“Well, after all, Queen Eleanor when she sucked blood from her husband's
arm was a cannibal." What is one to say to such people? One can only say "Confine yourself to sucking poisoned blood from people's arms, and I permit you to call yourself by the glorious title of Cannibal." In this sense people say of Eugenics, "After all, whenever we discourage a schoolboy from marrying a mad negress with a hump back, we are really Eugenists." Again one can only answer, "Confine yourselves strictly to such schoolboys as are naturally attracted to hump-backed negresses; and you may exult in the title of Eugenist, all the more proudly because that distinction will be rare." But surely anyone's common-sense must tell him that if Eugenics dealt only with such extravagant cases, it would be called common-sense—and not Eugenics. The human race has excluded such absurdities for unknown ages; and has never yet called it Eugenics.”

“But the Scriptures teach thus: Even though we collect in one mass the works of all the monks, however splendidly they may shine, they would not be as noble and good as if God should pick up a straw.”

This is outside the court where Afriforum lost their case. The court ruled that singing Kill The Boer (kill the farmer) is “not hate speech”.

Our friend Conscious Caracal filmed this

“Common Law makes it hard for society to progress” just got said as a bad thing in my business law class

Even though Stephen is gone to England this week, I will still be providing the regular Thursday economics stream

My interview with Per Bylund will be going live in 5!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJd0c0kjkB0

The discussion surrounding student loans and debt forgiveness and subsidizing the education system is full of absolutely terrible takes all around.

There’s a better way.

Remember the type of person whose debt will be forgiven and think if that’s who you want to help and strengthen. Believe it or not, American universities aren’t exactly filled with ourguys that are carrying on an ancient lineage of traditional humanities and based Roman engineering.

For those who know, pray for him.

I am a hardcore Western chauvinist. I have no interest and finding the "good bits" of alien cultures and ideologies like some perennialist retard. Arktos et al, please get your Eurasianist, Russophillic, Islamophillic trash out of my face. If the state of the right is that we are turning to Mohammed and Dugin, we should seppuku ourselves immediately. Fuck off with this shit.

That Kevin Barrett guy in the interview I linked above is a philosophiweeb. He's a Muslim convert. A traitor. I don't care how "based" he is; a white man who converts to Islam is a traitor. If you don't have a deep, abiding hatred for the presence of Islam in the West, your head isn't screwed on straight.

To build on Charlemagne’s point here, the type of person that supports Islam in the West because it’s “based” views religion as a utility and not as truth and heritage. The only way a white westerner can reach the conclusion that “Islam is based unlike those christcucks so we should all become Muslim hellholes like Syria” is if they have no care for the concept of god, let alone the actual God. Same too with the concept of heritage and their actual heritage. It’s all just philosophical fetishes for them.

From my business law class

I find this interesting. There’s a lot of patterns here.

Supposedly I belong to a church claiming the entire lineage of Christianity from the creation of the world till now, yet things like this are published and I’m having the most difficult time imagining this taught anytime before, say, 1930 and maybe even 1910.

We’re also at the point where our synod president is so focused on showing how the left are the real racists that he’s kindly speaking about racial communists from another era

Later on we have an open admission that positions on crime, poverty, state assistance, immigration, and climate policy are amoral so the clergy can just sit back and let the sheep fend for themselves

And don’t worry all you good anti-racists out there, the LCMS is anti-racist too! But not too far!

We here at the LCMS think that the Revolution can just be halted in one comfortable area without progressing to all the nasty stuff.

Here’s the infuriating contradiction. We can’t offer specific policy because that’s an overreach and wording on policy is hard.

But we can condemn “discrimination.” What is meant by this? They sure won’t tell you. It could be anything from hateful choices to family preference.