Here’s the infuriating contradiction. We can’t offer specific policy because that’s an overreach and wording on policy is hard.

But we can condemn “discrimination.” What is meant by this? They sure won’t tell you. It could be anything from hateful choices to family preference.

And finally our synod president ends the article declaring that the church is above petty secular politics and that it doesn’t follow the world.

And in the next breath it condemns “racist” policy.

I can’t think of a more fitting end to this article.

I'm afraid I've participated in a grave disservice to the broader dissident right wing by helping convince people that the US is strictly evil and lies about everything on the Cigar Streams.

I was on a lot of these Cigar Streams with Charlemagne saying the exact same things, and I was careless. I didn’t take into account that the internet thinks in black and white.

I could preface what I say with “extrapolate nothing beyond what I say,” but that still doesn’t fix the problem. I now realize I can’t just say “The USG is evil,” because a large contingency automatically thinks “everything US must be evil.”

I understand the impulse to embrace non western things, but the China worship within the right and increasingly within catholic circles is becoming truly disgusting. China sucks! I don't know if you've noticed, but people die in industrial accidents all the time, the pollution is horrible, and nobody gives a shit about human life.

I think this is a reaction to Boomers saying things like “the commies are our #1 enemies forever and only.”

It is impossible for a group of people to be 100% wrong. Just because the Boomers dislike China does not mean that the Right needs to embrace China. In fact, we have much better reasons than the Boomers to dislike China.

Watching Claremont and other conservative establishments give Jack Murphy a platform and voice doesn't surprise me, but if I wanted to watch someone sodomize themselves I'd just watch the GOP speak at AIPAC.

A couple people have already jumped on this, but I see a very interesting detail here:

“100% corrupt”

Why do I find this detail interesting? “The reason why it’s hard to conquer a country like Turkey is that there are no barons to invite you in and you can’t expect anyone to make your invasion easier by rebelling against the king. This follows naturally from the situation as described above; since all subjects are the king’s servants and indebted to him it’s hard to corrupt them, and even assuming you do manage to bribe someone he’s not likely to be much help because he can’t bring any local people along with him, this again for the reasons I’ve explained. So, anyone attacking this kind of country has to reckon that he will find it united against him and hence has to rely on his own armed forces rather than on any mutiny in enemy ranks.”


To take the inverse, an empire can only be 100% corrupt in one point in time, specifically immediately before it collapses.

https://t.me/BertieBassett4Life/8010

Why did I care so much about the evangelical streams that I did, and why did I focus on the details that we spent hours on? So that hopefully someone in our audience doesn’t go on to believe this hogwash.

If you thought that last excerpt from my homework was outrageous

From G

Hey guys. Got a temporary suspension on Twitter for defending white people. I've appealed but when I've done that in the past they simply don't respond. If anyone can raise a ruckus with Twitter support about it, I'd appreciate it. Here's the 'violation' – which is particularly insidious, as they've shut me down for defending whites under color of the claim I'm attacking them.

Tomorrow, Saturday, September 3 at 8:00 a.m. CST I will be joined once again by Panama Hat to discuss the Gunpowder Plot.

https://youtu.be/-xYLxrgARos

Miscegenation is wrong

Africans had the richest continent with more than enough land and resources and manpower and favorable geographic features and a head start, and they still ended up like they are today.

But I’m sure the next trillion dollars/better families/whatever else will fix the problem

I’ve had the misfortune of being dragged along to watch a new movie from this year meant for younger audiences, and in the first thirty minutes it’s prominently featured:

Miscegenation
Black music
Youth rebelling against parents and proper governance
Whites portrayed as backwards and unfit and incompetent
Blacks portrayed as strong and “cool”
Love of the alien over the local


It’s ubiquitous.

We’re at the point where Soviet cinema had better propaganda, jokes, plot, and reality

We shall be going live in five!