Forwarded from ⚡️☈ᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ💀
In a couple of weeks, when the Republicans coast to an easy, undeserved "Let's Go Brandon" victory, all of the "Roevember" Resistance shitlib cattle will just start talking about the next election — they won't do shit — they will impotently cry on Twitter Dot Com and Facebook. There is a lesson in this. Imposing your will works. If it can be done with abortion, it can be done with any other element of the cultural rot that we live with on a day to day basis.
There is no reason not to. We just have to purge the GOP of cowards who won't do it.
There is no reason not to. We just have to purge the GOP of cowards who won't do it.
👍15
Forwarded from Thuletide
Crazy how gay marriage was illegal in every Anglosphere country (except Canada) not even 10 years ago, and now we've got infinite genders, transgender toddlers, and people who deny that biological sex even exists.
Turns out the "slippery slope" that we fell down was a vertical drop into a bottomless pit.
Turns out the "slippery slope" that we fell down was a vertical drop into a bottomless pit.
👍35
Forwarded from Turnip’s Digest
Brits went from being lead by the last Victorian WWI veteran to a foreign Punjabi in not even 60 years
🤮28🤔1🤬1
Turnip’s Digest
It’s not been a good day for Concessional Lutheranism
Today is worse for the Concessionals
🔥12
This is the controversial statement in question. It’s a talking point directly from 2014 or 2015. The only difference is we went from
“Instead of having to pick Republicans or Socialists, we could have classical liberalism guys!”
to
“Instead of having to pick between technocratic dystopia and our Christian heritage, we could have classical liberalism guys!”
Have any of them ever considered why classical liberalism is called such? Have they considered why it’s no longer predominant, if ever it was so? I would guess not.
They also do such a great disservice to “classical conservatism.” Conservatives up until five decades ago advocated the separation of peoples and nations, direct religious influence over governance, and a strict delineation between the duties and spheres of men and women (with men being above women). Try to find any of these lefty pastors claiming any of those positions. To them, classical conservatism is limpwristed, milquetoast inaction with an older aesthetic to mask itself in.
“Instead of having to pick Republicans or Socialists, we could have classical liberalism guys!”
to
“Instead of having to pick between technocratic dystopia and our Christian heritage, we could have classical liberalism guys!”
Have any of them ever considered why classical liberalism is called such? Have they considered why it’s no longer predominant, if ever it was so? I would guess not.
They also do such a great disservice to “classical conservatism.” Conservatives up until five decades ago advocated the separation of peoples and nations, direct religious influence over governance, and a strict delineation between the duties and spheres of men and women (with men being above women). Try to find any of these lefty pastors claiming any of those positions. To them, classical conservatism is limpwristed, milquetoast inaction with an older aesthetic to mask itself in.
🔥11👍1
Forwarded from Eric
This is the guy who got a Right Wing pastor fired from AALC on phony charges and then coordinated with Antifa to dox and fire him from another church, causing him and his family to flee the state.
I just got done rehearsing a brass quartet for Reformation Day and I am so whitepilled rn
🙏14
Forwarded from James Leck
Telegram
Randall
Who’s going to call a Holy Crusade to save the remaining faithful Christians of the United Kingdom from their openly pagan ruler?
👏19🔥2
Forwarded from Diet of Worms
“Since, therefore, the entire Scriptures, the prophets, and the Gospels, can be clearly, unambiguously, and harmoniously understood by all, although all do not believe them… those persons will seem truly foolish who blind their eyes to such a clear demonstration” - St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 2:27:2
👍6