June 28 – Tau Day
In 2010, Michael Hartl published The Tau Manifesto, in which he argued that the constant τ = 2π should replace π as a more natural and elegant way to describe the circle. His case was simple yet compelling: if the circumference of a circle is τr instead of 2πr, many formulas become simpler and more intuitive.
However, the true significance of Tau may extend far beyond geometry.
In Theory Q, the number Tau regains a much deeper and broader meaning. It is no longer seen merely as “twice pi,” but as one of the fundamental constants that together form a coherent picture of reality.
Imagine three spatial dimensions and time as a fourth. Within this framework, four fundamental constants appear to be deeply interconnected:
e — the constant that governs growth and development in time (V = e · V₀),
Tau — the constant associated with cyclicity and one dimension (L = τ · R₀),
π — the constant that describes surface and two dimensions (S = π · R₀²),
σ (sigma) — the constant that completes the picture in three dimensions, linked to volume and spatial symmetry (V = σ · R₀³).
In this view, e and sigma are not arbitrary numbers. Together with Tau and π, they form a kind of fabric of spacetime — a symmetrical structure in which each constant corresponds to a different dimension of description. Time (e), cyclicity and boundary (Tau), form and surface (π), and spatial volume (sigma) all seem to be different expressions of a deeper underlying order.
While Hartl fought to establish Tau within geometry, Theory Q restores its full significance — showing that Tau is not merely an alternative to π, but a natural element of a larger symmetry in which time, space, and form are intimately connected.
Perhaps this is the real meaning of Tau Day — not only to replace one constant with another, but to recognize that behind these seemingly separate numbers lies a deeper, unified architecture of the world.
In 2010, Michael Hartl published The Tau Manifesto, in which he argued that the constant τ = 2π should replace π as a more natural and elegant way to describe the circle. His case was simple yet compelling: if the circumference of a circle is τr instead of 2πr, many formulas become simpler and more intuitive.
However, the true significance of Tau may extend far beyond geometry.
In Theory Q, the number Tau regains a much deeper and broader meaning. It is no longer seen merely as “twice pi,” but as one of the fundamental constants that together form a coherent picture of reality.
Imagine three spatial dimensions and time as a fourth. Within this framework, four fundamental constants appear to be deeply interconnected:
e — the constant that governs growth and development in time (V = e · V₀),
Tau — the constant associated with cyclicity and one dimension (L = τ · R₀),
π — the constant that describes surface and two dimensions (S = π · R₀²),
σ (sigma) — the constant that completes the picture in three dimensions, linked to volume and spatial symmetry (V = σ · R₀³).
In this view, e and sigma are not arbitrary numbers. Together with Tau and π, they form a kind of fabric of spacetime — a symmetrical structure in which each constant corresponds to a different dimension of description. Time (e), cyclicity and boundary (Tau), form and surface (π), and spatial volume (sigma) all seem to be different expressions of a deeper underlying order.
While Hartl fought to establish Tau within geometry, Theory Q restores its full significance — showing that Tau is not merely an alternative to π, but a natural element of a larger symmetry in which time, space, and form are intimately connected.
Perhaps this is the real meaning of Tau Day — not only to replace one constant with another, but to recognize that behind these seemingly separate numbers lies a deeper, unified architecture of the world.
My dear friends,
Yesterday we celebrated a very special day — the day of a Fundamental Constant that has been largely underestimated and misunderstood:
Tau
Tau and the number e are essentially the same — except that Tau relates to the spatial dimension, while e relates to the dimension of time. This is precisely what Theory Q reveals.
Today, however, is an even more significant day, because today I will be sharing with the participants of qLogos something truly unique...
For the first time in history.
This will become one of the cornerstones of a New Psychology, but also a foundation for understanding the Physical World itself.
Theory Q fully explains what Time truly is. It shows how deeply mistaken our common intuition and perception of time have been.
Today, you have the chance to be among the very first — and possibly the only — people in the world who will truly understand the nature of Time.
This changes everything — not only our approach to the world, but also the way we approach life itself. And it has profound practical implications, because it opens the door to a kind of journey through time.
It took me 45 years to finally solve this problem...
I have never spoken about this before — not in lectures, not during Zooms, and not even in my theory. I was always missing that final piece of the puzzle.
This past weekend, I finally found it.
Today at 5:15 PM (sharp, Polish time), I will present to you the First Part of this new understanding of Time.
But that is not all.
In doing so, we will also finally resolve many other long-standing mysteries, including:
Why Causal Velocity is the speed at which the future reaches us
What the Present actually is
Why the Speed of Light is simultaneously the Causal Velocity
Why it is impossible to travel backward in time
Why, in spacetime, it is impossible to exceed the speed of light
Why, for photons, time does not flow at all
Why teleportation of matter through spacetime is impossible, while the teleportation of information and memory through time is possible (which also explains my own experience with time many years ago)
All of this will be presented today at 5:15 PM Polish time.
There was one person before me who, back in the 1960s, claimed to have solved the mystery of time — Professor Grinberg from Mexico. However, on the very same day, he and his wife disappeared without a trace, and to this day, nothing is known about what happened to them.
That is why I have decided not to wait any longer, and to share these insights with you today.
This day is also personally significant for me — the day of Peter and Paul.
See you there.
Timoore
Yesterday we celebrated a very special day — the day of a Fundamental Constant that has been largely underestimated and misunderstood:
Tau
Tau and the number e are essentially the same — except that Tau relates to the spatial dimension, while e relates to the dimension of time. This is precisely what Theory Q reveals.
Today, however, is an even more significant day, because today I will be sharing with the participants of qLogos something truly unique...
For the first time in history.
This will become one of the cornerstones of a New Psychology, but also a foundation for understanding the Physical World itself.
Theory Q fully explains what Time truly is. It shows how deeply mistaken our common intuition and perception of time have been.
Today, you have the chance to be among the very first — and possibly the only — people in the world who will truly understand the nature of Time.
This changes everything — not only our approach to the world, but also the way we approach life itself. And it has profound practical implications, because it opens the door to a kind of journey through time.
It took me 45 years to finally solve this problem...
I have never spoken about this before — not in lectures, not during Zooms, and not even in my theory. I was always missing that final piece of the puzzle.
This past weekend, I finally found it.
Today at 5:15 PM (sharp, Polish time), I will present to you the First Part of this new understanding of Time.
But that is not all.
In doing so, we will also finally resolve many other long-standing mysteries, including:
Why Causal Velocity is the speed at which the future reaches us
What the Present actually is
Why the Speed of Light is simultaneously the Causal Velocity
Why it is impossible to travel backward in time
Why, in spacetime, it is impossible to exceed the speed of light
Why, for photons, time does not flow at all
Why teleportation of matter through spacetime is impossible, while the teleportation of information and memory through time is possible (which also explains my own experience with time many years ago)
All of this will be presented today at 5:15 PM Polish time.
There was one person before me who, back in the 1960s, claimed to have solved the mystery of time — Professor Grinberg from Mexico. However, on the very same day, he and his wife disappeared without a trace, and to this day, nothing is known about what happened to them.
That is why I have decided not to wait any longer, and to share these insights with you today.
This day is also personally significant for me — the day of Peter and Paul.
See you there.
Timoore
❤3
Introduction to My Life Story
My Life.
From My Own Perspective.
Introduction
I am not writing this out of a sense of self-importance, nor out of a sudden urge to publicly bare my private life. I have decided to recount a few key experiences, using them as a springboard to address a much broader issue. It is an issue that in Poland is still swept under the rug or treated with an alarming level of indulgence, yet it is intimately tied to what we call the Polish mentality.
I have no desire to be pigeonholed as a "critic of Polishness." First of all, I dislike generalizations. Secondly, I have many wonderful friends among Poles. And thirdly, I consider myself largely Polish.
However, I have spent my entire life interacting with many different nations and years integrating into various countries. This gives me a certain distance, allowing me to observe phenomena that are far more intense and destructive within Polish communities than anywhere else.
Working in Poland for many years, I lived a very good life up to a certain point. I had a multitude of appreciative clients and earned a very good income. However, this was accompanied by relentless hate, jealousy, envy, and constant attacks that I had to learn to endure or simply ignore. Today, looking back from the distance of Cambodia, I judge it much more harshly. I realized that material comfort and a high standard of living were not worth the price I paid: years of humiliation, degradation, and constant witch hunts.
I refuse to play the victim—I never felt comfortable in that role and always avoided it. However, I am fully aware that a high standard of living and success achieved without self-promotion do not make up for hatred and aggression. Moreover, I realize that I was no exception. Other Poles—celebrities, artists, or simply public figures—arouse the exact same hate and hostility among their compatriots.
The fact that I am not alone in this does not comfort me in the slightest, nor does it legitimize these destructive behaviors in any way. On the contrary, it makes me feel an even greater need to describe these events from my own, subjective perspective.
I hope that this subjectivity will expose a certain objective mechanism. I have noticed that many people approach this topic either defensively (claiming that "I'm just nitpicking") or with the false conviction that "it's the exact same everywhere in the world."
Let me be clear: it is simply not true.
The Polish mentality, in this regard, is a global anomaly. And it needs to be written about not because it hurt Piotr Tymochowicz or ruined his parents' lives, but because it primarily destroys Poles themselves.
My Life.
From My Own Perspective.
Introduction
I am not writing this out of a sense of self-importance, nor out of a sudden urge to publicly bare my private life. I have decided to recount a few key experiences, using them as a springboard to address a much broader issue. It is an issue that in Poland is still swept under the rug or treated with an alarming level of indulgence, yet it is intimately tied to what we call the Polish mentality.
I have no desire to be pigeonholed as a "critic of Polishness." First of all, I dislike generalizations. Secondly, I have many wonderful friends among Poles. And thirdly, I consider myself largely Polish.
However, I have spent my entire life interacting with many different nations and years integrating into various countries. This gives me a certain distance, allowing me to observe phenomena that are far more intense and destructive within Polish communities than anywhere else.
Working in Poland for many years, I lived a very good life up to a certain point. I had a multitude of appreciative clients and earned a very good income. However, this was accompanied by relentless hate, jealousy, envy, and constant attacks that I had to learn to endure or simply ignore. Today, looking back from the distance of Cambodia, I judge it much more harshly. I realized that material comfort and a high standard of living were not worth the price I paid: years of humiliation, degradation, and constant witch hunts.
I refuse to play the victim—I never felt comfortable in that role and always avoided it. However, I am fully aware that a high standard of living and success achieved without self-promotion do not make up for hatred and aggression. Moreover, I realize that I was no exception. Other Poles—celebrities, artists, or simply public figures—arouse the exact same hate and hostility among their compatriots.
The fact that I am not alone in this does not comfort me in the slightest, nor does it legitimize these destructive behaviors in any way. On the contrary, it makes me feel an even greater need to describe these events from my own, subjective perspective.
I hope that this subjectivity will expose a certain objective mechanism. I have noticed that many people approach this topic either defensively (claiming that "I'm just nitpicking") or with the false conviction that "it's the exact same everywhere in the world."
Let me be clear: it is simply not true.
The Polish mentality, in this regard, is a global anomaly. And it needs to be written about not because it hurt Piotr Tymochowicz or ruined his parents' lives, but because it primarily destroys Poles themselves.