefined—proving that only culture, not ideology, sustains a nation.
A declaration of independence is inherently peaceful because it recognizes the legitimacy of the state it chooses to split from, rather than attempting to overthrow it entirely, which would be a revolution
So there is no such thing as a "war for independence" or a "war of secession." Only wars against independence or against secession. The seceding area is defending its sovereignty, not aggressing against the parent state.
If it is aggressing, then it's a revolution, not a secession. For example: George Washington had no intention of replacing King George or Parliament with himself. No plans to invade London.
The meaning of "revolution" has changed. It was invented to describe the war of 1775-1783 because the patriots intended to "return" or "revolve" the political situation back to the way it had been before Parliament started intruding into colonial affairs in the 1760s
So there is no such thing as a "war for independence" or a "war of secession." Only wars against independence or against secession. The seceding area is defending its sovereignty, not aggressing against the parent state.
If it is aggressing, then it's a revolution, not a secession. For example: George Washington had no intention of replacing King George or Parliament with himself. No plans to invade London.
The meaning of "revolution" has changed. It was invented to describe the war of 1775-1783 because the patriots intended to "return" or "revolve" the political situation back to the way it had been before Parliament started intruding into colonial affairs in the 1760s
At that time, the word "secession" had not yet been applied to politics, as it just meant "withdrawal." After it was used to describe churches withdrawing from denominations, by the 1860s it was used to describe a state withdrawing its membership in the US Union.
Forwarded from Deseret Nationalism
There’s been a lot happening on the federal level in the past few weeks. The Supreme Court ruled that USAID payments could not be stopped, the deportation tracker was taken down, Trump turned on the only Republican representative not getting money from AIPAC, and Congress passed yet another out of control spending bill.
Trump winning has upset some things, but for the most part it is simply business as usual in D.C.. Congress remains corrupt and compromised, the Supreme Court refuses to uphold the constitution, and all the executive branch can do is complain about it.
The established corruption is so entrenched in the system, that it can not be removed by political means. Remember all of those delayed elections for senators and congressmen? In many of those elections the democrats ended up winning. Tell me why in some of these elections over 50,000 people would vote for Trump, then turn around and vote for a Democrat congressman? The answer is they didn’t, the elections in those states are a sham, and they simply focused their cheating efforts on Congress instead. In order to have nationwide election reform, we need to get the corrupt congressmen out. In order to get the corrupt congressmen out, we need nationwide election reform. It’s a catch 22, and political reform is impossible.
This isn’t the end of constitutional government, but this does appear to be the end of the government of the United States. This modern federal government does not follow the constitution at all, and simply wears it like a suit to give the appearance that “We the People” are in charge, when “We the People” haven’t had any meaningful influence over the government in over a century.
The founding fathers knew the constitution wasn’t corruption proof, which is why they added the ultimate check and balance; we the people. There is a good reason the 2nd amendment starts with “A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state”. The founders interpreted the meaning of “free state” to be a nation free from despotism.
Is modern America a “free state” as the founders interpreted it?
Furthermore, Benjamin Franklin famously said “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”, and also said that “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom”.
Is modern America moral and religious? For conservatives and right leaning people in general, absolutely. For the moderates, not so much, and for the progressives and left leaning, absolutely not. Do those who are deserving of a free and constitutional government deserve to share a nation with those who don’t?
I would say absolutely not. Let the righteous and the wicked have separate nations, and let the wicked destroy themselves, and drive their own nations into the ground while the righteous prosper.
Trump winning has upset some things, but for the most part it is simply business as usual in D.C.. Congress remains corrupt and compromised, the Supreme Court refuses to uphold the constitution, and all the executive branch can do is complain about it.
The established corruption is so entrenched in the system, that it can not be removed by political means. Remember all of those delayed elections for senators and congressmen? In many of those elections the democrats ended up winning. Tell me why in some of these elections over 50,000 people would vote for Trump, then turn around and vote for a Democrat congressman? The answer is they didn’t, the elections in those states are a sham, and they simply focused their cheating efforts on Congress instead. In order to have nationwide election reform, we need to get the corrupt congressmen out. In order to get the corrupt congressmen out, we need nationwide election reform. It’s a catch 22, and political reform is impossible.
This isn’t the end of constitutional government, but this does appear to be the end of the government of the United States. This modern federal government does not follow the constitution at all, and simply wears it like a suit to give the appearance that “We the People” are in charge, when “We the People” haven’t had any meaningful influence over the government in over a century.
The founding fathers knew the constitution wasn’t corruption proof, which is why they added the ultimate check and balance; we the people. There is a good reason the 2nd amendment starts with “A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state”. The founders interpreted the meaning of “free state” to be a nation free from despotism.
Is modern America a “free state” as the founders interpreted it?
Furthermore, Benjamin Franklin famously said “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”, and also said that “Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom”.
Is modern America moral and religious? For conservatives and right leaning people in general, absolutely. For the moderates, not so much, and for the progressives and left leaning, absolutely not. Do those who are deserving of a free and constitutional government deserve to share a nation with those who don’t?
I would say absolutely not. Let the righteous and the wicked have separate nations, and let the wicked destroy themselves, and drive their own nations into the ground while the righteous prosper.
State rep. Michael Burton, D-Lakeshire, suggested St. Louis, St. Louis County and St. Charles County should break up with Missouri to become the 51st state. It's 27% of the state's pop. More area than Rhode Island. Burton has asked House staff to draft a bill.
While the city of St. Louis has strong Democratic leanings, much of St. Louis County votes Republican. And no Democrats represent St. Charles County in the Legislature. He should focus on the areas that would willingly join St. Louis.
Another possibility would be to relocate the state line so that St. Louis becomes a city of Illinois, as East St. Louis is.
Now that we have bridges, we don't need state lines in rivers. Philadelphia could become a city of New Jersey, like Camden is, by the way.
However, if downstate Illinois joins a red state, then St. Louis will wish it had become a state unto itself instead. https://archive.is/JuBOW#selection-4931.0-4937.248
While the city of St. Louis has strong Democratic leanings, much of St. Louis County votes Republican. And no Democrats represent St. Charles County in the Legislature. He should focus on the areas that would willingly join St. Louis.
Another possibility would be to relocate the state line so that St. Louis becomes a city of Illinois, as East St. Louis is.
Now that we have bridges, we don't need state lines in rivers. Philadelphia could become a city of New Jersey, like Camden is, by the way.
However, if downstate Illinois joins a red state, then St. Louis will wish it had become a state unto itself instead. https://archive.is/JuBOW#selection-4931.0-4937.248
archive.is
Lawmaker proposes St. Louis area leaving Missouri
archived 14 Mar 2025 10:12:51 UTC
This is the best article against immigration I've ever seen
https://substack.com/home/post/p-158036044
https://substack.com/home/post/p-158036044
Aporiamagazine
Immigration does not solve population decline
Refuting a common fallacy
Trump only declared Tren De Aragua as invaders, but Boasberg issued a restraining order
This is the 26th decision by Trump blocked by federal judges.
Looks like federal judges won the presidential election. We can escape DC judges by helping TX lead the red states to secede
This is the 26th decision by Trump blocked by federal judges.
Looks like federal judges won the presidential election. We can escape DC judges by helping TX lead the red states to secede
Now 27 of Trump's decisions have been blocked by federal judges
2/3 of this Senate will never vote to remove them. Only 53% are GOP, including RINOs
Winning the presidency is not enough to fix fedgov because the Left is more powerful in the US
Solution: help the Texas Nationalist Movement or Free Louisiana lead the red states out of the Union!
2/3 of this Senate will never vote to remove them. Only 53% are GOP, including RINOs
Winning the presidency is not enough to fix fedgov because the Left is more powerful in the US
Solution: help the Texas Nationalist Movement or Free Louisiana lead the red states out of the Union!
Today, federal Judge Ana Reyes blocked Trump's policy that only allows transgenders with exemptions into the military AND federal judge Chuang ordered the restoration of USAID & all access, employment & privileges to all its former employees & contractors
That makes 27 of Trump's decisions blocked by federal judges
2/3 of this Senate will never vote to remove them. Only 53% are GOP, including RINOs
Winning the presidency is not enough to fix fedgov because the Left is more powerful in the US
Solution: help the Texas Nationalist Movement and Free Louisiana lead the red states out of the Union!
That makes 27 of Trump's decisions blocked by federal judges
2/3 of this Senate will never vote to remove them. Only 53% are GOP, including RINOs
Winning the presidency is not enough to fix fedgov because the Left is more powerful in the US
Solution: help the Texas Nationalist Movement and Free Louisiana lead the red states out of the Union!
Federal judge Chuang stripped Trump's deputy admin of USAID Jeremy Lewin from authority because he's tainted by association with DOGE and DOGE is icky
That makes 31 of Trump admin's decisions blocked by federal judges. Here's my list.
Fedgov is unfixable. We must help The Texas Nationalist Movement or Free Louisiana initiate a National Divorce
That makes 31 of Trump admin's decisions blocked by federal judges. Here's my list.
Fedgov is unfixable. We must help The Texas Nationalist Movement or Free Louisiana initiate a National Divorce
2 bills critical for Texas sovereignty will be debated and voted on at the Texas House State Affairs committee this coming Wednesday, March 26:
* HB 796: Texas Sovereignty Act creates process for Texas to reject unconstitutional federal laws and actions
* HB 1056: transactional gold
Also being heard is the bill to remove the expiration of the application for a Convention of States that Texas made in 2017 (HJR 98)
The hearing starts at 8:00 am in the John Regan Building, Room 140 (JHR 140) which is on the north side of the Capitol complex: https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/schedules/html/C4502025032608001.HTM
Come to the Capitol and sign up at the kiosks outside the meeting room in favor of HB 796 and HB 1056. Sign up to testify as well.
If you cannot make it to the Capitol, please use the online comments portal to express support and reasons if you so choose. That portal is up for use now and will close at end of testimony on Wednesday. https://comments.house.texas.gov/home?c=c450
* HB 796: Texas Sovereignty Act creates process for Texas to reject unconstitutional federal laws and actions
* HB 1056: transactional gold
Also being heard is the bill to remove the expiration of the application for a Convention of States that Texas made in 2017 (HJR 98)
The hearing starts at 8:00 am in the John Regan Building, Room 140 (JHR 140) which is on the north side of the Capitol complex: https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/89R/schedules/html/C4502025032608001.HTM
Come to the Capitol and sign up at the kiosks outside the meeting room in favor of HB 796 and HB 1056. Sign up to testify as well.
If you cannot make it to the Capitol, please use the online comments portal to express support and reasons if you so choose. That portal is up for use now and will close at end of testimony on Wednesday. https://comments.house.texas.gov/home?c=c450
Warning: Hollywood made another Trump assassination & coup fantasy movie, but "Mickey 17" now in theaters doesn't have the redeeming features of the other one: "Civil War"
Amusingly, the story of Mickey 17 is predicated on the assumption that Trump would lose in 2024! The producers had to swallow their pride & release the movie even though he didn't, because the scenes had already been shot. It was intended to dunk on Trump's failure
Mickey 17 tries to lift up the status of, and teach you to desire, organizing politically to take down Trump, and having sexual relationships with black women
I realized that libs think Trump is dumb because he's not a wordcel. He enjoys spending time with blue-collar types and uses their vocabulary. Libs never evaluate his intelligence based on his accomplishments and good choices
Wordcels look over a lot of tech geniuses this way
Amusingly, the story of Mickey 17 is predicated on the assumption that Trump would lose in 2024! The producers had to swallow their pride & release the movie even though he didn't, because the scenes had already been shot. It was intended to dunk on Trump's failure
Mickey 17 tries to lift up the status of, and teach you to desire, organizing politically to take down Trump, and having sexual relationships with black women
I realized that libs think Trump is dumb because he's not a wordcel. He enjoys spending time with blue-collar types and uses their vocabulary. Libs never evaluate his intelligence based on his accomplishments and good choices
Wordcels look over a lot of tech geniuses this way
Of course, one tends to think that people who disagree with one are less intelligent. Both red & blue assume this of the other.
But progressive ideology is that "experts must rule, not the people." So they can't afford to acknowledge that their enemies are wise or smart.
Mickey 17 trailer tricked me into paying to see this contribution to "the Resistance" to Trump. Both movies are big-budget, good acting & effects. I'm jealous how much Hollywood bestows on "The Resistance."
Having Lefty Mark Ruffalo in the trailer was a red flag that it might be a Lefty movie, but didn't have time to vet the movie before going. My wife thought it was the worst ever, but I'd give it a C.
Trump is not mentioned by name in the film. Actually the character is a mix of Trump and a tele-evangelist. I don't think the government can put the producers in jail.
But I'll certainly blame them if someone takes Trump out.
The Left has a dangerous belief that the Right only exists because our presidential candidates exist. If they could just take out the few conservatives that they hear about, then the Right wouldn't exist anymore
Truth is: they need to let the red states secede
I just find funny that political message of “we are the aliens not this creatures that might be ugly but they are friendly”
Rotten Tomatoes gets few votes anymore, so don't trust them. Try Criticless
Whoever has stock in Warner Bros or Plan B should sue the CEO for making a film that's a $200M contribution to the anti-Trump resistance, not a real attempt at making money for the owners
• Production budget — $118M
• Marketing budget — $80M
• Needs to make over $275M to break even
But progressive ideology is that "experts must rule, not the people." So they can't afford to acknowledge that their enemies are wise or smart.
Mickey 17 trailer tricked me into paying to see this contribution to "the Resistance" to Trump. Both movies are big-budget, good acting & effects. I'm jealous how much Hollywood bestows on "The Resistance."
Having Lefty Mark Ruffalo in the trailer was a red flag that it might be a Lefty movie, but didn't have time to vet the movie before going. My wife thought it was the worst ever, but I'd give it a C.
Trump is not mentioned by name in the film. Actually the character is a mix of Trump and a tele-evangelist. I don't think the government can put the producers in jail.
But I'll certainly blame them if someone takes Trump out.
The Left has a dangerous belief that the Right only exists because our presidential candidates exist. If they could just take out the few conservatives that they hear about, then the Right wouldn't exist anymore
Truth is: they need to let the red states secede
I just find funny that political message of “we are the aliens not this creatures that might be ugly but they are friendly”
Rotten Tomatoes gets few votes anymore, so don't trust them. Try Criticless
Whoever has stock in Warner Bros or Plan B should sue the CEO for making a film that's a $200M contribution to the anti-Trump resistance, not a real attempt at making money for the owners
• Production budget — $118M
• Marketing budget — $80M
• Needs to make over $275M to break even