I have to write movie reviews for one of my classes. Should I post them here?
They don’t assess the movie normally, but rather they are papers on entrepreneurship related to the movies.
They don’t assess the movie normally, but rather they are papers on entrepreneurship related to the movies.
👍16👎1
Forwarded from Radical Liberation
For nearly a year (yes, before the war), we have been pointing out the signs of economic pain coming.
Now it is here.
With Ryan Turnipseed.
https://youtu.be/MMBB3TYvDNs
Now it is here.
With Ryan Turnipseed.
https://youtu.be/MMBB3TYvDNs
YouTube
The Pain Begins
For nearly a year (yes, before the war), we have been pointing out the signs of economic pain coming.
Now it is here.
With Ryan Turnipseed
https://findmyfrens.net/ryanturnipseed/
FOLLOW
https://twitter.com/RadicalLib
https://gab.com/RadicalLiberation
…
Now it is here.
With Ryan Turnipseed
https://findmyfrens.net/ryanturnipseed/
FOLLOW
https://twitter.com/RadicalLib
https://gab.com/RadicalLiberation
…
Forwarded from The Prudentialist
Tomorrow at 7 PM Eastern I'm joined by T. R. Hudson, author of Automaton, and other short stories. We will talk about his book, his writing workshop, and the growth of independent fiction.
https://youtu.be/hvA_tLmuPHg
https://youtu.be/hvA_tLmuPHg
YouTube
An Interview with T.R. Hudson
Today my good friend, writer, and author T.R. Hudson joins me to discuss his debut novel, Automaton, the creative writing process, and what's coming up next for his work.
Buy Automaton: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09PMJY81P
T.R. Hudson's Substack: htt…
Buy Automaton: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09PMJY81P
T.R. Hudson's Substack: htt…
Tomorrow at 8:00 a.m. CST I will be joined by Christopher Sandbatch to discuss the Dixiecrats and the Party Switch!
https://youtu.be/Fvup1NXsCko
https://youtu.be/Fvup1NXsCko
YouTube
Turnip's Digest: The Dixiecrats 1948-1968
In a surprise turn of events, I carry out a solo stream going over the platforms of the 1948 Democratic, Republican, and States Rights Democratic Party and the 1968 platform of the American Independent Party.
If you like what I do, please consider supporting:…
If you like what I do, please consider supporting:…
🔥3
Turnip’s Digest
Tomorrow at 8:00 a.m. CST I will be joined by Christopher Sandbatch to discuss the Dixiecrats and the Party Switch! https://youtu.be/Fvup1NXsCko
For various reasons that have arisen this morning, this has to be postponed to next Saturday.
There will be no stream today.
There will be no stream today.
😢9
All the non-American experts on America think us to be Black and Jewish, be they demagogues from the left or the right. Not one actual American thinks this, let alone sees it.
🔥31👍1
It’s real strange how I haven’t seen a single American concur with the “America is solely a nation for black landwhales” criticism.
Perhaps it’s not a reaction of national pride. Perhaps, and hear me out here, we know the problems of our country, like what has been outlined with the Zoomers or that the authentic right has been expunged from day to day life or that we’ve been subjected to administration after administration hellbent on destroying the last strongholds of White Christian America, and we therefore know whether something is true or false about our problems, as opposed to relying solely on TikTok videos and a swarthy Sicilian that never saw the continent, let alone met an American.
https://t.me/BertieBassett4Life/9543
Perhaps it’s not a reaction of national pride. Perhaps, and hear me out here, we know the problems of our country, like what has been outlined with the Zoomers or that the authentic right has been expunged from day to day life or that we’ve been subjected to administration after administration hellbent on destroying the last strongholds of White Christian America, and we therefore know whether something is true or false about our problems, as opposed to relying solely on TikTok videos and a swarthy Sicilian that never saw the continent, let alone met an American.
https://t.me/BertieBassett4Life/9543
Telegram
Bertie Bassett
It’s strange to see in 2022 but it has revealed how far from complete the task is: it is necessary to eliminate untrue things fostered by such things as “national pride” in order to see things as they are.
👍10🔥3👏1🤮1
https://t.me/TheCourseofEmpire2/13582
I just came across this quote from Sam Francis about the old religious right, and a lot has changed.
Almost all the writers and clergy and other intellectuals that would be at the core of “modern” Christian Nationalism seem to either already completely understand the issues being outlined here or instinctually and implicitly do. This is not to say that it’s some large movement, as has been made out by various media elements and other detractors, but so far they’ve fixed the old issues and have gone much farther than what has been outlined here.
Unlike the old religious right, the new seems entirely resistant to compromise with overt satanic elements (like the USG and the various NGOs that racially and legally destroy peoples).
On the Lutheran side of things, which I share simply because I know the most, the two examples that immediately come to mind of this would be:
https://cognosceveritatem.com/author/eschatologuy/
And
https://coreyjmahler.com
But there are other denominations with similar people.
From the “Dissident Right,” the emerging narrative that Christian Nationalism is some toothless and fake ideology emerging out of nothing is frankly ignorant. It discounts the intellectual core and development of the whole thing, ignores the current state of churches and how they got there, doesn’t provide a solution for the problem (provided the DR member in question is not themselves anti-Christian), and in spite of all the knowledge about how media has operated since time immemorial, accepts the media caricature of Christian Nationalism instead of what is actually there. The last part is understandable, as Christian Nationalism is by no means unified and lacks common beliefs in a lot of areas (much like the “Dissident Right”), but this does not preclude it from proper intellectual scrutiny before discounting it.
And if you do discount it, you either need to be prepared to bleed Christians as you move into real world organization (an occurrence that would sink any American activity and organization), or you need to be prepared to present a real, tangible solution to their problems.
I just came across this quote from Sam Francis about the old religious right, and a lot has changed.
Almost all the writers and clergy and other intellectuals that would be at the core of “modern” Christian Nationalism seem to either already completely understand the issues being outlined here or instinctually and implicitly do. This is not to say that it’s some large movement, as has been made out by various media elements and other detractors, but so far they’ve fixed the old issues and have gone much farther than what has been outlined here.
Unlike the old religious right, the new seems entirely resistant to compromise with overt satanic elements (like the USG and the various NGOs that racially and legally destroy peoples).
On the Lutheran side of things, which I share simply because I know the most, the two examples that immediately come to mind of this would be:
https://cognosceveritatem.com/author/eschatologuy/
And
https://coreyjmahler.com
But there are other denominations with similar people.
From the “Dissident Right,” the emerging narrative that Christian Nationalism is some toothless and fake ideology emerging out of nothing is frankly ignorant. It discounts the intellectual core and development of the whole thing, ignores the current state of churches and how they got there, doesn’t provide a solution for the problem (provided the DR member in question is not themselves anti-Christian), and in spite of all the knowledge about how media has operated since time immemorial, accepts the media caricature of Christian Nationalism instead of what is actually there. The last part is understandable, as Christian Nationalism is by no means unified and lacks common beliefs in a lot of areas (much like the “Dissident Right”), but this does not preclude it from proper intellectual scrutiny before discounting it.
And if you do discount it, you either need to be prepared to bleed Christians as you move into real world organization (an occurrence that would sink any American activity and organization), or you need to be prepared to present a real, tangible solution to their problems.
👍11
Without changing a single one of my views, I went from being a lolbert isolationist that didn’t care about the West who subversively deconstructs patriotism to a genocidal neocon that loves boomer truth.
Pick one and stick with it for crying out loud.
Pick one and stick with it for crying out loud.
🤔16👍3🎉1
Forwarded from ⚡️☈ᴇᴠᴇɴᴀɴᴛ💀
Have been seeing this, uh, "analogy" for unwanted pregnancy going around a lot lately.
Why do these people have such a hard time understanding that "unwanted" outcomes are different from forced outcomes? Their use of this analogy suggests that these women don't believe they bear any responsibility for their "unwanted" pregnancies — as if they just woke up one day to discover that they had become pregnant out of nowhere.
It's like rear-ending someone in your car and trying to get out of it by calling it an "unwanted car accident."
It just goes to show you that not even the majority of women actually view themselves as having agency in any meaningful way, which is why they historically weren't treated as people with agency.
Why do these people have such a hard time understanding that "unwanted" outcomes are different from forced outcomes? Their use of this analogy suggests that these women don't believe they bear any responsibility for their "unwanted" pregnancies — as if they just woke up one day to discover that they had become pregnant out of nowhere.
It's like rear-ending someone in your car and trying to get out of it by calling it an "unwanted car accident."
It just goes to show you that not even the majority of women actually view themselves as having agency in any meaningful way, which is why they historically weren't treated as people with agency.
👍4🔥1