✅ Blood in the Rhetoric: When Ideology Pulls the Trigger

✅ Red Reckoning: A Killing Beyond Spin and What-About-ism

✔️ The Day the Words Bled: Murder in the Name of Ideology

✅ No More Excuses—Only Blood Remains

🏁 A Bullet for the Truth: When Denial Turns Deadly

🏁 Crimson Reality: The Death That Shattered Both-Sides Politics

Greg Gutfeld argues that “what-aboutism” is dead and rejects claims of equivalence between political sides.

They stress that the killing of a “young, bright man” was a clear, ideologically driven act, not a random crime like the case of Melissa Hortman.

They believe attempts to deflect—by citing other incidents or demanding all the facts first—are rationalizations born of cognitive dissonance, used to avoid admitting that some on the political left condone harmful ideas (e.g., child gender surgeries, calling opponents “fascists”) that can fuel violence.

Greg Gutfeld insists:

They and their audience are calm, honest, and resolute, not defensive.

The incident is “immune to news cycles, bias, or relativism,” so mainstream media framing no longer matters.

The alleged shooter was a “patsy,” influenced by a nihilistic ideology (“trans cult”) that denies biological reality and devalues human life.