J6 people were heroes.
Ballot mules need some justice.

This story out of Belgium is chilling. Dries Van Langenhove shared the truth in a lecture. The government admits it was the truth. They are sending him to jail anyway.

————————————-

“A very sad announcement.

I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.

In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.

Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.

In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.

Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.

Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."

You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.

Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.

The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.

Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.

Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.

If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.

If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.”

https://x.com/dvanlangenhove/status/2059275296050741666

I will soon have to take a summer break to focus on providing for Mrs TruthHammer.

Time to start something on the professional side. Exact timing not known yet.

Trump order tightening federal election controls stands!

May I say it’s also funny that the AP used such a smug winning photo of Trump? Did they give up resisting?

A nuclear option way bigger than killing the filibuster is approaching. Writing an article now for release tonight.

(Not the insurrection act)

For years I have believed Trump's ultimate plan for his legacy is to both drain the DC swamp AND to pass Constitutional Amendments that will correct suicidal defects in some of our institutions... but I never saw exactly how he could accomplish that with so much resistance from both Dems and RINOs.

👀👉A way has suddenly become clear even if it would require Republicans to be more aggressive than they have been willing to be in the past, and it seems that Trump has already taken initial steps to set it up.

There is a looming battle between certain states, and the federal government, over the issue of voter eligibility, and whether the states can be forced to comply with federal law.

Up to 30 states are currently dragging their feet, or outright refusing, to prove their voter rolls are compliant with federal requirements about citizenship, with many lawsuits pending.

Courts are so far refusing to block Trump Executive Order 14399 outright requiring states to verify federal election voter eligibility, and imposes requirements on the USPS for handling mail in ballots, however on 8 occasions lower courts have so far ruled against the DOJ trying to get voter rolls from California, Oregon, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, Arizona, Maine, Wisconsin. None of these cases have gone to the US Supreme Court yet.

If this Order is ultimately upheld, then it and existing federal election law, set up conditions where some state elections may be deemed invalid.

If the controversial idea of ending the Senate filibuster is often described as a "nuclear option", then what's coming in January 2027 and January 2029 could be both vastly more powerful and vastly more controversial, yet well within the constitutional power of Republicans at that time... because the Republican controlled House and Senate will have no obligation to accept the results of non-compliant state elections.

Let me repeat this point. If a state runs an election that is known to be non-compliant with federal election laws, then the House & Senate have the authority to CHOOSE NOT TO seat their respective new members until a new election is run that COMPLIES WITH THE LAW.
See Article I, Section 5 authority.

In today's highly polarized political climate ask yourself... what factors would encourage Republicans to seize this power sitting in their hands, versus what factors would encourage them to dilute their own power and swear their ideological enemies into office? Many arguments and counter arguments are possible for those trying to predict what Republicans WILL do. I am merely showing what they may be in a position to do.

👉By a simple majority vote the U.S. House may refuse to seat any new Representative from states that will not comply.

These 30 states have about 280 House Reps up for election in 2026... so the number of sworn in Representatives could legally drop as low as 155 in 2026. Republicans would control an air tight Super Majority until the problem states can hold new special elections that comply with the law. (unrealistic extreme case)

Only 78 House Reps would be needed for simple majority vote business in 2027. IN 2027 ONLY 104 WOULD BE NEEDED TO APPROVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUT OF THE SENATE.

👉By a simple majority vote the U.S. Senate may refuse to seat any new Senator from states that will not comply.

These same 30 states have about 30 Senators up for election with roughly 15 in 2026 and 15 in 2028... so the number of sworn in Senators could legally drop to 85 in 2026 and 70 in 2028. Again, Republicans would control an air tight Super Majority until the problem states can hold new special elections that comply with the law. (unrealistic extreme case)

Only 43 Senators would be needed for normal majority vote business in 2027, and only 36 in 2029. IN 2027 ONLY 57 WOULD BE NEEDED TO APPROVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OUT OF THE SENATE.

Part 1 (go to Part 2)

Ask yourself “do I believe President Trump’s ego is big enough that he would seek a path to achieve a super majority and leave a legacy of passing urgently needed constitutional amendments?”

Don’t say he can’t find a way to force the GOP to do it… but we’ll see.

I strongly encourage people to steal this content and use it in their own posts. No credit requested or wanted. Just get the knowledge into the public awareness.

Let’s be realistic… Congress will never have the balls to use their power in a way that would bring this much public backlash…

UNLESS an even louder faction is demanding it. The People will only have themselves to blame if it doesn’t happen. That’s just how Congress works.

It’s funny that some people think I’m being too optimistic, when this is the closing paragraph of my essay…

“But ultimately YOU are the only thing that can make Congress have the spine required to seize this opportunity. Clearly Trump is teeing it up to make this possible. The Republic is being given a chance to save itself, and needs to step up.”

Main post

If other channels you’re on haven’t shared this yet (or made their own version of equivalent info…) it’s time to ask them why.